Comments on: American Pro-Life Parties Alliance http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/27/american-pro-life-parties-alliance/ Sat, 06 Sep 2008 17:38:22 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1.3 by: clay modeling car http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/27/american-pro-life-parties-alliance/#comment-572147 Fri, 18 Apr 2008 18:46:29 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/27/american-pro-life-parties-alliance/#comment-572147 <strong>arrow clip art free</strong> girl breast com arrow clip art free

girl breast com

]]> by: Cody Quirk http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/27/american-pro-life-parties-alliance/#comment-174702 Thu, 03 May 2007 18:43:54 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/27/american-pro-life-parties-alliance/#comment-174702 I think he's left the building, and also people have already moved on too. I think he’s left the building, and also people have already moved on too.

]]> by: Yosemite1967 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/27/american-pro-life-parties-alliance/#comment-174311 Wed, 02 May 2007 18:56:50 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/27/american-pro-life-parties-alliance/#comment-174311 Kewl! Learn something new every day. :) (Noseless this time.) Kewl! Learn something new every day. :) (Noseless this time.)

]]> by: Yosemite1967 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/27/american-pro-life-parties-alliance/#comment-174309 Wed, 02 May 2007 18:55:45 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/27/american-pro-life-parties-alliance/#comment-174309 Hm, those were supposed to be smilies with caret characters for noses, but I inadvertently figured out how to do superscripting. OK, here goes a test: E=mc^2^ Hm, those were supposed to be smilies with caret characters for noses, but I inadvertently figured out how to do superscripting.

OK, here goes a test: E=mc2

]]> by: Yosemite1967 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/27/american-pro-life-parties-alliance/#comment-174303 Wed, 02 May 2007 18:52:15 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/27/american-pro-life-parties-alliance/#comment-174303 :^) I commend you on your patience. :^) :) I commend you on your patience. :)

]]> by: Cody Quirk http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/27/american-pro-life-parties-alliance/#comment-174280 Wed, 02 May 2007 18:19:43 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/27/american-pro-life-parties-alliance/#comment-174280 Tick, tick, tick...... Tick, tick, tick…...

]]> by: Cody Quirk http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/27/american-pro-life-parties-alliance/#comment-173868 Tue, 01 May 2007 20:30:15 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/27/american-pro-life-parties-alliance/#comment-173868 So how is your email debate coming Trent? So how is your email debate coming Trent?

]]> by: Cody Quirk http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/27/american-pro-life-parties-alliance/#comment-173838 Tue, 01 May 2007 19:03:39 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/27/american-pro-life-parties-alliance/#comment-173838 The clock is ticking......... The clock is ticking…......

]]> by: Yosemite1967 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/27/american-pro-life-parties-alliance/#comment-173819 Tue, 01 May 2007 18:27:14 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/27/american-pro-life-parties-alliance/#comment-173819 Cody, it would be better to let RRH answer himself, so that you don't risk misrepresenting his position, regardless of whether he has already done so with your beliefs. It's, "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you," rather than, "Do unto others as they do unto you." :^) Cody, it would be better to let RRH answer himself, so that you don’t risk misrepresenting his position, regardless of whether he has already done so with your beliefs. It’s, “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you,” rather than, “Do unto others as they do unto you.” :^)

]]> by: Cody Quirk http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/27/american-pro-life-parties-alliance/#comment-173781 Tue, 01 May 2007 17:10:15 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/27/american-pro-life-parties-alliance/#comment-173781 RRHeustis, do you really think that it is wise to be consigning people to hell for not believing in a man-made interpretation of scripture like the Nicene creed? =Basically yes, he thinks it's wise- after all, anybody not a true Calvinist is going to Hell, right? =And Jesus has a 'different version' of himself that Mormons believe in! LOL! (sarcasm off) RRHeustis, do you really think that it is wise to be consigning people to hell for not believing in a man-made interpretation of scripture like the Nicene creed?

=Basically yes, he thinks it’s wise- after all, anybody not a true Calvinist is going to Hell, right?

=And Jesus has a ‘different version’ of himself that Mormons believe in!

LOL!

