<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Starrett for President?</title>
	<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/06/starett-for-president/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 20:23:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: petsminorjok</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/06/starett-for-president/#comment-719156</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 00:15:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/06/starett-for-president/#comment-719156</guid>
					<description>dog bag wood girl car deliver all sun england microsoft woman dog</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>dog bag wood girl car deliver all sun england microsoft woman dog</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: James Niemela</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/06/starett-for-president/#comment-165400</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 21:18:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/06/starett-for-president/#comment-165400</guid>
					<description>Dear Chris,

Thank you for the response. Signing off.....

James</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Dear Chris,</p>
	<p>Thank you for the response. Signing off&#8230;..</p>
	<p>James</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Chris Fluharty</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/06/starett-for-president/#comment-165311</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 16:38:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/06/starett-for-president/#comment-165311</guid>
					<description>The bible does say thus sayeth the lord.  It says submit to the governing authorities. The Gov says a women can vote and run for office.  You can either submit as Paul said to do, or you can be civily obedient while not voting a women or letting one run form you family.  Or you can try to change the law of the gov.  Or you can be disobedient and rebellion against the civil authority and face the sword.  It is a thus sayeth the Lord issue.  Pray and seek the wisdom of His Word for yourself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>The bible does say thus sayeth the lord.  It says submit to the governing authorities. The Gov says a women can vote and run for office.  You can either submit as Paul said to do, or you can be civily obedient while not voting a women or letting one run form you family.  Or you can try to change the law of the gov.  Or you can be disobedient and rebellion against the civil authority and face the sword.  It is a thus sayeth the Lord issue.  Pray and seek the wisdom of His Word for yourself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: James Niemela</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/06/starett-for-president/#comment-165221</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 11:23:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/06/starett-for-president/#comment-165221</guid>
					<description>Dear Chris,

Thank you for the response. Perhaps I wasn't clear enough in my answer. Certainly, what God says in the Bible settles it for time and eternity. However, if something is not expressly spelled out in the Bible, we need to look to what is laid out and apply it to the circumstance at hand. Example: The Bible doesn't say &quot;Do not let your lawnmower clippings blow into your neighbor's yard. &quot; Or &quot;Do not let your dog bark by your neighbor's bedroom window at 2:00 in the morning.&quot; However, the command to &quot;Love your neighbor as yourself&quot; would indicate that you should not do something that you would not like to be done to yourself, therefore you should not blow your grass clippings into his yard, or let your dog bark at his bedroom window at 2:00 in the morning. Likewise, the Bible does not say &quot;Thou shalt not beat your wife with the broomstick.&quot; Do I therefore have freedom to do it? No, because the Bible commands me to love my wife, and give honor unto her as the weaker vessel, and to love and cherish her. (Not saying that I would like to beat her anyway, but just to prove my point. :) ) So when the Bible says something specifically, we need to say, &quot;Yes, that is true and right. Thus sayeth the Lord.&quot; When the Bible isn't specific on a certain matter, we need to look at the principles and apply them to the case at hand. 
As far as your statement that &quot;We cannot force beliefs onto America.&quot;, we do all the time. (And rightfully so.) We have laws against murder, rape, theft, perjury, etc.etc. So we do (and should) have laws which reflect God's principles. 

Thank you-

James Niemela</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Dear Chris,</p>
	<p>Thank you for the response. Perhaps I wasn&#8217;t clear enough in my answer. Certainly, what God says in the Bible settles it for time and eternity. However, if something is not expressly spelled out in the Bible, we need to look to what is laid out and apply it to the circumstance at hand. Example: The Bible doesn&#8217;t say &#8220;Do not let your lawnmower clippings blow into your neighbor&#8217;s yard. &#8221; Or &#8220;Do not let your dog bark by your neighbor&#8217;s bedroom window at 2:00 in the morning.&#8221; However, the command to &#8220;Love your neighbor as yourself&#8221; would indicate that you should not do something that you would not like to be done to yourself, therefore you should not blow your grass clippings into his yard, or let your dog bark at his bedroom window at 2:00 in the morning. Likewise, the Bible does not say &#8220;Thou shalt not beat your wife with the broomstick.&#8221; Do I therefore have freedom to do it? No, because the Bible commands me to love my wife, and give honor unto her as the weaker vessel, and to love and cherish her. (Not saying that I would like to beat her anyway, but just to prove my point. <img src='http://thirdpartywatch.com/wp-images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  ) So when the Bible says something specifically, we need to say, &#8220;Yes, that is true and right. Thus sayeth the Lord.&#8221; When the Bible isn&#8217;t specific on a certain matter, we need to look at the principles and apply them to the case at hand.<br />
As far as your statement that &#8220;We cannot force beliefs onto America.&#8221;, we do all the time. (And rightfully so.) We have laws against murder, rape, theft, perjury, etc.etc. So we do (and should) have laws which reflect God&#8217;s principles.</p>
	<p>Thank you-</p>
	<p>James Niemela</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Chris Fluharty</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/06/starett-for-president/#comment-165065</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 23:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/06/starett-for-president/#comment-165065</guid>
					<description>James,

