<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Senate Bill Aims to Relieve Jore&#8217;s Debt</title>
	<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/31/senate-bill-aims-to-relieve-jores-debt/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 19:54:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Yosemite1967</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/31/senate-bill-aims-to-relieve-jores-debt/#comment-106867</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2007 21:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/31/senate-bill-aims-to-relieve-jores-debt/#comment-106867</guid>
					<description>Ah, 1-1/2 out o' 2--not too bad.  :^)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Ah, 1-1/2 out o&#8217; 2&#8212;not too bad.  :^)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: undercover_anarchist</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/31/senate-bill-aims-to-relieve-jores-debt/#comment-106721</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2007 17:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/31/senate-bill-aims-to-relieve-jores-debt/#comment-106721</guid>
					<description>28 years old
Public high school
Catholic university... Where I became an atheist...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>28 years old<br />
Public high school<br />
Catholic university&#8230; Where I became an atheist&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Yosemite1967</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/31/senate-bill-aims-to-relieve-jores-debt/#comment-106134</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 23:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/31/senate-bill-aims-to-relieve-jores-debt/#comment-106134</guid>
					<description>P.S.  I agree that HB 52 is a better alternative (having those who brought the suit pay their own expenses).  I would even say that SB 117 is immoral, because when you make the state pay, you're not teaching the state government any lessons--you're merely authorizing the state government to take the money by force from innocent people who had nothing to do with the controversy.

Consult the history of Davey Crockett in congress for more on using the government for charity.  Like I always say, &quot;It's uncharitable to be charitable with other people's money.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>P.S.  I agree that <span class="caps">HB 52</span> is a better alternative (having those who brought the suit pay their own expenses).  I would even say that <span class="caps">SB 117</span> is immoral, because when you make the state pay, you&#8217;re not teaching the state government any lessons&#8212;you&#8217;re merely authorizing the state government to take the money by force from innocent people who had nothing to do with the controversy.</p>
	<p>Consult the history of Davey Crockett in congress for more on using the government for charity.  Like I always say, &#8220;It&#8217;s uncharitable to be charitable with other people&#8217;s money.&#8221; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Yosemite1967</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/31/senate-bill-aims-to-relieve-jores-debt/#comment-106131</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 23:26:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/31/senate-bill-aims-to-relieve-jores-debt/#comment-106131</guid>
					<description>I'm taking bets on undercover_anarchist being under 30 years old and being educated by the government.

Any takers?

How about with three-to-one odds?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I&#8217;m taking bets on undercover_anarchist being under 30 years old and being educated by the government.</p>
	<p>Any takers?</p>
	<p>How about with three-to-one odds?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Chris</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/31/senate-bill-aims-to-relieve-jores-debt/#comment-106075</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 20:53:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/31/senate-bill-aims-to-relieve-jores-debt/#comment-106075</guid>
					<description>Anarchist, I have met Jore and found him to be something you are not and probably never will be:
1. Gentleman
2. Kind
3. Moral
4. Clean Thinking
5. Clean talking
6. Fair and Honest
7. Without Calumny
8. Without Guile
9.Educated
10. Prosperous
11. Faith Filled
12. Knowledgeable on Issues


You could, if you did not have filthy sex on the brain and general stupidity, be like him....but you instead would prefer to waddle in the gutter and the slime.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Anarchist, I have met Jore and found him to be something you are not and probably never will be:<br />
1. Gentleman<br />
2. Kind<br />
3. Moral<br />
4. Clean Thinking<br />
5. Clean talking<br />
6. Fair and Honest<br />
7. Without Calumny<br />
8. Without Guile<br />
9.Educated<br />
10. Prosperous<br />
11. Faith Filled<br />
12. Knowledgeable on Issues</p>
	<p>You could, if you did not have filthy sex on the brain and general stupidity, be like him&#8230;.but you instead would prefer to waddle in the gutter and the slime.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: John Brown</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/31/senate-bill-aims-to-relieve-jores-debt/#comment-105945</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 17:18:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/31/senate-bill-aims-to-relieve-jores-debt/#comment-105945</guid>
					<description>Why not? Bob Barr made his ex-wife get one. 

