<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wednesday&#8217;s Candidate: Chief Wana Dubie</title>
	<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/06/21/wednesdays-candidate-chief-wana-dubie/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 01:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Zack Moore "little Dubie"</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/06/21/wednesdays-candidate-chief-wana-dubie/#comment-611006</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 15:50:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/06/21/wednesdays-candidate-chief-wana-dubie/#comment-611006</guid>
					<description>DUBIE!!!!! DUBIE!!! i love dubie!!!
GO DUBIE......
i want 1 million dubies</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><span class="caps">DUBIE</span><img src="!" alt="" border="0" />!! <span class="caps">DUBIE</span><img src="!" alt="" border="0" /> i love dubie<img src="!" alt="" border="0" /><br />
GO <span class="caps">DUBIE</span>&#8230;...<br />
i want 1 million dubies</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mr. Tomnus</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/06/21/wednesdays-candidate-chief-wana-dubie/#comment-56058</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 08:20:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/06/21/wednesdays-candidate-chief-wana-dubie/#comment-56058</guid>
					<description>As if Libertarians are something special because they stand for something most others don't.  The problem with Libs is , stage one:denial.  Stage two:  Violent wording and opposition.  If they could ever get to Stage three:  Self evident truth realized, that men have no GOD DAMN right to declare in their own prideful arrogant ways that a plant created by GOD, wrongly classified as a drug is somehow responsible for the LP's pathetic problems, Chief running, as well as all societal problems.  What a pathetic farce.  If that's all you can come up with, you proved my point.  You should smoke some pot and open up your pathetic closed pinneal gland that is clogged with fluoride aspartame and mercury from vaccines.  You poor souls who lack inner vision all by choice, SUCK SATANS COCK.  Keep Slurpin boys!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>As if Libertarians are something special because they stand for something most others don&#8217;t.  The problem with Libs is , stage one:denial.  Stage two:  Violent wording and opposition.  If they could ever get to Stage three:  Self evident truth realized, that men have no <span class="caps">GOD DAMN</span> right to declare in their own prideful arrogant ways that a plant created by <span class="caps">GOD</span>, wrongly classified as a drug is somehow responsible for the LP&#8217;s pathetic problems, Chief running, as well as all societal problems.  What a pathetic farce.  If that&#8217;s all you can come up with, you proved my point.  You should smoke some pot and open up your pathetic closed pinneal gland that is clogged with fluoride aspartame and mercury from vaccines.  You poor souls who lack inner vision all by choice, <span class="caps">SUCK SATANS COCK</span>.  Keep Slurpin boys!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: The Exercise of Vital Powers &#187; Why Libertarians can&#8217;t get elected part 876</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/06/21/wednesdays-candidate-chief-wana-dubie/#comment-52283</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Aug 2006 02:39:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/06/21/wednesdays-candidate-chief-wana-dubie/#comment-52283</guid>
					<description>[...] Chief Wanna Dubie    &amp;#160; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>[...] Chief Wanna Dubie    &nbsp; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: The Exercise of Vital Powers &#187; My take on the LP Convention and its future</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/06/21/wednesdays-candidate-chief-wana-dubie/#comment-52281</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Aug 2006 02:33:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/06/21/wednesdays-candidate-chief-wana-dubie/#comment-52281</guid>
					<description>[...] The LP gives libertarianism a bad name. I left the LP when I realized that for every new person I manage to bring into the party a blue, pot-head with a ring who runs for office as a libertarian will drive away 10. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>[...] The LP gives libertarianism a bad name. I left the LP when I realized that for every new person I manage to bring into the party a blue, pot-head with a ring who runs for office as a libertarian will drive away 10. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mr Tomnus</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/06/21/wednesdays-candidate-chief-wana-dubie/#comment-34387</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2006 13:46:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/06/21/wednesdays-candidate-chief-wana-dubie/#comment-34387</guid>
					<description>Exactly Tom.  He is not as embarrassing as George W.  Chief doesn't have to deal with bombing Iraq, his vice president conducting military drills on 911 to create the pretext for war in the middle east, or the next phase of invading and attacking Iran.  Too few good men are standing up to the evil shitwhores in the whitehouse, and the worthless parties called republican and democrat.  Chief's platform, was from it's inception to give people the encouragement to register, run, and vote.  If a hippie from the woods can do it, why can't you?  He is on the lib ticket because no one else ran against him.  That is the lib parties fault not Chief's.  It doesn't matter if he wins or not.  He already accomplished exactly what he set out to do.  Spark debate, get people interested in taking part in the system of democracy.  Dent county has a record number of candidates in all parties this year.  More registered voters than in previous years.  Chief helped this happen.  I know two candidates that ran because they saw Chief was running.  He already won.
To quote Jason:
  &quot;slurred speech; obvious motor skill disorder; personal hygiene deficiency, not to mention that distinctive homeless feature that exhibits the unmistakable quality of “jobless.”   
Sounds like Jesus to me. LOL
Jason here is putting Chief under the gun.  What's in your closet Jason?  Where is your website?  Casting stones are we?  Are you running for office?  The closest you'll ever get to that is leaving your worthless posts on this website.  I said you we're a pussy and you showed us I was right.  Keep shooting.  One day you might get it.  Not a pussy american't.  Mr. Tomnus
&quot;I believe in a free Narnia.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Exactly Tom.  He is not as embarrassing as George W.  Chief doesn&#8217;t have to deal with bombing Iraq, his vice president conducting military drills on 911 to create the pretext for war in the middle east, or the next phase of invading and attacking Iran.  Too few good men are standing up to the evil shitwhores in the whitehouse, and the worthless parties called republican and democrat.  Chief&#8217;s platform, was from it&#8217;s inception to give people the encouragement to register, run, and vote.  If a hippie from the woods can do it, why can&#8217;t you?  He is on the lib ticket because no one else ran against him.  That is the lib parties fault not Chief&#8217;s.  It doesn&#8217;t matter if he wins or not.  He already accomplished exactly what he set out to do.  Spark debate, get people interested in taking part in the system of democracy.  Dent county has a record number of candidates in all parties this year.  More registered voters than in previous years.  Chief helped this happen.  I know two candidates that ran because they saw Chief was running.  He already won.<br />
To quote Jason:</p>
	<p>  &#8220;slurred speech; obvious motor skill disorder; personal hygiene deficiency, not to mention that distinctive homeless feature that exhibits the unmistakable quality of &#8220;jobless.&#8221;<br />
Sounds like Jesus to me. <span class="caps">LOL</span><br />
Jason here is putting Chief under the gun.  What&#8217;s in your closet Jason?  Where is your website?  Casting stones are we?  Are you running for office?  The closest you&#8217;ll ever get to that is leaving your worthless posts on this website.  I said you we&#8217;re a pussy and you showed us I was right.  Keep shooting.  One day you might get it.  Not a pussy american&#8217;t.  Mr. Tomnus<br />
&#8220;I believe in a free Narnia.&#8221;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Thomas L. Knapp</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/06/21/wednesdays-candidate-chief-wana-dubie/#comment-33361</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 23:50:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/06/21/wednesdays-candidate-chief-wana-dubie/#comment-33361</guid>
					<description>Quoth Joe Magyer:

