<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Marvin Pro-Life Richardson running for US Senate in Idaho as an independent</title>
	<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/12/28/marvin-pro-life-richardson-running-for-us-senate-in-idaho-as-an-independent/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 22:07:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Information Portal</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/12/28/marvin-pro-life-richardson-running-for-us-senate-in-idaho-as-an-independent/#comment-543538</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 20:45:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/12/28/marvin-pro-life-richardson-running-for-us-senate-in-idaho-as-an-independent/#comment-543538</guid>
					<description>Who will win the battle</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Who will win the battle</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Cody Quirk</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/12/28/marvin-pro-life-richardson-running-for-us-senate-in-idaho-as-an-independent/#comment-92301</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 03:18:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/12/28/marvin-pro-life-richardson-running-for-us-senate-in-idaho-as-an-independent/#comment-92301</guid>
					<description>After all, Reed Heustis and your friends were going for the ban.

I was too, but I wasn't crazy about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>After all, Reed Heustis and your friends were going for the ban.</p>
	<p>I was too, but I wasn&#8217;t crazy about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Cody Quirk</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/12/28/marvin-pro-life-richardson-running-for-us-senate-in-idaho-as-an-independent/#comment-91536</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 06:45:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/12/28/marvin-pro-life-richardson-running-for-us-senate-in-idaho-as-an-independent/#comment-91536</guid>
					<description>Whether you like it or not Joe,

The reason why the SD abortion ban failed was because it was too strict in language. It would've passed if it included all exceptions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Whether you like it or not Joe,</p>
	<p>The reason why the SD abortion ban failed was because it was too strict in language. It would&#8217;ve passed if it included all exceptions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Joe</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/12/28/marvin-pro-life-richardson-running-for-us-senate-in-idaho-as-an-independent/#comment-90965</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 12:04:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/12/28/marvin-pro-life-richardson-running-for-us-senate-in-idaho-as-an-independent/#comment-90965</guid>
					<description>Human life begins at the moment of fertilization.  Contraceptives cause chemical abortions after fertilization. Yet the so-called pro-life forces in South Dakota last year embraced these drugs to accommodate the destruction of those lives formed via the sins of their fathers.  They were trying to put an end to surgical abortion when the time for surgical abortion is all but near obsolete.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Human life begins at the moment of fertilization.  Contraceptives cause chemical abortions after fertilization. Yet the so-called pro-life forces in South Dakota last year embraced these drugs to accommodate the destruction of those lives formed via the sins of their fathers.  They were trying to put an end to surgical abortion when the time for surgical abortion is all but near obsolete.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: RCAIP</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/12/28/marvin-pro-life-richardson-running-for-us-senate-in-idaho-as-an-independent/#comment-88601</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 12:41:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/12/28/marvin-pro-life-richardson-running-for-us-senate-in-idaho-as-an-independent/#comment-88601</guid>
					<description>Marvin...

I'm still waiting for your answer to my question .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Marvin&#8230;</p>
	<p>I&#8217;m still waiting for your answer to my question .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: RRHeustisJr</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/12/28/marvin-pro-life-richardson-running-for-us-senate-in-idaho-as-an-independent/#comment-87752</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 01:49:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/12/28/marvin-pro-life-richardson-running-for-us-senate-in-idaho-as-an-independent/#comment-87752</guid>
					<description>&lt;b&gt; Message for Bri:&lt;/b&gt;

Bri, please contact me privately via email.  I have a couple of questions for you.  Thanks so much.  Happy New Year of our Lord.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><b> Message for Bri:</b></p>
	<p>Bri, please contact me privately via email.  I have a couple of questions for you.  Thanks so much.  Happy New Year of our Lord.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: RCAIP</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/12/28/marvin-pro-life-richardson-running-for-us-senate-in-idaho-as-an-independent/#comment-87417</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 16:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/12/28/marvin-pro-life-richardson-running-for-us-senate-in-idaho-as-an-independent/#comment-87417</guid>
					<description>Dang lines!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Dang lines!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: RCAIP</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/12/28/marvin-pro-life-richardson-running-for-us-senate-in-idaho-as-an-independent/#comment-87415</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 16:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/12/28/marvin-pro-life-richardson-running-for-us-senate-in-idaho-as-an-independent/#comment-87415</guid>
					<description>Sorry to hear that Gene. That's your choice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Sorry to hear that Gene. That&#8217;s your choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: RCAIP</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/12/28/marvin-pro-life-richardson-running-for-us-senate-in-idaho-as-an-independent/#comment-87411</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 16:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/12/28/marvin-pro-life-richardson-running-for-us-senate-in-idaho-as-an-independent/#comment-87411</guid>
					<description>Ask your friend Gary Odom about the Key Races Committee and who were chosen as key races. There is a process in the Constitution Party, and that is what I was commenting on. Your ignorance of the workings of your own party is astounding.

