1- I became unhappy with the Republican Party of which I belonged to. The main issues were illegal aliens, abortion, and family values.

2- I researched all third party platforms: Green, Libertarian, Personal Choice, and even Socialistic parties.

3- After reading the Constitution Party platform, I realized how far off the Republicans and Democrats have fallen from our Founding Father’s intent of the Constitution.

4- I immediately joined the party and now am a happy District Deligate, and my wife is a Presinct Delegate. We are both working hard to spread the CP message to friends and family because the message “sells” itself.

The Founding Fathers wanted a country that encourages religious freedoms. These religious freedoms shape the way in which we view issues, but the constitutional framework should also be valued. Republicans and Democrats have shoved the Constitution into the corner, and the Constitution Party is the ONLY political party that is shinning a light on it.

Please to not let this aborshon debate devide us away from what we all love- protecting the constitution. Let those from Nevada stay in the party, and please do not leave because of them. Those in the party are not perfect, and we should have a spirit of cooperation and unity even in the face of dissagrement. We all have the same desire to protect the unborn child, lets not let logistics get in the way of the greater objective and goal.

Thank you for your time,

T Smith – tylersredguitar@yahoo.com

The point is that the reason that these state affiliates came together was because they were all nationalist as opposed to Repub/Dem globalist and they believed that our rights come from God (as opposed to LP). This made them a distinct “third” party voice.

This is probably why I do not find any position on abortion in the actual IAPN platform. At least I couldn’t find it in their website even though IAPN was accepted for affiliation by the pro-Life USTP/CP very early on.

So what we really have here is a catch-22. The national CP requires affiliates to pledge allegiance to the national party platform (even if neither it or their bylaws existed when they originally affiliated) and also requires affilates to maintain this allegiance as running changes are made to the platform/bylaws. Methinks Nevada is grandfathered.

They yell, scream, cry and invoke the name of God but only in regards to the abortion issue. Some of these extremist were delegates to the national convention, and they still are going on like a bunch of wildcats.

What the pro-disaffiliate camp does not realize, or better… refuses to realize, is that efforts to stop party growth in the state, and continuing with their tirades, has only hurt them. I doubt they even once stopped to consider that they should return home, grow the party like gain-busters and then move in and influence the party for change.

Instead, they plan to create a new independent party, based on Bible truth. They have even submitted bylaws (yet to be voted on) that eliminate the possibility of anyone who is not a Bible believing Christian from being an officer or member within the party. Correct me if I’m wrong… but the pro-disaffiliates are promoting an ideology contrary to the instruments (The Constitution and the Bill of Rights) they claim they want to protect and preserve.

In regard to the vote on the Nevada disaffiliation issue, the pro-disaffiliates of course did not prevail. So whose fault is it that Nevada was not disaffiliated? Nevada? NO. National? NO. The fault is squarely with the delegates at the National Convention. Nobody else. That is what voting and Democracy is all about. If things go wrong, or the people put into office screw it up… well who do we have to blame but ourselves for putting incompetent boobs into office in the first place.

I personally hope the disaffiliation question does not pass, and the “nut jobs” can go crack their walnuts someplace else; but if it doesn’t, and they shut the door on the National Party, well… I happen to know that the windows and the backdoors are still wide open… and I’m going to use them.

Also if you knew anything about which you pontificate concerning the Constitution Party and its affiliates, you would know that the Nevada IAP was not affiliated with any national committee throughout most the 80’s, though the California AIP was. Therefore, certainly from Mr. Hansen’s perspective the “old” party had died out in the 70’s.

Where do you get your information on the history of the American Independent Party and the Constitution Party? You should be embarrassed to be writing so much about a subject of which you know so little. I suppose, however, that you will continue to amuse us with your hysterical, historical antecdotes about the Constitution Party.

By the way, when I was in Tampa, Florida for the recent CP national meeting, another California national committee member and I journeyed to St. Petersberg to visit and pay our respects at the Florida Holocaust Museum. Yes sir, us CP members definitely seek out the hotbeds of anti-semitism and and white supremecy when we go visting.

As for the Confederate flag, anyone that has a problem with it is already brain washed by the public schools and the NWO-really one and the same. Lincoln would be proud of GW as he was a proven militarist and racist himself.
Anyone that thinks the League is racist, same thing, they have been reading Homo Dees’ sight too much and beleiving it. Dees has about $200 million from being the white Jesse Jackson-a race/ethnic/religious baiter and not uniter.

