Comments on: Brad’s Interview with Pro-Life (part 1) http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/11/brads-interview-with-pro-life-part-1/ Fri, 21 Nov 2008 12:13:52 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1.3 by: Brad’s Interview with Pro-Life (part 2) ¦ Crack The Vote http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/11/brads-interview-with-pro-life-part-1/#comment-93458 Sat, 13 Jan 2007 06:27:51 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/11/brads-interview-with-pro-life-part-1/#comment-93458 [...] This is the second half of Brad’s interview with Pro-Life, the man formerly known as Marvin Richardson. To read the first half of this interview click here! [...] [...] This is the second half of Brad’s interview with Pro-Life, the man formerly known as Marvin Richardson. To read the first half of this interview click here! [...]

]]> by: Cody Quirk http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/11/brads-interview-with-pro-life-part-1/#comment-93113 Fri, 12 Jan 2007 15:45:54 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/11/brads-interview-with-pro-life-part-1/#comment-93113 Matt, Personally I think Pro-Life is full of himself. Hold on, I think I'm going to start writing a article now.... Matt,

Personally I think Pro-Life is full of himself.

Hold on, I think I’m going to start writing a article now….

]]> by: Third Party Watch » Blog Archive » Brad’s Interview with Pro-Life (part 2) http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/11/brads-interview-with-pro-life-part-1/#comment-93052 Fri, 12 Jan 2007 12:36:48 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/11/brads-interview-with-pro-life-part-1/#comment-93052 [...] This is the second half of Brad’s interview with Pro-Life, the man formerly known as Marvin Richardson. To read the first half of this interview click here! [...] [...] This is the second half of Brad’s interview with Pro-Life, the man formerly known as Marvin Richardson. To read the first half of this interview click here! [...]

]]> by: matt http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/11/brads-interview-with-pro-life-part-1/#comment-92677 Thu, 11 Jan 2007 21:55:38 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/11/brads-interview-with-pro-life-part-1/#comment-92677 I like Mr. Life. He says what he thinks. he understands that abortion is wrong, admits to having made mistakes in the past, and is doing his best to get his point across. This interview contains a great deal of honesty. I wish he'd tone down the rhetoric, patch things up with LDS and the CP, and generally learn how to work together with people a little better. For all we know, he might. I'd love to see abortion banned state-by-state too. I like Mr. Life.

He says what he thinks. he understands that abortion is wrong, admits to having made mistakes in the past, and is doing his best to get his point across. This interview contains a great deal of honesty. I wish he’d tone down the rhetoric, patch things up with LDS and the CP, and generally learn how to work together with people a little better. For all we know, he might.

I’d love to see abortion banned state-by-state too.

]]> by: Anthony Distler http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/11/brads-interview-with-pro-life-part-1/#comment-92669 Thu, 11 Jan 2007 21:31:39 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/11/brads-interview-with-pro-life-part-1/#comment-92669 Trent, Thanks for the clear-up. I can certain see the CP's stance on this issue. I've move away from the right on several issues, but always kept a pro-life stance (though...not one like Mr. "Pro-Life" up there in Idaho.) While it's a stretch to think that abortion will be banned nationally anytime soon, a state by stae thing may be approaching in the near future. I look toward states like Idaho and Wyoming first. Trent,
Thanks for the clear-up. I can certain see the CP’s stance on this issue. I’ve move away from the right on several issues, but always kept a pro-life stance (though…not one like Mr. “Pro-Life” up there in Idaho.)

While it’s a stretch to think that abortion will be banned nationally anytime soon, a state by stae thing may be approaching in the near future. I look toward states like Idaho and Wyoming first.

]]> by: Mike N. http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/11/brads-interview-with-pro-life-part-1/#comment-92661 Thu, 11 Jan 2007 21:23:52 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/11/brads-interview-with-pro-life-part-1/#comment-92661 Don't give Hacker any ideas... the next thing you know he will be changing his name to "L Ron Hacker" or perhaps "God"? Don’t give Hacker any ideas… the next thing you know he will be changing his name to “L Ron Hacker” or perhaps “God”?

