<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The American Patriot &#8220;Party&#8221;</title>
	<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2005/07/21/the-american-patriot-party/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 10:17:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: free ringtones software</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2005/07/21/the-american-patriot-party/#comment-700051</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 14:59:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2005/07/21/the-american-patriot-party/#comment-700051</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;free on line slots&lt;/strong&gt;

Manana lasseters online casino video poker rules free poker download video poker on line gratis play free poker online</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><strong>free on line slots</strong></p>
	<p>Manana lasseters online casino video poker rules free poker download video poker on line gratis play free poker online</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Cody Quirk</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2005/07/21/the-american-patriot-party/#comment-285088</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 18:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2005/07/21/the-american-patriot-party/#comment-285088</guid>
					<description>-From Mr. Taylor-----

Thank you for your interest!

Our site presents the original intent of the founders.

Reading the constitutional debates and other historical documents presented on the web site will help those that are not acquainted with the history of freedom.

The site will only seem confusing to those that have not read or have studied any of the documents.

I would suggest reviewing:

The University of Chicago – Founders Constitution:
http://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/indexes/indexes.html

and Constitution . ORG
http://www.constitution.org

Constitutional Debates:
http://www.constitution.org/elliot.htm

Several original state organizers who left under the confusing situation of the former party (which caused the previous national to step away), returned to begin organizing simply because of this clarity. There are 11 states now under organization.

The above comment has confused the green states which are those that were extent of the former party. The blue states are under organization and have fully operative links. Since we have only been national for about a year, we have left those in green for those wishing to restart their state party which some have done.

Our strict conformance to the original founders intent has limited infighting that plagued the former party that allowed those with modern interpretation to become involved.

Bryon K. Pulliam Ex- National Chairman American Patriot Party mentions in his Third Party Watch letter ( http://www.thirdpartywatch.com/2006/01/24/american-patriot-party-officially-done/ ) “The few bright spots organizationally and in numbers were seen in Illinois, Oregon, and Ohio.”

Having been Chair of the Oregon Patriot Party since 2004, I would assume our party was one of those “bright spots”. ... And thank Bryon for mentioning us.

We invite those that wish to review our site to do so without any inhibitions from this thread.

Our party is not above spell check and welcome corrections if found; Note that we try not to correct the spelling of the founders such as &quot;defence&quot; as opposed to defense as it is correct for the period.