&quot;Since all of the LP candidates are, to my knowledge, pretty much normal people, I just can’t but wonder how a guy like this gets nominated by the LP.&quot;

Chief Wanadubie is running for office in Missouri, where the LP is an &quot;established&quot; party. Our understanding of Missouri election law, until recently*, was that the party organization has no control whatsoever over party nominations to public office.

In Missouri, party nominations to public office are made in a primary election.

Each voter can  vote the primary ballot of the party he or she chooses (i.e. there is no registration by party -- but at any given election, one voter gets to choose only one party's ballot).

Any candidate can seek the nomination of any party by visiting the relevant election authority's office (for the legislature, that's the Secretary of State), filling out some paperwork, and paying a &quot;filing fee&quot; (either to the party, or to the election authority -- the election authority turns it over to the party if the latter). That candidate's name then appears on the primary ballot and, if that candidate wins the primary, he or she is the party's nominee ... whether the party likes it or not.

Now, for the little &quot;until recently*.&quot; This year, a white supremacist filed for election to the US House of Representatives on the Democratic Party's ticket. The Democratic state executive committee returned his filing fee, and the Secretary of State ruled that, since the filing fee had been returned, the supremacist was not entitled to be on the ballot. He then attempted to file on the Republican and Libertarian tickets, and both of those parties likewise returned his filing fee and said &quot;no dice.&quot; I believe he is suing the Secretary of State and possibly the Democrats. If he wins, then we were correct in our earlier interpretation of the law. If he loses, then the LP (and the other parties) will have gained significant control over whom they nominate.

