<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Badnarik Debt Now $15,000</title>
	<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/25/badnarik-debt-now-15000/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 16:59:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Trent Hill</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/25/badnarik-debt-now-15000/#comment-105684</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 05:32:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/25/badnarik-debt-now-15000/#comment-105684</guid>
					<description>Don't you mean money to unwisely spend on the behalf of a good candidate?
Or do you mean waste?

As for illiteracy. We can read just fine Allen. Can you read your books and explain to us one more time how the dollar-fairy stole Badnarik's funds?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Don&#8217;t you mean money to unwisely spend on the behalf of a good candidate?<br />
Or do you mean waste?</p>
	<p>As for illiteracy. We can read just fine Allen. Can you read your books and explain to us one more time how the dollar-fairy stole Badnarik&#8217;s funds?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Allen Hacker</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/25/badnarik-debt-now-15000/#comment-105620</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 03:18:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/25/badnarik-debt-now-15000/#comment-105620</guid>
					<description>Illiteracy and innumeracy--so much of you in so few.

If you can't discern the message and have to clasp onto a single phrase just so you can manufacture some babble; if you have to dick around with someone's name because you don't have anything substantial to say; if you want to scream &quot;apples&quot; over and over when the answer is &quot;oranges&quot;: you will do what you will do.

Anyway, the fun has run out for now, this thread has slipped into the previous posts section, and I have money to count.

Until next time, kids.

-0-</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Illiteracy and innumeracy&#8212;so much of you in so few.</p>
	<p>If you can&#8217;t discern the message and have to clasp onto a single phrase just so you can manufacture some babble; if you have to dick around with someone&#8217;s name because you don&#8217;t have anything substantial to say; if you want to scream &#8220;apples&#8221; over and over when the answer is &#8220;oranges&#8221;: you will do what you will do.</p>
	<p>Anyway, the fun has run out for now, this thread has slipped into the previous posts section, and I have money to count.</p>
	<p>Until next time, kids.</p>
	<p><del>0</del></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: John Brown</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/25/badnarik-debt-now-15000/#comment-105527</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 00:28:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/25/badnarik-debt-now-15000/#comment-105527</guid>
					<description>Everything you need to know about Alien Hacker is contained within the first four letters of his last name. 

What is his worth to any campaign?

-0-</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Everything you need to know about Alien Hacker is contained within the first four letters of his last name.</p>
	<p>What is his worth to any campaign?</p>
	<p><del>0</del></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Trent Hill</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/25/badnarik-debt-now-15000/#comment-105451</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 22:51:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/25/badnarik-debt-now-15000/#comment-105451</guid>
					<description>Oh, and 5 people? Austin would probably take offense to that. 
Considering 214 people voted for the Libertarian Poll, I dont see &quot;five&quot; as being a legitimate number.
If this is an example of how your gross miscalculations could mess up a campaign, it is indeed a good one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Oh, and 5 people? Austin would probably take offense to that.<br />
Considering 214 people voted for the Libertarian Poll, I dont see &#8220;five&#8221; as being a legitimate number.<br />
If this is an example of how your gross miscalculations could mess up a campaign, it is indeed a good one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Trent Hill</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/25/badnarik-debt-now-15000/#comment-105285</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 19:04:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/25/badnarik-debt-now-15000/#comment-105285</guid>
					<description>OHk. Hacker,

The fact that people are still donating to get you out of the hole proves nothing. All it means is that well-meaning libertarians are losing their money. I like Badnarik, and im glad he's being bailed out. However, I hope you dont see a dime.

Also, nothing in the archives EXPLAINS anything. It is full of excuses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>OHk. Hacker,</p>
	<p>The fact that people are still donating to get you out of the hole proves nothing. All it means is that well-meaning libertarians are losing their money. I like Badnarik, and im glad he&#8217;s being bailed out. However, I hope you dont see a dime.</p>
	<p>Also, nothing in the archives <span class="caps">EXPLAINS</span> anything. It is full of excuses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Rob</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/25/badnarik-debt-now-15000/#comment-105205</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 15:26:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/25/badnarik-debt-now-15000/#comment-105205</guid>
					<description>Seriously, Hacker, can you name ONE Libertatian campaign with worse stats then yours?

Or maybe I should let one of your *many* supporters do the spinning... :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Seriously, Hacker, can you name <span class="caps">ONE </span>Libertatian campaign with worse stats then yours?</p>
	<p>Or maybe I should let one of your <strong>many</strong> supporters do the spinning&#8230; <img src='http://thirdpartywatch.com/wp-images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Allen Hacker</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/25/badnarik-debt-now-15000/#comment-105046</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 08:53:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/25/badnarik-debt-now-15000/#comment-105046</guid>
					<description>Trent,

Don't posture.  If you've read the archives, you know why I haven't posted my analysis yet, and you should know better than to re-ask questions about that which have already been answered more than once.

Seriously.  How is it you presume to know what everyone thinks?  You don't, you know.

Here's a little hint.  We got contributions in the mail today from more people than all combined on this blog who post against me.

Little wonder I'm not concerned with your opinion.  Your everyone is a tiny closed group.

What IS the sound of 5 guys echoing nothing among themselves?

