<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Newest TPW Contributor</title>
	<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/25/newest-tpw-contributor/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 17:47:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: H. Doxson</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/25/newest-tpw-contributor/#comment-207770</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 23:40:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/25/newest-tpw-contributor/#comment-207770</guid>
					<description>I hope this site works better for you.  I have read your Elliscountyobserver site, but I don't like pornography and never will.  If you stay here, please try not to offend.  The picture of the unclothed men having sex was a bit much, even to get your point across.  Let's keep it clean, learn to use your words.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I hope this site works better for you.  I have read your Elliscountyobserver site, but I don&#8217;t like pornography and never will.  If you stay here, please try not to offend.  The picture of the unclothed men having sex was a bit much, even to get your point across.  Let&#8217;s keep it clean, learn to use your words.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jay Matthews</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/25/newest-tpw-contributor/#comment-172052</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2007 23:29:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/25/newest-tpw-contributor/#comment-172052</guid>
					<description>&quot;That’s true, but being radically anti-choice and anti-gay is a form of domestic war. If war is the only thing/by far the most important thing, would you support, say, McGovern over Goldwater?&quot;

Really?  Radically anti-choice??  From www.ontheissues.org:

Ron Paul:

Voted NO on restricting interstate transport of minors to get abortions

Voted NO on barring transporting minors to get an abortion

(The above two votes were similar but separate bills years apart.)  

Voted YES on banning partial-birth abortion except to save mother’s life. 

(A &quot;radical&quot; would want it prohibited even with the mother's life in danger.)

And he has publicly stated while he is pro-life he believes it should be a state issue as per the 9th and 10 amendments.  Again, not the sign of a radical.

Anti-Gay??

He voted NO on Constitutional Amendment banning same-sex marriage. 

Some radical.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>&#8220;That&#8217;s true, but being radically anti-choice and anti-gay is a form of domestic war. If war is the only thing/by far the most important thing, would you support, say, McGovern over Goldwater?&#8221;</p>
	<p>Really?  Radically anti-choice??  From <a href='http://www.ontheissues.org' rel='nofollow'>www.ontheissues.org</a>:</p>
	<p>Ron Paul:</p>
	<p>Voted NO on restricting interstate transport of minors to get abortions</p>
	<p>Voted NO on barring transporting minors to get an abortion</p>
	<p>(The above two votes were similar but separate bills years apart.)</p>
	<p>Voted <span class="caps">YES</span> on banning partial-birth abortion except to save mother&#8217;s life.</p>
	<p>(A &#8220;radical&#8221; would want it prohibited even with the mother&#8217;s life in danger.)</p>
	<p>And he has publicly stated while he is pro-life he believes it should be a state issue as per the 9th and 10 amendments.  Again, not the sign of a radical.</p>
	<p>Anti-Gay??</p>
	<p>He voted NO on Constitutional Amendment banning same-sex marriage.</p>
	<p>Some radical.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: globalist_elitist</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/25/newest-tpw-contributor/#comment-171841</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2007 15:32:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/25/newest-tpw-contributor/#comment-171841</guid>
					<description>That's true, but being radically anti-choice and anti-gay is a form of domestic war. If war is the only thing/by far the most important thing, would you support, say, McGovern over Goldwater?

And yes, Paul is anti-gay. 1) That's why he fired Dondero, and 2) That's why he opposed allowing gay couples adopt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>That&#8217;s true, but being radically anti-choice and anti-gay is a form of domestic war. If war is the only thing/by far the most important thing, would you support, say, McGovern over Goldwater?</p>
	<p>And yes, Paul is anti-gay. 1) That&#8217;s why he fired Dondero, and 2) That&#8217;s why he opposed allowing gay couples adopt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Andy</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/25/newest-tpw-contributor/#comment-171426</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2007 04:36:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/25/newest-tpw-contributor/#comment-171426</guid>
					<description>&quot;globalist_elitist Says: 

April 27th, 2007 at 9:28 pm 
Just so you know, Ron Paul and Barry Goldwater are almost nothing alike. Goldwater was pro-choice, pro-gay marriage, and a mega hawk. Ron Paul is anti-gay, anti-choice, and anti-war. I’ll take Goldwater’s two out of three to Paul’s one.&quot;

