<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Legacy of Republican Voter Fraud</title>
	<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/10/the-legacy-of-republican-voter-fraud/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 16:33:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: gljqedpmtv</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/10/the-legacy-of-republican-voter-fraud/#comment-226313</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 19:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/10/the-legacy-of-republican-voter-fraud/#comment-226313</guid>
					<description>Thanks for this site!
 &lt;a href=&quot;http://hifue.info&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;hifue.info&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Thanks for this site!</p>
	<p> <a href="http://hifue.info" rel="nofollow">hifue.info</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: twrdschzik</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/10/the-legacy-of-republican-voter-fraud/#comment-221099</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2007 15:06:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/10/the-legacy-of-republican-voter-fraud/#comment-221099</guid>
					<description>Hello! Good Site! Thanks you! qembpdxfimrhqv</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Hello! Good Site! Thanks you! qembpdxfimrhqv</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: globalist_elitist</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/10/the-legacy-of-republican-voter-fraud/#comment-163882</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 15:38:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/10/the-legacy-of-republican-voter-fraud/#comment-163882</guid>
					<description>No shit. That doesn't negate that fact that the South was fighting explicitly to ensure that slavery would endure, or that, by the war's end, it was a battle for black emancipation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>No shit. That doesn&#8217;t negate that fact that the South was fighting explicitly to ensure that slavery would endure, or that, by the war&#8217;s end, it was a battle for black emancipation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Andy</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/10/the-legacy-of-republican-voter-fraud/#comment-163610</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 08:16:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/10/the-legacy-of-republican-voter-fraud/#comment-163610</guid>
					<description>&quot;The Confederacy was a white-supremacist terrorist insurrection and it needed to be crushed as totally as Nazi Germany.&quot;

Unlike the Union which also had slave states and which was a base of operations for slave trading ships.  Discrimination and brutal treatment of blacks was actually quite common in the Union states,  as was brutal treatment of American Indians.  

Why don't you get your facts straight instead of spewing forth propaganda?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>&#8220;The Confederacy was a white-supremacist terrorist insurrection and it needed to be crushed as totally as Nazi Germany.&#8221;</p>
	<p>Unlike the Union which also had slave states and which was a base of operations for slave trading ships.  Discrimination and brutal treatment of blacks was actually quite common in the Union states,  as was brutal treatment of American Indians.</p>
	<p>Why don&#8217;t you get your facts straight instead of spewing forth propaganda?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Trent Hill</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/10/the-legacy-of-republican-voter-fraud/#comment-163517</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 04:38:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/10/the-legacy-of-republican-voter-fraud/#comment-163517</guid>
					<description>Ohk. As long as you are playing apologetic for the &quot;illegalities and cruelties&quot; of the North, I think we can agree here.
We can also agree that everytime America has sought to destroy its enemy, it has succeeded. Whereas in Vietnam, Korea, Iraq, and to a certain degree,the South...they did not.

We disagree on the &quot;being jailed and deported&quot; thing. But only because of how Lincoln talked about the war. Had he jailed everyone who refused to swear allegiance to the Union...he would've had to dedicate one state (a large one) as a penal colony. And even then, he'd be hard-pressed to fit everyone. Because of the way the war was handled by the North...he couldnt, and he shouldn't have as he had no right to. However. We agree on principle, in an unnamed/random war...Congress should declare war (so the PEOPLE are the ones declaring,rather than the president. And the President can't be blamed and public opinion turned against him),and the goal shouldn't be occupation but destruction of the enemy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Ohk. As long as you are playing apologetic for the &#8220;illegalities and cruelties&#8221; of the North, I think we can agree here.<br />
We can also agree that everytime America has sought to destroy its enemy, it has succeeded. Whereas in Vietnam, Korea, Iraq, and to a certain degree,the South&#8230;they did not.</p>
	<p>We disagree on the &#8220;being jailed and deported&#8221; thing. But only because of how Lincoln talked about the war. Had he jailed everyone who refused to swear allegiance to the Union&#8230;he would&#8217;ve had to dedicate one state (a large one) as a penal colony. And even then, he&#8217;d be hard-pressed to fit everyone. Because of the way the war was handled by the North&#8230;he couldnt, and he shouldn&#8217;t have as he had no right to. However. We agree on principle, in an unnamed/random war&#8230;Congress should declare war (so the <span class="caps">PEOPLE</span> are the ones declaring,rather than the president. And the President can&#8217;t be blamed and public opinion turned against him),and the goal shouldn&#8217;t be occupation but destruction of the enemy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: globalist_elitist</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/10/the-legacy-of-republican-voter-fraud/#comment-163455</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 00:01:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/10/the-legacy-of-republican-voter-fraud/#comment-163455</guid>
					<description>RE: Shelby Steele... As someone who has made his own ideological conversion, it seems as though Mr. Steele has swung a little too far in the opposite direction, in his loyalties if not his views. He basically makes the case of Jeffersonian liberal values and then makes apologies for the modern GOP. I agree with you on this point. Also, it was completely disingenuous how he completely ignored the fact that Eisenhower DID have an open affair. But those are very small nitpicks. The bigger one is that he makes the case that white guilt has undermined American legitimacy, but he doesn't really offer much of an appropriate alternative. It was good for the U.S. and its people to acknowledge racism and its history, but then what? Clearly, &quot;disassociation&quot; at all costs and as the end-all be-all is not the solution.