http://www.americanpatriotparty.cc</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><del>From Mr. Taylor</del>&#8212;&#8212;<br />
Thank you for your interest!</p>
	<p>Our site presents the original intent of the founders.</p>
	<p>Reading the constitutional debates and other historical documents presented on the web site will help those that are not acquainted with the history of freedom.</p>
	<p>The site will only seem confusing to those that have not read or have studied any of the documents.</p>
	<p>I would suggest reviewing:</p>
	<p>The University of Chicago &#8211; Founders Constitution:<br />
<a href='http://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/indexes/indexes.html' rel='nofollow'>http://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/indexes/indexes.html</a></p>
	<p>and Constitution . <span class="caps">ORG</span><br />
<a href='http://www.constitution.org' rel='nofollow'>http://www.constitution.org</a></p>
	<p>Constitutional Debates:<br />
<a href='http://www.constitution.org/elliot.htm' rel='nofollow'>http://www.constitution.org/elliot.htm</a></p>
	<p>Several original state organizers who left under the confusing situation of the former party (which caused the previous national to step away), returned to begin organizing simply because of this clarity. There are 11 states now under organization.</p>
	<p>The above comment has confused the green states which are those that were extent of the former party. The blue states are under organization and have fully operative links. Since we have only been national for about a year, we have left those in green for those wishing to restart their state party which some have done.</p>
	<p>Our strict conformance to the original founders intent has limited infighting that plagued the former party that allowed those with modern interpretation to become involved.</p>
	<p>Bryon K. Pulliam Ex- National Chairman American Patriot Party mentions in his Third Party Watch letter ( <a href='http://www.thirdpartywatch.com/2006/01/24/american-patriot-party-officially-done/' rel='nofollow'>http://www.thirdpartywatch.com/2006/01/24/american-patriot-party-officially-done/</a> ) &#8220;The few bright spots organizationally and in numbers were seen in Illinois, Oregon, and Ohio.&#8221;</p>
	<p>Having been Chair of the Oregon Patriot Party since 2004, I would assume our party was one of those &#8220;bright spots&#8221;. ... And thank Bryon for mentioning us.</p>
	<p>We invite those that wish to review our site to do so without any inhibitions from this thread.</p>
	<p>Our party is not above spell check and welcome corrections if found; Note that we try not to correct the spelling of the founders such as &#8220;defence&#8221; as opposed to defense as it is correct for the period.</p>
	<p><a href='http://www.americanpatriotparty.cc' rel='nofollow'>http://www.americanpatriotparty.cc</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jim Lampet</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2005/07/21/the-american-patriot-party/#comment-182467</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 19:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2005/07/21/the-american-patriot-party/#comment-182467</guid>
					<description>Agreed Mark.  I took a look at the new party site and it's very bad.  Not only are there a bunch of clear spelling errors but the set up of the page is very childish.  My 11 year old son has made better web layouts.  Also they have a colored map of the nation which uses green to represent states that are organized and functioning.  Almost all of them have no one listed as working in those states.  The ones that do only have one person at best.  This is not a party, this is a joke.  Tell the cartoonist to stick to art and leave well enough alone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Agreed Mark.  I took a look at the new party site and it&#8217;s very bad.  Not only are there a bunch of clear spelling errors but the set up of the page is very childish.  My 11 year old son has made better web layouts.  Also they have a colored map of the nation which uses green to represent states that are organized and functioning.  Almost all of them have no one listed as working in those states.  The ones that do only have one person at best.  This is not a party, this is a joke.  Tell the cartoonist to stick to art and leave well enough alone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mark</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2005/07/21/the-american-patriot-party/#comment-182202</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 13:31:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2005/07/21/the-american-patriot-party/#comment-182202</guid>
					<description>HAHAHA Richard A. Taylor from Oregon, isn't that the animation guy???  Has anyone else looked at the so-called &quot;new&quot; national Patriot site.  It's nothing but one guy from Oregon claiming to be the head of a Party that shut down awhile ago.  Not to mention that on the website there are a bunch of spelling errors...Does this guy have anything past a highschool education?  If the other states are still organized like he said I'd like to know the state chairman, vice- chairman, secretary and treasurer for each state.  Also when was the last National convention and the next one.  How many candidates for office have they had since Taylor's been head.  I mean come on, you can't just announce yourself as the head of a party and act like your running a party because you have a website and make some posts on other blogs... Patriot Party is done, has been done, and should stay done!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><span class="caps">HAHAHA </span>Richard A. Taylor from Oregon, isn&#8217;t that the animation guy???  Has anyone else looked at the so-called &#8220;new&#8221; national Patriot site.  It&#8217;s nothing but one guy from Oregon claiming to be the head of a Party that shut down awhile ago.  Not to mention that on the website there are a bunch of spelling errors&#8230;Does this guy have anything past a highschool education?  If the other states are still organized like he said I&#8217;d like to know the state chairman, vice- chairman, secretary and treasurer for each state.  Also when was the last National convention and the next one.  How many candidates for office have they had since Taylor&#8217;s been head.  I mean come on, you can&#8217;t just announce yourself as the head of a party and act like your running a party because you have a website and make some posts on other blogs&#8230; Patriot Party is done, has been done, and should stay done!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Website Optimization</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2005/07/21/the-american-patriot-party/#comment-104729</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 00:36:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2005/07/21/the-american-patriot-party/#comment-104729</guid>
					<description>Sounds good!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Sounds good!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Richard Taylor</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2005/07/21/the-american-patriot-party/#comment-44954</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2006 16:43:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2005/07/21/the-american-patriot-party/#comment-44954</guid>
					<description>The new web address to the American Patriot Party is http://www.americanpatriotparty.cc  

Both addresses are supported to the same web site.