=That process is usually done behind closed doors and Gary is not one to divulge confidential information. And I am not on the national committee. I am only involved actively with my state party. However I do check up on the national Party to see whats going on.

A national key race has never been elected to office. This is where the national party puts their time, money, and effort. 

=I think there was effort on the part to help elect Rick Jore. Plus those candidates that are the key races do get a good amount of votes. Mary did pretty good in Oregon. Randy Stufflebeam got nearly 20,000 write-in votes, more then any write-in candidate in the history of Illinois- don't you read the TPW posts?

You can call me an ignorant woman, but I read what you have written and it is obvious that you choose to either ignore statements when you are wrong or just scream louder. You remind me of my three year old niece.

=Actually I call you a hypocritical women, since you support those that want to take away a woman's right to vote. And you can't respond to my accurate accusations on anti-LDS hysteria with many of the ex-CP'ers. Or even to your own inaccurate information on AIP history, or our opposition to Bush and those the likes of Orin Hatch- you are completely misinformed.
You think you're a big girl? Well you're the one you fits your description of your niece.

Please use a pacifier, ma'am.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Ask your friend Gary Odom about the Key Races Committee and who were chosen as key races. There is a process in the Constitution Party, and that is what I was commenting on. Your ignorance of the workings of your own party is astounding.</p>
	<p>=That process is usually done behind closed doors and Gary is not one to divulge confidential information. And I am not on the national committee. I am only involved actively with my state party. However I do check up on the national Party to see whats going on.</p>
	<p>A national key race has never been elected to office. This is where the national party puts their time, money, and effort.</p>
	<p>=I think there was effort on the part to help elect Rick Jore. Plus those candidates that are the key races do get a good amount of votes. Mary did pretty good in Oregon. Randy Stufflebeam got nearly 20,000 write-in votes, more then any write-in candidate in the history of Illinois- don&#8217;t you read the <span class="caps">TPW</span> posts?</p>
	<p>You can call me an ignorant woman, but I read what you have written and it is obvious that you choose to either ignore statements when you are wrong or just scream louder. You remind me of my three year old niece.</p>
	<p>=Actually I call you a hypocritical women, since you support those that want to take away a woman&#8217;s right to vote. And you can&#8217;t respond to my accurate accusations on anti-LDS hysteria with many of the ex-CP&#8217;ers. Or even to your own inaccurate information on <span class="caps">AIP</span> history, or our opposition to Bush and those the likes of Orin Hatch- you are completely misinformed.<br />
You think you&#8217;re a big girl? Well you&#8217;re the one you fits your description of your niece.</p>
	<p>Please use a pacifier, ma&#8217;am.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: RCAIP</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/12/28/marvin-pro-life-richardson-running-for-us-senate-in-idaho-as-an-independent/#comment-87401</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 15:57:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/12/28/marvin-pro-life-richardson-running-for-us-senate-in-idaho-as-an-independent/#comment-87401</guid>
					<description>&quot;The only time i believe the taking of the babies life could be justified, would be in the delivery or operating room and a condition comes up where either the mother or the baby is going to die (one of them is going to have the privilage to meet the lord)&quot;

-On that matter I totally agree.

-However on the cases of rape or incest, while I think abortion should be allowed, HOWEVER, I think it should go though a legal and medical step-by-step process before the abortion could be performed. Each instance of a unwanted pregnancy caused by rape or incest also should be judged on a case by case basis. 

