dirt cheap tickets really cheap

Vince is wrong!

-Except for a political party that believes in the US Constitution, including the 10th Amendment.

This is not true.

=Yes it is, the target was the Mormons, not the ‘no-exceptionists’.

“None of us are happy with the situation as it presently exists, but the Exec Comm has adopted a policy that winks at dead babies—as long as the dead babies are dead Mormon babies—after all, the Mormon policy permitting the killing of unborn thieves-in-the-womb, bastard children (C. Hansen’s words) or foetally deformed babies requires deliberation with the Priest and divine confirmation, and no Calvinist Demoniac, as Mr. Hansen calls us, is likely to be given such divine confirmation or audience with the Priest. After all, “forcing” a woman to carry such a child might cause her significant spiritual damage or ruin her soul, while aborting the baby puts that baby straight into heaven and might even save the girl (according to Scott Bartlett, SD Chairman and Regional Co-Chairman). You know, in New Hampshire it is illegal to sell fireworks to minors who reside in New Hampshire—but NH can sell fireworks to minors from Massachusetts—afterall, who really cares about Massachusetts kids, right?”

-Scott Whittman

The CP Platform says that they are 100% pro-life. Not that they are just pro-life, but 100%.

=The CP Sanctity of Life says that Government cannot take life WITHOUT JUSTIFICATION. In other words, while rape or incest doesn’t count. Other circumstances do, like to save the life of the mother. So that is exceptionist right there. Not 100%

=What a load of crap- I’ve read the TAV forums. Here’s a quote form your friend Reed Heustis-

“...Fourteen years after its seeding, the Constitution Party began to bear its godless fruits. At its 2006 National Committee meeting last Spring in Tampa, Florida, the Constitution Party voted to continue its affiliation with a Nevada affiliate, owned and operated by Mormons, that regularly supports pro-abortion candidates and officers. As a consequence of its pro-abortion, anti-Christian actions, eight Constitution Party state affiliates have disaffiliated from the Pluralist national party, and more are likely to follow. Meanwhile, the entire western region of the Constitution Party has fallen into complete Mormon control. Some National Committee members justified their votes on the grounds of “religious liberty.” Others justified their votes on the grounds of “party growth.” Others on “states’ rights.” Others on “family loyalty.” Still others on demonic Mormonism itself. Vain imaginations. High things…”

=Gee, does it sound like the Abortion issue was the sole reason?

I dont like hypocrisy.

=You’re speaking it, Vince.

And have you read the CP Constitution? I have a copy and NO where does it say that they cant or shouldnt disaffiliate a state party for not upholding the platform that they ALL agreed too.

=Neither does it say they can.

They had no problem disaffiliating the IL CP when it suited them and the reason was alot flimsier than the case against IAPNV.

=Because the old Ill. CP was full of anti-non-Calvinist bigots.

Whereas the National Committee of the Constitution Party has been
troubled for more than a year and a half by events arising from a
decision by the chairman of the Independent American Party of Nevada
(IAPN) to publicly air views in clear opposition to the pro-life
plank of the National Party, and

Whereas the IAPN chairman has refused to publicly recant his
statements, but has affirmed his position, and

Whereas the National Committee by majority vote at its meeting in
Columbus, Ohio, in the fall of 2005 has requested the Independent
American Party of Nevada to address the situation, and

Whereas the Independent American Party of Nevada has responded by
stating in writing to the national Constitution Party chairman the
IAPN support for its state chairman, thus elevating the issue to the
level of a scandal that threatens the pro-life position and message
of the Constitution Party, and

Whereas leaders in the national Constitution Party have failed to
address the scandal but have instead publicly attacked and unfairly
maligned individuals seeking to promote the party’s pro-life
identity, and

Whereas several state affiliates, including Michigan, Ohio, Montana,
Alabama, Oregon and New York have formally called for disaffiliation
of the IAPN in accordance with the powers granted to the National
Committee by its bylaws, and

Whereas a disaffiliation motion brought to the floor of the National
Committee in Columbus, Ohio, in 2005 was ruled out of order by the
National Chairman;

Be it hereby resolved that the Constitution Party of New York shall
formally cease its affiliation with the national Constitution Party
if the Independent American Party of Nevada is not disaffiliated
from the national Constitution Party as of April 23, 2006.

I am a member of the New York party and was present when our disaffiliation resolution was discussed. Nowhere in it does it say anything about us wishing to create a church, nor did anyone during our discussion say anything of the kind. I voted to disaffiliate because I could not in good conscience remain in a party that voted to allow a state party remain that knowingly elected leaders and nominated candidates that would allow abortion in the cases of rape and incest.

They had no problem disaffiliating the IL CP when it suited them and the reason was alot flimsier than the case against IAPNV.