<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Brad&#8217;s Interview with Dave Roberts</title>
	<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/02/03/brads-interview-with-dave-roberts/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 00:03:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: carpet yoga</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/02/03/brads-interview-with-dave-roberts/#comment-361751</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 19:27:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/02/03/brads-interview-with-dave-roberts/#comment-361751</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;carpet yoga&lt;/strong&gt;

carpet yoga</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><strong>carpet yoga</strong></p>
	<p>carpet yoga</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: betfair bot, betfair horse racing</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/02/03/brads-interview-with-dave-roberts/#comment-358142</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 19:20:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/02/03/brads-interview-with-dave-roberts/#comment-358142</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;betfair bot&lt;/strong&gt;

betfair bot, betfair horse racing</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><strong>betfair bot</strong></p>
	<p>betfair bot, betfair horse racing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: xbox 360 hd dvd</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/02/03/brads-interview-with-dave-roberts/#comment-354992</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 22:03:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/02/03/brads-interview-with-dave-roberts/#comment-354992</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;xbox 360 hd dvd&lt;/strong&gt;

xbox 360 hd dvd</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><strong>xbox 360 hd dvd</strong></p>
	<p>xbox 360 hd dvd</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: crossdresser clothing</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/02/03/brads-interview-with-dave-roberts/#comment-348235</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 18:10:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/02/03/brads-interview-with-dave-roberts/#comment-348235</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;crossdresser clothing&lt;/strong&gt;

crossdresser clothing</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><strong>crossdresser clothing</strong></p>
	<p>crossdresser clothing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Employment Guide and Search</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/02/03/brads-interview-with-dave-roberts/#comment-320346</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 09:42:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/02/03/brads-interview-with-dave-roberts/#comment-320346</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;employment&lt;/strong&gt;

Everything You Always Wanted to Know about Employment &amp;#38; Job Search at http://myemploymentzone.net/employment/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><strong>employment</strong></p>
	<p>Everything You Always Wanted to Know about Employment &#038; Job Search at <a href='http://myemploymentzone.net/employment/' rel='nofollow'>http://myemploymentzone.net/employment/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Third Party Watch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Martinez opponent joins the Constitution Party of Florida</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/02/03/brads-interview-with-dave-roberts/#comment-187538</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2007 14:34:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/02/03/brads-interview-with-dave-roberts/#comment-187538</guid>
					<description>[...] http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/02/03/brads-interview-with-dave-roberts/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>[...] <a href='http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/02/03/brads-interview-with-dave-roberts/' rel='nofollow'>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/02/03/brads-interview-with-dave-roberts/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: matt</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/02/03/brads-interview-with-dave-roberts/#comment-109329</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 17:19:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/02/03/brads-interview-with-dave-roberts/#comment-109329</guid>
					<description>BTW, Dave,

Accusing people of racism isn't usually my style, but I couldn't help but notice the name of your website. Why is it &quot;go home mel&quot;? I can see that perhaps if you didn't want mel to represent you in DC, you might say &quot;come home mel&quot;, or &quot;bring mel home&quot;, even &quot;send mel packing&quot; would be racially neutral. The problem is this: where will you send Mel? It sounds to me like you want him sent &quot;home&quot; to some other country. Advocating the removal of naturalized citizens for racial reasons is 100% racist, and that's also what anyone reading your domain name would think of first. Is this a coincidence or do you actually hold a racial prejuidice against latinos? 

Dave Roberts, do you want US Latino citizens &quot;sent home&quot; to some other country?

Are you happy to accept the support of those who do? 

If you answered yes to either of these questions, you are a racist, and you yourself need to be &quot;sent home&quot;.

Are you happy to have the support of</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><span class="caps">BTW</span>, Dave,</p>
	<p>Accusing people of racism isn&#8217;t usually my style, but I couldn&#8217;t help but notice the name of your website. Why is it &#8220;go home mel&#8221;? I can see that perhaps if you didn&#8217;t want mel to represent you in DC, you might say &#8220;come home mel&#8221;, or &#8220;bring mel home&#8221;, even &#8220;send mel packing&#8221; would be racially neutral. The problem is this: where will you send Mel? It sounds to me like you want him sent &#8220;home&#8221; to some other country. Advocating the removal of naturalized citizens for racial reasons is 100% racist, and that&#8217;s also what anyone reading your domain name would think of first. Is this a coincidence or do you actually hold a racial prejuidice against latinos?</p>
	<p>Dave Roberts, do you want <span class="caps">US </span>Latino citizens &#8220;sent home&#8221; to some other country?</p>
	<p>Are you happy to accept the support of those who do?</p>
	<p>If you answered yes to either of these questions, you are a racist, and you yourself need to be &#8220;sent home&#8221;.</p>
	<p>Are you happy to have the support of</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Joe</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/02/03/brads-interview-with-dave-roberts/#comment-109260</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 16:11:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/02/03/brads-interview-with-dave-roberts/#comment-109260</guid>
					<description>I agree with Matt.  

