<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lieberman Calls for Debate</title>
	<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/09/01/lieberman-calls-for-debate/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 09:39:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: trmadol</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/09/01/lieberman-calls-for-debate/#comment-102703</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 22:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/09/01/lieberman-calls-for-debate/#comment-102703</guid>
					<description>dude. awesome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>dude. awesome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Pro-Life 2008</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/09/01/lieberman-calls-for-debate/#comment-53092</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2006 20:43:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/09/01/lieberman-calls-for-debate/#comment-53092</guid>
					<description>Its good to see that Lieberman wants to debate the other minor party candidates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Its good to see that Lieberman wants to debate the other minor party candidates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Chris Campbell</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/09/01/lieberman-calls-for-debate/#comment-53072</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2006 18:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/09/01/lieberman-calls-for-debate/#comment-53072</guid>
					<description>They should ignore him the way all other &quot;3rd aprty&quot; candidates get treated. Might wake him up...maybe???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>They should ignore him the way all other &#8220;3rd aprty&#8221; candidates get treated. Might wake him up&#8230;maybe???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: undercover_anarchist</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/09/01/lieberman-calls-for-debate/#comment-52998</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2006 11:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/09/01/lieberman-calls-for-debate/#comment-52998</guid>
					<description>I've said this before, but I'll say it again:  I don't agree with Mr. Lieberman on hardly anything, but I thoroughly respect him. I'm glad he lost to the anti-war Ned Lamont, but I am also glad that he's continuing his campaign as an indepdenent.

This is the first evidence of the dividends his independent campaign is paying.

Lieberman wants all 5 candidates at the debates. How else could he frame his requests? Lamont probably wants the others there primarily because it will lessen Lieberman's mic time, and from what I know about Lamont, he would be slaugthered by Lieberman in a 1-on-1. In fact, Lieberman might convince ME that the war is peachy keen if he were up against that empty suit, Lamont.

Regardless... This is a good thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I&#8217;ve said this before, but I&#8217;ll say it again:  I don&#8217;t agree with Mr. Lieberman on hardly anything, but I thoroughly respect him. I&#8217;m glad he lost to the anti-war Ned Lamont, but I am also glad that he&#8217;s continuing his campaign as an indepdenent.</p>
	<p>This is the first evidence of the dividends his independent campaign is paying.</p>
	<p>Lieberman wants all 5 candidates at the debates. How else could he frame his requests? Lamont probably wants the others there primarily because it will lessen Lieberman&#8217;s mic time, and from what I know about Lamont, he would be slaugthered by Lieberman in a 1-on-1. In fact, Lieberman might convince ME that the war is peachy keen if he were up against that empty suit, Lamont.</p>
	<p>Regardless&#8230; This is a good thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