First of all,  Ron Paul is not anti-gay.  Second,  if you think that being &quot;pro-gay&quot; and anti-abortion are more important than being anti-war you've got some mixed up priorities.  War is the biggest and most destructive government program that there is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>&#8220;globalist_elitist Says:</p>
	<p>April 27th, 2007 at 9:28 pm<br />
Just so you know, Ron Paul and Barry Goldwater are almost nothing alike. Goldwater was pro-choice, pro-gay marriage, and a mega hawk. Ron Paul is anti-gay, anti-choice, and anti-war. I&#8217;ll take Goldwater&#8217;s two out of three to Paul&#8217;s one.&#8221;</p>
	<p>First of all,  Ron Paul is not anti-gay.  Second,  if you think that being &#8220;pro-gay&#8221; and anti-abortion are more important than being anti-war you&#8217;ve got some mixed up priorities.  War is the biggest and most destructive government program that there is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: globalist_elitist</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/25/newest-tpw-contributor/#comment-171323</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2007 01:28:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/25/newest-tpw-contributor/#comment-171323</guid>
					<description>Just so you know, Ron Paul and Barry Goldwater are almost nothing alike. Goldwater was pro-choice, pro-gay marriage, and a mega hawk. Ron Paul is anti-gay, anti-choice, and anti-war. I'll take Goldwater's two out of three to Paul's one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Just so you know, Ron Paul and Barry Goldwater are almost nothing alike. Goldwater was pro-choice, pro-gay marriage, and a mega hawk. Ron Paul is anti-gay, anti-choice, and anti-war. I&#8217;ll take Goldwater&#8217;s two out of three to Paul&#8217;s one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: globalist_elitist</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/25/newest-tpw-contributor/#comment-171317</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2007 01:24:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/25/newest-tpw-contributor/#comment-171317</guid>
					<description>Hey, it's great that TPW has added another competetent contributor, but can anything be done about the emphasis on the far-right parties? Virtually all of the contributors are from the CP/CP-like factions. No offense to Mr. Dauben.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Hey, it&#8217;s great that <span class="caps">TPW</span> has added another competetent contributor, but can anything be done about the emphasis on the far-right parties? Virtually all of the contributors are from the CP/CP-like factions. No offense to Mr. Dauben.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: LPiberty</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/25/newest-tpw-contributor/#comment-170979</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 16:33:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/25/newest-tpw-contributor/#comment-170979</guid>
					<description>Welcome. Much success.


How much WAR can millions buy?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Welcome. Much success.</p>
	<p>How much <span class="caps">WAR</span> can millions buy?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Doctor Paul Wayne Snyder, PhD</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/25/newest-tpw-contributor/#comment-170141</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 18:13:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/25/newest-tpw-contributor/#comment-170141</guid>
					<description>Objective news articles, 
not just rah-rah propaganda!
Plz!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Objective news articles,<br />
not just rah-rah propaganda!<br />
Plz!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Trent Hill</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/25/newest-tpw-contributor/#comment-170083</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 16:56:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/25/newest-tpw-contributor/#comment-170083</guid>
					<description>Well Chris,

Cody Quirk is an AIP member, and Joey Dauben is supportive of CP activities...so you can send them the stuff i'd guess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Well Chris,</p>
	<p>Cody Quirk is an <span class="caps">AIP</span> member, and Joey Dauben is supportive of CP activities&#8230;so you can send them the stuff i&#8217;d guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Chris Campbell</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/25/newest-tpw-contributor/#comment-169962</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 13:54:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/25/newest-tpw-contributor/#comment-169962</guid>
					<description>I would love to know this fellow's secret, as I was asked by Field Director odom some months ago to report on CP issues. The owner of this site told me to send him articles, etc.

So far, no response and no posting of anything I have sent. More power to him as apparently a state Chairman's contributions go without any response.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I would love to know this fellow&#8217;s secret, as I was asked by Field Director odom some months ago to report on CP issues. The owner of this site told me to send him articles, etc.</p>
	<p>So far, no response and no posting of anything I have sent. More power to him as apparently a state Chairman&#8217;s contributions go without any response.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Freelancer</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/25/newest-tpw-contributor/#comment-169729</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 03:40:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/25/newest-tpw-contributor/#comment-169729</guid>
					<description>Welcome abourd, Joey.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Welcome abourd, Joey.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Trent Hill</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/25/newest-tpw-contributor/#comment-169707</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 02:16:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/25/newest-tpw-contributor/#comment-169707</guid>
					<description>Joey!

BRING US MORE UPDATES AND GOOD ARTICLES!

I get tired of reading the same articles over and over,lol. Maybe one per hour?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Joey!</p>
	<p><span class="caps">BRING US MORE UPDATES AND GOOD ARTICLES</span>!</p>
	<p>I get tired of reading the same articles over and over,lol. Maybe one per hour?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