-Basically, yes I am in favor of exceptions, BUT I do not agree that it should be automatically allowed unless its a situation that Tim cited. On those rare exceptions it must be regulated medically and even legally under the circumstances.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>&#8220;The only time i believe the taking of the babies life could be justified, would be in the delivery or operating room and a condition comes up where either the mother or the baby is going to die (one of them is going to have the privilage to meet the lord)&#8221;</p>
	<p>-On that matter I totally agree.</p>
	<p><del>However on the cases of rape or incest, while I think abortion should be allowed, <span class="caps">HOWEVER</span>, I think it should go though a legal and medical step</del>by-step process before the abortion could be performed. Each instance of a unwanted pregnancy caused by rape or incest also should be judged on a case by case basis.</p>
	<p>-Basically, yes I am in favor of exceptions, <span class="caps">BUT I</span> do not agree that it should be automatically allowed unless its a situation that Tim cited. On those rare exceptions it must be regulated medically and even legally under the circumstances.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: RCAIP</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/12/28/marvin-pro-life-richardson-running-for-us-senate-in-idaho-as-an-independent/#comment-87396</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 15:43:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/12/28/marvin-pro-life-richardson-running-for-us-senate-in-idaho-as-an-independent/#comment-87396</guid>
					<description>What hissy fit are you talking about? If you reread my posts here you will see that my comments were not critical of the Constitution Party.

=Yes, in fact kudos to you for being civilized in dialoge, but I check out TAV every now and then and it seems that very few can't get over the Constitution Party and have given their entire focus on bashing the CP rather then get over it and focus on building the AHP or their rogue state affiliate.

 I spoke up to disagree that abortion should be permissible to protect the life and health of the mother.

=And I disagree on your take. There are plenty of circumstances, including tubal pregnancy.

 I also pointed out that all chemical contraceptives on the market are abortificient. I am actually defending the current life plank of the Constitution Party – which is opposed to birth control as well as abortion in the cases of rape and incest.

=Also note that the same Plank says- 

&quot;...No government may legalize the taking of the unalienable right to life WITHOUT JUSTIFICATION...&quot;

=And even Chris Hansen agrees with the Life Plank.

 The Constitution Party of New York has not joined the American Heritage Party nor any Christian Liberty Party.

=Why not?

http://christianheritageparty.net/

-They seem to fit your profile.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>What hissy fit are you talking about? If you reread my posts here you will see that my comments were not critical of the Constitution Party.</p>
	<p>=Yes, in fact kudos to you for being civilized in dialoge, but I check out <span class="caps">TAV</span> every now and then and it seems that very few can&#8217;t get over the Constitution Party and have given their entire focus on bashing the CP rather then get over it and focus on building the <span class="caps">AHP</span> or their rogue state affiliate.</p>
	<p> I spoke up to disagree that abortion should be permissible to protect the life and health of the mother.</p>
	<p>=And I disagree on your take. There are plenty of circumstances, including tubal pregnancy.</p>
	<p> I also pointed out that all chemical contraceptives on the market are abortificient. I am actually defending the current life plank of the Constitution Party &#8211; which is opposed to birth control as well as abortion in the cases of rape and incest.</p>
	<p>=Also note that the same Plank says-</p>
	<p>&#8220;...No government may legalize the taking of the unalienable right to life <span class="caps">WITHOUT JUSTIFICATION</span>&#8230;&#8221;</p>
	<p>=And even Chris Hansen agrees with the Life Plank.</p>
	<p> The Constitution Party of New York has not joined the American Heritage Party nor any Christian Liberty Party.</p>
	<p>=Why not?</p>
	<p><a href='http://christianheritageparty.net/' rel='nofollow'>http://christianheritageparty.net/</a></p>
	<p>-They seem to fit your profile.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Trent Hill</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/12/28/marvin-pro-life-richardson-running-for-us-senate-in-idaho-as-an-independent/#comment-87054</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 22:04:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/12/28/marvin-pro-life-richardson-running-for-us-senate-in-idaho-as-an-independent/#comment-87054</guid>
					<description>Gene Henley,

