<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Badnarik, Smither Fail to Top 10%</title>
	<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/11/08/badnarik-smither-fail-to-top-10/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 15:19:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Timothy West</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/11/08/badnarik-smither-fail-to-top-10/#comment-67157</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2006 23:46:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/11/08/badnarik-smither-fail-to-top-10/#comment-67157</guid>
					<description>austin, congrats on your victory in your race.  I was back in the hospitl last 3 days so did nt gt to see anything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>austin, congrats on your victory in your race.  I was back in the hospitl last 3 days so did nt gt to see anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: rj</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/11/08/badnarik-smither-fail-to-top-10/#comment-66538</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 20:04:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/11/08/badnarik-smither-fail-to-top-10/#comment-66538</guid>
					<description>No one's impressed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>No one&#8217;s impressed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mike N.</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/11/08/badnarik-smither-fail-to-top-10/#comment-66535</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 19:31:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/11/08/badnarik-smither-fail-to-top-10/#comment-66535</guid>
					<description>Smither polled  18.90% in the Special.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Smither polled  18.90% in the Special.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: undercover_anarchist</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/11/08/badnarik-smither-fail-to-top-10/#comment-66464</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 11:14:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/11/08/badnarik-smither-fail-to-top-10/#comment-66464</guid>
					<description>I wouldn't trust Fraudnarik to run for county commission. He would need $100,000 just to do that.

Seriously, I'm against capital punishment, but Fraudnarik and Hacker each deserve death for this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I wouldn&#8217;t trust Fraudnarik to run for county commission. He would need $100,000 just to do that.</p>
	<p>Seriously, I&#8217;m against capital punishment, but Fraudnarik and Hacker each deserve death for this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jackcjackson</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/11/08/badnarik-smither-fail-to-top-10/#comment-66440</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 08:42:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/11/08/badnarik-smither-fail-to-top-10/#comment-66440</guid>
					<description>and Badnarik probably woud have gotten 4% without spending a dime. Any &quot;no name&quot;  Libertarian would have gotten 2-3%. I hope his career of running for federal office in the LP is over.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>and Badnarik probably woud have gotten 4% without spending a dime. Any &#8220;no name&#8221;  Libertarian would have gotten 2-3%. I hope his career of running for federal office in the LP is over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jackcjackson</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/11/08/badnarik-smither-fail-to-top-10/#comment-66439</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 08:40:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/11/08/badnarik-smither-fail-to-top-10/#comment-66439</guid>
					<description>Polls were somewhat right. Obviously more Republicans did vote for Lampson than Smither and in the special election I think Austin is right that it was probably mostly Democrats voting for Smither to vote against all the other Republicans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Polls were somewhat right. Obviously more Republicans did vote for Lampson than Smither and in the special election I think Austin is right that it was probably mostly Democrats voting for Smither to vote against all the other Republicans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mike N.</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/11/08/badnarik-smither-fail-to-top-10/#comment-66426</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 08:02:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/11/08/badnarik-smither-fail-to-top-10/#comment-66426</guid>
					<description>Austin,

Really, then why is Smither 2nd in that race - ahead of 3 Republicans... all of whom are less than 15%?  Why didn't 3 Republicans get at least 15%?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Austin,</p>
	<p>Really, then why is Smither 2nd in that race &#8211; ahead of 3 Republicans&#8230; all of whom are less than 15%?  Why didn&#8217;t 3 Republicans get at least 15%?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Austin Cassidy</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/11/08/badnarik-smither-fail-to-top-10/#comment-66422</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 07:52:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/11/08/badnarik-smither-fail-to-top-10/#comment-66422</guid>
					<description>Any generic candidate should have been able to poll 15%+ in that race.  Those are probably just Democrats who voted for Lampson in the general.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Any generic candidate should have been able to poll 15%+ in that race.  Those are probably just Democrats who voted for Lampson in the general.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mike N.</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/11/08/badnarik-smither-fail-to-top-10/#comment-66418</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 07:38:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/11/08/badnarik-smither-fail-to-top-10/#comment-66418</guid>
					<description>He is actually at  18.54% not 16.48%.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>He is actually at  18.54% not 16.48%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mike N.</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/11/08/badnarik-smither-fail-to-top-10/#comment-66417</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 07:36:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/11/08/badnarik-smither-fail-to-top-10/#comment-66417</guid>
					<description>Smither is currently at  16.48%	 in the special election.

http://207.200.23.22/06novspc.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Smither is currently at  16.48% in the special election.</p>
	<p><a href='http://207.200.23.22/06novspc.htm' rel='nofollow'>http://207.200.23.22/06novspc.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: torah</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/11/08/badnarik-smither-fail-to-top-10/#comment-66415</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 07:09:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/11/08/badnarik-smither-fail-to-top-10/#comment-66415</guid>
					<description>This is a disgusting update of news. I for sure thought the total would have been higher for both of these candidates. I'm ashamed. Allen Hacker will have a lot of explaining to do...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>This is a disgusting update of news. I for sure thought the total would have been higher for both of these candidates. I&#8217;m ashamed. Allen Hacker will have a lot of explaining to do&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Phil</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/11/08/badnarik-smither-fail-to-top-10/#comment-66401</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 06:24:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/11/08/badnarik-smither-fail-to-top-10/#comment-66401</guid>
					<description>Pierce County in Washington I should say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Pierce County in Washington I should say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Phil</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/11/08/badnarik-smither-fail-to-top-10/#comment-66400</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 06:23:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/11/08/badnarik-smither-fail-to-top-10/#comment-66400</guid>
					<description>In Pierce County, a charter amendment to use IRV for county offices is passing 53%-47% with 90% of the vote counted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>In Pierce County, a charter amendment to use <span class="caps">IRV</span> for county offices is passing 53%-47% with 90% of the vote counted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Otto Kerner</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/11/08/badnarik-smither-fail-to-top-10/#comment-66380</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 04:56:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/11/08/badnarik-smither-fail-to-top-10/#comment-66380</guid>
					<description>Well, I'd prefer it if Mr. Badnarik had won, naturally, not that that ever seemed like a plausible outcome. As a consolation prize, though: good riddance to bad candidate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Well, I&#8217;d prefer it if Mr. Badnarik had won, naturally, not that that ever seemed like a plausible outcome. As a consolation prize, though: good riddance to bad candidate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
