<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gerald Ford (1913-2006)</title>
	<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/12/27/gerald-ford-1913-2006/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 04:51:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Trent Hill</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/12/27/gerald-ford-1913-2006/#comment-85501</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Dec 2006 21:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/12/27/gerald-ford-1913-2006/#comment-85501</guid>
					<description>Ill be voting CP, unless they can't get ballot qualified in my state. Then ill be voting LP.
If neither....I write in &quot;James Madison.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Ill be voting CP, unless they can&#8217;t get ballot qualified in my state. Then ill be voting LP.<br />
If neither&#8230;.I write in &#8220;James Madison.&#8221; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: matt</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/12/27/gerald-ford-1913-2006/#comment-85295</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Dec 2006 14:24:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/12/27/gerald-ford-1913-2006/#comment-85295</guid>
					<description>If the CP was unified and/or on the ball, they could run someone Libertarian-friendly, steal the conservative vote from the Republican party, and really shake things up. Since they're too busy fighting over Mormons, however, I'll probably be voting LP again. If we pick a good campaigner we might get 5%.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>If the CP was unified and/or on the ball, they could run someone Libertarian-friendly, steal the conservative vote from the Republican party, and really shake things up. Since they&#8217;re too busy fighting over Mormons, however, I&#8217;ll probably be voting LP again. If we pick a good campaigner we might get 5%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Phil Sawyer</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/12/27/gerald-ford-1913-2006/#comment-84970</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Dec 2006 06:03:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/12/27/gerald-ford-1913-2006/#comment-84970</guid>
					<description>&quot;If anything is going to happen in 2008 ... &quot;:  Of course something is going to happen in 2008, Austin, and (as always) there will be plenty of surprises.

You are correct about the need for people to be consistent in building the party (whatever party he or she belongs to).  We are in agreement on that.  Some of us, though, have been working on that since the late 60's and the early 70's (or even before) and it has not done a lot of good so far.  It also takes the right time in history for things to happen.  Where the importance of party building comes in is that it is necessary to be well organized when that time finally does come around.  That is something that I have been preaching over the decades but not many people are willing to listen.

In any case, the next presidential election will be won by either an independent slate (perhaps Unity08), a &quot;third party,&quot; or the Democrats.  The Republican Party is not going to go anywhere but down.  They will put on a good show and perhaps even &quot;go down in flames.&quot;  Down they will go in any event.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>&#8220;If anything is going to happen in 2008 &#8230; &#8220;:  Of course something is going to happen in 2008, Austin, and (as always) there will be plenty of surprises.</p>
	<p>You are correct about the need for people to be consistent in building the party (whatever party he or she belongs to).  We are in agreement on that.  Some of us, though, have been working on that since the late 60&#8217;s and the early 70&#8217;s (or even before) and it has not done a lot of good so far.  It also takes the right time in history for things to happen.  Where the importance of party building comes in is that it is necessary to be well organized when that time finally does come around.  That is something that I have been preaching over the decades but not many people are willing to listen.</p>
	<p>In any case, the next presidential election will be won by either an independent slate (perhaps Unity08), a &#8220;third party,&#8221; or the Democrats.  The Republican Party is not going to go anywhere but down.  They will put on a good show and perhaps even &#8220;go down in flames.&#8221;  Down they will go in any event.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Austin Cassidy</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/12/27/gerald-ford-1913-2006/#comment-84062</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Dec 2006 05:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/12/27/gerald-ford-1913-2006/#comment-84062</guid>
					<description>Do I think the Republican and Democratic parties will last &quot;forever&quot;?  No, of course not.  Do I think they're going to break apart any time soon?  No.

I'll say it again... the only way to build a party is to BUILD IT.

So what if there's a split and some element of the GOP strikes off and tries to form another party?  That doesn't help the Libertarians and it won't last more than a few cycles at best.

If anything is going to happen in 2008, the Giuliani/McCain element of the GOP is going to win control of the party and the Keyes/Buchanan followers on the &quot;hard-right&quot; will bolt to the Constitution Party for a couple of years to show their displeasure.  

The major parties remain the major parties because they have infrastructure built up and down from the very tiny local levels to the national level... and that infrastructure generates lots of cash... the cash and infrastructure attract credible candidates to their primaries... they win 99.9% of all elections... and that's that.

And when I say infrastructure, I mean there must be 15 organized &quot;Republican Clubs&quot; in my county alone... there's a vibrant group at the local University... the county party has a big office with lots of available space to assemble campaign materials, phone bank, etc.