The matter of Chief Wanadubie was mentioned at the LP executive committee meeting in which it was decided to reject the white supremacist's candidacy (I sit on that committee), but we didn't move to reject his candidacy. He's not as embarrassing as a white supremacist. Hell, he's not as embarrassing as George W. Bush.

Regards,
Tom Knapp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Quoth Joe Magyer:</p>
	<p>&#8220;Since all of the LP candidates are, to my knowledge, pretty much normal people, I just can&#8217;t but wonder how a guy like this gets nominated by the LP.&#8221;</p>
	<p>Chief Wanadubie is running for office in Missouri, where the LP is an &#8220;established&#8221; party. Our understanding of Missouri election law, until recently*, was that the party organization has no control whatsoever over party nominations to public office.</p>
	<p>In Missouri, party nominations to public office are made in a primary election.</p>
	<p>Each voter can  vote the primary ballot of the party he or she chooses (i.e. there is no registration by party&#8212;but at any given election, one voter gets to choose only one party&#8217;s ballot).</p>
	<p>Any candidate can seek the nomination of any party by visiting the relevant election authority&#8217;s office (for the legislature, that&#8217;s the Secretary of State), filling out some paperwork, and paying a &#8220;filing fee&#8221; (either to the party, or to the election authority&#8212;the election authority turns it over to the party if the latter). That candidate&#8217;s name then appears on the primary ballot and, if that candidate wins the primary, he or she is the party&#8217;s nominee &#8230; whether the party likes it or not.</p>
	<p>Now, for the little &#8220;until recently*.&#8221; This year, a white supremacist filed for election to the <span class="caps">US </span>House of Representatives on the Democratic Party&#8217;s ticket. The Democratic state executive committee returned his filing fee, and the Secretary of State ruled that, since the filing fee had been returned, the supremacist was not entitled to be on the ballot. He then attempted to file on the Republican and Libertarian tickets, and both of those parties likewise returned his filing fee and said &#8220;no dice.&#8221; I believe he is suing the Secretary of State and possibly the Democrats. If he wins, then we were correct in our earlier interpretation of the law. If he loses, then the <span class="caps">LP </span>(and the other parties) will have gained significant control over whom they nominate.</p>
	<p>The matter of Chief Wanadubie was mentioned at the LP executive committee meeting in which it was decided to reject the white supremacist&#8217;s candidacy (I sit on that committee), but we didn&#8217;t move to reject his candidacy. He&#8217;s not as embarrassing as a white supremacist. Hell, he&#8217;s not as embarrassing as George W. Bush.</p>
	<p>Regards,<br />
Tom Knapp</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jason</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/06/21/wednesdays-candidate-chief-wana-dubie/#comment-33260</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 21:11:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/06/21/wednesdays-candidate-chief-wana-dubie/#comment-33260</guid>
					<description>Riiighhht....Thanks for all that information. Tomnus, you should really find new friends...

I don’t want to engage in any discussion with you because I do not think I am dealing with someone who has all his faculties. Some people just can't be disputed and I sense you are one of those people. I’m sure there are reasons for being the way you are. So let me part with some words of encouragement.

Good luck in your quest for truth. I’m sure the Chief will do well in his bid for office. I mean the guy has everything one would look for in a candidate: slurred speech; obvious motor skill disorder; personal hygiene deficiency, not to mention that distinctive homeless feature that exhibits the unmistakable quality of “jobless.” With his credentials and you as his spokesman and campaigner; the two of you have set up a regular “dream team” and I'm confident the both of you will pull out all the stops.

