Comments on: An Infuriating Letter to the Editor http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/12/26/an-infuriating-letter-to-the-editor/ Fri, 04 Jul 2008 20:40:23 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1.3 by: baseball online internet sport boo http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/12/26/an-infuriating-letter-to-the-editor/#comment-313316 Tue, 30 Oct 2007 11:44:12 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/12/26/an-infuriating-letter-to-the-editor/#comment-313316 <strong>baseball online internet sport books system</strong> player.denigrate browned,rope,timestamp baseball online internet sport books system

player.denigrate browned,rope,timestamp

]]> by: Matthew http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/12/26/an-infuriating-letter-to-the-editor/#comment-94652 Tue, 16 Jan 2007 03:57:41 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/12/26/an-infuriating-letter-to-the-editor/#comment-94652 I am not a Democrat. They will never get my vote. If the Democrats can't convince a major of voters they are the right direction, they don't deserve to win. I am not going to throw away my vote by voting for a party that doesn't reflect my values. My goal is to raise Green voting. I don't know why anyone would expect me to care how well or bad a Democrat does. Whether a Democrat or a Republican wins a race, I have lost. In my opinion, then, so has America. Good luck to the Dem's, but you won't get it from me. The Greens have earned my vote. Maybe the Dem's should try that angle. I am not a Democrat. They will never get my vote. If the Democrats can’t convince a major of voters they are the right direction, they don’t deserve to win. I am not going to throw away my vote by voting for a party that doesn’t reflect my values. My goal is to raise Green voting. I don’t know why anyone would expect me to care how well or bad a Democrat does. Whether a Democrat or a Republican wins a race, I have lost. In my opinion, then, so has America. Good luck to the Dem’s, but you won’t get it from me. The Greens have earned my vote. Maybe the Dem’s should try that angle.

]]> by: Chris http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/12/26/an-infuriating-letter-to-the-editor/#comment-81898 Wed, 27 Dec 2006 13:42:05 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/12/26/an-infuriating-letter-to-the-editor/#comment-81898 The guy is basically a fear mongering tool of the GOP/DNC The guy is basically a fear mongering tool of the GOP/DNC

]]> by: RCAIP http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/12/26/an-infuriating-letter-to-the-editor/#comment-81847 Wed, 27 Dec 2006 09:10:41 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/12/26/an-infuriating-letter-to-the-editor/#comment-81847 Nope! IRV is NOT the way for third-parties to go. Nope! IRV is NOT the way for third-parties to go.

]]> by: matt http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/12/26/an-infuriating-letter-to-the-editor/#comment-81815 Wed, 27 Dec 2006 06:58:26 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/12/26/an-infuriating-letter-to-the-editor/#comment-81815 IRV or Range voting might be the answer for us, but for Mr. Moore, the answer is more likely "keep enforcing the duopoly". IRV or Range voting might be the answer for us, but for Mr. Moore, the answer is more likely “keep enforcing the duopoly”.

]]> by: Carl http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/12/26/an-infuriating-letter-to-the-editor/#comment-81766 Wed, 27 Dec 2006 03:10:49 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/12/26/an-infuriating-letter-to-the-editor/#comment-81766 No, range voting is the answer. IRV still results in a two party system. http://www.rangevoting.org No, range voting is the answer. IRV still results in a two party system.

http://www.rangevoting.org

]]> by: Matt Sterba http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/12/26/an-infuriating-letter-to-the-editor/#comment-81710 Tue, 26 Dec 2006 22:56:30 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/12/26/an-infuriating-letter-to-the-editor/#comment-81710 Instant Runoff Voting is the answer. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Instant-runoff_voting Instant Runoff Voting is the answer.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Instant-runoff_voting

]]> by: Trent Hill http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/12/26/an-infuriating-letter-to-the-editor/#comment-81692 Tue, 26 Dec 2006 21:21:29 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/12/26/an-infuriating-letter-to-the-editor/#comment-81692 Well, this guy DOES give ONE good point. Third parties CAN spoil it for the big two, and we're looking to do alot more. However, if he is so worried about having "Integrity" then he shouldn't be voting for the "lesser of two evils". I have always held major disdain for that phrase. "Voting for the lesser of two evils" is still voting for someone whom you think is evil,and thus incorrect to run the U.S. government. Shame on you. Well, this guy DOES give ONE good point. Third parties CAN spoil it for the big two, and we’re looking to do alot more.
However, if he is so worried about having “Integrity” then he shouldn’t be voting for the “lesser of two evils”.
I have always held major disdain for that phrase. “Voting for the lesser of two evils” is still voting for someone whom you think is evil,and thus incorrect to run the U.S. government. Shame on you.

]]> by: Citizens For A Better Veterans Home[s] http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/12/26/an-infuriating-letter-to-the-editor/#comment-81689 Tue, 26 Dec 2006 20:43:13 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/12/26/an-infuriating-letter-to-the-editor/#comment-81689 So Is John Jordan Moore is serious contender for the 2007 "Puke" Cunningham INTEGRITY IN POLITICS award? If this guy is on the up and up [and not just a brilliant parady] we Non Democans and Non Republicrats need to forward this Mis -Admistration unmercifully all over the net! So Is John Jordan Moore is serious contender for the 2007 “Puke” Cunningham INTEGRITY IN POLITICS award?

If this guy is on the up and up [and not just a brilliant parady] we Non Democans and Non Republicrats need to forward this Mis -Admistration unmercifully all over the net!

]]>