You hit the nail on the head.  You &quot;think&quot; scripture indicates it.  I am a literalist.  I do not think because then it is me and not God.  Weather I believe a child or a women should vote is not the issue.  Personally I believe in one family one vote.  However.  I cannot force what is Gods into the realm of that which is Cesar's.  If God ordains the government then whoever rules over us is exactly who God intends.  God uses human stupidity to fulfill his ultimate desires.  So where we fail to agree is not in principle but in application.  America is a Republic a Nation of laws.  So thus we cannot circumvent our constitution to fit our biblical beliefs.  This is why good Christians are commanded to be civilly obedient.  Man does not command a women to vote.  You can be a good Christian family by only sending the man to vote.  Do you see what I mean.  You have a right to be biblically correct which I agree you are.  But you cannot demand Cesar to follow God's rules.  Which takes us to another reason why we will not agree.  I believe in free will.  And forced faith is not free will.  I believe Jesus died for ALL not just a select few.  But God already knows who will accept him and reject him.  So I am not saying scripturally you are wrong.  That is why I needed you to prove your stance first.  But you would have to provide a verse that says God forbids it in Caesar's realm to prove your point.   A women not running for office is America's burden to bear.  You do not have to let a women run or vote for a women if you do not want to.  Do you understand what I am getting at.  We cannot force beliefs onto America.  But we still have the right to practice our beliefs and we should.  Hope this helps.  But Cody and Trent are free to believe what they want just as you are free to believe in headship which is certainly biblical.  But Paul also commands us via the Holy Spirit to submit to the civil authorities.  Until man takes your right to worship and follow the Bible away you are free to not vote for a women.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>James,</p>
	<p>You hit the nail on the head.  You &#8220;think&#8221; scripture indicates it.  I am a literalist.  I do not think because then it is me and not God.  Weather I believe a child or a women should vote is not the issue.  Personally I believe in one family one vote.  However.  I cannot force what is Gods into the realm of that which is Cesar&#8217;s.  If God ordains the government then whoever rules over us is exactly who God intends.  God uses human stupidity to fulfill his ultimate desires.  So where we fail to agree is not in principle but in application.  America is a Republic a Nation of laws.  So thus we cannot circumvent our constitution to fit our biblical beliefs.  This is why good Christians are commanded to be civilly obedient.  Man does not command a women to vote.  You can be a good Christian family by only sending the man to vote.  Do you see what I mean.  You have a right to be biblically correct which I agree you are.  But you cannot demand Cesar to follow God&#8217;s rules.  Which takes us to another reason why we will not agree.  I believe in free will.  And forced faith is not free will.  I believe Jesus died for <span class="caps">ALL</span> not just a select few.  But God already knows who will accept him and reject him.  So I am not saying scripturally you are wrong.  That is why I needed you to prove your stance first.  But you would have to provide a verse that says God forbids it in Caesar&#8217;s realm to prove your point.   A women not running for office is America&#8217;s burden to bear.  You do not have to let a women run or vote for a women if you do not want to.  Do you understand what I am getting at.  We cannot force beliefs onto America.  But we still have the right to practice our beliefs and we should.  Hope this helps.  But Cody and Trent are free to believe what they want just as you are free to believe in headship which is certainly biblical.  But Paul also commands us via the Holy Spirit to submit to the civil authorities.  Until man takes your right to worship and follow the Bible away you are free to not vote for a women.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: James Niemela</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/06/starett-for-president/#comment-164969</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 16:18:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/06/starett-for-president/#comment-164969</guid>
					<description>Dear Chris,

Thank you. If you are looking for a direct Scriptural quote that says, &quot;Women cannot be involved in any way in the political/civil process&quot;, you will not find one. Just like there is no Scriptural quote that says, &quot;You shall not use forceps to tear a baby apart in the womb.&quot; However, the Scriptural implications are, I believe, clear on both issues. The Bible indicates the value of human life, and how God is the Creator of life, and how life is to be protected. Likewise, I believe Scripture is clear on the God-ordained headship order. Christ, man, woman, and then children. You stated God is no respecter of persons, and that is true. The Bible says it. Do you then feel children should be able to vote? If not, why not? Why should they be denied the &quot;right&quot; to be involved in the political process? You may bring up Deborah in the Bible; the Israelites also wanted a king, and God consented to their request/demands. But it was not to their blessing. I can't recall the exact place in Scripture where it says it, but I remember a reference in the Bible which speaks of children being their oppressors, and women ruling over them. I hope this answers you where I am coming from. If we are still in disagreement, I fear we will never come to agreement. If I am wrong, please show me from Scripture where I am wrong. Thank you-

