<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The philosophy of Rick Jore</title>
	<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/09/the-philosophy-of-rick-jore/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 12:03:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Cody Quirk</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/09/the-philosophy-of-rick-jore/#comment-105849</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 14:01:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/09/the-philosophy-of-rick-jore/#comment-105849</guid>
					<description>-I have dial up, so the audio sucks on my computer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>-I have dial up, so the audio sucks on my computer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Joe</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/09/the-philosophy-of-rick-jore/#comment-105169</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 14:18:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/09/the-philosophy-of-rick-jore/#comment-105169</guid>
					<description>If you listen to the show I linked to you can hear him say so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>If you listen to the show I linked to you can hear him say so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Cody Quirk</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/09/the-philosophy-of-rick-jore/#comment-102034</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 01:19:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/09/the-philosophy-of-rick-jore/#comment-102034</guid>
					<description>I'm talking about has he severd ties completely with the national? I don't remember him having a cow about the national's endorsement of him in the election.

I recall he still was present at Tampa after the Nevada vote, when most of the Peroutka crowd left.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I&#8217;m talking about has he severd ties completely with the national? I don&#8217;t remember him having a cow about the national&#8217;s endorsement of him in the election.</p>
	<p>I recall he still was present at Tampa after the Nevada vote, when most of the Peroutka crowd left.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Joe</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/09/the-philosophy-of-rick-jore/#comment-97143</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 14:08:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/09/the-philosophy-of-rick-jore/#comment-97143</guid>
					<description>Yes, he voted to disaffiliate from the national party.  You can hear his public rebuke at http://www.theamericanview.com/index.php?id=721</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Yes, he voted to disaffiliate from the national party.  You can hear his public rebuke at <a href='http://www.theamericanview.com/index.php?id=721' rel='nofollow'>http://www.theamericanview.com/index.php?id=721</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Cody Quirk</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/09/the-philosophy-of-rick-jore/#comment-97140</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 13:50:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/09/the-philosophy-of-rick-jore/#comment-97140</guid>
					<description>Joe, has Jore personally rebuked the national Party at all?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Joe, has Jore personally rebuked the national Party at all?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Trent Hill</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/09/the-philosophy-of-rick-jore/#comment-94678</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 06:20:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/09/the-philosophy-of-rick-jore/#comment-94678</guid>
					<description>No. He is APART of the Constitution Party.
He is simply a part of a state party that is no longer affiliated with the national.
When you say &quot;have seperated themselves from the Constitution Party&quot;, you should specify the National Constitution Party.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>No. He is <span class="caps">APART</span> of the Constitution Party.<br />
He is simply a part of a state party that is no longer affiliated with the national.<br />
When you say &#8220;have seperated themselves from the Constitution Party&#8221;, you should specify the National Constitution Party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Joe</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/09/the-philosophy-of-rick-jore/#comment-94545</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 23:11:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/09/the-philosophy-of-rick-jore/#comment-94545</guid>
					<description>Like I said, both Pro-Life and Jore have separated themselves from the Constitution Party.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Like I said, both Pro-Life and Jore have separated themselves from the Constitution Party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Trent Hill</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/09/the-philosophy-of-rick-jore/#comment-94542</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 23:04:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/09/the-philosophy-of-rick-jore/#comment-94542</guid>
					<description>Wrong again Joe. Man, you really cant seem to get stuff right,huh?

Pro-life has distanced himself from the CP.

