Comments on: Audio of testimony on Montana House Bill 403 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/02/04/video-of-debate-on-montana-house-bill-403/ Fri, 21 Nov 2008 11:57:16 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1.3 by: Cody Quirk http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/02/04/video-of-debate-on-montana-house-bill-403/#comment-120252 Thu, 22 Feb 2007 11:44:48 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/02/04/video-of-debate-on-montana-house-bill-403/#comment-120252 If someone sponsors legislation that would allow abortion in the cases of rape and incest they are, by definition, pro-abortion. Planned parenthood has supported phony “pro-life” legislation supported by phony “pro-life” groups because they realize that such legislation codifies baby murder into law. =If that's your way of thinking, then abortion will forever be legal because of your selfishness. You can overturn Roe V. Wade, but you can't have it your way pal. If someone sponsors legislation that would allow abortion in the cases of rape and incest they are, by definition, pro-abortion. Planned parenthood has supported phony “pro-life” legislation supported by phony “pro-life” groups because they realize that such legislation codifies baby murder into law.

=If that’s your way of thinking, then abortion will forever be legal because of your selfishness. You can overturn Roe V. Wade, but you can’t have it your way pal.

]]> by: Joe http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/02/04/video-of-debate-on-montana-house-bill-403/#comment-119087 Tue, 20 Feb 2007 16:46:36 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/02/04/video-of-debate-on-montana-house-bill-403/#comment-119087 If someone sponsors legislation that would allow abortion in the cases of rape and incest they are, by definition, pro-abortion. Planned parenthood has supported phony "pro-life" legislation supported by phony "pro-life" groups because they realize that such legislation codifies baby murder into law. If someone sponsors legislation that would allow abortion in the cases of rape and incest they are, by definition, pro-abortion. Planned parenthood has supported phony “pro-life” legislation supported by phony “pro-life” groups because they realize that such legislation codifies baby murder into law.

]]> by: Cody Quirk http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/02/04/video-of-debate-on-montana-house-bill-403/#comment-115514 Fri, 16 Feb 2007 12:41:51 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/02/04/video-of-debate-on-montana-house-bill-403/#comment-115514 ...Oh yeah, and this legislation got defeated. ...Oh yeah, and this legislation got defeated.

]]> by: Cody Quirk http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/02/04/video-of-debate-on-montana-house-bill-403/#comment-115513 Fri, 16 Feb 2007 12:40:27 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/02/04/video-of-debate-on-montana-house-bill-403/#comment-115513 Why would a pro-abort sponsor a bill that saves 97% or 99% of the unborn? I don't think a pro-abortionist would support ANYTHING that's even 1/2 of a percent Pro-Life. Think before you type Joe. Why would a pro-abort sponsor a bill that saves 97% or 99% of the unborn? I don’t think a pro-abortionist would support ANYTHING that’s even 1/2 of a percent Pro-Life. Think before you type Joe.

]]> by: Joe http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/02/04/video-of-debate-on-montana-house-bill-403/#comment-114570 Wed, 14 Feb 2007 18:22:09 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/02/04/video-of-debate-on-montana-house-bill-403/#comment-114570 If pro-aborts sponsor bills that include the rape and incest exceptions we must understand that they are directly attacking the personhood of the child, and the sacredness of all life. If pro-aborts sponsor bills that include the rape and incest exceptions we must understand that they are directly attacking the personhood of the child, and the sacredness of all life.

]]> by: Cody Quirk http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/02/04/video-of-debate-on-montana-house-bill-403/#comment-114375 Wed, 14 Feb 2007 06:50:48 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/02/04/video-of-debate-on-montana-house-bill-403/#comment-114375 Even if such legislation gets defeated time and again and abortion continues as Planned Parenthood laughs at us behind our backs? Even if such legislation gets defeated time and again and abortion continues as Planned Parenthood laughs at us behind our backs?

]]> by: Joe http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/02/04/video-of-debate-on-montana-house-bill-403/#comment-114092 Tue, 13 Feb 2007 12:00:07 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/02/04/video-of-debate-on-montana-house-bill-403/#comment-114092 I think Rick Jore has the right idea. We must continually stand and declare that EVERY child has the right to live-regardless of the circumstances of conception, alleged threat to the mothers health/life, or any other excuse which is raised as to why it is OK to kill children. I think Rick Jore has the right idea. We must continually stand and declare that EVERY child has the right to live-regardless of the circumstances of conception, alleged threat to the mothers health/life, or any other excuse which is raised as to why it is OK to kill children.