RE: Reconstruction... The Old Guard did re-emerge shortly after Reconstruction ended. Slaves, who had rightfully been given property that was built by their labor, had it confiscated and returned to their old slavemasters, who were enemy combatants and refused to swear allegiance to the Constitution. I guess I don't get your argument. We seem to be saying the same thing, and yet at the same time, the opposite thing.

My point is that if a war is to be fought, it should be fought entirely. I am not making excuses for illegalities or cruelties of the North during the war, but the goal should have been the complete anihilation of the enemy. Every time this has been America's goal, we have won wars. Every time it has not, we have not. This was the goal of the North (&quot;America&quot; in this case), but it was not seen through to completion.

There were people and groups in the South still in open rebellion. Just look at the Battle of New Orleans. My belief is that these people should have been treated no differently than insurgents in Iraq or members of Al Qaeda in Afghanistan and Pakistan. Any former Confederate who refused to swear allagience to the Constitution should have been deported, jailed, or executed for treason. Anyone guilty of infringing upon the constitutional rights of others should have been sentenced to prison. There should have been no tolerance for a return to the Old Way. And this was one vote in the Senate away from being the way it would have been, if Johnson would have been convicted and Wade had become president.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>RE: Shelby Steele&#8230; As someone who has made his own ideological conversion, it seems as though Mr. Steele has swung a little too far in the opposite direction, in his loyalties if not his views. He basically makes the case of Jeffersonian liberal values and then makes apologies for the modern <span class="caps">GOP</span>. I agree with you on this point. Also, it was completely disingenuous how he completely ignored the fact that Eisenhower <span class="caps">DID</span> have an open affair. But those are very small nitpicks. The bigger one is that he makes the case that white guilt has undermined American legitimacy, but he doesn&#8217;t really offer much of an appropriate alternative. It was good for the U.S. and its people to acknowledge racism and its history, but then what? Clearly, &#8220;disassociation&#8221; at all costs and as the end-all be-all is not the solution.</p>
	<p>RE: Reconstruction&#8230; The Old Guard did re-emerge shortly after Reconstruction ended. Slaves, who had rightfully been given property that was built by their labor, had it confiscated and returned to their old slavemasters, who were enemy combatants and refused to swear allegiance to the Constitution. I guess I don&#8217;t get your argument. We seem to be saying the same thing, and yet at the same time, the opposite thing.</p>
	<p>My point is that if a war is to be fought, it should be fought entirely. I am not making excuses for illegalities or cruelties of the North during the war, but the goal should have been the complete anihilation of the enemy. Every time this has been America&#8217;s goal, we have won wars. Every time it has not, we have not. This was the goal of the North (&#8220;America&#8221; in this case), but it was not seen through to completion.</p>
	<p>There were people and groups in the South still in open rebellion. Just look at the Battle of New Orleans. My belief is that these people should have been treated no differently than insurgents in Iraq or members of Al Qaeda in Afghanistan and Pakistan. Any former Confederate who refused to swear allagience to the Constitution should have been deported, jailed, or executed for treason. Anyone guilty of infringing upon the constitutional rights of others should have been sentenced to prison. There should have been no tolerance for a return to the Old Way. And this was one vote in the Senate away from being the way it would have been, if Johnson would have been convicted and Wade had become president.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Trent Hill</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/10/the-legacy-of-republican-voter-fraud/#comment-163446</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 22:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/10/the-legacy-of-republican-voter-fraud/#comment-163446</guid>
					<description>I'll agree it was a White Power Structure. But it wasn't the Old White Power Structure.
It was a northern dominated power structure. The fight between the old gaurd and the new gaurd, with rival factions of racists and integrationists in each group intensified until the 1960's,when it came to a head.
Iv read the book, and agree with large portions of it (despite the fact that he is a Republican apologetic). It makes a great case for how Blacks traded hand-outs for self-determination. He makes some over-arching statements that I disagree with, but in general--I like it.