-0-</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Trent,</p>
	<p>Don&#8217;t posture.  If you&#8217;ve read the archives, you know why I haven&#8217;t posted my analysis yet, and you should know better than to re-ask questions about that which have already been answered more than once.</p>
	<p>Seriously.  How is it you presume to know what everyone thinks?  You don&#8217;t, you know.</p>
	<p>Here&#8217;s a little hint.  We got contributions in the mail today from more people than all combined on this blog who post against me.</p>
	<p>Little wonder I&#8217;m not concerned with your opinion.  Your everyone is a tiny closed group.</p>
	<p>What IS the sound of 5 guys echoing nothing among themselves?</p>
	<p><del>0</del></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Trent Hill</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/25/badnarik-debt-now-15000/#comment-104990</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 06:16:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/25/badnarik-debt-now-15000/#comment-104990</guid>
					<description>I'd have to agree Rob. Maybe we could contact Guiness?
I mean,the idea of an LIBERTARIAN candidate spending 52$ a vote is just....insane.

Hacker,

I have read the archives, quite thoroughly. And I, like everyone else who has read ANYTHING about you, still am not convinced.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I&#8217;d have to agree Rob. Maybe we could contact Guiness?<br />
I mean,the idea of an <span class="caps">LIBERTARIAN</span> candidate spending 52$ a vote is just&#8230;.insane.</p>
	<p>Hacker,</p>
	<p>I have read the archives, quite thoroughly. And I, like everyone else who has read <span class="caps">ANYTHING</span> about you, still am not convinced.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Allen Hacker</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/25/badnarik-debt-now-15000/#comment-104961</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 05:18:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/25/badnarik-debt-now-15000/#comment-104961</guid>
					<description>Rob,

It concerns me to see you so comfortable there in that void.

-0-</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Rob,</p>
	<p>It concerns me to see you so comfortable there in that void.</p>
	<p><del>0</del></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Rob</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/25/badnarik-debt-now-15000/#comment-104701</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 00:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/25/badnarik-debt-now-15000/#comment-104701</guid>
					<description>Does anyone know of a Libertarian campaign that actually did *worse* than the Hacker debacle?

$400,000 raised, 4% vote, 7000-some-odd votes; that's gotta be some sort of record.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Does anyone know of a Libertarian campaign that actually did <strong>worse</strong> than the Hacker debacle?</p>
	<p>$400,000 raised, 4% vote, 7000-some-odd votes; that&#8217;s gotta be some sort of record.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Allen Hacker</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/25/badnarik-debt-now-15000/#comment-104545</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 21:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/25/badnarik-debt-now-15000/#comment-104545</guid>
					<description>Rob,

Obviously there are other ways to do that.  But apparently, your imagination runs only along certain channels.

-0-</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Rob,</p>
	<p>Obviously there are other ways to do that.  But apparently, your imagination runs only along certain channels.</p>
	<p><del>0</del></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Allen Hacker</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/25/badnarik-debt-now-15000/#comment-104543</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 20:59:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/25/badnarik-debt-now-15000/#comment-104543</guid>
					<description>Trent,

You realy know how to make a guy think you're worth talking to.

As for your question, &quot;Why...?&quot; --Asked and answered.  Read the archives.

-0-</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Trent,</p>
	<p>You realy know how to make a guy think you&#8217;re worth talking to.</p>
	<p>As for your question, &#8220;Why&#8230;?&#8221;&#8212;Asked and answered.  Read the archives.</p>
	<p><del>0</del></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Rob</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/25/badnarik-debt-now-15000/#comment-104450</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 18:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/25/badnarik-debt-now-15000/#comment-104450</guid>
					<description>Wow, so Hacker actually spent about $52 PER VOTE, while the Democrat spent about $1 per vote?!?!  That's amazing.

If there was a Campaigns &amp;#38; Elections magazine Hall of Shame issue, Hacker would be on the front cover.

To do that poorly, you'd expect the candidate was a convicted child molester or something - and the campaign manager went around and advertised that fact.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Wow, so Hacker actually spent about $52 <span class="caps">PER VOTE</span>, while the Democrat spent about $1 per vote?<img src="?" alt="" border="0" />  That&#8217;s amazing.</p>
	<p>If there was a Campaigns &#038; Elections magazine Hall of Shame issue, Hacker would be on the front cover.</p>
	<p>To do that poorly, you&#8217;d expect the candidate was a convicted child molester or something &#8211; and the campaign manager went around and advertised that fact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Trent Hill</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/25/badnarik-debt-now-15000/#comment-104419</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 18:04:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/25/badnarik-debt-now-15000/#comment-104419</guid>
					<description>Allen,

L. Ron Hubbard says you're crazy.
Tom Cruise pales in comparison.
Why don't you release a detailed budgetary outline for the Badnarik campaign? Volunteer to be audited. This would satisfy libertarian activists and donors,and would provide transparency on the issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Allen,</p>
	<p>L. Ron Hubbard says you&#8217;re crazy.<br />
Tom Cruise pales in comparison.<br />
Why don&#8217;t you release a detailed budgetary outline for the Badnarik campaign? Volunteer to be audited. This would satisfy libertarian activists and donors,and would provide transparency on the issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Allen Hacker</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/25/badnarik-debt-now-15000/#comment-104128</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 07:04:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/25/badnarik-debt-now-15000/#comment-104128</guid>
					<description>Trent,

The quality of your attempts at communication is appalling.

Why would I care what you think?

-0-</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Trent,</p>
	<p>The quality of your attempts at communication is appalling.</p>
	<p>Why would I care what you think?</p>
	<p><del>0</del></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