Regards,

James Niemela</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Dear Chris,</p>
	<p>Thank you. If you are looking for a direct Scriptural quote that says, &#8220;Women cannot be involved in any way in the political/civil process&#8221;, you will not find one. Just like there is no Scriptural quote that says, &#8220;You shall not use forceps to tear a baby apart in the womb.&#8221; However, the Scriptural implications are, I believe, clear on both issues. The Bible indicates the value of human life, and how God is the Creator of life, and how life is to be protected. Likewise, I believe Scripture is clear on the God-ordained headship order. Christ, man, woman, and then children. You stated God is no respecter of persons, and that is true. The Bible says it. Do you then feel children should be able to vote? If not, why not? Why should they be denied the &#8220;right&#8221; to be involved in the political process? You may bring up Deborah in the Bible; the Israelites also wanted a king, and God consented to their request/demands. But it was not to their blessing. I can&#8217;t recall the exact place in Scripture where it says it, but I remember a reference in the Bible which speaks of children being their oppressors, and women ruling over them. I hope this answers you where I am coming from. If we are still in disagreement, I fear we will never come to agreement. If I am wrong, please show me from Scripture where I am wrong. Thank you-</p>
	<p>Regards,</p>
	<p>James Niemela</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Cody Quirk</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/06/starett-for-president/#comment-164822</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 12:34:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/06/starett-for-president/#comment-164822</guid>
					<description>&quot;Ooooohhhhhh, Cody! Such hostility! Tsk! Tsk! Tsk!&quot;

Ooooohhhhhh, James! Such hypocracy! Tsk! Tsk! Tsk!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>&#8220;Ooooohhhhhh, Cody! Such hostility! Tsk! Tsk! Tsk!&#8221;</p>
	<p>Ooooohhhhhh, James! Such hypocracy! Tsk! Tsk! Tsk!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Chris Fluharty</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/06/starett-for-president/#comment-164648</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 01:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/06/starett-for-president/#comment-164648</guid>
					<description>James you cannot answer a question with another question either you have an answer or not.  My guess is that you do not.  Jesus said it I believe it that settles it.  As for Paul and Peter they simply commanded that we be civilly obedient to the governing authority.  And that god ordained government to be a tool for justice.  Where is the justice in exclusion.  Paul told Titus to do all things w/o partiality.  God is no respecter of persons.  So why would he deny a women the right to be civilly involved.  This does not contradict his Word.  God allows for women leadership in the church so why not in the government.  Only in the home is a women subject to headship laws.  You will need to study headship/head covering to better understand the subject.  You are forcing an interpretation onto the text when the Greek and the historical context does not support it.  SO you need to tell me why you believe the way you do before we can even discuss it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>James you cannot answer a question with another question either you have an answer or not.  My guess is that you do not.  Jesus said it I believe it that settles it.  As for Paul and Peter they simply commanded that we be civilly obedient to the governing authority.  And that god ordained government to be a tool for justice.  Where is the justice in exclusion.  Paul told Titus to do all things w/o partiality.  God is no respecter of persons.  So why would he deny a women the right to be civilly involved.  This does not contradict his Word.  God allows for women leadership in the church so why not in the government.  Only in the home is a women subject to headship laws.  You will need to study headship/head covering to better understand the subject.  You are forcing an interpretation onto the text when the Greek and the historical context does not support it.  SO you need to tell me why you believe the way you do before we can even discuss it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: James Niemela</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/06/starett-for-president/#comment-164475</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 19:20:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/06/starett-for-president/#comment-164475</guid>
					<description>&quot;Paul address all of this in Romans 13 and Peter deals with it in his first epistle. Besides these are political statements not spiritual ones. Paul says to be in subjection to the governing authorities. So we need to try our best to have good governing authorities no matter what their sex is. That still does not answer my question. &quot;   [Chris]

Dear Chris,

Could you explain how Romans 13 and 1st Peter deal with the above stated issues (Property rights, Constitution, States' Rights, American Sovereignty)? Certainly, you have the right to advocate for them what does God say about them? Do you have the right to force them on America? By whose authority do you determine that property rights, Constitution, states rights, and American sovereignty are political/civil issues, but the issue of Biblical headship is outside the political/civil realm? Is God only over the church? Is He not also over politics, and over everything? We need to make some sense of this or we cannot debate it. If our worldviews are not in agreement, we cannot ever come to agreement, and all our words are for naught.

