Comments on: Yesterday’s Independence Party Caucus… http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/03/09/yesterdays-independence-party-caucus/ Thu, 20 Nov 2008 15:48:06 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1.3 by: calcio italia http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/03/09/yesterdays-independence-party-caucus/#comment-171596 Sat, 28 Apr 2007 07:54:30 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/03/09/yesterdays-independence-party-caucus/#comment-171596 <strong>calcio italia</strong> news calcio italia

news

]]> by: Citizens For A Better Veterans Home http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/03/09/yesterdays-independence-party-caucus/#comment-2827 Sat, 11 Mar 2006 23:01:35 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/03/09/yesterdays-independence-party-caucus/#comment-2827 Sad Sad Sad News From The Carolinas (Don't kid yourselves, any slip ups amoung any Non Democans and Non Republicrats is a source of rejoicing from those folks whom have taken the world's one and only Super Power to a point of being (JUSTIFIABLY!) an inter national laughing stock!) Jack Stewart wrote: &#62; To: FAIRELECTIONSCOALITION@yahoogroups.com &#62; From: Jack Stewart &#62; Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2006 08:08:26 -0500 &#62; Subject: [FAIRELECTIONSCOALITION] Re: Labor &#62; Party ballot access update &#62; &#62; &#62; &#62; ban@richardwinger.com wrote: &#62; &#62; &#62; The Labor Party expects to turn in its South &#62; Carolina &#62; &#62; party petition in mid-April 2006. &#62; &#62; &#62; Apparently the Labor Party does not bother to &#62; inform the people who read &#62; the Labor Party News or subscribe to the Party &#62; Builder news and &#62; information list(s). There was no corrections in &#62; the March editions. Not &#62; that it is relevant to this list, but it &#62; doesn't inspire confidence or &#62; trust. &#62; &#62; &#62; &#62; &#62; Yahoo! Groups Links &#62; &#62; To visit your group on the web, go to: &#62; &#62; http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FAIRELECTIONSCOALITION/ &#62; &#62; To unsubscribe from this group, send an &#62; email to: &#62; &#62; FAIRELECTIONSCOALITION-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com &#62; &#62; Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: &#62; http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ &#62; &#62; &#62; &#62; &#62; Sad Sad Sad News From The Carolinas

(Don’t kid yourselves, any slip ups amoung any Non Democans and Non Republicrats is a source of rejoicing from those folks whom have taken the world’s one and only Super Power to a point of being (JUSTIFIABLY!) an inter national laughing stock!)

Jack Stewart wrote:

> To: FAIRELECTIONSCOALITION@yahoogroups.com
> From: Jack Stewart
> Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2006 08:08:26 -0500
> Subject: [FAIRELECTIONSCOALITION] Re: Labor
> Party ballot access update
>

>
>

> ban@richardwinger.com wrote:
>

> > The Labor Party expects to turn in its South
> Carolina
> > party petition in mid-April 2006.
>

>
> Apparently the Labor Party does not bother to
> inform the people who read
> the Labor Party News or subscribe to the Party
> Builder news and
> information list(s). There was no corrections in
> the March editions. Not
> that it is relevant to this list, but it
> doesn’t inspire confidence or
> trust.
>

>
>

>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>

> To visit your group on the web, go to:
>

> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FAIRELECTIONSCOALITION/
>

> To unsubscribe from this group, send an
> email to:
>

> FAIRELECTIONSCOALITION-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>

> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>

>
>

>
>

]]> by: Freelancer http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/03/09/yesterdays-independence-party-caucus/#comment-2809 Thu, 09 Mar 2006 21:46:02 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/03/09/yesterdays-independence-party-caucus/#comment-2809 Hmm. Kinda interesting, I guess. Hmm. Kinda interesting, I guess.

]]>