Comments on: Mississippi Greens and CP Field Candidates http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/03/05/mississippi-greens-and-cp-field-candidates/ Sat, 05 Jul 2008 04:42:27 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1.3 by: Mississippi Constitution Party http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/03/05/mississippi-greens-and-cp-field-candidates/#comment-134953 Wed, 14 Mar 2007 22:34:29 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/03/05/mississippi-greens-and-cp-field-candidates/#comment-134953 FYI: The Mississippi Constitution Party has 11 Candidates for the 2007 Election in November. Our Party Web Site is located at: www.MississippiCP.com FYI: The Mississippi Constitution Party has 11 Candidates for the 2007 Election in November. Our Party Web Site is located at: www.MississippiCP.com

]]> by: General Lee http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/03/05/mississippi-greens-and-cp-field-candidates/#comment-134270 Tue, 13 Mar 2007 20:40:12 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/03/05/mississippi-greens-and-cp-field-candidates/#comment-134270 http://harrybrowne.org/2000/WasItWorthIt.htm http://harrybrowne.org/2000/WasItWorthIt.htm

]]> by: Winston Smith http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/03/05/mississippi-greens-and-cp-field-candidates/#comment-134000 Tue, 13 Mar 2007 15:12:31 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/03/05/mississippi-greens-and-cp-field-candidates/#comment-134000 Matt, if you find his filthy and childish rants entertaining, go for it. WWJD? Not talk like UA or listen to him. He makes unfounded accusations about anyone that is a redneck, in the CP, etc. Read his posts, read Matt's response of 3/7. BTW- 'capitalism means to few capitalists, not too many"- GK Chesterton. Capitalism, likes its cousin Socialism, leads to the few-whether corporate heads controlling Govt or Govt officials themselves-controlling the many. Think about! Not too anarchistic in the end. Have to go now, my 2 Minutes of Hate coming up, hate to miss it...they will notice. Matt, if you find his filthy and childish rants entertaining, go for it. WWJD? Not talk like UA or listen to him. He makes unfounded accusations about anyone that is a redneck, in the CP, etc. Read his posts, read Matt’s response of 3/7.

BTW- ‘capitalism means to few capitalists, not too many”- GK Chesterton.

Capitalism, likes its cousin Socialism, leads to the few-whether corporate heads controlling Govt or Govt officials themselves-controlling the many. Think about!

Not too anarchistic in the end.

Have to go now, my 2 Minutes of Hate coming up, hate to miss it…they will notice.

]]> by: Trent Hill http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/03/05/mississippi-greens-and-cp-field-candidates/#comment-133140 Mon, 12 Mar 2007 00:46:55 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/03/05/mississippi-greens-and-cp-field-candidates/#comment-133140 DISINTER. They are running candidates for state legislature. There are two theories on how to build a party. Bottom-up or Top-down. Bottom-up is what you are describing, start by electing state representatives and change the country County by County, State by State. Top-down is when they run a Presidential Candidate and try and get some name recognition. The Green Party succeeded in doing this with Ralph Nader. They are both plausible ways of going about things. DISINTER.

They are running candidates for state legislature. There are two theories on how to build a party.

Bottom-up or Top-down.

Bottom-up is what you are describing, start by electing state representatives and change the country County by County, State by State.

Top-down is when they run a Presidential Candidate and try and get some name recognition. The Green Party succeeded in doing this with Ralph Nader.

They are both plausible ways of going about things.

]]> by: disinter http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/03/05/mississippi-greens-and-cp-field-candidates/#comment-133028 Sun, 11 Mar 2007 18:11:03 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/03/05/mississippi-greens-and-cp-field-candidates/#comment-133028 Meanwhile, the failure-prone Libertarian Party continues to spend scarce resources on races like US President that they will NEVER win until they actually start electing some state legislature races. Idiots. Meanwhile, the failure-prone Libertarian Party continues to spend scarce resources on races like US President that they will NEVER win until they actually start electing some state legislature races.

Idiots.

]]> by: undercover_anarchist http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/03/05/mississippi-greens-and-cp-field-candidates/#comment-131545 Thu, 08 Mar 2007 21:52:09 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/03/05/mississippi-greens-and-cp-field-candidates/#comment-131545 "Healthy, free capitalism" /= immigrant bashing and protectionism. My purpose at TPW or any other forum or blog is (1) To freely express my views (with the consent of the property owners who provide the space to do so); (2) To do whatever little bit I can to show that there is a strong philosophical and moral divide between the CP and the LP; and (3) To point out the racist and/or anti-growth/socialist aspects of so-called "libertarian" thought. Feel free to ignore me. There are people reading who don't post, and I want them to know that there is a voice for capitalism, even if it is a lonely voice. Look at the parties on the right side of TPW. The closest thing to a national capitalist party is the LP (I would prefer the MNIP). It fails miserably, but it is still light years ahead of the next most capitalist party, the damn Democrats. This is very troubling to me, and I do not see how bringing a new form of anticapitalism to the political discourse does anything to promote the philosophy of pro-growth economics. “Healthy, free capitalism” /= immigrant bashing and protectionism. My purpose at TPW or any other forum or blog is (1) To freely express my views (with the consent of the property owners who provide the space to do so); (2) To do whatever little bit I can to show that there is a strong philosophical and moral divide between the CP and the LP; and (3) To point out the racist and/or anti-growth/socialist aspects of so-called “libertarian” thought. Feel free to ignore me. There are people reading who don’t post, and I want them to know that there is a voice for capitalism, even if it is a lonely voice. Look at the parties on the right side of TPW. The closest thing to a national capitalist party is the LP (I would prefer the MNIP). It fails miserably, but it is still light years ahead of the next most capitalist party, the damn Democrats. This is very troubling to me, and I do not see how bringing a new form of anticapitalism to the political discourse does anything to promote the philosophy of pro-growth economics.