We’ll we be seeing a Chief for a White House bid in ’08? If so, what will be some of his issues? Oh, I hope he doesn't adopt platform over principles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Riiighhht&#8230;.Thanks for all that information. Tomnus, you should really find new friends&#8230;</p>
	<p>I don&#8217;t want to engage in any discussion with you because I do not think I am dealing with someone who has all his faculties. Some people just can&#8217;t be disputed and I sense you are one of those people. I&#8217;m sure there are reasons for being the way you are. So let me part with some words of encouragement.</p>
	<p>Good luck in your quest for truth. I&#8217;m sure the Chief will do well in his bid for office. I mean the guy has everything one would look for in a candidate: slurred speech; obvious motor skill disorder; personal hygiene deficiency, not to mention that distinctive homeless feature that exhibits the unmistakable quality of &#8220;jobless.&#8221; With his credentials and you as his spokesman and campaigner; the two of you have set up a regular &#8220;dream team&#8221; and I&#8217;m confident the both of you will pull out all the stops.</p>
	<p>We&#8217;ll we be seeing a Chief for a White House bid in &#8217;08? If so, what will be some of his issues? Oh, I hope he doesn&#8217;t adopt platform over principles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mr Tomnus</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/06/21/wednesdays-candidate-chief-wana-dubie/#comment-33223</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 19:54:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/06/21/wednesdays-candidate-chief-wana-dubie/#comment-33223</guid>
					<description>Oh Jason:  I love you.  www.scholarsfor911truth.org  I hope you wake up.  But you are the typical american't I rant of in my previous posts.  You always try to kill the messenger but fail to see the message.  You don't know what you do and I forgive you.  I hope you forgive yourself as well.  Maybe if you picked up the pipe instead of your 19 prescription drugs you take everyday you might see.  Instead you are what Chief terms a not-see.  And if I was Osama, the CIA tactician (AKA Tim Osmond) at least I have been found.  
Most respectively Mr. Tomnus 
And yes, that is a tatoo on his forhead.  I respect men with balls.  Founding father types who aren't afraid to stand up.  I have no respect for pussies.  Don't be one.  Seek.
www.infowars.com
www.reopen911.org
www.leap.org
www.1984videos.com
www.question911.com
www.naihc.org</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Oh Jason:  I love you.  <a href='http://www.scholarsfor911truth.org' rel='nofollow'>www.scholarsfor911truth.org</a>  I hope you wake up.  But you are the typical american&#8217;t I rant of in my previous posts.  You always try to kill the messenger but fail to see the message.  You don&#8217;t know what you do and I forgive you.  I hope you forgive yourself as well.  Maybe if you picked up the pipe instead of your 19 prescription drugs you take everyday you might see.  Instead you are what Chief terms a not-see.  And if I was Osama, the <span class="caps">CIA</span> tactician (AKA Tim Osmond) at least I have been found.<br />
Most respectively Mr. Tomnus<br />
And yes, that is a tatoo on his forhead.  I respect men with balls.  Founding father types who aren&#8217;t afraid to stand up.  I have no respect for pussies.  Don&#8217;t be one.  Seek.<br />
<a href='http://www.infowars.com' rel='nofollow'>www.infowars.com</a><br />
<a href='http://www.reopen911.org' rel='nofollow'>www.reopen911.org</a><br />
<a href='http://www.leap.org' rel='nofollow'>www.leap.org</a><br />
<a href='http://www.1984videos.com' rel='nofollow'>www.1984videos.com</a><br />
<a href='http://www.question911.com' rel='nofollow'>www.question911.com</a><br />
<a href='http://www.naihc.org' rel='nofollow'>www.naihc.org</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jason</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/06/21/wednesdays-candidate-chief-wana-dubie/#comment-33183</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 18:29:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/06/21/wednesdays-candidate-chief-wana-dubie/#comment-33183</guid>
					<description>Osama...Is that you??


You are a fruit and the very definition of a &quot;kook.&quot; Lay down the pipe man and step away. In the mean time, we'll be over here in reality. You can't miss it. It's full of SANE people!