rick Jore is still a part of the Constitution Party of Montana. While they are &quot;dissafilliated&quot;, they share the same name and platform as the national party. This is a heavy link. The Montana party, in itself, is a perfectly good establishment. I hope they will rejoin us soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Wrong again Joe. Man, you really cant seem to get stuff right,huh?</p>
	<p>Pro-life has distanced himself from the CP.</p>
	<p>rick Jore is still a part of the Constitution Party of Montana. While they are &#8220;dissafilliated&#8221;, they share the same name and platform as the national party. This is a heavy link. The Montana party, in itself, is a perfectly good establishment. I hope they will rejoin us soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Joe</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/09/the-philosophy-of-rick-jore/#comment-92654</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 21:02:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/09/the-philosophy-of-rick-jore/#comment-92654</guid>
					<description>Both Jore and Pro-life have separated themselves from the Constitution Party.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Both Jore and Pro-life have separated themselves from the Constitution Party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Anthony Distler</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/09/the-philosophy-of-rick-jore/#comment-92644</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 20:36:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/09/the-philosophy-of-rick-jore/#comment-92644</guid>
					<description>If I were the Constitution Party...and I am not...I would look at Rick Jore for a leadership position within the party. They need to seperate themselves from people like &quot;Pro-Life&quot; and more towards Rick Jore.

And with the Republican Party reeling from the recent 2006 elections, the Constitution Party may be in for a boost. 2008 is going to be a very interesting election cycle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>If I were the Constitution Party&#8230;and I am not&#8230;I would look at Rick Jore for a leadership position within the party. They need to seperate themselves from people like &#8220;Pro-Life&#8221; and more towards Rick Jore.</p>
	<p>And with the Republican Party reeling from the recent 2006 elections, the Constitution Party may be in for a boost. 2008 is going to be a very interesting election cycle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Chris Campbell</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/09/the-philosophy-of-rick-jore/#comment-92637</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 20:06:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/09/the-philosophy-of-rick-jore/#comment-92637</guid>
					<description>Rick is a good fellow and I was pleased to support him-even after the now Infamous Tampa Vote</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Rick is a good fellow and I was pleased to support him-even after the now Infamous Tampa Vote</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Trent Hill</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/09/the-philosophy-of-rick-jore/#comment-92356</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 05:23:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/09/the-philosophy-of-rick-jore/#comment-92356</guid>
					<description>That editor should be VERY proud. Missoula is pretty liberal, and he put out a decent report on a VERY conservative politician.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>That editor should be <span class="caps">VERY</span> proud. Missoula is pretty liberal, and he put out a decent report on a <span class="caps">VERY</span> conservative politician.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: RWR</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/09/the-philosophy-of-rick-jore/#comment-92330</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 04:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/09/the-philosophy-of-rick-jore/#comment-92330</guid>
					<description>NewFederalist –

To the paper's further credit, I wrote the editor and author of that piece to thank him for such a fair and informative interview, and his response to me was that he also believes it is the duty of the press to be as straightforward and honest with its readers as possible, and that he wants to conduct interviews like this more often with high-profile local politicians.

THIS is the type of thinking we need much more of at our nation's newspapers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>NewFederalist &#8211;</p>
	<p>To the paper&#8217;s further credit, I wrote the editor and author of that piece to thank him for such a fair and informative interview, and his response to me was that he also believes it is the duty of the press to be as straightforward and honest with its readers as possible, and that he wants to conduct interviews like this more often with high-profile local politicians.</p>
	<p><span class="caps">THIS</span> is the type of thinking we need much more of at our nation&#8217;s newspapers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: RWR</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/09/the-philosophy-of-rick-jore/#comment-92329</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 04:34:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/09/the-philosophy-of-rick-jore/#comment-92329</guid>
					<description>Montana probably has some of the most liberal districts in the country mere miles away from some of the most conservative. I live about a half-hour south of Ronan, in Missoula, which is so liberal it would probably go unnoticed if it suddenly became a suburb of San Fransisco.

George Phillies is right – Montana politics defies explanation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Montana probably has some of the most liberal districts in the country mere miles away from some of the most conservative. I live about a half-hour south of Ronan, in Missoula, which is so liberal it would probably go unnoticed if it suddenly became a suburb of San Fransisco.</p>
	<p>George Phillies is right &#8211; Montana politics defies explanation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Freelancer</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/09/the-philosophy-of-rick-jore/#comment-92167</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 21:22:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/09/the-philosophy-of-rick-jore/#comment-92167</guid>
					<description>LOL!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><span class="caps">LOL</span>!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
