It particularly annoyed me being here in Georgia, because CNN is based out of Atlanta, and Browne came in third here. Nader and Hagelin weren’t even on the ballot. But from their broadcast that night (and morning), you wouldn’t have even known Browne was in the race.

I live in Georgia and on election night the local news does post “Libertarian” and not indpendent next to candidates names when they show results. (I am refering to the news out of Atlanta and not some small town)
In fact every time I have seen this poll result reported on the local news they mention how Hayes is polling, that he is the Libertarian candidate, and that he could force a runoff if he manages to get the same share of the vote that this poll is predicting.
On a side note I am a Democrat but I am going to vote for the Libertarian that is running for state school supertintendent

Kyle

But it doesn’t fit the bash Republicans 24/7, 365 days a year for the liberal media.

If you play up Libertarians, than you are saying to the American voter that there’s a Party out there who really does want to cut taxes and spending. The Republicans then become defacto “Moderate” and “Middle-of-the-road” and “Reasonable.”

The Liberal media can’t have that now. So, their policy is to completely whitewash Libertarians.

AJC: “3 vie for McKinney’s former Congress seat”

And being merely a write-in candidate, I’m even more flattered by this article. Unfortunately, I haven’t yet convinced the AJC to include me in their Voter’s Guide, and no other newspapers have expressed similar interest, despite my having contacted several local publications. I’m still holding out hope of attracting some attention in these last two weeks, though.

I watched the first part of the debate (could not fit the rest into my schedule) but I was impressed by Garrett Michael Hayes. He obviously had practised getting his message into 30-second and 60-second time periods. He was confident and cool, collected but calculating. I look forward to seeing his ad.