Very Respectively,
Jason</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Osama&#8230;Is that you??</p>
	<p>You are a fruit and the very definition of a &#8220;kook.&#8221; Lay down the pipe man and step away. In the mean time, we&#8217;ll be over here in reality. You can&#8217;t miss it. It&#8217;s full of <span class="caps">SANE</span> people!</p>
	<p>Very Respectively,<br />
Jason</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mr Tomnus</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/06/21/wednesdays-candidate-chief-wana-dubie/#comment-33159</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 17:58:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/06/21/wednesdays-candidate-chief-wana-dubie/#comment-33159</guid>
					<description>Oh and in case I forgot to mention....fuck normalcy!  You version of normalcy is, to the intelligent entities of a higher universal order, simply insane.  And to all you boot licking fucking lackeys, Chief is a fighter, not a flighter.  I dare you to debate him.  We will record it and put it on the net.  E-mail chiefwanadubie@yahoo.com and we will set it up.  Put your nuts where your mouth is, or go on in your life leaving your little pathetic comments on the blog sites thinking by doing so you are helping the world.  I invite you out to the real world. Send an e-mail with your phone number and we will do the rest.  Or go on judging what you know nothing about. You think you are a good man?  Have you studied 911....do you have a good reason why Building 7 collasped.....don't regurgitate the media lies...tell me....you go along just to get along.....pussies make me sick.....you are not men, your are abominations to what true warrior men are.  Chief is a warrior.  He could out debate any of you pricks on this site.  Send the e-mail and we will record and post on his site a live debate unedited.....take on the pro hemp pro 911 truth candidate and his team with your team.....you don't have the stones I bet.....too bad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Oh and in case I forgot to mention&#8230;.fuck normalcy!  You version of normalcy is, to the intelligent entities of a higher universal order, simply insane.  And to all you boot licking fucking lackeys, Chief is a fighter, not a flighter.  I dare you to debate him.  We will record it and put it on the net.  E-mail <a href="mailto:chiefwanadubie@yahoo.com">chiefwanadubie@yahoo.com</a> and we will set it up.  Put your nuts where your mouth is, or go on in your life leaving your little pathetic comments on the blog sites thinking by doing so you are helping the world.  I invite you out to the real world. Send an e-mail with your phone number and we will do the rest.  Or go on judging what you know nothing about. You think you are a good man?  Have you studied 911&#8230;.do you have a good reason why Building 7 collasped&#8230;..don&#8217;t regurgitate the media lies&#8230;tell me&#8230;.you go along just to get along&#8230;..pussies make me sick&#8230;..you are not men, your are abominations to what true warrior men are.  Chief is a warrior.  He could out debate any of you pricks on this site.  Send the e-mail and we will record and post on his site a live debate unedited&#8230;..take on the pro hemp pro 911 truth candidate and his team with your team&#8230;..you don&#8217;t have the stones I bet&#8230;..too bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mr Tomnus</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/06/21/wednesdays-candidate-chief-wana-dubie/#comment-33153</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 17:45:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/06/21/wednesdays-candidate-chief-wana-dubie/#comment-33153</guid>
					<description>Just wanted to say your death match comments and the kook comments and all the other name calling shows me your levels of intelligence.  The fact that you think Bush and co is not responsible for 911 is a total outing of your lack of inner vision.  How come a chief in the woods &amp;#38; pot smoking hippie can tell the difference between good men and pathetic reptilian minded materialistic externalists seeking to control everything, but you cannot.  I have the answer.  Everyone matters.  Chief inspired many people to run, vote, and take part in even a corrupted political process.  What have you fucking losers who bash him as a kook done.  He openly discusses 911.  What do you do?  Most of these responses let me know.  You suck Satan's cock.  And the worst part, you want everyone else to.  

I believe in a free America.  Mr Tomnus</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Just wanted to say your death match comments and the kook comments and all the other name calling shows me your levels of intelligence.  The fact that you think Bush and co is not responsible for 911 is a total outing of your lack of inner vision.  How come a chief in the woods &#038; pot smoking hippie can tell the difference between good men and pathetic reptilian minded materialistic externalists seeking to control everything, but you cannot.  I have the answer.  Everyone matters.  Chief inspired many people to run, vote, and take part in even a corrupted political process.  What have you fucking losers who bash him as a kook done.  He openly discusses 911.  What do you do?  Most of these responses let me know.  You suck Satan&#8217;s cock.  And the worst part, you want everyone else to.</p>
	<p>I believe in a free America.  Mr Tomnus</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jason</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/06/21/wednesdays-candidate-chief-wana-dubie/#comment-31797</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2006 21:12:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/06/21/wednesdays-candidate-chief-wana-dubie/#comment-31797</guid>
					<description>By the way, is that a tattoo on his forehead?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>By the way, is that a tattoo on his forehead?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jason</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/06/21/wednesdays-candidate-chief-wana-dubie/#comment-31769</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2006 18:55:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/06/21/wednesdays-candidate-chief-wana-dubie/#comment-31769</guid>
					<description>Mr. Campbell,

     I certainly wasn't meaning everyone in the party, I know I was going a little overboard. Its just the bitterness coming out. I believe in alot of the principles and ideas the CP promotes. Matter of fact I believe so much that I contribute. I just detest this faction splitting and this zealous religious overtone that has been promoted by many influential individuals in the party. 