Again, we truly have a variance of people in the CP, a few nuts not withstanding. Then again, the Klan tried to burn a cross on my great-grandfather’s yard and they were either Repubs or Dems in that area at that time.

Sorry anarchist, you live in a carefully molded and manipulated fantasy world.

Here is some more info on the CP as a hate group subject:

“Among the party’s current roster of local candidates is a Salt Lake City man, Jack Gray, who has no qualms about presenting himself as a member of David Duke’s white supremacist hate group, the European American Unity and Rights Organization (EURO).

The party’s official ‘key race’ for 2003 is a gubernatorial bid by Mississippi’s most virulent Confederate flag defender, John Thomas Cripps, a long-time member of the white-supremacist hate group, League of the South.”

There, I have addressed your comments. Why do you and other CPers refuse to address mine? I apologize for the hyperbolic intimation that the rapist was a CP member, if an apology is what you’re looking for.

Now, seriously. 11-year-old girls DO get raped by their fathers and become pregnant. This is an extreme, but not unrealistic scenario. If the health of the girl is seriously imperiled, you allegedly stand for allowing her to die rather than abort the product of the incestuous rape.

I say allegedly, because I think in your refusal to address the scenario, you are admitting that such a position is preposterous. No one, not even the CP, can possibly be so inhumane. Far from being a hater, I am willing to give you the benefit of the doubt, and assume that you would indeed make an exception to your “pro-life” case here.

May 5th, 2006 at 10:05 am
An 11-year-old girl is raped by her CP member father. Doctors say there is a substantial risk of her death if she carries the “baby” to term. If the world were the way that the CP wants it, the girl would either (a) die in childbirth, leaving her newborn baby, if it were “lucky” enought to live, to be raised and raped by her father/rapist; or (b) the girl would have a backalley abortion, in which she and the “baby” may die anyway, AND if the CP lynchmob got their hands on the abortionist, he too would be executed by their totalitarian socialist regime. Who is the murderer? Who is the enemgy of good?

Besides straw man ranting, you have no idea what a socialist is clearly, you do show extreme lack of education-more likely, public education.

Look up what the Socialists Parties believe in, look at our platform-we have little to no similarity. For fun, look at the GOP actions-mucho in common.

‘Baby” is what it is, it is fully human. Who now is a bigot and hater??

Christian
Constitutionalist
Pro-Family-Anti-Abortion

How nice Undercover is so clean and open minded. I am sure he/she has black family, friends and neighbors. It is just a utopia for Undercover.

Yeah, right-its called projecting

Yes, the example is EXTREME—but so is a position that would not allow an exception to the “100% ‘pro-life’” dogma.

This person should not be dignified with any further comment, feedback or discussion from any Constitution Party activist or leader or any other thoughtful person. It’s a free country so suit yourselves, but this “example” is so far beyond the scope of decency that the author of it really deserves nothing but to be totally ignored on these pages.

To be honestly challenged and confronted on the issues is one thing, but to spend any time responding to a raving lunatic is just a complete waste of time.

With “anarchist” we can see the full flowing of the public education system and the full flowering of the hedonistic society of Darwin, et al.

In the Christian mind set, all life is precsiou gift of God. IT is typical of low mentality, angry and vengeful people to label those of us in the CP as racists. Odd, though, I sat in Tampa at one point next to a Jew and next to one of the sharpest and best voices in the CP today-Ricardo Davis, CP chair in Ga and a black American.

The 11 yr old girl in your scanrio is already mentally, and possibly, physically traumatized. She needs the church and the community to aid her and care for her. Abortion leads to, often times death and physical problems, always deep, long term mental issues-with increased incidents of alcoholism, drug abuse, suicide, etc.

“Choose ye this day whom you will serve” God decided the conception would happen, we abide and care for this wounded soul.

Your hating all that is good is evident ‘I saw Satan fall like lightening…”

fairly evident indeed.

So one IAP faded into obscurity and another emerged to take its place. The new one cannot then be called “racist” when the first clearly was? Well, hey, the KKK has disappeared and re-emerged time again. If a new party calling itself the Nazis came into being, and had a swinging multi-cultrual dad like you at the helm, would that mean that it wouldn’t be “racist” in the very name it chose?

I hate all that is “good.” The “good” that you love. Like forcing 11 year old girls to die from giving birth to a child that was conceived through rape by their fathers—or at the very least, pledging allegiance to a hateful sect of redneck trash who professes such a belief. THAT is 100% pro-life!