]]> by: Trent Hill http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/11/brads-interview-with-pro-life-part-1/#comment-92660 Thu, 11 Jan 2007 21:20:55 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/11/brads-interview-with-pro-life-part-1/#comment-92660 No,it doesnt. The CP advocates states rights (and indeed individual an community rights also). The CP believes that Abortion is murder. Let me ask you this. If in Florida they passed a law which said you could kill someone as long as they had over $100 on their person. Would/should the federal government stand by idly and allow this to happen? Absolutely not. Because it is the purpose of the government to protect human life. This is included in the Constitution,and therefor applies Federally. No,it doesnt.
The CP advocates states rights (and indeed individual an community rights also). The CP believes that Abortion is murder.
Let me ask you this.
If in Florida they passed a law which said you could kill someone as long as they had over $100 on their person. Would/should the federal government stand by idly and allow this to happen?
Absolutely not. Because it is the purpose of the government to protect human life. This is included in the Constitution,and therefor applies Federally.

]]> by: Anthony Distler http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/11/brads-interview-with-pro-life-part-1/#comment-92652 Thu, 11 Jan 2007 20:58:21 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/11/brads-interview-with-pro-life-part-1/#comment-92652 So, wait. The Constitution Party is saying that we should shrink the government and it's control? And yet...the government should ban abortions? Doesn't that contridict itself? So, wait. The Constitution Party is saying that we should shrink the government and it’s control? And yet…the government should ban abortions? Doesn’t that contridict itself?

]]> by: Trent Hill http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/11/brads-interview-with-pro-life-part-1/#comment-92650 Thu, 11 Jan 2007 20:55:19 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/11/brads-interview-with-pro-life-part-1/#comment-92650 Which party Timothy? The CP has more at stake than JUST pro-life stances. While we CPers believe it is a vital plank of the platform,you can't stand on one plank of wood for long. You need infrastructure, you need support. You need other planks. It is argueable that within the CP, shrinking governmnt is the largest plank. I would make that arguement, because the majority of issues raised are about that very subject. As for Mr. Marvin, he seems to have the best interest of babies in mind, but he is going about it all wrong. I'd prefer we don't interview guys whom are QUITE this crazy and bigoted anymore. Which party Timothy?
The CP has more at stake than JUST pro-life stances. While we CPers believe it is a vital plank of the platform,you can’t stand on one plank of wood for long. You need infrastructure, you need support. You need other planks. It is argueable that within the CP, shrinking governmnt is the largest plank. I would make that arguement, because the majority of issues raised are about that very subject.

As for Mr. Marvin, he seems to have the best interest of babies in mind, but he is going about it all wrong. I’d prefer we don’t interview guys whom are QUITE this crazy and bigoted anymore.

]]> by: Timothy West http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/11/brads-interview-with-pro-life-part-1/#comment-92636 Thu, 11 Jan 2007 20:03:33 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/11/brads-interview-with-pro-life-part-1/#comment-92636 Why not just rename it The Anti-Abortion Party and be done with it? Why not just rename it The Anti-Abortion Party and be done with it?