As for the failure of Reconstruction, it could have been carried out better. We both agree on that. You think it should have been a more systematic destruction of the Old Gaurd. I think the Old Gaurd would have faded off without the Abuse of the Northerners...there would have been nothing to fuel that Old Guard's hatred.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I&#8217;ll agree it was a White Power Structure. But it wasn&#8217;t the Old White Power Structure.<br />
It was a northern dominated power structure. The fight between the old gaurd and the new gaurd, with rival factions of racists and integrationists in each group intensified until the 1960&#8217;s,when it came to a head.<br />
Iv read the book, and agree with large portions of it (despite the fact that he is a Republican apologetic). It makes a great case for how Blacks traded hand-outs for self-determination. He makes some over-arching statements that I disagree with, but in general&#8212;I like it.</p>
	<p>As for the failure of Reconstruction, it could have been carried out better. We both agree on that. You think it should have been a more systematic destruction of the Old Gaurd. I think the Old Gaurd would have faded off without the Abuse of the Northerners&#8230;there would have been nothing to fuel that Old Guard&#8217;s hatred.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: globalist_elitist</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/10/the-legacy-of-republican-voter-fraud/#comment-163439</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 22:08:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/10/the-legacy-of-republican-voter-fraud/#comment-163439</guid>
					<description>I generally agree. But the failure of Reconstruction was that it was incomplete... Not that it &quot;went too far.&quot; The old white power structure was put back in place to exploit blacks and whites alike, and this remained in effect in large part for another 100 years, and continues today in some small part. Either I'm right or Southerners are naturally dumb, lazy, and racist.

Hey, I got a good book for you, Trent. I just got it from my conservative father-in-law and read it in one sitting two nights ago. It is called White Guilt, by Shelby Steele (a supposed &quot;black conservative,&quot; but I would not tag him as such). Ever heard of it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I generally agree. But the failure of Reconstruction was that it was incomplete&#8230; Not that it &#8220;went too far.&#8221; The old white power structure was put back in place to exploit blacks and whites alike, and this remained in effect in large part for another 100 years, and continues today in some small part. Either I&#8217;m right or Southerners are naturally dumb, lazy, and racist.</p>
	<p>Hey, I got a good book for you, Trent. I just got it from my conservative father-in-law and read it in one sitting two nights ago. It is called White Guilt, by Shelby Steele (a supposed &#8220;black conservative,&#8221; but I would not tag him as such). Ever heard of it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Trent Hill</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/10/the-legacy-of-republican-voter-fraud/#comment-163424</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 21:58:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/10/the-legacy-of-republican-voter-fraud/#comment-163424</guid>
					<description>Thier environment? Well, it could be that.

However, what has directly affected our environment? At least part of it is the bad methods of Reconstruction,and the War Crimes of Sherman (who was NOT a president! lol).
Particularly the war crimes of Sherman, protectionism of the North, destruction of the slave system, and death of a generation, left our area of the country about 5 decades behind everyone else. 
After that you count the bad policies of carpet baggars and racist democrats, and the causes of the Southern lagging becomes apparent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Thier environment? Well, it could be that.</p>
	<p>However, what has directly affected our environment? At least part of it is the bad methods of Reconstruction,and the War Crimes of Sherman (who was <span class="caps">NOT</span> a president! lol).<br />
Particularly the war crimes of Sherman, protectionism of the North, destruction of the slave system, and death of a generation, left our area of the country about 5 decades behind everyone else.<br />
After that you count the bad policies of carpet baggars and racist democrats, and the causes of the Southern lagging becomes apparent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: globalist_elitist</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/10/the-legacy-of-republican-voter-fraud/#comment-163266</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 15:51:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/10/the-legacy-of-republican-voter-fraud/#comment-163266</guid>
					<description>John Chance - Look at aggregate data. The South is behind the North under almost every intellectual, financial, and technological measure. Things are finally starting to get better now. But citing a bunch of pre-Civil War figures to &quot;prove&quot; that the South has not lagged since that time is ridiculous. What's even more ridiculous is the fact that I have to say that Southerners are no different from Northerners. It is the enviornment that has held them back. Duh. What else could it be? Are they naturally inferior? Of course not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>John Chance &#8211; Look at aggregate data. The South is behind the North under almost every intellectual, financial, and technological measure. Things are finally starting to get better now. But citing a bunch of pre-Civil War figures to &#8220;prove&#8221; that the South has not lagged since that time is ridiculous. What&#8217;s even more ridiculous is the fact that I have to say that Southerners are no different from Northerners. It is the enviornment that has held them back. Duh. What else could it be? Are they naturally inferior? Of course not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Chris Campbell</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/10/the-legacy-of-republican-voter-fraud/#comment-163173</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 13:03:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/10/the-legacy-of-republican-voter-fraud/#comment-163173</guid>
					<description>Gary, I know what you mean. They go too far off deep end on almost anything. A shame that all the positive articles I send to the editors here largely go ignored.