We will never forget the innocent victims and the brave heroes that died attempting to save them. We will never forget the survivors, the children, the devastated families and the grieving friends they left behind. 

To prevent this kind of tragedy from ever happening again, demand that your elected politicians:

1. Halt our interventionist foreign policy and unravel ourselves from a web of entangling alliances.

2. Reform our disastrous immigration policy which has divided America into a number of hostile and alien sovereignties.

3. Repeal restrictions on the right to keep and bear arms so that the American people can defend themselves - something our government has demonstrated they are incapable or unwilling to do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I agree with Matt.</p>
	<p>We will never forget the innocent victims and the brave heroes that died attempting to save them. We will never forget the survivors, the children, the devastated families and the grieving friends they left behind.</p>
	<p>To prevent this kind of tragedy from ever happening again, demand that your elected politicians:</p>
	<p>1. Halt our interventionist foreign policy and unravel ourselves from a web of entangling alliances.</p>
	<p>2. Reform our disastrous immigration policy which has divided America into a number of hostile and alien sovereignties.</p>
	<p>3. Repeal restrictions on the right to keep and bear arms so that the American people can defend themselves &#8211; something our government has demonstrated they are incapable or unwilling to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Trent Hill</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/02/03/brads-interview-with-dave-roberts/#comment-107916</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 05:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/02/03/brads-interview-with-dave-roberts/#comment-107916</guid>
					<description>Matt. Those words were stolen from my mouth!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Matt. Those words were stolen from my mouth!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: matt</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/02/03/brads-interview-with-dave-roberts/#comment-107875</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 03:59:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/02/03/brads-interview-with-dave-roberts/#comment-107875</guid>
					<description>&lt;i&gt; The war on terror is not something that was ever conceived of by the Founding Fathers. There was no idea that a war would ever have to be declared against a percentage of an extremist religion that are scattered all around the world with no defining flag, uniform or leader.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;

Dave,
The reason why the &quot;war on terror&quot; wasn't concieved by the founding fathers is because it is a misnomer. You can't declare war on a criminal tactic. Also, a lawful nation cannot &quot;declare war&quot; on a group of individuals who commit crimes. If they do so, they are engaging in criminal crimefighting, since war presumes the guilt of the enemy and that guilt has not been legally established. &quot;War on Terrorism&quot; terminology presumes the guilt of the enemy group. If you think that's ok for muslims, I question your consistency. Will you also think it's ok if and when it's done to christians? I doubt it.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><i> The war on terror is not something that was ever conceived of by the Founding Fathers. There was no idea that a war would ever have to be declared against a percentage of an extremist religion that are scattered all around the world with no defining flag, uniform or leader.</i><i></p>
	<p>Dave,<br />
The reason why the &#8220;war on terror&#8221; wasn&#8217;t concieved by the founding fathers is because it is a misnomer. You can&#8217;t declare war on a criminal tactic. Also, a lawful nation cannot &#8220;declare war&#8221; on a group of individuals who commit crimes. If they do so, they are engaging in criminal crimefighting, since war presumes the guilt of the enemy and that guilt has not been legally established. &#8220;War on Terrorism&#8221; terminology presumes the guilt of the enemy group. If you think that&#8217;s ok for muslims, I question your consistency. Will you also think it&#8217;s ok if and when it&#8217;s done to christians? I doubt it.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Dave Roberts</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/02/03/brads-interview-with-dave-roberts/#comment-107835</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 02:55:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/02/03/brads-interview-with-dave-roberts/#comment-107835</guid>
					<description>The comments of Trent and Cutty Sark are indicative of the serious problems we face. The war on terror is not something that was ever conceived of by the Founding Fathers. There was no idea that a war would ever have to be declared against a percentage of an extremist religion that are scattered all around the world with no defining flag, uniform or leader. So what are we to do? Await another attack? I don't think so. And for your information Sark, I am not an immigrant basher, I like immigrants, the ones who take the time and trouble to take the legal course to become citizens. The ones who don't, need to go home.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>The comments of Trent and Cutty Sark are indicative of the serious problems we face. The war on terror is not something that was ever conceived of by the Founding Fathers. There was no idea that a war would ever have to be declared against a percentage of an extremist religion that are scattered all around the world with no defining flag, uniform or leader. So what are we to do? Await another attack? I don&#8217;t think so. And for your information Sark, I am not an immigrant basher, I like immigrants, the ones who take the time and trouble to take the legal course to become citizens. The ones who don&#8217;t, need to go home.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Cutty Sark</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/02/03/brads-interview-with-dave-roberts/#comment-107590</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Feb 2007 21:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/02/03/brads-interview-with-dave-roberts/#comment-107590</guid>
					<description>It's certainly possible for an independent to be worse than a standard corporate party douchebag candidate. 