The fact that you are unwilling to WORK with people who are also trying to limit abortions is pretty ignorant. Both you and Chris Hanson are attempting to VASTLY limit abortions. Furthermore,if you're ever going to change ANYONE's mind on the issue of abortion, opening a dialogue is important.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Gene Henley,</p>
	<p>The fact that you are unwilling to <span class="caps">WORK</span> with people who are also trying to limit abortions is pretty ignorant. Both you and Chris Hanson are attempting to <span class="caps">VASTLY</span> limit abortions. Furthermore,if you&#8217;re ever going to change <span class="caps">ANYONE</span>&#8217;s mind on the issue of abortion, opening a dialogue is important.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: matt</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/12/28/marvin-pro-life-richardson-running-for-us-senate-in-idaho-as-an-independent/#comment-86939</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 16:56:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/12/28/marvin-pro-life-richardson-running-for-us-senate-in-idaho-as-an-independent/#comment-86939</guid>
					<description>I don't know what kinds of Christians are in the CP, but they've all agreed to fight like Baptists, I guess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I don&#8217;t know what kinds of Christians are in the CP, but they&#8217;ve all agreed to fight like Baptists, I guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Gene Henley</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/12/28/marvin-pro-life-richardson-running-for-us-senate-in-idaho-as-an-independent/#comment-86911</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 15:36:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/12/28/marvin-pro-life-richardson-running-for-us-senate-in-idaho-as-an-independent/#comment-86911</guid>
					<description>I`ve read commentary about&quot;a lot of Catholics &quot;and the vote of them concerning Nevada and disaffiliation. 
 I took no poll about Roman Catholics and their votes. I`ll give mine.
 I am four square against any deliberate abortion for any reason whatsoever!
  I voted for the disaffiliation of New York. I`d do it again if necessary. 
I am intransigent. I will npt compromise no matterwhat reasons are brought forth to violate my conscience. 
  The Constitution Party has violated honour. I cannot support them.
 I voted to disaffiliate those state parties that stay with the Constitution 
Party. That party is not mine. Mine is the Constitution Party of New York.
                               Gene Henley
                                    Roman Catholic</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I`ve read commentary about&#8221;a lot of Catholics &#8220;and the vote of them concerning Nevada and disaffiliation.</p>
	<p> I took no poll about Roman Catholics and their votes. I`ll give mine.<br />
 I am four square against any deliberate abortion for any reason whatsoever!<br />
  I voted for the disaffiliation of New York. I`d do it again if necessary.<br />
I am intransigent. I will npt compromise no matterwhat reasons are brought forth to violate my conscience.<br />
  The Constitution Party has violated honour. I cannot support them.<br />
 I voted to disaffiliate those state parties that stay with the Constitution<br />
Party. That party is not mine. Mine is the Constitution Party of New York.<br />
                               Gene Henley<br />
                                    Roman Catholic
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Gene Henley</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/12/28/marvin-pro-life-richardson-running-for-us-senate-in-idaho-as-an-independent/#comment-86912</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 15:36:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/12/28/marvin-pro-life-richardson-running-for-us-senate-in-idaho-as-an-independent/#comment-86912</guid>
					<description>I`ve read commentary about&quot;a lot of Catholics &quot;and the vote of them concerning Nevada and disaffiliation. 
 I took no poll about Roman Catholics and their votes. I`ll give mine.
 I am four square against any deliberate abortion for any reason whatsoever!
  I voted for the disaffiliation of New York. I`d do it again if necessary. 
I am intransigent. I will npt compromise no matterwhat reasons are brought forth to violate my conscience. 
  The Constitution Party has violated honour. I cannot support them.
 I voted to disaffiliate those state parties that stay with the Constitution 
Party. That party is not mine. Mine is the Constitution Party of New York.
                               Gene Henley
                                    Roman Catholic</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I`ve read commentary about&#8221;a lot of Catholics &#8220;and the vote of them concerning Nevada and disaffiliation.</p>
	<p> I took no poll about Roman Catholics and their votes. I`ll give mine.<br />
 I am four square against any deliberate abortion for any reason whatsoever!<br />
  I voted for the disaffiliation of New York. I`d do it again if necessary.<br />
I am intransigent. I will npt compromise no matterwhat reasons are brought forth to violate my conscience.<br />
  The Constitution Party has violated honour. I cannot support them.<br />
 I voted to disaffiliate those state parties that stay with the Constitution<br />
Party. That party is not mine. Mine is the Constitution Party of New York.<br />
                               Gene Henley<br />
                                    Roman Catholic
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