]]> by: Cody Quirk http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/02/04/video-of-debate-on-montana-house-bill-403/#comment-114079 Tue, 13 Feb 2007 10:16:05 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/02/04/video-of-debate-on-montana-house-bill-403/#comment-114079 I found a interesting article online... http://wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=54121 I found a interesting article online…

http://wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=54121

]]> by: Kurtis Oliverson http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/02/04/video-of-debate-on-montana-house-bill-403/#comment-108778 Tue, 06 Feb 2007 05:27:27 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/02/04/video-of-debate-on-montana-house-bill-403/#comment-108778 Correcting myself here: They probably got their audio from A. D. Gettis, of "Montana's 3rd Party News", rather than from mine on cpomt.webhop.org. I assumed that it came from mine, because they just happened to name their file exactly the same as I did {HB403.MP3}, caps. 'n' all--great minds think alike, I guess. :^) Anyway, thanks for the link, Brad. I also busted up the MP3 on cpomt.webhop.org today into smaller chunks containing separate main parts of the reading--as follows: 1-Jore's Intro 2-Dr. Johnston's Testimony 3-Other Proponents 4-Opponents 5-Committee Discussion Correcting myself here: They probably got their audio from A. D. Gettis, of “Montana’s 3rd Party News”, rather than from mine on cpomt.webhop.org. I assumed that it came from mine, because they just happened to name their file exactly the same as I did {HB403.MP3}, caps. ‘n’ all—great minds think alike, I guess. :^)

Anyway, thanks for the link, Brad. I also busted up the MP3 on cpomt.webhop.org today into smaller chunks containing separate main parts of the reading—as follows:

1-Jore’s Intro
2-Dr. Johnston’s Testimony
3-Other Proponents
4-Opponents
5-Committee Discussion

]]> by: Cody Quirk http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/02/04/video-of-debate-on-montana-house-bill-403/#comment-108744 Tue, 06 Feb 2007 04:32:53 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/02/04/video-of-debate-on-montana-house-bill-403/#comment-108744 Unlike Utah, it may face some serious opposition. Unlike Utah, it may face some serious opposition.

]]> by: Brad Winthrop http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/02/04/video-of-debate-on-montana-house-bill-403/#comment-108718 Tue, 06 Feb 2007 03:40:16 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/02/04/video-of-debate-on-montana-house-bill-403/#comment-108718 Thanks Kurtis. I have corrected the entry to indicate that it is audio, not video and have also linked to the Constitution Party of Montana's website. Thanks Kurtis. I have corrected the entry to indicate that it is audio, not video and have also linked to the Constitution Party of Montana’s website.

]]> by: Kurtis Oliverson http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/02/04/video-of-debate-on-montana-house-bill-403/#comment-107682 Sun, 04 Feb 2007 23:24:15 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/02/04/video-of-debate-on-montana-house-bill-403/#comment-107682 I'm not finding any video at the supplied link. There IS an MP3 (audio) file there, which appears to possibly be a cut from the MP3 that I put up on cpomt.webhop.org yesterday. I would love to get video of that hearing, if it really exists and if anyone knows where I might find it, as I'd like to post it on cpomt.webhop.org. If anyone is interested, though the MP3 on cpomt.webhop.org is much more bulky, it contains the whole discussion on HB 403 at the hearing. It was interesting to see how weak, in my opinion, that the opponents' arguments were. I’m not finding any video at the supplied link. There IS an MP3 (audio) file there, which appears to possibly be a cut from the MP3 that I put up on cpomt.webhop.org yesterday.

I would love to get video of that hearing, if it really exists and if anyone knows where I might find it, as I’d like to post it on cpomt.webhop.org.

If anyone is interested, though the MP3 on cpomt.webhop.org is much more bulky, it contains the whole discussion on HB 403 at the hearing. It was interesting to see how weak, in my opinion, that the opponents’ arguments were.

]]>