They have executive committee meetings at the county-level here that are attended by 100+ people every single month.  I don't even know that there's a Libertarian Party organized in my county.  If there is, I would be willing to guess that they have no associated clubs or other elements.  They probably have next to no money in the bank.  They almost never run candidates for office.  And... if I had to bet money, they don't have an office or paid staff.  The meetings are probably monthly dinners at Denny's or Applebee's attended by 5 to 15 people who sit around and debate about writing letters to the governor to express their principled opinion on why property taxes should be eliminated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Do I think the Republican and Democratic parties will last &#8220;forever&#8221;?  No, of course not.  Do I think they&#8217;re going to break apart any time soon?  No.</p>
	<p>I&#8217;ll say it again&#8230; the only way to build a party is to <span class="caps">BUILD IT</span>.</p>
	<p>So what if there&#8217;s a split and some element of the <span class="caps">GOP</span> strikes off and tries to form another party?  That doesn&#8217;t help the Libertarians and it won&#8217;t last more than a few cycles at best.</p>
	<p>If anything is going to happen in 2008, the Giuliani/McCain element of the <span class="caps">GOP</span> is going to win control of the party and the Keyes/Buchanan followers on the &#8220;hard-right&#8221; will bolt to the Constitution Party for a couple of years to show their displeasure.</p>
	<p>The major parties remain the major parties because they have infrastructure built up and down from the very tiny local levels to the national level&#8230; and that infrastructure generates lots of cash&#8230; the cash and infrastructure attract credible candidates to their primaries&#8230; they win 99.9% of all elections&#8230; and that&#8217;s that.</p>
	<p>And when I say infrastructure, I mean there must be 15 organized &#8220;Republican Clubs&#8221; in my county alone&#8230; there&#8217;s a vibrant group at the local University&#8230; the county party has a big office with lots of available space to assemble campaign materials, phone bank, etc.</p>
	<p>They have executive committee meetings at the county-level here that are attended by 100+ people every single month.  I don&#8217;t even know that there&#8217;s a Libertarian Party organized in my county.  If there is, I would be willing to guess that they have no associated clubs or other elements.  They probably have next to no money in the bank.  They almost never run candidates for office.  And&#8230; if I had to bet money, they don&#8217;t have an office or paid staff.  The meetings are probably monthly dinners at Denny&#8217;s or Applebee&#8217;s attended by 5 to 15 people who sit around and debate about writing letters to the governor to express their principled opinion on why property taxes should be eliminated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Phil Sawyer</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/12/27/gerald-ford-1913-2006/#comment-83829</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Dec 2006 05:05:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/12/27/gerald-ford-1913-2006/#comment-83829</guid>
					<description>A major point that you have missed, Austin, is that political parties are merely part of the overall superstructure of society.  As our society, which is based upon monopoly capitalism and imperialism, goes through the dramtic changes that are taking place because of the ending of one epoch and the beginning of a new one, those political parties are bound to be changed as well.  Do you really think that the two major parties are going to last forever as major-sized organizations?

Timothy is right on the money once again.  The Country Club wing of the GOP is simply not going to put up with the neo-conservatives running the party into the ground.  They are going to fight back and they are going to try to regain control.  You are going to see a three-way race for the presidential nomination between these factions:  (a)  the Country Club wing (which I also refer to as part of the Old Guard), led by Rudy Guilani; (b)  the Neo-Conservatives, led by Senator John McCain; and (c)  the Religious Right, led by Senator Sam Brownback.  Other (smaller) factions will be involved, too:  (d)  the Neo-Reformers, led by Senator Chuck Hagel; and (e)  the Conservative Isolationists (also part of the Old Guard), led by Patrick Buchanan.  It will be a real circus - evey single day!  Watch for the leaders of all these groupings to make temporary deals and so forth.  Remember the Reagan and Rockefeller joint attempt to stop Richard Nixon from taking a first ballot win at Miami Beach in 1968?