]]> by: Chris Campbell http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/11/brads-interview-with-pro-life-part-1/#comment-92633 Thu, 11 Jan 2007 20:00:13 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/11/brads-interview-with-pro-life-part-1/#comment-92633 The Constitution Party did NOT compromise on the Pro-life platform, we merely stated that the errant views of a few in the Nevada CP were no reason to kick out the entire Party. We hope that the Nevada membership-which is solely responsible for choosing their leaders-will be more prudential in the future. In the meantime, we will continue to plod forward. The whole Nevda fight is more over a select few wishing to weed the CP of the Mormons, which Mr. Richardson shows us- from his self-serving interview,-that he has reall problems with. At Tampa, Mr. Richardson coldly told the rest of us that anyone not voting with the self described "exposer of crooks and liars" were Pro-choice and pro-baby killers. Many of those he maligned were long time fighters for Pro-life. I my self stood w/Randy Terry and marched in the snow of Washington D.C. The reason I left the GOP and to the CP was precisely due to Bush campaigning for Specter and Cheney smoozing it up w/Pro-lifers on the other side of PA. As we see, Mr. Richardson-good fellow he I am sure is-is rather tossed to and fro. As we see: TPW: Who did you vote for United States Senate last time? Why? Pro-life: I did not vote for Mike Crapo. He ran unopposed in 2004. I was going to run in that race but I ignored my conscience and God’s promptings Mr. Richardson is not so hard core. The Constitution Party did NOT compromise on the Pro-life platform, we merely stated that the errant views of a few in the Nevada CP were no reason to kick out the entire Party. We hope that the Nevada membership-which is solely responsible for choosing their leaders-will be more prudential in the future.

In the meantime, we will continue to plod forward. The whole Nevda fight is more over a select few wishing to weed the CP of the Mormons, which Mr. Richardson shows us- from his self-serving interview,-that he has reall problems with.

At Tampa, Mr. Richardson coldly told the rest of us that anyone not voting with the self described “exposer of crooks and liars” were Pro-choice and pro-baby killers.

Many of those he maligned were long time fighters for Pro-life. I my self stood w/Randy Terry and marched in the snow of Washington D.C. The reason I left the GOP and to the CP was precisely due to Bush campaigning for Specter and Cheney smoozing it up w/Pro-lifers on the other side of PA.

As we see, Mr. Richardson-good fellow he I am sure is-is rather tossed to and fro. As we see:

TPW: Who did you vote for United States Senate last time? Why?

Pro-life: I did not vote for Mike Crapo. He ran unopposed in 2004. I was going to run in that race but I ignored my conscience and God’s promptings

Mr. Richardson is not so hard core.

]]> by: Anthony Distler http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/11/brads-interview-with-pro-life-part-1/#comment-92618 Thu, 11 Jan 2007 19:27:58 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/11/brads-interview-with-pro-life-part-1/#comment-92618 The guy legally changed his name to "Pro-Life". I don't take much of what he says seriously. If the Constitution Party is calling him a nut, then I'm staying as far away from this guy as physically possible. The guy legally changed his name to “Pro-Life”. I don’t take much of what he says seriously.

If the Constitution Party is calling him a nut, then I’m staying as far away from this guy as physically possible.

]]> by: Citizens For A Better Veterans Home[s] http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/11/brads-interview-with-pro-life-part-1/#comment-92601 Thu, 11 Jan 2007 18:48:54 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/11/brads-interview-with-pro-life-part-1/#comment-92601 Thx for the interview [literally: internal vision] and yet another example of the insanity of mixing religion and public administration...... Plz, every one, protect our personal spiritual base by keeping public policy away from home and temple and keep church away from politics! If human life truly begins at conception -----why is his family not counselling women of child bearing age out side of pubs and bars not to smoke tobacco, over indulge on alcohol, and take street drugs? Looking for fakers and decievers? Try the mirror, Bud, try the mirror! [Especially your Do Nothin Abused Veterans stances ---no better than the Democans or Republicrats.....Pure Hypocricy!] Thx for the interview [literally: internal vision] and yet another example of the insanity of mixing religion and public administration…...

Plz, every one, protect our personal spiritual base by keeping public policy away from home and temple and keep church away from politics!

If human life truly begins at conception——-why is his family not counselling women of child bearing age out side of pubs and bars not to smoke tobacco, over indulge on alcohol, and take street drugs?

Looking for fakers and decievers? Try the mirror, Bud, try the mirror!

[Especially your Do Nothin Abused Veterans stances—-no better than the Democans or Republicrats…..Pure Hypocricy!]

]]>