We hope that you will review and consider the American Patriot Party. The true strict Democratic Republican party of Jefferson and The Liberty Tree Patriots.

Inalienable Rights, States Rights and Local Control.

Our Platform is the Declaration of Independence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>The new web address to the American Patriot Party is <a href='http://www.americanpatriotparty.cc' rel='nofollow'>http://www.americanpatriotparty.cc</a></p>
	<p>Both addresses are supported to the same web site.</p>
	<p>We hope that you will review and consider the American Patriot Party. The true strict Democratic Republican party of Jefferson and The Liberty Tree Patriots.</p>
	<p>Inalienable Rights, States Rights and Local Control.</p>
	<p>Our Platform is the Declaration of Independence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Richard Taylor</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2005/07/21/the-american-patriot-party/#comment-28611</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2006 15:43:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2005/07/21/the-american-patriot-party/#comment-28611</guid>
					<description>A good discussion. 

You may be interested to know that only the national group of the American Patriot Party has stepped down, the States parties which make up the American Patriot Party are still organizing.

The Oregon Patriot Party, has taken the position as national to assist and encourage other state parties to organize.

Each state is responsible in developing their own independent state parties as it has always been;

There will be some changes in the party structure and those changes will be posted in the future on the Oregon Patriot Party and New Main American Patriot Party website; Which will be announced in a few months.

The Present APP is an establishment that follows the intent of the Originating Founding Fathers of the Declaration of Independence. 

Should you wish to get involved, it would be good to be very acquainted with the founders letters and the Declaration of Independence, the documents that define freedom.

If you have interest in starting an APP state party in your area, please let us know.

I invite you to review the Oregon Patriot Party website at http://www.oregonpatriotparty.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>A good discussion.</p>
	<p>You may be interested to know that only the national group of the American Patriot Party has stepped down, the States parties which make up the American Patriot Party are still organizing.</p>
	<p>The Oregon Patriot Party, has taken the position as national to assist and encourage other state parties to organize.</p>
	<p>Each state is responsible in developing their own independent state parties as it has always been;</p>
	<p>There will be some changes in the party structure and those changes will be posted in the future on the Oregon Patriot Party and New Main American Patriot Party website; Which will be announced in a few months.</p>
	<p>The Present <span class="caps">APP</span> is an establishment that follows the intent of the Originating Founding Fathers of the Declaration of Independence.</p>
	<p>Should you wish to get involved, it would be good to be very acquainted with the founders letters and the Declaration of Independence, the documents that define freedom.</p>
	<p>If you have interest in starting an <span class="caps">APP</span> state party in your area, please let us know.</p>
	<p>I invite you to review the Oregon Patriot Party website at <a href='http://www.oregonpatriotparty.com' rel='nofollow'>http://www.oregonpatriotparty.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ken M</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2005/07/21/the-american-patriot-party/#comment-3849</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Apr 2006 22:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2005/07/21/the-american-patriot-party/#comment-3849</guid>
					<description>Have you tried the American First Party?
http://www.americafirstparty.org/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Have you tried the American First Party?<br />
<a href='http://www.americafirstparty.org/' rel='nofollow'>http://www.americafirstparty.org/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Otto Kerner</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2005/07/21/the-american-patriot-party/#comment-2098</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2006 13:37:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2005/07/21/the-american-patriot-party/#comment-2098</guid>
					<description>Well, I'm sure every third party has a lot of weird people in it. The LP, actually, probably has fewer paranoid-delusives per capita, just because it's older. Those whose behaviour was too disruptive probably tended to get filtered out (along with a lot of good people) during the infighting of the 80s, and new disruptives (as well as new good people) find it harder to get into positions of power. Instead, the LP, from what I saw, has a lot of eccentric but mentally stable long-term third-party-geeks. This isn't really healthy, either, but it might tend to be offensive in subtler ways.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Well, I&#8217;m sure every third party has a lot of weird people in it. The LP, actually, probably has fewer paranoid-delusives per capita, just because it&#8217;s older. Those whose behaviour was too disruptive probably tended to get filtered out (along with a lot of good people) during the infighting of the 80s, and new disruptives (as well as new good people) find it harder to get into positions of power. Instead, the LP, from what I saw, has a lot of eccentric but mentally stable long-term third-party-geeks. This isn&#8217;t really healthy, either, but it might tend to be offensive in subtler ways.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: naoko</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2005/07/21/the-american-patriot-party/#comment-2093</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:31:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2005/07/21/the-american-patriot-party/#comment-2093</guid>
					<description>Lol, I got the almost exact same treatment when I was interested in joining the Green Party of West Virginia last summer. Except Republican was switched with GDI and I had no clue what they were talking about at first. Looked up some information about GDI added with the person's behavior and all the holes were filled in about where they stood on the shady Cobb issue.

