<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Minnesota Constitution Party rejects disaffiliation</title>
	<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/03/26/minnesota-constitution-party-rejects-disaffiliation/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 20:18:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Cody Quirk</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/03/26/minnesota-constitution-party-rejects-disaffiliation/#comment-151351</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2007 00:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/03/26/minnesota-constitution-party-rejects-disaffiliation/#comment-151351</guid>
					<description>Alright, I'll take your word for it SovereignMN,

I just heard from a source that it was close I guess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Alright, I&#8217;ll take your word for it SovereignMN,</p>
	<p>I just heard from a source that it was close I guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: SovereignMN</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/03/26/minnesota-constitution-party-rejects-disaffiliation/#comment-151175</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 21:14:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/03/26/minnesota-constitution-party-rejects-disaffiliation/#comment-151175</guid>
					<description>I don't think the vote was that close.  I would GUESS that about 1/3 of those present wanted to disaffiliate. 

When an amendment to the resolution was proposed to strip out all disaffiliation language, about 60-65% of the attendees voted in favor of it.  

I actually voted AGAINST that resolution despite not favoring disaffiliation because I wanted there to be a straight up/down vote so we knew precisely how many people favored disaffiliation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I don&#8217;t think the vote was that close.  I would <span class="caps">GUESS</span> that about 1/3 of those present wanted to disaffiliate.</p>
	<p>When an amendment to the resolution was proposed to strip out all disaffiliation language, about 60-65% of the attendees voted in favor of it.</p>
	<p>I actually voted <span class="caps">AGAINST</span> that resolution despite not favoring disaffiliation because I wanted there to be a straight up/down vote so we knew precisely how many people favored disaffiliation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Trent Hill</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/03/26/minnesota-constitution-party-rejects-disaffiliation/#comment-151148</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 20:48:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/03/26/minnesota-constitution-party-rejects-disaffiliation/#comment-151148</guid>
					<description>I believe he is referring to the disafilliation vote.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I believe he is referring to the disafilliation vote.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: SovereignMN</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/03/26/minnesota-constitution-party-rejects-disaffiliation/#comment-151091</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 19:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/03/26/minnesota-constitution-party-rejects-disaffiliation/#comment-151091</guid>
					<description>Cody, which vote are you referring to as close?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Cody, which vote are you referring to as close?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Trent Hill</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/03/26/minnesota-constitution-party-rejects-disaffiliation/#comment-150881</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 16:23:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/03/26/minnesota-constitution-party-rejects-disaffiliation/#comment-150881</guid>
					<description>Cody,

That is certainly bad news. In some GOOD news, the LACP is making alot of headway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Cody,</p>
	<p>That is certainly bad news. In some <span class="caps">GOOD</span> news, the <span class="caps">LACP</span> is making alot of headway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Cody Quirk</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/03/26/minnesota-constitution-party-rejects-disaffiliation/#comment-150811</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 14:55:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/03/26/minnesota-constitution-party-rejects-disaffiliation/#comment-150811</guid>
					<description>Ehhh, I decided to leave the matter of the Minnesota CP to this one article. This probably covers the whole thing here.

And also I was informed that the meeting was complex and the vote was somewhat close.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Ehhh, I decided to leave the matter of the Minnesota CP to this one article. This probably covers the whole thing here.</p>
	<p>And also I was informed that the meeting was complex and the vote was somewhat close.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: matt</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/03/26/minnesota-constitution-party-rejects-disaffiliation/#comment-150734</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 13:53:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/03/26/minnesota-constitution-party-rejects-disaffiliation/#comment-150734</guid>
					<description>Chick's rarely right, and always obnoxious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Chick&#8217;s rarely right, and always obnoxious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Cody Quirk</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/03/26/minnesota-constitution-party-rejects-disaffiliation/#comment-150567</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 11:19:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/03/26/minnesota-constitution-party-rejects-disaffiliation/#comment-150567</guid>
					<description>And that's why he'll never convince me that his views are right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>And that&#8217;s why he&#8217;ll never convince me that his views are right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Trent Hill</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/03/26/minnesota-constitution-party-rejects-disaffiliation/#comment-150368</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 05:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/03/26/minnesota-constitution-party-rejects-disaffiliation/#comment-150368</guid>
					<description>True.
And while im not a mormon,or supportive of their theology...Chick is never right.

Chick may in fact make factual points sometimes...but he portrays them in a hateful, anti-christian method.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>True.<br />
And while im not a mormon,or supportive of their theology&#8230;Chick is never right.</p>
	<p>Chick may in fact make factual points sometimes&#8230;but he portrays them in a hateful, anti-christian method.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: matt</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/03/26/minnesota-constitution-party-rejects-disaffiliation/#comment-150295</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 04:19:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/03/26/minnesota-constitution-party-rejects-disaffiliation/#comment-150295</guid>
					<description>Jack Chick certainly is a loon, but, as my mother used to say; &quot;even a broken clock is right twice a day&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Jack Chick certainly is a loon, but, as my mother used to say; &#8220;even a broken clock is right twice a day&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Trent Hill</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/03/26/minnesota-constitution-party-rejects-disaffiliation/#comment-149848</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 22:20:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/03/26/minnesota-constitution-party-rejects-disaffiliation/#comment-149848</guid>
					<description>Jack Chick is vehemently anti-Mormon and Catholic. He is also a hardcore Fundamentalist who opposes Rock music and anything other than a STRICT fundamental view of the Bible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Jack Chick is vehemently anti-Mormon and Catholic. He is also a hardcore Fundamentalist who opposes Rock music and anything other than a <span class="caps">STRICT</span> fundamental view of the Bible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: catholicresistence</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/03/26/minnesota-constitution-party-rejects-disaffiliation/#comment-149652</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 17:55:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/03/26/minnesota-constitution-party-rejects-disaffiliation/#comment-149652</guid>
					<description>His site says it all-so mucch for the denial that it was about Mormons and Catholics-2 groups-especially us-that Chick hates intensly.

Surprised he did not rant-as did Lefamine about us too-probably getting out that white sheet and hood now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>His site says it all-so mucch for the denial that it was about Mormons and Catholics-2 groups-especially us-that Chick hates intensly.</p>
	<p>Surprised he did not rant-as did Lefamine about us too-probably getting out that white sheet and hood now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Cody Quirk</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/03/26/minnesota-constitution-party-rejects-disaffiliation/#comment-149053</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 07:20:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/03/26/minnesota-constitution-party-rejects-disaffiliation/#comment-149053</guid>
					<description>Thanks Matt:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Thanks Matt:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: matt</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/03/26/minnesota-constitution-party-rejects-disaffiliation/#comment-148244</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 15:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/03/26/minnesota-constitution-party-rejects-disaffiliation/#comment-148244</guid>
					<description>It is good work. Very detailed. As are your articles; you're doing a good thing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>It is good work. Very detailed. As are your articles; you&#8217;re doing a good thing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Cody Quirk</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/03/26/minnesota-constitution-party-rejects-disaffiliation/#comment-147856</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 09:39:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/03/26/minnesota-constitution-party-rejects-disaffiliation/#comment-147856</guid>
					<description>I spent more then 6 hours on the rebuttal. Time really was the consideration.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I spent more then 6 hours on the rebuttal. Time really was the consideration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