You can be sure that the Libertarians in this chat room are not worried about your opinion of their chances.  This is their best shot yet since 1980 (when the LP should have offered its nomination to Eugene McCarthy).  If they do not go for it now, in a really big way, that will be the end of it - and I think that they know that.  Meanwhile, on the left, we socialists will be making plenty of hay of our own!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>A major point that you have missed, Austin, is that political parties are merely part of the overall superstructure of society.  As our society, which is based upon monopoly capitalism and imperialism, goes through the dramtic changes that are taking place because of the ending of one epoch and the beginning of a new one, those political parties are bound to be changed as well.  Do you really think that the two major parties are going to last forever as major-sized organizations?</p>
	<p>Timothy is right on the money once again.  The Country Club wing of the <span class="caps">GOP</span> is simply not going to put up with the neo-conservatives running the party into the ground.  They are going to fight back and they are going to try to regain control.  You are going to see a three-way race for the presidential nomination between these factions:  (a)  the Country Club wing (which I also refer to as part of the Old Guard), led by Rudy Guilani; (b)  the Neo-Conservatives, led by Senator John McCain; and&#169;  the Religious Right, led by Senator Sam Brownback.  Other (smaller) factions will be involved, too:  (d)  the Neo-Reformers, led by Senator Chuck Hagel; and (e)  the Conservative Isolationists (also part of the Old Guard), led by Patrick Buchanan.  It will be a real circus &#8211; evey single day!  Watch for the leaders of all these groupings to make temporary deals and so forth.  Remember the Reagan and Rockefeller joint attempt to stop Richard Nixon from taking a first ballot win at Miami Beach in 1968?</p>
	<p>You can be sure that the Libertarians in this chat room are not worried about your opinion of their chances.  This is their best shot yet since 1980 (when the LP should have offered its nomination to Eugene McCarthy).  If they do not go for it now, in a really big way, that will be the end of it &#8211; and I think that they know that.  Meanwhile, on the left, we socialists will be making plenty of hay of our own!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Austin Cassidy</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/12/27/gerald-ford-1913-2006/#comment-83828</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Dec 2006 04:53:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/12/27/gerald-ford-1913-2006/#comment-83828</guid>
					<description>Glad to hear it's the last round of chemo for you, Tim... how are things looking overall?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Glad to hear it&#8217;s the last round of chemo for you, Tim&#8230; how are things looking overall?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Timothy West</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/12/27/gerald-ford-1913-2006/#comment-83824</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Dec 2006 04:47:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/12/27/gerald-ford-1913-2006/#comment-83824</guid>
					<description>thanks. lots of side effects lately - I  O'd on my anti seizure drugs becuase I lost 100 pounds of weight and that made hospital stay number 5, but just  a overnighter. Of course they never adjusted the dosage since I got out of surgery 100 pounds ago. Stupid doctors.

I'm getting ready to take it right now and go to bed. If I can get to sleep quick I can make it without ralfing.  bucket by the bed. nite.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>thanks. lots of side effects lately &#8211; <span class="caps">I  O</span>&#8217;d on my anti seizure drugs becuase I lost 100 pounds of weight and that made hospital stay number 5, but just  a overnighter. Of course they never adjusted the dosage since I got out of surgery 100 pounds ago. Stupid doctors.</p>
	<p>I&#8217;m getting ready to take it right now and go to bed. If I can get to sleep quick I can make it without ralfing.  bucket by the bed. nite.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: paulie cannoli</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/12/27/gerald-ford-1913-2006/#comment-83605</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Dec 2006 04:10:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/12/27/gerald-ford-1913-2006/#comment-83605</guid>
					<description>Yeah, I feel pretty crappy too. 

Bronchitis, maybe pneumonia - hopefully not tuberculosis. 

Other stuff too. 

But I'm glad it's not chemo. 

Hope you feel better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Yeah, I feel pretty crappy too.</p>
	<p>Bronchitis, maybe pneumonia &#8211; hopefully not tuberculosis.</p>
	<p>Other stuff too.</p>
	<p>But I&#8217;m glad it&#8217;s not chemo.</p>
	<p>Hope you feel better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Timothy West</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/12/27/gerald-ford-1913-2006/#comment-83477</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Dec 2006 03:56:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/12/27/gerald-ford-1913-2006/#comment-83477</guid>
					<description>I'll look at it more on Sunday and give you some more detail.  I'm in the middle of my last round of chemo and  I feel like shit and probably not in the best of thought. (in case you didnt notice, duh)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I&#8217;ll look at it more on Sunday and give you some more detail.  I&#8217;m in the middle of my last round of chemo and  I feel like shit and probably not in the best of thought. (in case you didnt notice, duh)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: paulie cannoli</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/12/27/gerald-ford-1913-2006/#comment-83103</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Dec 2006 02:35:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/12/27/gerald-ford-1913-2006/#comment-83103</guid>
					<description>Oh Lord.

Pick a level. Not the issue. Whatever level it applies at.

Look at the papers. See what you think, of its propaganda value and/or the value of the ideas presented. 

If you decide you want to share your opinion, I wouldn't mind. If you don't, I won't keep asking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Oh Lord.</p>
	<p>Pick a level. Not the issue. Whatever level it applies at.</p>
	<p>Look at the papers. See what you think, of its propaganda value and/or the value of the ideas presented.</p>
	<p>If you decide you want to share your opinion, I wouldn&#8217;t mind. If you don&#8217;t, I won&#8217;t keep asking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Timothy West</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/12/27/gerald-ford-1913-2006/#comment-83102</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Dec 2006 02:14:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/12/27/gerald-ford-1913-2006/#comment-83102</guid>
					<description>a local? no probably not. energy is generally at least a state level issue I think. How local is local?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>a local? no probably not. energy is generally at least a state level issue I think. How local is local?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: paulie cannoli</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/12/27/gerald-ford-1913-2006/#comment-82757</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 23:13:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/12/27/gerald-ford-1913-2006/#comment-82757</guid>
					<description>I just asked what you thought about the  paper. 