]]> by: matt http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/03/05/mississippi-greens-and-cp-field-candidates/#comment-131433 Thu, 08 Mar 2007 17:19:07 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/03/05/mississippi-greens-and-cp-field-candidates/#comment-131433 I say we should put whether or not to legalize drugs to a vote on a county by county (or even township by township) basis. That way the people who prefer legal drugs can have them and the people who don't won't. Philosophically, I believe that drugs should be legal everywhere, but social change works better from the ground up, and it would also help each community to "own" their decision. I say we should put whether or not to legalize drugs to a vote on a county by county (or even township by township) basis. That way the people who prefer legal drugs can have them and the people who don’t won’t.

Philosophically, I believe that drugs should be legal everywhere, but social change works better from the ground up, and it would also help each community to “own” their decision.

]]> by: Cody Quirk http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/03/05/mississippi-greens-and-cp-field-candidates/#comment-131317 Thu, 08 Mar 2007 12:03:18 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/03/05/mississippi-greens-and-cp-field-candidates/#comment-131317 Personally, drug laws should be left up to the states, not the federal government. And only for medicinal purposes should marijuana be legalized. Personally, drug laws should be left up to the states, not the federal government.

And only for medicinal purposes should marijuana be legalized.

]]> by: Trent Hill http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/03/05/mississippi-greens-and-cp-field-candidates/#comment-131231 Thu, 08 Mar 2007 08:04:55 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/03/05/mississippi-greens-and-cp-field-candidates/#comment-131231 UA, I support the GP as a basic premise. I support the fact that Socialist environmentalists have a party to call home. I dont neccesarily support their ideology, but I like that they CAN have their own orginization. As for the CP Banning things they don't like. We dont ban religious extremists. We dont ban dissent. We dont ban different opinions (like the former Religious zealots of the American View do). In our platform,it is clearly stated that the party wants to ban drug useage. However, a LARGE group of CP members/leaders signed a proclomation supporting Medical Marijuana. UA,
I support the GP as a basic premise. I support the fact that Socialist environmentalists have a party to call home. I dont neccesarily support their ideology, but I like that they CAN have their own orginization.
As for the CP Banning things they don’t like. We dont ban religious extremists. We dont ban dissent. We dont ban different opinions (like the former Religious zealots of the American View do). In our platform,it is clearly stated that the party wants to ban drug useage. However, a LARGE group of CP members/leaders signed a proclomation supporting Medical Marijuana.

]]> by: matt http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/03/05/mississippi-greens-and-cp-field-candidates/#comment-131115 Thu, 08 Mar 2007 03:25:50 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/03/05/mississippi-greens-and-cp-field-candidates/#comment-131115 UA Maybe one of the things "in the way" that obstructs pro-growth capitalism is your obsession with stale ad-hominems directed towards people who actually want to steer us back to healthy, free capitalism. You're free to say whatever you want here. That's how we non-fascists do things. There's no slur or insult you're barred from using, and you're free to attatch them to whomever you choose. This is obvious. Just don't fool yourself into thinking that your bitching is making us even slightly more free. Our freedoms are being pissed away by the Republicrats while those of us who know better are thwarted in our attempts to make things better. We're thwarted by infighting, and, here at least, you are the number one merchant of infighting. You're trading away your freedoms and those of your descendents for the momentary jolt of pleasure that accompanies writing something nasty on a message board. You're free to do so, just so long as you know what you're doing. UA
Maybe one of the things “in the way” that obstructs pro-growth capitalism is your obsession with stale ad-hominems directed towards people who actually want to steer us back to healthy, free capitalism.

You’re free to say whatever you want here. That’s how we non-fascists do things. There’s no slur or insult you’re barred from using, and you’re free to attatch them to whomever you choose. This is obvious.

Just don’t fool yourself into thinking that your bitching is making us even slightly more free. Our freedoms are being pissed away by the Republicrats while those of us who know better are thwarted in our attempts to make things better. We’re thwarted by infighting, and, here at least, you are the number one merchant of infighting.

You’re trading away your freedoms and those of your descendents for the momentary jolt of pleasure that accompanies writing something nasty on a message board.

