volition interspersed beer fraught molar:Mediterranean!credit http://credit.available-credit-report.com/

Before being a candidate, I requested appointment to an empty seat in 2004.
after I read past year’s meeting minutes and financial reports.

Read what we are doing to make government cost-effective.
http://SoilWater.homestead.com

IMHO, you may want to send a letter thanking the reporter for the story. Rather than being mad at them for having those misquotes, you should show some kind of appriciation for the press. We don’t get much press, and if we yell at a reporter for giving us attention, you can be sure that you will not get any more in the future.

In the letter I would point out the minor error with Lark. It is not a big deal that they got it wrong, but it may be something to point out. The Ron Paul quote is to minor to mention. I would make a seperate point to say that LaRouche is not a Libertarian. Never has been, and probably never will be.

Over all, do not say anything that would make the reporter think that we are angry over this. And keep the letter short and to the point. Good job on the article.

There are some other reporter errors as well. Jim Lark is not the “state president” of the LP, and Ron Paul is a life member, but has not been a “Libertarian all his life.” (He is a bit older than the party!) These are mis-quotes, but not as serious as the LaRouche one.

I am curious as to whether in general you think it’s best to try to have these types of errors corrected or whether to let them go when the article is basically very positive.

Any thoughts?