The campaign as a whole is a separate issue. 

If a local candidate wanted to adapt that paper, do you think it would be an effective way of addressing those issues - one that would help expand our base?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I just asked what you thought about the  paper.</p>
	<p>The campaign as a whole is a separate issue.</p>
	<p>If a local candidate wanted to adapt that paper, do you think it would be an effective way of addressing those issues &#8211; one that would help expand our base?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Timothy West</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/12/27/gerald-ford-1913-2006/#comment-82756</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 23:03:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/12/27/gerald-ford-1913-2006/#comment-82756</guid>
					<description>hard for me to take any  LP presidential candidate seriously. it only makes sense if the  person uses the race as a funding springboard for our lower level races. his positions  could be the bestest evar, but it does not matter. we have to build the lp's support and candidate base first. 

we cannot even begin to win the office.  but we can put the party into good shape and have a number of credible  down ticket candidates for the '10 and '12 contests. 
we can also work on further broadening our platform for more left right balance while using personal individualist freedom as the policy means. 

and we seriously need media money for TV across the entire party, but mostly for state level candidates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>hard for me to take any  LP presidential candidate seriously. it only makes sense if the  person uses the race as a funding springboard for our lower level races. his positions  could be the bestest evar, but it does not matter. we have to build the lp&#8217;s support and candidate base first.</p>
	<p>we cannot even begin to win the office.  but we can put the party into good shape and have a number of credible  down ticket candidates for the &#8216;10 and &#8216;12 contests.<br />
we can also work on further broadening our platform for more left right balance while using personal individualist freedom as the policy means.</p>
	<p>and we seriously need media money for TV across the entire party, but mostly for state level candidates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: paulie cannoli</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/12/27/gerald-ford-1913-2006/#comment-82732</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 19:59:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/12/27/gerald-ford-1913-2006/#comment-82732</guid>
					<description>Tim - what do you think of Kubby's paper on the environment and energy?

http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&amp;#38;friendID=107509135&amp;#38;blogID=207756301

There's also this

http://knappster.blogspot.com/2006/12/libertarians-warm-up-to-environmental.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Tim &#8211; what do you think of Kubby&#8217;s paper on the environment and energy?</p>
	<p><a href='http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&#038;friendID=107509135&#038;blogID=207756301' rel='nofollow'>http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&#038;friendID=107509135&#038;blogID=207756301</a></p>
	<p>There&#8217;s also this</p>
	<p><a href='http://knappster.blogspot.com/2006/12/libertarians-warm-up-to-environmental.html' rel='nofollow'>http://knappster.blogspot.com/2006/12/libertarians-warm-up-to-environmental.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Timothy West</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/12/27/gerald-ford-1913-2006/#comment-82727</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 19:37:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/12/27/gerald-ford-1913-2006/#comment-82727</guid>
					<description>the LP can be a credible choice, but it has to choose that path. I'm much more optimistic about the GOP breaking into 2 or 3 parts because even today, with crap &quot;journalism&quot; and the elite backers,  crime is still crime. I think when the evidence comes out what Bush and Cheney have done, the neo cons and the northeastern country club wing of the he party are going to split, with all the christians being the third bloc. 

We need much more left wing in the LP, but to do that we have to adopt some policy in regard to what the left wing cares about. Stuff like pollution, the commons, ownership of natural resources and the disposal of same for the benefit of regular people, not corporations.

a balanced left - right approach with personal individual freedom in the middle for the average man is the party of the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>the LP can be a credible choice, but it has to choose that path. I&#8217;m much more optimistic about the <span class="caps">GOP</span> breaking into 2 or 3 parts because even today, with crap &#8220;journalism&#8221; and the elite backers,  crime is still crime. I think when the evidence comes out what Bush and Cheney have done, the neo cons and the northeastern country club wing of the he party are going to split, with all the christians being the third bloc.</p>
	<p>We need much more left wing in the LP, but to do that we have to adopt some policy in regard to what the left wing cares about. Stuff like pollution, the commons, ownership of natural resources and the disposal of same for the benefit of regular people, not corporations.</p>
	<p>a balanced left &#8211; right approach with personal individual freedom in the middle for the average man is the party of the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