The multiple time married author of the &quot;Defense of Marriage&quot; act is now on the Libertarian National Committee and may be their next presidential candidate, despite his denials.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Why not? Bob Barr made his ex-wife get one.</p>
	<p>The multiple time married author of the &#8220;Defense of Marriage&#8221; act is now on the Libertarian National Committee and may be their next presidential candidate, despite his denials.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: undercover_anarchist</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/31/senate-bill-aims-to-relieve-jores-debt/#comment-105633</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 03:51:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/31/senate-bill-aims-to-relieve-jores-debt/#comment-105633</guid>
					<description>Yay, welfare for Jore! I bet if his daughter had sex with a Negro of Chinaman, he would seek a state-funded abortion, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Yay, welfare for Jore! I bet if his daughter had sex with a Negro of Chinaman, he would seek a state-funded abortion, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Joey Dauben</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/31/senate-bill-aims-to-relieve-jores-debt/#comment-104915</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 03:43:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/31/senate-bill-aims-to-relieve-jores-debt/#comment-104915</guid>
					<description>Btw, didn't some of you guys say that Jore's district is heavily militia or something? It'd be interesting to get an analysis of his district for TPW, that way you folks could &quot;see&quot; for yourself, &quot;okay what will it take to get elected in a district like this,&quot; etc., etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Btw, didn&#8217;t some of you guys say that Jore&#8217;s district is heavily militia or something? It&#8217;d be interesting to get an analysis of his district for <span class="caps">TPW</span>, that way you folks could &#8220;see&#8221; for yourself, &#8220;okay what will it take to get elected in a district like this,&#8221; etc., etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Joey Dauben</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/31/senate-bill-aims-to-relieve-jores-debt/#comment-104912</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 03:42:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/31/senate-bill-aims-to-relieve-jores-debt/#comment-104912</guid>
					<description>I'm excited to read that Jore is being taken seriously and being a respected member of the House.

Of course, that might have to do with him holding the balance, ya know?

Or maybe because he was a former Republican, but still, it's not like the media hackjob on Ventura when he won.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I&#8217;m excited to read that Jore is being taken seriously and being a respected member of the House.</p>
	<p>Of course, that might have to do with him holding the balance, ya know?</p>
	<p>Or maybe because he was a former Republican, but still, it&#8217;s not like the media hackjob on Ventura when he won.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Chris</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/31/senate-bill-aims-to-relieve-jores-debt/#comment-104573</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 21:39:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/31/senate-bill-aims-to-relieve-jores-debt/#comment-104573</guid>
					<description>Jore's persecution is deplorable, as the state conducted it, the state needs to make it right iwth him. And some heads to roll maybe........</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Jore&#8217;s persecution is deplorable, as the state conducted it, the state needs to make it right iwth him. And some heads to roll maybe&#8230;.....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: RWR</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/31/senate-bill-aims-to-relieve-jores-debt/#comment-104474</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 19:33:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/31/senate-bill-aims-to-relieve-jores-debt/#comment-104474</guid>
					<description>&quot;The bill had only one opponent Monday: Mark Simonich, representing the secretary of state’s office.

Cobb’s bill says the cost will come out of the secretary of state’s budget.

Simonich said the secretary of state shouldn’t have to foot the bill. He said the office supports a different approach contained in HB52, which says that if someone sues to invalidate votes, they have to pay their own legal fees, regardless of the outcome.&quot;

I think that is a much fairer idea, and it passed the House twice a couple of weeks ago, each time with an &quot;aye&quot; from Jore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>&#8220;The bill had only one opponent Monday: Mark Simonich, representing the secretary of state&#8217;s office.</p>
	<p>Cobb&#8217;s bill says the cost will come out of the secretary of state&#8217;s budget.</p>
	<p>Simonich said the secretary of state shouldn&#8217;t have to foot the bill. He said the office supports a different approach contained in <span class="caps">HB52</span>, which says that if someone sues to invalidate votes, they have to pay their own legal fees, regardless of the outcome.&#8221;</p>
	<p>I think that is a much fairer idea, and it passed the House twice a couple of weeks ago, each time with an &#8220;aye&#8221; from Jore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Trent Hill</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/31/senate-bill-aims-to-relieve-jores-debt/#comment-104382</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:41:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/31/senate-bill-aims-to-relieve-jores-debt/#comment-104382</guid>
					<description>Joe, we agree for once. The Republican's idea is great, but not perfect.
Although,usually, the taxpayers would pay anyways.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Joe, we agree for once. The Republican&#8217;s idea is great, but not perfect.<br />
Although,usually, the taxpayers would pay anyways.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Joe</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/31/senate-bill-aims-to-relieve-jores-debt/#comment-104361</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:04:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/01/31/senate-bill-aims-to-relieve-jores-debt/#comment-104361</guid>
					<description>It will be interesting to see how Jore votes on this bill.  I think he definitely got a raw deal and shouldn't have to pay it, but I don't think the tax payers should foot the bill either.  A better one would be to require the person who brings the suit to pay the cost.  Or would that make too much sense?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>It will be interesting to see how Jore votes on this bill.  I think he definitely got a raw deal and shouldn&#8217;t have to pay it, but I don&#8217;t think the tax payers should foot the bill either.  A better one would be to require the person who brings the suit to pay the cost.  Or would that make too much sense?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