You’re free to do so, just so long as you know what you’re doing.

]]> by: undercover_anarchist http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/03/05/mississippi-greens-and-cp-field-candidates/#comment-131111 Thu, 08 Mar 2007 03:06:32 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/03/05/mississippi-greens-and-cp-field-candidates/#comment-131111 I want a multiplicity of parties. I just wish there were a capitalist party. You see, a fasicst like Trent Hill can't understand how I could think that the CP and the GP are moronic, and yet not want to ban them or obstruct them. Because to fascists in the CP and Marxists in the GP, anything they don't like, they want banned. I fully support your right to be a half-wit. You indulge in that right on a daily basis. Three cheers for freedom! I want a multiplicity of parties. I just wish there were a capitalist party.

You see, a fasicst like Trent Hill can’t understand how I could think that the CP and the GP are moronic, and yet not want to ban them or obstruct them. Because to fascists in the CP and Marxists in the GP, anything they don’t like, they want banned.

I fully support your right to be a half-wit. You indulge in that right on a daily basis. Three cheers for freedom!

]]> by: Trent Hill http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/03/05/mississippi-greens-and-cp-field-candidates/#comment-131106 Thu, 08 Mar 2007 02:54:12 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/03/05/mississippi-greens-and-cp-field-candidates/#comment-131106 "“The Green Party of Mississippi’ is just absurd. That would be like having “The Monogomist Party of Utah” or “The Non-Mulefucker Party of South Carolina,” etc." And how does that comment encourage capitalist growth? In fact,it seems to oppose the basic tenant of capitalism. You seem to have an overt problem with any third party being taken seriously. Do you WANT only two parties on the ballot? Because that isnt very capitalist. Everyone on this forum is quite capable of doing their own research,so why do you try and extend your hand to their minds? If someone mentions the CP, im sure they can do their OWN research to determine wether it is a pro-liberty, constitutionalist, group or a "Mulefucking" party. If someone mentions the Greens, im sure Jimmy Crackedcorn or Cindy Loowho can do their own research and draw their own conclusions, get it? You seem to only present the Republicans and Democrats as pertinent choices, and even that is incorrect--you reject the Republicans as neo-fascists. So, to you the Democrats are the only group worth voting for? Perhaps we should have a one-party ballot like China? Does that suit you UA? ““The Green Party of Mississippi’ is just absurd. That would be like having “The Monogomist Party of Utah” or “The Non-Mulefucker Party of South Carolina,” etc.”

And how does that comment encourage capitalist growth?
In fact,it seems to oppose the basic tenant of capitalism. You seem to have an overt problem with any third party being taken seriously. Do you WANT only two parties on the ballot? Because that isnt very capitalist.
Everyone on this forum is quite capable of doing their own research,so why do you try and extend your hand to their minds? If someone mentions the CP, im sure they can do their OWN research to determine wether it is a pro-liberty, constitutionalist, group or a “Mulefucking” party. If someone mentions the Greens, im sure Jimmy Crackedcorn or Cindy Loowho can do their own research and draw their own conclusions, get it?
You seem to only present the Republicans and Democrats as pertinent choices, and even that is incorrect—you reject the Republicans as neo-fascists. So, to you the Democrats are the only group worth voting for? Perhaps we should have a one-party ballot like China? Does that suit you UA?

]]> by: undercover_anarchist http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/03/05/mississippi-greens-and-cp-field-candidates/#comment-130960 Wed, 07 Mar 2007 23:06:23 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/03/05/mississippi-greens-and-cp-field-candidates/#comment-130960 Possessed? Yes, possessed by a love for pro-growth capitalism and an immense distaste for everything in its way. Possessed? Yes, possessed by a love for pro-growth capitalism and an immense distaste for everything in its way.

]]> by: matt http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/03/05/mississippi-greens-and-cp-field-candidates/#comment-130941 Wed, 07 Mar 2007 22:25:23 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/03/05/mississippi-greens-and-cp-field-candidates/#comment-130941 There's a book I'd buy, Cutty. Raoul Duke could have fun down there if anyone could. There’s a book I’d buy, Cutty.

Raoul Duke could have fun down there if anyone could.

]]> by: matt http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/03/05/mississippi-greens-and-cp-field-candidates/#comment-130918 Wed, 07 Mar 2007 21:50:46 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/03/05/mississippi-greens-and-cp-field-candidates/#comment-130918 UA can say whatever he wants for whatever reason he wants, and we will still have no logical basis to suggest he is posessed. At best, it's impolite. Furthermore, he's funny sometimes. Can you find anywhere in the Christian tradition where the devil or any of his minions are described as funny? Maybe you're joking, though. If so, UA is funnier than you are. UA can say whatever he wants for whatever reason he wants, and we will still have no logical basis to suggest he is posessed.

At best, it’s impolite.

Furthermore, he’s funny sometimes. Can you find anywhere in the Christian tradition where the devil or any of his minions are described as funny?

Maybe you’re joking, though. If so, UA is funnier than you are.

]]>