James Niemela</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>&#8220;Paul address all of this in Romans 13 and Peter deals with it in his first epistle. Besides these are political statements not spiritual ones. Paul says to be in subjection to the governing authorities. So we need to try our best to have good governing authorities no matter what their sex is. That still does not answer my question. &#8221;   [Chris]</p>
	<p>Dear Chris,</p>
	<p>Could you explain how Romans 13 and 1st Peter deal with the above stated issues (Property rights, Constitution, States&#8217; Rights, American Sovereignty)? Certainly, you have the right to advocate for them what does God say about them? Do you have the right to force them on America? By whose authority do you determine that property rights, Constitution, states rights, and American sovereignty are political/civil issues, but the issue of Biblical headship is outside the political/civil realm? Is God only over the church? Is He not also over politics, and over everything? We need to make some sense of this or we cannot debate it. If our worldviews are not in agreement, we cannot ever come to agreement, and all our words are for naught.</p>
	<p>James Niemela</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Trent Hill</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/06/starett-for-president/#comment-164332</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 14:48:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/06/starett-for-president/#comment-164332</guid>
					<description>James,

How juvenile of you. =)
You should do the &quot;nanna nanna boo boo&quot; thing...that one gets 'em every time!

James, none of the issues listed on Chris' website NEED to come from God. They are government affairs, political matters. The truth is, Women holding office is a civil issue also. But you say it is a spiritual matter, so Chris is being a man,and fighting you on your own ground. 
Furthermore, you failed to answer Chris' question still.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>James,</p>
	<p>How juvenile of you. =)<br />
You should do the &#8220;nanna nanna boo boo&#8221; thing&#8230;that one gets &#8216;em every time!</p>
	<p>James, none of the issues listed on Chris&#8217; website <span class="caps">NEED</span> to come from God. They are government affairs, political matters. The truth is, Women holding office is a civil issue also. But you say it is a spiritual matter, so Chris is being a man,and fighting you on your own ground.<br />
Furthermore, you failed to answer Chris&#8217; question still.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: James Niemela</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/06/starett-for-president/#comment-164308</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 13:56:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/06/starett-for-president/#comment-164308</guid>
					<description>Ooooohhhhhh, Cody! Such hostility! Tsk! Tsk! Tsk!

James</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Ooooohhhhhh, Cody! Such hostility! Tsk! Tsk! Tsk!</p>
	<p>James</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Cody Quirk</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/06/starett-for-president/#comment-164302</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 13:22:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/06/starett-for-president/#comment-164302</guid>
					<description>If you don't like being given a dose of your own medicine, then stop posting here or leave James.

-Cody</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>If you don&#8217;t like being given a dose of your own medicine, then stop posting here or leave James.</p>
	<p>-Cody</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Cody Quirk</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/06/starett-for-president/#comment-164301</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 13:21:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/06/starett-for-president/#comment-164301</guid>
					<description>Again, could you ask Cody to stop hijacking discussion with his idotic antics?

=Could you stop doing the same thing too James? No one likes a hypocrite.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Again, could you ask Cody to stop hijacking discussion with his idotic antics?</p>
	<p>=Could you stop doing the same thing too James? No one likes a hypocrite.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Cody Quirk</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/06/starett-for-president/#comment-164299</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 13:19:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/06/starett-for-president/#comment-164299</guid>
					<description>If all you have is cheap shots to contribute to this forum, you might as well give up and go home.

=Look whose talking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>If all you have is cheap shots to contribute to this forum, you might as well give up and go home.</p>
	<p>=Look whose talking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Chris Fluharty</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/06/starett-for-president/#comment-164127</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 01:19:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/06/starett-for-president/#comment-164127</guid>
					<description>Paul address all of this in Romans 13 and Peter deals with it in his first epistle.  Besides these are political statements not spiritual ones.  Paul says to be in subjection to the governing authorities.  So we need to try our best to have good governing authorities no matter what their sex is.  That still does not answer my question.  The answer is there are no verses because Jesus said to keep Cesar in Cesar's realm and God in God's realm.  The Jews wanted a political messiah, Jesus was a spiritual Messiah.  The TAVers are no different then Judas.  They are trying to force the hand of God onto politics and God is not one we can force into anything.

BTW I accept your apology.  We have to make sure our intentions are clear.  This is why I am usually so blunt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Paul address all of this in Romans 13 and Peter deals with it in his first epistle.  Besides these are political statements not spiritual ones.  Paul says to be in subjection to the governing authorities.  So we need to try our best to have good governing authorities no matter what their sex is.  That still does not answer my question.  The answer is there are no verses because Jesus said to keep Cesar in Cesar&#8217;s realm and God in God&#8217;s realm.  The Jews wanted a political messiah, Jesus was a spiritual Messiah.  The TAVers are no different then Judas.  They are trying to force the hand of God onto politics and God is not one we can force into anything.</p>
	<p><span class="caps">BTW I</span> accept your apology.  We have to make sure our intentions are clear.  This is why I am usually so blunt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