    This party will never survive if we allow a religous order to dictate our policies and our alliances. If you argue differently, or anyone else for that matter, then you are in fact, dillusional. That was my point and I should have put it that way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Mr. Campbell,</p>
	<p>     I certainly wasn&#8217;t meaning everyone in the party, I know I was going a little overboard. Its just the bitterness coming out. I believe in alot of the principles and ideas the CP promotes. Matter of fact I believe so much that I contribute. I just detest this faction splitting and this zealous religious overtone that has been promoted by many influential individuals in the party.</p>
	<p>    This party will never survive if we allow a religous order to dictate our policies and our alliances. If you argue differently, or anyone else for that matter, then you are in fact, dillusional. That was my point and I should have put it that way.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Michael L.</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/06/21/wednesdays-candidate-chief-wana-dubie/#comment-31751</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2006 17:48:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/06/21/wednesdays-candidate-chief-wana-dubie/#comment-31751</guid>
					<description>Austin's statement that &quot;...frankly there aren't that many serious candidates out there to begin with,&quot; seems to prove Mark San Souci's point.  Actually, from the U.S. Senate to the state legislature, there are literally hundreds and hundreds of serious and highly-qualified independent and third-party candidates competing in this year's mid-term elections across the country.  In addition to a few that have already been featured on TPW, such as Art Olivier in California and Professor Bruce Guthrie, representing &quot;the new sensible center&quot; in the state of Washington, the Libertarians boast one of their most impressive fields in years, including former Graham County sheriff Richard Mack and Libertarian Party founder David Nolan in Arizona; Johns Hopkins and University of Chicago-educated economist Leonard Schwartz in Michigan; Harvard-educated financial guru Phil Maymin in Connecticut; attorney Allen Buckley in Georgia; and Eric Sundwall in New York, whose dark-horse candidacy is already beginning to register in the Zogby Poll, to mention but a few.  And that's just for starters...
 
As amusing as they might be, one can only wonder how deep in the barrel Austin had to dig to find candidates like Frodo and Chief Wana Dubie...  I know it takes a lot of digging to make the Republicans --- a party that has wrapped itself in the flag while bankrupting the country --- look good these days, but c'mon!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Austin&#8217;s statement that &#8220;...frankly there aren&#8217;t that many serious candidates out there to begin with,&#8221; seems to prove Mark San Souci&#8217;s point.  Actually, from the U.S. Senate to the state legislature, there are literally hundreds and hundreds of serious and highly-qualified independent and third-party candidates competing in this year&#8217;s mid-term elections across the country.  In addition to a few that have already been featured on <span class="caps">TPW</span>, such as Art Olivier in California and Professor Bruce Guthrie, representing &#8220;the new sensible center&#8221; in the state of Washington, the Libertarians boast one of their most impressive fields in years, including former Graham County sheriff Richard Mack and Libertarian Party founder David Nolan in Arizona; Johns Hopkins and University of Chicago-educated economist Leonard Schwartz in Michigan; Harvard-educated financial guru Phil Maymin in Connecticut; attorney Allen Buckley in Georgia; and Eric Sundwall in New York, whose dark-horse candidacy is already beginning to register in the Zogby Poll, to mention but a few.  And that&#8217;s just for starters&#8230;</p>
	<p>As amusing as they might be, one can only wonder how deep in the barrel Austin had to dig to find candidates like Frodo and Chief Wana Dubie&#8230;  I know it takes a lot of digging to make the Republicans&#8212;- a party that has wrapped itself in the flag while bankrupting the country&#8212;- look good these days, but c&#8217;mon!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Otto Kerner</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/06/21/wednesdays-candidate-chief-wana-dubie/#comment-31745</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2006 16:49:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/06/21/wednesdays-candidate-chief-wana-dubie/#comment-31745</guid>
					<description>Joe Magyer: I don't know how it works where you live, but I think that in a lot of state, such as my home state of Illinois, the organised Libertarian Party has no control over who runs under its name, at least not for lower-level offices like State Representative. In Illinois, for instance, the Libertarian Party does not legally exist in between elections; therefore, anybody who goes to the trouble to get on the ballot as the Libertarian Party candidate is entitled to that name, and nobody else can stop them, except through persuasion.

Maybe they should have tried harder to persuade this guy not to run. It's true that a lot of LP groups have the attitude that &quot;any candidate is better than no candidate.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Joe Magyer: I don&#8217;t know how it works where you live, but I think that in a lot of state, such as my home state of Illinois, the organised Libertarian Party has no control over who runs under its name, at least not for lower-level offices like State Representative. In Illinois, for instance, the Libertarian Party does not legally exist in between elections; therefore, anybody who goes to the trouble to get on the ballot as the Libertarian Party candidate is entitled to that name, and nobody else can stop them, except through persuasion.</p>
	<p>Maybe they should have tried harder to persuade this guy not to run. It&#8217;s true that a lot of LP groups have the attitude that &#8220;any candidate is better than no candidate.&#8221; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
