<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FSP Hits 1,000 &#8220;Early Movers&#8221;</title>
	<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/24/fsp-hits-1000-early-movers/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 00:50:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: car electric kid riding</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/24/fsp-hits-1000-early-movers/#comment-146704</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 02:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/24/fsp-hits-1000-early-movers/#comment-146704</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;car electric kid riding&lt;/strong&gt;

Technologies of car electric kid riding</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><strong>car electric kid riding</strong></p>
	<p>Technologies of car electric kid riding</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: matt</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/24/fsp-hits-1000-early-movers/#comment-101486</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 23:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/24/fsp-hits-1000-early-movers/#comment-101486</guid>
					<description>Speaking of modest ankles, isn't Bob Jones University in SC?

It seems like there's some good looking Baptist girls walking around this country, but that's just an educated guess. No way to find out for sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Speaking of modest ankles, isn&#8217;t Bob Jones University in SC?</p>
	<p>It seems like there&#8217;s some good looking Baptist girls walking around this country, but that&#8217;s just an educated guess. No way to find out for sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Trent Hill</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/24/fsp-hits-1000-early-movers/#comment-101055</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 06:57:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/24/fsp-hits-1000-early-movers/#comment-101055</guid>
					<description>NO MORE WEARING SHORTS! ANKLES ARE IN THE NAUGHTY ZONE!

lol.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><span class="caps">NO MORE WEARING SHORTS</span>! ANKLES <span class="caps">ARE IN THE NAUGHTY ZONE</span>!</p>
	<p>lol.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Andy</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/24/fsp-hits-1000-early-movers/#comment-101046</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 06:35:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/24/fsp-hits-1000-early-movers/#comment-101046</guid>
					<description>&quot;matt Says: 

January 25th, 2007 at 12:08 pm 
If anyone in central Ohio is interested in starting an eccleisiocracy, just call me. I’ll personally help you pack your bags for South Carolina.&quot;

Just don't send them to Myrtle Beach.  Those party poopers will take away stuff that makes that town fun.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>&#8220;matt Says:</p>
	<p>January 25th, 2007 at 12:08 pm<br />
If anyone in central Ohio is interested in starting an eccleisiocracy, just call me. I&#8217;ll personally help you pack your bags for South Carolina.&#8221;</p>
	<p>Just don&#8217;t send them to Myrtle Beach.  Those party poopers will take away stuff that makes that town fun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Trent Hill</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/24/fsp-hits-1000-early-movers/#comment-100326</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 05:40:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/24/fsp-hits-1000-early-movers/#comment-100326</guid>
					<description>LOL. Nice Matt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><span class="caps">LOL</span>. Nice Matt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: matt</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/24/fsp-hits-1000-early-movers/#comment-99841</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 16:08:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/24/fsp-hits-1000-early-movers/#comment-99841</guid>
					<description>If anyone in central Ohio is interested in starting an eccleisiocracy, just call me. I'll personally help you pack your bags for South Carolina. I can come on short notice and even bring my own masking tape and bubble wrap. Also, it would be nice if you'd help repeal those stupid sunday liquor laws before you go.

All of this is said in the Spirit of Christian Love...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>If anyone in central Ohio is interested in starting an eccleisiocracy, just call me. I&#8217;ll personally help you pack your bags for South Carolina. I can come on short notice and even bring my own masking tape and bubble wrap. Also, it would be nice if you&#8217;d help repeal those stupid sunday liquor laws before you go.</p>
	<p>All of this is said in the Spirit of Christian Love&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Cody Quirk</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/24/fsp-hits-1000-early-movers/#comment-99531</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 09:26:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/24/fsp-hits-1000-early-movers/#comment-99531</guid>
					<description>Good luck, FSP.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Good luck, <span class="caps">FSP</span>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Trent Hill</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/24/fsp-hits-1000-early-movers/#comment-99397</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 06:57:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/24/fsp-hits-1000-early-movers/#comment-99397</guid>
					<description>Christian Exodus will probably be largely maginalized though, due to the large population of South Carolina. While South Carolina is a VERY conservative state, im not sure the influx of &quot;christian immigrants&quot; will make any difference. They would need more than 20,000 to positively affect elections.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Christian Exodus will probably be largely maginalized though, due to the large population of South Carolina. While South Carolina is a <span class="caps">VERY</span> conservative state, im not sure the influx of &#8220;christian immigrants&#8221; will make any difference. They would need more than 20,000 to positively affect elections.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Cody Quirk</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/24/fsp-hits-1000-early-movers/#comment-99344</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 05:44:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/24/fsp-hits-1000-early-movers/#comment-99344</guid>
					<description>I think it is wise for Christian Exodus to operate independently from any political party, although they still clearly state on their website that they are happy to work with members of the CP and share many of their principles. If Tampa changed that, then they haven’t said so that I can tell.

=Agreed.

If you mean ecclesiocracy, which people often do when they say theocracy, then CE is very adamant that they do not seek that. Freedom of all South Carolinians to practice or not practice Christianity is one of their expressed values. If you literally mean theocracy – God rules – then I would argue that an omnipotent God either does or doesn’t rule, regardless of the form of government.