Well, I am only a loly National member.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Gary, I know what you mean. They go too far off deep end on almost anything. A shame that all the positive articles I send to the editors here largely go ignored.</p>
	<p>Well, I am only a loly National member.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: John Chance</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/10/the-legacy-of-republican-voter-fraud/#comment-163168</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 13:01:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/10/the-legacy-of-republican-voter-fraud/#comment-163168</guid>
					<description>Angela, take your own advice and views-zip it and do not criticize the menfolk. Men (leaders) are talking now.

As far as teh South being ignorant, etc, etc. is this the same South that gave us R.E. Lee? Jefferson? Washington? Madison?

For such backward folks, there was certainly a big enough fuss to force them at gun point to stay in a union they no longer wished to have. Also, blacks were especially targeted for theft, assualt and rape by Yankee troops.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Angela, take your own advice and views-zip it and do not criticize the menfolk. Men (leaders) are talking now.</p>
	<p>As far as teh South being ignorant, etc, etc. is this the same South that gave us R.E. Lee? Jefferson? Washington? Madison?</p>
	<p>For such backward folks, there was certainly a big enough fuss to force them at gun point to stay in a union they no longer wished to have. Also, blacks were especially targeted for theft, assualt and rape by Yankee troops.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Trent Hill</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/10/the-legacy-of-republican-voter-fraud/#comment-161152</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 00:29:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/10/the-legacy-of-republican-voter-fraud/#comment-161152</guid>
					<description>The right to peaceably assemble at all.
No,White Leagues could easily be called a riot or inciting a riot. So that is obviously not what I'm identifying here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>The right to peaceably assemble at all.<br />
No,White Leagues could easily be called a riot or inciting a riot. So that is obviously not what I&#8217;m identifying here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: globalist_elitist</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/10/the-legacy-of-republican-voter-fraud/#comment-161117</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 22:53:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/10/the-legacy-of-republican-voter-fraud/#comment-161117</guid>
					<description>Because they had corrupt, ulterior motives. That's irrelavent, though.

The right to &quot;peacably assemble&quot; in White Leagues?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Because they had corrupt, ulterior motives. That&#8217;s irrelavent, though.</p>
	<p>The right to &#8220;peacably assemble&#8221; in White Leagues?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Trent Hill</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/10/the-legacy-of-republican-voter-fraud/#comment-161084</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 22:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/10/the-legacy-of-republican-voter-fraud/#comment-161084</guid>
					<description>Technically, if they were a territory--then your arguement that blacks were citizens is incorrect. But I get your point. 

It was the WAY Reconstruction was handled. Those white people, the citizens, had no real represenation, and widescale voter fraud (as you so noted) took place. They may have been protecting the black citizens rights, meanwhile they were destroying the white southerner's rights. (and no,im not talking rights toi property. Im talking right to peaceably assemble. Right to representation. Right to bear arms. Stuff like that).

Also, why would the Post-Civil War republicans take on such a courageous mission when during the Civil War, they had oppressed their own citizens so heavily,indeed blurring the lines between democracy and fascism by taking away Habeas Corpus, deporting political opposition, and shutting down dissenting newpapers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Technically, if they were a territory&#8212;then your arguement that blacks were citizens is incorrect. But I get your point.</p>
	<p>It was the <span class="caps">WAY </span>Reconstruction was handled. Those white people, the citizens, had no real represenation, and widescale voter fraud (as you so noted) took place. They may have been protecting the black citizens rights, meanwhile they were destroying the white southerner&#8217;s rights. (and no,im not talking rights toi property. Im talking right to peaceably assemble. Right to representation. Right to bear arms. Stuff like that).</p>
	<p>Also, why would the Post-Civil War republicans take on such a courageous mission when during the Civil War, they had oppressed their own citizens so heavily,indeed blurring the lines between democracy and fascism by taking away Habeas Corpus, deporting political opposition, and shutting down dissenting newpapers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
