Comments on: Peroutka slams big-money presidential hopefuls http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/10/peroutka-slams-big-money-presidential-hopefuls/ Wed, 03 Dec 2008 20:40:05 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1.3 by: globalist_elitist http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/10/peroutka-slams-big-money-presidential-hopefuls/#comment-163272 Mon, 16 Apr 2007 16:03:47 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/10/peroutka-slams-big-money-presidential-hopefuls/#comment-163272 I abandoned the undercover_anarchist moniker because I am no longer undercover, and I never was an anarchist. I took the globalist_elitist name from the great Chuck Baldwin. I also post as unrepetentant_archcapitalist elsewhere. WJB /= Thomas Jefferson. WJB = Dennis Kucinich, to a tee. I abandoned the undercover_anarchist moniker because I am no longer undercover, and I never was an anarchist.

I took the globalist_elitist name from the great Chuck Baldwin.

I also post as unrepetentant_archcapitalist elsewhere.

WJB /= Thomas Jefferson. WJB = Dennis Kucinich, to a tee.

]]> by: Trent Hill http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/10/peroutka-slams-big-money-presidential-hopefuls/#comment-163262 Mon, 16 Apr 2007 15:42:16 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/10/peroutka-slams-big-money-presidential-hopefuls/#comment-163262 Winston, John, UA and GE are indeed one and the same person. UA stated a while back that he was changing his handle to GE. Winston, John,

UA and GE are indeed one and the same person. UA stated a while back that he was changing his handle to GE.

]]> by: Winston Smith http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/10/peroutka-slams-big-money-presidential-hopefuls/#comment-163195 Mon, 16 Apr 2007 13:29:56 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/10/peroutka-slams-big-money-presidential-hopefuls/#comment-163195 I think I can agree -UA and GE are likely 1 and the same. Something about the inane pedantering. I think I can agree -UA and GE are likely 1 and the same. Something about the inane pedantering.

]]> by: John Chance http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/10/peroutka-slams-big-money-presidential-hopefuls/#comment-163190 Mon, 16 Apr 2007 13:26:01 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/10/peroutka-slams-big-money-presidential-hopefuls/#comment-163190 globalist_elitist Says: April 11th, 2007 at 2:20 pm If it makes everyone feel better, I can state with relative confidence that NONE of you will be going to hell. um, gee thanks "god" globalist_elitist Says:

April 11th, 2007 at 2:20 pm
If it makes everyone feel better, I can state with relative confidence that NONE of you will be going to hell.

um, gee thanks “god”

]]> by: John Chance http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/10/peroutka-slams-big-money-presidential-hopefuls/#comment-163187 Mon, 16 Apr 2007 13:24:56 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/10/peroutka-slams-big-money-presidential-hopefuls/#comment-163187 globalist_elitist Says: April 10th, 2007 at 1:20 pm This just solidifies that the CP is nothing more than an old-school Democratic-esque, William Jennings Bryant, anticapitalist group of class warriors preaching disdain for wealth and success. Nice to know undercover anarchist has company in the truly stupid and inane comments section. Wonder if UA and GE are one and the same?? The old school Democractic--yada, yada-are based on decentralized Jeffersonina, so in a sense, yeah, guess so. If we have a disdain for wealth/success, guess we mised Peroutka's when we had him as our front man in 2004. Oh, and Howard Phillips, Jim Clymer, etc-all men of moderate wealth and success. lets not forget Bill Shearer either. As far as capitalism, who says this economic viewpoint is sacrosanct?? 'Capitalism does not produce too many capitalists, but too few" -GK Chesteron How, with big box businesses, tied in w/big box Party's, was he right!!!! globalist_elitist Says:

April 10th, 2007 at 1:20 pm
This just solidifies that the CP is nothing more than an old-school Democratic-esque, William Jennings Bryant, anticapitalist group of class warriors preaching disdain for wealth and success.

Nice to know undercover anarchist has company in the truly stupid and inane comments section. Wonder if UA and GE are one and the same??

The old school Democractic—yada, yada-are based on decentralized Jeffersonina, so in a sense, yeah, guess so. If we have a disdain for wealth/success, guess we mised Peroutka’s when we had him as our front man in 2004. Oh, and Howard Phillips, Jim Clymer, etc-all men of moderate wealth and success. lets not forget Bill Shearer either. As far as capitalism, who says this economic viewpoint is sacrosanct??

‘Capitalism does not produce too many capitalists, but too few”
-GK Chesteron

How, with big box businesses, tied in w/big box Party’s, was he right!

]]> by: Cody Quirk http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/10/peroutka-slams-big-money-presidential-hopefuls/#comment-161888 Fri, 13 Apr 2007 13:53:11 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/10/peroutka-slams-big-money-presidential-hopefuls/#comment-161888 I believe he is a Catholic who also enjoys the New Age fruitiness. One thing is for sure: He is not an atheist nor a secularist. Separation of church and stete is not high on his agenda. =I don't go for anything New Age. I believe he is a Catholic who also enjoys the New Age fruitiness. One thing is for sure: He is not an atheist nor a secularist. Separation of church and stete is not high on his agenda.

=I don’t go for anything New Age.

]]> by: Timm Knibbs http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/10/peroutka-slams-big-money-presidential-hopefuls/#comment-161573 Thu, 12 Apr 2007 19:37:49 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/10/peroutka-slams-big-money-presidential-hopefuls/#comment-161573 Ron Paul has introduced several time legislation that would give an unborn child the same protection as a child who has been born. Ron Paul has introduced several time legislation that would give an unborn child the same protection as a child who has been born.