Think George Wallace for example.

Dave is not just an extreme immigrant basher, he also supports the dangerous National Sales Tax idea, is a big warmonger and is extremely repressive in his social views. Honestly I did not see anything to like. 

It sounds like if he had a crack at the big time he would work to make things even worse than standard issue corporate whore politicians like Martinez, who is at least half decent on immigration for a Republican. 

Not that I would really expect Dave to be close, so I don't expect to really have to cut a douchebag like Martinez a check, but real world politics is 99% damage control.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>It&#8217;s certainly possible for an independent to be worse than a standard corporate party douchebag candidate.</p>
	<p>Think George Wallace for example.</p>
	<p>Dave is not just an extreme immigrant basher, he also supports the dangerous National Sales Tax idea, is a big warmonger and is extremely repressive in his social views. Honestly I did not see anything to like.</p>
	<p>It sounds like if he had a crack at the big time he would work to make things even worse than standard issue corporate whore politicians like Martinez, who is at least half decent on immigration for a Republican.</p>
	<p>Not that I would really expect Dave to be close, so I don&#8217;t expect to really have to cut a douchebag like Martinez a check, but real world politics is 99% damage control.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: matt</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/02/03/brads-interview-with-dave-roberts/#comment-107523</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Feb 2007 19:23:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/02/03/brads-interview-with-dave-roberts/#comment-107523</guid>
					<description>Cutty Sark,
Mel's stance on immigration may make more sense than Dave's (I certainly think so), but everyone wins when outsider candidates are elected. It takes a pretty awful outsider candidate to actually be worse than one of the main-money hogs at the trough presently. Probably a communist or a KKK candidate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Cutty Sark,<br />
Mel&#8217;s stance on immigration may make more sense than Dave&#8217;s (I certainly think so), but everyone wins when outsider candidates are elected. It takes a pretty awful outsider candidate to actually be worse than one of the main-money hogs at the trough presently. Probably a communist or a <span class="caps">KKK</span> candidate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Trent Hill</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/02/03/brads-interview-with-dave-roberts/#comment-107286</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Feb 2007 10:50:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/02/03/brads-interview-with-dave-roberts/#comment-107286</guid>
					<description>Good for you Cutty.

Dick Gray,
Dave Roberts supports NAFTA (but not in its current form). The CP opposes anything like it.
&quot;I voted for George W. Bush because I believed that he would continue the war on terror&quot;
The 'War on Terror' is not sumthin the CP supports.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Good for you Cutty.</p>
	<p>Dick Gray,<br />
Dave Roberts supports <span class="caps">NAFTA </span>(but not in its current form). The CP opposes anything like it.<br />
&#8220;I voted for George W. Bush because I believed that he would continue the war on terror&#8221;<br />
The &#8216;War on Terror&#8217; is not sumthin the CP supports.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Cutty Sark</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/02/03/brads-interview-with-dave-roberts/#comment-107094</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Feb 2007 04:28:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/02/03/brads-interview-with-dave-roberts/#comment-107094</guid>
					<description>I'll send Mel Martinez a donation if Dave starts to look like a serious threat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I&#8217;ll send Mel Martinez a donation if Dave starts to look like a serious threat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