=Actually I think you're right, they don't look as extreme as TAV, neither do they sound the same in their language. But I don't know what they think, so I'm not jumping to conclusions on this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I think it is wise for Christian Exodus to operate independently from any political party, although they still clearly state on their website that they are happy to work with members of the CP and share many of their principles. If Tampa changed that, then they haven&#8217;t said so that I can tell.</p>
	<p>=Agreed.</p>
	<p>If you mean ecclesiocracy, which people often do when they say theocracy, then CE is very adamant that they do not seek that. Freedom of all South Carolinians to practice or not practice Christianity is one of their expressed values. If you literally mean theocracy &#8211; God rules &#8211; then I would argue that an omnipotent God either does or doesn&#8217;t rule, regardless of the form of government.</p>
	<p>=Actually I think you&#8217;re right, they don&#8217;t look as extreme as <span class="caps">TAV</span>, neither do they sound the same in their language. But I don&#8217;t know what they think, so I&#8217;m not jumping to conclusions on this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: RWR</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/24/fsp-hits-1000-early-movers/#comment-99300</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 04:50:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/24/fsp-hits-1000-early-movers/#comment-99300</guid>
					<description>I think it is wise for Christian Exodus to operate independently from any political party, although they still clearly state on their website that they are happy to work with members of the CP and share many of their principles. If Tampa changed that, then they haven't said so that I can tell.

&lt;i&gt;CQ: &quot;Christian Exodus seeks to turn SC govenment into a Christian-oriented one, perhaps into a theocracy?&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

If you mean ecclesiocracy, which people often do when they say theocracy, then CE is very adamant that they do not seek that. Freedom of all South Carolinians to practice or not practice Christianity is one of their expressed values. If you literally mean theocracy – &lt;i&gt;God rules&lt;/i&gt; – then I would argue that an omnipotent God either does or doesn't rule, regardless of the form of government.

Congratulations to the FSP for reaching that landmark, and to CE for being on its way to doing the same. I think both are fine ideas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I think it is wise for Christian Exodus to operate independently from any political party, although they still clearly state on their website that they are happy to work with members of the CP and share many of their principles. If Tampa changed that, then they haven&#8217;t said so that I can tell.</p>
	<p><i>CQ: &#8220;Christian Exodus seeks to turn SC govenment into a Christian-oriented one, perhaps into a theocracy?&#8221;</i></p>
	<p>If you mean ecclesiocracy, which people often do when they say theocracy, then CE is very adamant that they do not seek that. Freedom of all South Carolinians to practice or not practice Christianity is one of their expressed values. If you literally mean theocracy &#8211; <i>God rules</i> &#8211; then I would argue that an omnipotent God either does or doesn&#8217;t rule, regardless of the form of government.</p>
	<p>Congratulations to the <span class="caps">FSP</span> for reaching that landmark, and to CE for being on its way to doing the same. I think both are fine ideas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Cody Quirk</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/24/fsp-hits-1000-early-movers/#comment-99255</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 04:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/24/fsp-hits-1000-early-movers/#comment-99255</guid>
					<description>-Although I think they may have distanced themselves from the CP after the Tampa meeting, I'm not sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>-Although I think they may have distanced themselves from the CP after the Tampa meeting, I&#8217;m not sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Cody Quirk</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/24/fsp-hits-1000-early-movers/#comment-99242</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 04:12:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/24/fsp-hits-1000-early-movers/#comment-99242</guid>
					<description>=Christian Exodus.

-Nope, doesn't relate to the CP at all, though they do sympatheize with the Party. 
My opinion was we should move to a state and turn it into the model government that our founding fathers invisioned. Christian Exodus seeks to turn SC govenment into a Christian-oriented one, perhaps into a theocracy?

But I wouldn't be suprised if some of the CP'ers support it. Especially in the South.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>=Christian Exodus.</p>
	<p>-Nope, doesn&#8217;t relate to the CP at all, though they do sympatheize with the Party.<br />
My opinion was we should move to a state and turn it into the model government that our founding fathers invisioned. Christian Exodus seeks to turn SC govenment into a Christian-oriented one, perhaps into a theocracy?</p>
	<p>But I wouldn&#8217;t be suprised if some of the CP&#8217;ers support it. Especially in the South.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: torah</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/24/fsp-hits-1000-early-movers/#comment-99183</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 03:06:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/24/fsp-hits-1000-early-movers/#comment-99183</guid>
					<description>Cody, don't you Constitution Partyers have that out in South Carolina? Project exodus it was called?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Cody, don&#8217;t you Constitution Partyers have that out in South Carolina? Project exodus it was called?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Cody Quirk</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/24/fsp-hits-1000-early-movers/#comment-99174</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 02:55:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/24/fsp-hits-1000-early-movers/#comment-99174</guid>
					<description>Hmmmm,

I wonder if we, or I, should start a CSP (Constitutionalist State Project).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Hmmmm,</p>
	<p>I wonder if we, or I, should start a <span class="caps">CSP </span>(Constitutionalist State Project).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Seth Cohn</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/24/fsp-hits-1000-early-movers/#comment-99148</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 02:20:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/24/fsp-hits-1000-early-movers/#comment-99148</guid>
					<description>Torah: false rumor.  Didn't happen.  At the very end, some people were paid to make phone calls, and some paid mailings went out, but NO ONE was paid to sign, and in fact, some (50+?) false signers (phony emails, etc) were removed right toward the end, to ensure that we had 1000 real people signed up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Torah: false rumor.  Didn&#8217;t happen.  At the very end, some people were paid to make phone calls, and some paid mailings went out, but <span class="caps">NO ONE</span> was paid to sign, and in fact, some (50+?) false signers (phony emails, etc) were removed right toward the end, to ensure that we had 1000 real people signed up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