]]> by: Yosemite1967 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/10/peroutka-slams-big-money-presidential-hopefuls/#comment-161538 Thu, 12 Apr 2007 17:42:28 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/10/peroutka-slams-big-money-presidential-hopefuls/#comment-161538 Trent, I'm sorry if I kind of combined you and Cody into one person in my arguments. I can see the sense of what you were saying. I was just starting to see the discussion going from reasonable criticism of your opponents to demonization (which they have done too), but I realize that Cody's was more obvious. I respect both of you guys for all of the good that you're doing in the world. I'm not trying to act like a thread moderator or anything--just trying to constructively criticize one of your methods which will, by its nature, only serve to divide the conservative pool further, rather than unite it. The more we freedom fighters hate each other, the more freedom we will lose. Trent, I’m sorry if I kind of combined you and Cody into one person in my arguments. I can see the sense of what you were saying.

I was just starting to see the discussion going from reasonable criticism of your opponents to demonization (which they have done too), but I realize that Cody’s was more obvious. I respect both of you guys for all of the good that you’re doing in the world.

I’m not trying to act like a thread moderator or anything—just trying to constructively criticize one of your methods which will, by its nature, only serve to divide the conservative pool further, rather than unite it. The more we freedom fighters hate each other, the more freedom we will lose.

]]> by: globalist_elitist http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/10/peroutka-slams-big-money-presidential-hopefuls/#comment-161442 Thu, 12 Apr 2007 14:12:04 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/10/peroutka-slams-big-money-presidential-hopefuls/#comment-161442 I believe he is a Catholic who also enjoys the New Age fruitiness. One thing is for sure: He is not an atheist nor a secularist. Separation of church and stete is not high on his agenda. I believe he is a Catholic who also enjoys the New Age fruitiness. One thing is for sure: He is not an atheist nor a secularist. Separation of church and stete is not high on his agenda.

]]> by: Cody Quirk http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/10/peroutka-slams-big-money-presidential-hopefuls/#comment-161354 Thu, 12 Apr 2007 11:47:19 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/10/peroutka-slams-big-money-presidential-hopefuls/#comment-161354 Denis is a religious-freak? What religion specially? New Age? Denis is a religious-freak?

What religion specially? New Age?

]]> by: Trent Hill http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/10/peroutka-slams-big-money-presidential-hopefuls/#comment-161032 Wed, 11 Apr 2007 20:15:05 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/10/peroutka-slams-big-money-presidential-hopefuls/#comment-161032 That. Was actually rather humorous. That. Was actually rather humorous.

]]> by: globalist_elitist http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/10/peroutka-slams-big-money-presidential-hopefuls/#comment-161012 Wed, 11 Apr 2007 19:36:42 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/10/peroutka-slams-big-money-presidential-hopefuls/#comment-161012 Of course, I can say the same for Charles Manson, Fidel Castro, GWB, etc. Of course, I can say the same for Charles Manson, Fidel Castro, GWB, etc.

]]> by: Jason http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/10/peroutka-slams-big-money-presidential-hopefuls/#comment-161008 Wed, 11 Apr 2007 19:27:31 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/10/peroutka-slams-big-money-presidential-hopefuls/#comment-161008 Thanks GE.... Thanks GE….

]]> by: globalist_elitist http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/10/peroutka-slams-big-money-presidential-hopefuls/#comment-160992 Wed, 11 Apr 2007 18:20:42 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/10/peroutka-slams-big-money-presidential-hopefuls/#comment-160992 If it makes everyone feel better, I can state with relative confidence that NONE of you will be going to hell. If it makes everyone feel better, I can state with relative confidence that NONE of you will be going to hell.

]]> by: Trent Hill http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/10/peroutka-slams-big-money-presidential-hopefuls/#comment-160989 Wed, 11 Apr 2007 18:13:22 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/10/peroutka-slams-big-money-presidential-hopefuls/#comment-160989 Its not that they didn't have our belief set Yosemite. I neither know, nor care, about Lofton/Whiteman/Peroutka's religious beliefs. I have heard they are Calvinists, and don't doubt it. I also know next to nothing about Calvinism itself. I don't think Peroutka is going to hell, nor have I even given that thought before you just mentioned it. I simply believe him to be wrong on the issue of disafilliation. My statement, "the fact that...$...went to...Lofton....makes me sick" is the same as saying it makes me sick that Karl Rove got some of my money, or whomever. I GROSSLY disagree with their political beliefs, and don't feel wrong in expressing that. Mind you, I can work with alot of people with whom I disagree. To be sure, I am in the CP, which I disagree with on several issues. The difference being, I will cooperate with anyone on an issue which we agree on, as long as they are civil. I do not find Lofton, Whittman, or Whiteman to be civil. I find them to be damaging to the cause of Constitutionalism. And I oppose them with the same vigilance that I oppose MUSLIM fundamentalists who wish to remove women's rights. Its not that they didn’t have our belief set Yosemite.
I neither know, nor care, about Lofton/Whiteman/Peroutka’s religious beliefs. I have heard they are Calvinists, and don’t doubt it. I also know next to nothing about Calvinism itself. I don’t think Peroutka is going to hell, nor have I even given that thought before you just mentioned it.
I simply believe him to be wrong on the issue of disafilliation. My statement, “the fact that…$...went to…Lofton….makes me sick” is the same as saying it makes me sick that Karl Rove got some of my money, or whomever. I GROSSLY disagree with their political beliefs, and don’t feel wrong in expressing that. Mind you, I can work with alot of people with whom I disagree. To be sure, I am in the CP, which I disagree with on several issues. The difference being, I will cooperate with anyone on an issue which we agree on, as long as they are civil. I do not find Lofton, Whittman, or Whiteman to be civil. I find them to be damaging to the cause of Constitutionalism. And I oppose them with the same vigilance that I oppose MUSLIM fundamentalists who wish to remove women’s rights.

]]>