Comments on: Pawlowski Qualified for Matching Funds http://thirdpartywatch.com/2005/09/02/pawlowski-qualified-for-matching-funds/ Fri, 05 Dec 2008 03:52:20 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1.3 by: county casino http://thirdpartywatch.com/2005/09/02/pawlowski-qualified-for-matching-funds/#comment-705848 Sun, 20 Jul 2008 10:19:26 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2005/09/02/pawlowski-qualified-for-matching-funds/#comment-705848 <strong>county casino</strong> cider voyages Sabina carved county casino

cider voyages Sabina carved

]]> by: golden riviera casino http://thirdpartywatch.com/2005/09/02/pawlowski-qualified-for-matching-funds/#comment-705577 Sun, 20 Jul 2008 04:29:21 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2005/09/02/pawlowski-qualified-for-matching-funds/#comment-705577 <strong>golden riviera casino</strong> ingestion.brokers?assaulted radian interdict golden riviera casino

ingestion.brokers?assaulted radian interdict

]]> by: George Whitfield http://thirdpartywatch.com/2005/09/02/pawlowski-qualified-for-matching-funds/#comment-898 Thu, 15 Sep 2005 01:28:20 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2005/09/02/pawlowski-qualified-for-matching-funds/#comment-898 Well, now it appears that both Corzine and Forrester have said that they will debate Jeff Pawlowski. I am glad he persisted in raising funds for his campaign. Good going Jeff and all Libertarians who donated. Well, now it appears that both Corzine and Forrester have said that they will debate Jeff Pawlowski. I am glad he persisted in raising funds for his campaign. Good going Jeff and all Libertarians who donated.

]]> by: Patrick Henry http://thirdpartywatch.com/2005/09/02/pawlowski-qualified-for-matching-funds/#comment-840 Wed, 07 Sep 2005 19:04:47 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2005/09/02/pawlowski-qualified-for-matching-funds/#comment-840 Nonsense...niether dupoly candidates are taking public funds and are therefore NOT subject to NJ ELEC guidelines! This applies to debates. This is the point and this was a fact known months ago. See todays NJ Star Ledger which confirms that the duopoly candidates will only debate each other under private, not public sponsorship. Even if Jeff showed up in drag, smoked a joint and carried an assualt rifle, I doubt they would include him! NJ ELEC rules DO NOT apply to candidates who refuse public funds. That is the point! What would make Jeffs campaign more "viable" is if he and his party had a party to run upon, if his campaign web addressed issues and if he raised the funds honorably. Nonsense…niether dupoly candidates are taking public funds and are therefore NOT subject to NJ ELEC guidelines! This applies to debates. This is the point and this was a fact known months ago. See todays NJ Star Ledger which confirms that the duopoly candidates will only debate each other under private, not public sponsorship. Even if Jeff showed up in drag, smoked a joint and carried an assualt rifle, I doubt they would include him! NJ ELEC rules DO NOT apply to candidates who refuse public funds. That is the point!

What would make Jeffs campaign more “viable” is if he and his party had a party to run upon, if his campaign web addressed issues and if he raised the funds honorably.

]]> by: John L. http://thirdpartywatch.com/2005/09/02/pawlowski-qualified-for-matching-funds/#comment-838 Wed, 07 Sep 2005 16:02:44 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2005/09/02/pawlowski-qualified-for-matching-funds/#comment-838 Qualifying certainly makes Jeff's campaign more viable. If the other candidates run and hide from the NJ ELEC sponsorerd debates thats a plus for Jeff. Qualifying also gives him more leverage to push any private run groups into including him in the debates. According to a document posted on elec's website, qualifying for matching funds is not the same as qualifying for the debates. This document seems to indicate that forrester is interested in qualifying for the debates. See http://www.elec.state.nj.us/pdffiles/AO/ao050405.pdf So we may have a real debate after all. Qualifying certainly makes Jeff’s campaign more viable. If the other candidates run and hide from the NJ ELEC sponsorerd debates thats a plus for Jeff. Qualifying also gives him more leverage to push any private run groups into including him in the debates.

According to a document posted on elec’s website, qualifying for matching funds is not the same as qualifying for the debates. This document seems to indicate that forrester is interested in qualifying for the debates. See http://www.elec.state.nj.us/pdffiles/AO/ao050405.pdf

So we may have a real debate after all.