So I'm wondering if the Green Party is doing just as badly or something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Lol, I got the almost exact same treatment when I was interested in joining the Green Party of West Virginia last summer. Except Republican was switched with <span class="caps">GDI</span> and I had no clue what they were talking about at first. Looked up some information about <span class="caps">GDI</span> added with the person&#8217;s behavior and all the holes were filled in about where they stood on the shady Cobb issue.</p>
	<p>So I&#8217;m wondering if the Green Party is doing just as badly or something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Rob Hodgkinson</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2005/07/21/the-american-patriot-party/#comment-2092</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:20:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2005/07/21/the-american-patriot-party/#comment-2092</guid>
					<description>My take on Joe in Kansas is that he is like all the social conservatives that are fed up with the republicans. The &quot;little buddy&quot; comment I can believe as Joe seemed to need to &quot;be in charge&quot; or he would'nt play.

He did run in 2004 for the KS 3rd district U.S. House as an LP'er - he did not follow thru with supposed campaign spending promises and did not make any more difference that any other LP U.S. House candidate in Kansas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>My take on Joe in Kansas is that he is like all the social conservatives that are fed up with the republicans. The &#8220;little buddy&#8221; comment I can believe as Joe seemed to need to &#8220;be in charge&#8221; or he would&#8217;nt play.</p>
	<p>He did run in 2004 for the KS 3rd district U.S. House as an LP&#8217;er &#8211; he did not follow thru with supposed campaign spending promises and did not make any more difference that any other <span class="caps">LP U</span>.S. House candidate in Kansas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Austin Cassidy&#8217;s Third Party Watch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; American Patriot Party Finally Dead?</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2005/07/21/the-american-patriot-party/#comment-2091</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 11:57:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2005/07/21/the-american-patriot-party/#comment-2091</guid>
					<description>[...] Considering the way they treat potential new members this wouldn&amp;#8217;t shock me one bit. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>[...] Considering the way they treat potential new members this wouldn&#8217;t shock me one bit. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Third Party Watch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Third Party National Conference?</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2005/07/21/the-american-patriot-party/#comment-1070</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2005 04:48:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2005/07/21/the-american-patriot-party/#comment-1070</guid>
					<description>[...] It does appear that someone from the American Patriot Party will be giving a speech on &amp;#8220;Third Party Priorities&amp;#8221;. Considering my past history with that party, I&amp;#8217;m kind of sorry I won&amp;#8217;t get to see what he has to say&amp;#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>[...] It does appear that someone from the American Patriot Party will be giving a speech on &#8220;Third Party Priorities&#8221;. Considering my past history with that party, I&#8217;m kind of sorry I won&#8217;t get to see what he has to say&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Alex Peak</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2005/07/21/the-american-patriot-party/#comment-429</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2005 04:26:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2005/07/21/the-american-patriot-party/#comment-429</guid>
					<description>Nope.  http://www.politics1.com/parties.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Nope.  <a href='http://www.politics1.com/parties.htm' rel='nofollow'>http://www.politics1.com/parties.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: JonT</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2005/07/21/the-american-patriot-party/#comment-409</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2005 22:42:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2005/07/21/the-american-patriot-party/#comment-409</guid>
					<description>Im sure there is some information on the Politics1 Political parties page.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Im sure there is some information on the Politics1 Political parties page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
