<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Decent Reform Party Congressional Candidate</title>
	<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/04/04/a-decent-reform-party-congressional-candidate/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 10:15:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: thisgirlglas</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/04/04/a-decent-reform-party-congressional-candidate/#comment-716718</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 11:48:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/04/04/a-decent-reform-party-congressional-candidate/#comment-716718</guid>
					<description>yes key google are woman site minor home busy speed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>yes key google are woman site minor home busy speed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jim 101</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/04/04/a-decent-reform-party-congressional-candidate/#comment-4352</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2006 21:50:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/04/04/a-decent-reform-party-congressional-candidate/#comment-4352</guid>
					<description>It's good to see individuals that are guided by principles, rather than blind party allegaince. I hope to see more moves like this.

What happened to the Libertarian minded Republican party that Barry Goldwater championed? I think if he were still around today, he would also have moved over to the Reform Party...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>It&#8217;s good to see individuals that are guided by principles, rather than blind party allegaince. I hope to see more moves like this.</p>
	<p>What happened to the Libertarian minded Republican party that Barry Goldwater championed? I think if he were still around today, he would also have moved over to the Reform Party&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Citizens For A Better Veterans Home</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/04/04/a-decent-reform-party-congressional-candidate/#comment-4208</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Apr 2006 18:41:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/04/04/a-decent-reform-party-congressional-candidate/#comment-4208</guid>
					<description>Additional 'proof' that Democans and Republicrats are the incestuous doupoly which as lead the Globe's one and only super power to the (richly deserved!) position of inter national Laughing Stock!  Additional 'proof' that long term reform will come from the Radical Center, the Messy Middle!

DonLake@sbcglobal.net, a reform minded citizen from Collie Fornia</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Additional &#8216;proof&#8217; that Democans and Republicrats are the incestuous doupoly which as lead the Globe&#8217;s one and only super power to the (richly deserved!) position of inter national Laughing Stock!  Additional &#8216;proof&#8217; that long term reform will come from the Radical Center, the Messy Middle!</p>
	<p>DonLake@sbcglobal.net, a reform minded citizen from Collie Fornia</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Daniel Ong</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/04/04/a-decent-reform-party-congressional-candidate/#comment-4189</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Apr 2006 07:59:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/04/04/a-decent-reform-party-congressional-candidate/#comment-4189</guid>
					<description>First known (by me) newspaper article (Saturday) on his Reform Party candidacy:
http://www.lovelandfyi.com/region-story.asp?ID=4605

Insider coverage:
http://coloradopols.com/06/?p=1080

Others and I commented on his possible candidacy problems because of his recent affiliation (twelve months required?) with the Reform Party at:
http://coloradopols.com/06/?p=94

As a Republican he would have had to get at least 10% of the votes at the Republican district assembly to be eligible to petition onto the primary ballot, and 30% to automatically be placed on the primary ballot.  Republican Party leadership is generally unsupportive of challenges to incumbent Republicans.

Running as a Reform Party candidate (if he survives possible legal challenges to his candidacy) he might take enough support away from Musgrave (and Paccione) to make it an interesting race.  Musgrave has moderated her stands recently after realizing she was vulnerable to being defeated (weak re-election results).  A Green Party challenger got 4.17% in 2004, even after telling voters to vote for the Democrat challenger if they thought it was going to be close.

Colorado's 4th district, roughly the rural eastern third of Colorado, fairly strongly leans Republican.  Population centers include Ft. Collins (Colorado State University), Greeley (University of Northern Colorado), Loveland, and Longmont.

I noticed his endorsement by Tom Sutherland, nationally known former hostage, as well as a former Republican congressman from this district.  Those endorsements should carry some weight.

I live only 15 miles from this district.  I nearly forced a mandatory statewide recount by my candidacy in 2004 for University of Colorado Regent as a Libertarian (I got 4.25%).  My fellow Libertarian candidate for regent http://www.liberty1st.us/ in the 4th district got 28% with some effort in a two-way race against a Republican incumbent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>First known (by me) newspaper article (Saturday) on his Reform Party candidacy:<br />
<a href='http://www.lovelandfyi.com/region-story.asp?ID=4605' rel='nofollow'>http://www.lovelandfyi.com/region-story.asp?ID=4605</a></p>
	<p>Insider coverage:<br />
<a href='http://coloradopols.com/06/?p=1080' rel='nofollow'>http://coloradopols.com/06/?p=1080</a></p>
	<p>Others and I commented on his possible candidacy problems because of his recent affiliation (twelve months required?) with the Reform Party at:<br />
<a href='http://coloradopols.com/06/?p=94' rel='nofollow'>http://coloradopols.com/06/?p=94</a></p>
	<p>As a Republican he would have had to get at least 10% of the votes at the Republican district assembly to be eligible to petition onto the primary ballot, and 30% to automatically be placed on the primary ballot.  Republican Party leadership is generally unsupportive of challenges to incumbent Republicans.</p>
	<p>Running as a Reform Party candidate (if he survives possible legal challenges to his candidacy) he might take enough support away from Musgrave (and Paccione) to make it an interesting race.  Musgrave has moderated her stands recently after realizing she was vulnerable to being defeated (weak re-election results).  A Green Party challenger got 4.17% in 2004, even after telling voters to vote for the Democrat challenger if they thought it was going to be close.</p>
	<p>Colorado&#8217;s 4th district, roughly the rural eastern third of Colorado, fairly strongly leans Republican.  Population centers include Ft. Collins (Colorado State University), Greeley (University of Northern Colorado), Loveland, and Longmont.</p>
	<p>I noticed his endorsement by Tom Sutherland, nationally known former hostage, as well as a former Republican congressman from this district.  Those endorsements should carry some weight.</p>
	<p>I live only 15 miles from this district.  I nearly forced a mandatory statewide recount by my candidacy in 2004 for University of Colorado Regent as a Libertarian (I got 4.25%).  My fellow Libertarian candidate for regent <a href='http://www.liberty1st.us/' rel='nofollow'>http://www.liberty1st.us/</a> in the 4th district got 28% with some effort in a two-way race against a Republican incumbent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