]]> by: Patrick Henry http://thirdpartywatch.com/2005/09/02/pawlowski-qualified-for-matching-funds/#comment-836 Wed, 07 Sep 2005 14:12:23 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2005/09/02/pawlowski-qualified-for-matching-funds/#comment-836 Todays NJ Star Ledger (Sept. 7, 2005) reports what many all have been saying for months on various forums, including TPW. Todays report states that both duopoly party candidates will not avail of any public funds and that any debates will be sponsored by private state-wide groups and will not include any third party candidates. As the duopoly party candidates are not taking public matching funds they need not abide by the NJ Election Law Enforcement Commission (NJ ELEC) provisions for debate and are NOT obligated to invite any candidate reaching the $300.000 fund mark to any debates. The fact that both duopoly party candidates would refuse public funds was NO SECRET here in NJ. We also note that no one from the NJLP has ever replied to the assertions made to this effect on TPW or other forums. Todays NJ Star Ledger (Sept. 7, 2005) reports what many all have been saying for months on various forums, including TPW. Todays report states that both duopoly party candidates will not avail of any public funds and that any debates will be sponsored by private state-wide groups and will not include any third party candidates. As the duopoly party candidates are not taking public matching funds they need not abide by the NJ Election Law Enforcement Commission (NJ ELEC) provisions for debate and are NOT obligated to invite any candidate reaching the $300.000 fund mark to any debates.

The fact that both duopoly party candidates would refuse public funds was NO SECRET here in NJ.

We also note that no one from the NJLP has ever replied to the assertions made to this effect on TPW or other forums.

]]> by: Patrick Henry http://thirdpartywatch.com/2005/09/02/pawlowski-qualified-for-matching-funds/#comment-827 Tue, 06 Sep 2005 14:18:46 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2005/09/02/pawlowski-qualified-for-matching-funds/#comment-827 PS: The last time the NJLP bothered to update its platform was over eight years ago....when Murray Sabrin ran as the NJLP candidate! PS:

The last time the NJLP bothered to update its platform was over eight years ago….when Murray Sabrin ran as the NJLP candidate!

]]> by: Patrick Henry http://thirdpartywatch.com/2005/09/02/pawlowski-qualified-for-matching-funds/#comment-826 Tue, 06 Sep 2005 14:16:28 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2005/09/02/pawlowski-qualified-for-matching-funds/#comment-826 Neither of the duopoly party candidates intend to take public funds and therefore the NJ ELEC rules DO NOT apply for debates. There will be no debates to which the NJLP candidate will be invited. That both duopoly party candidates intend NOT to take public funding is a matter of lonf standing public record. Call their campiagn HQs and ask! THERE WILL BE NO NJ ELEC DEBATES. Just like the Drag outfit, the political influence certs and the lack of issues addressed on the candidates web its all a FRAUD. The sensible NJLP candidates running for the Assembly should disassociate themself from these lies and stunts. Neither of the duopoly party candidates intend to take public funds and therefore the NJ ELEC rules DO NOT apply for debates. There will be no debates to which the NJLP candidate will be invited. That both duopoly party candidates intend NOT to take public funding is a matter of lonf standing public record. Call their campiagn HQs and ask!

THERE WILL BE NO NJ ELEC DEBATES.

Just like the Drag outfit, the political influence certs and the lack of issues addressed on the candidates web its all a FRAUD.

The sensible NJLP candidates running for the Assembly should disassociate themself from these lies and stunts.

]]> by: Big Sexy http://thirdpartywatch.com/2005/09/02/pawlowski-qualified-for-matching-funds/#comment-818 Sat, 03 Sep 2005 02:48:23 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2005/09/02/pawlowski-qualified-for-matching-funds/#comment-818 I wouldn't think they have that much cash, because the things on e-bay are going rather cheap. I wouldn’t think they have that much cash, because the things on e-bay are going rather cheap.

]]> by: Austin Cassidy http://thirdpartywatch.com/2005/09/02/pawlowski-qualified-for-matching-funds/#comment-814 Fri, 02 Sep 2005 13:50:15 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2005/09/02/pawlowski-qualified-for-matching-funds/#comment-814 I would be curious to know how much cash on hand they have. I would be curious to know how much cash on hand they have.

]]> by: George Phillies http://thirdpartywatch.com/2005/09/02/pawlowski-qualified-for-matching-funds/#comment-813 Fri, 02 Sep 2005 13:27:52 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2005/09/02/pawlowski-qualified-for-matching-funds/#comment-813 He has raised enough to get in, it appears, which shows that there is L money available. He has also showed he has the ability to do serious fundraising, whcih is pretty good. He has raised enough to get in, it appears, which shows that there is L money available. He has also showed he has the ability to do serious fundraising, whcih is pretty good.

]]> by: Mike N. http://thirdpartywatch.com/2005/09/02/pawlowski-qualified-for-matching-funds/#comment-811 Fri, 02 Sep 2005 05:42:04 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2005/09/02/pawlowski-qualified-for-matching-funds/#comment-811 Does anyone know if this guy stands a crdible chance? I haven't followed the race, so any enlightenment would be great. I will definitely donate if there is hope here.... Does anyone know if this guy stands a crdible chance? I haven’t followed the race, so any enlightenment would be great. I will definitely donate if there is hope here….

]]>