(sarcasm off)

]]> by: Yosemite1967 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/27/american-pro-life-parties-alliance/#comment-173732 Tue, 01 May 2007 15:49:34 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/27/american-pro-life-parties-alliance/#comment-173732 RRHeustis, do you really think that it is wise to be consigning people to hell for not believing in a man-made interpretation of scripture like the Nicene creed? I mean, did its authors receive it from an angel of God, or is it the product of a committee? It seems like a pretty sandy foundation to be standing on, but straighten me out here. RRHeustis, do you really think that it is wise to be consigning people to hell for not believing in a man-made interpretation of scripture like the Nicene creed? I mean, did its authors receive it from an angel of God, or is it the product of a committee?

It seems like a pretty sandy foundation to be standing on, but straighten me out here.

]]> by: Cody Quirk http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/27/american-pro-life-parties-alliance/#comment-173387 Tue, 01 May 2007 00:58:07 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/27/american-pro-life-parties-alliance/#comment-173387 Either Jesus is part of the God-head, or He isn’t. If one person believes Jesus is God, and the other person believes Jesus is not God, then both people logically cannot be right at the same time and in the same way. Logic dictates the outcome: two different Jesus’s. One true. The other false. =Then obviously Jesus has dozens of clones of himself, since different christian sects and even other religions believe in Jesus differently from one another. Here's our belief on the nature of Jesus Christ http://ldsfaq.byu.edu/emmain.asp?number=106 Who are you to dictate logic, Reed? Your arguments against the CP lack logic itself. Your absolutionist arguments are quiet a handicap. Either Jesus is part of the God-head, or He isn’t. If one person believes Jesus is God, and the other person believes Jesus is not God, then both people logically cannot be right at the same time and in the same way.
Logic dictates the outcome: two different Jesus’s. One true. The other false.

=Then obviously Jesus has dozens of clones of himself, since different christian sects and even other religions believe in Jesus differently from one another.

Here’s our belief on the nature of Jesus Christ

http://ldsfaq.byu.edu/emmain.asp?number=106

Who are you to dictate logic, Reed? Your arguments against the CP lack logic itself. Your absolutionist arguments are quiet a handicap.

]]> by: Trent Hill http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/27/american-pro-life-parties-alliance/#comment-173384 Tue, 01 May 2007 00:50:28 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/27/american-pro-life-parties-alliance/#comment-173384 I can see with that Cody. Thats not to say I agree. I don't... but I can certainly see where that inference comes from. I can see with that Cody.

Thats not to say I agree. I don’t…
but I can certainly see where that inference comes from.

]]> by: Cody Quirk http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/27/american-pro-life-parties-alliance/#comment-173380 Tue, 01 May 2007 00:41:18 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/27/american-pro-life-parties-alliance/#comment-173380 "Sorry Trent, your motions are faulty. The Bible teaches that Jesus Christ is self-creating because He is God. (See John 1). =I don't think so... Psalms 2:7, Matthew 3:17, Mark 9:7, Luke 9:35, Acts 13:33, Hebrews 1:5, 5:5, 2 Peter 1:17, and so on, and so on. The phrases "Son of God", "My Son", "Only Begotten Son" etc. we take literally, if the Bible says that Jesus is the Son of God, then he is the literal Son of God. Plus John 1:1 can be interpreted by LDS like this this- "In the beginning was the gospel preached through the Son. And the gospel was the word, and the word was with the Son, and the Son was with God, and the Son was of God." Some further reading= http://fairwiki.org/index.php/Godhead_and_the_Trinity http://www.fairlds.org/Mormonism_201/m20103.html “Sorry Trent, your motions are faulty. The Bible teaches that Jesus Christ is self-creating because He is God. (See John 1).

=I don’t think so…

Psalms 2:7, Matthew 3:17, Mark 9:7, Luke 9:35, Acts 13:33, Hebrews 1:5, 5:5, 2 Peter 1:17, and so on, and so on. The phrases “Son of God”, “My Son”, “Only Begotten Son” etc. we take literally, if the Bible says that Jesus is the Son of God, then he is the literal Son of God.

Plus John 1:1 can be interpreted by LDS like this this-

“In the beginning was the gospel preached through the Son. And the gospel was the word, and the word was with the Son, and the Son was with God, and the Son was of God.”

Some further reading=

http://fairwiki.org/index.php/Godhead_and_the_Trinity

http://www.fairlds.org/Mormonism_201/m20103.html

]]> by: Trent Hill http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/27/american-pro-life-parties-alliance/#comment-173368 Mon, 30 Apr 2007 23:59:32 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/04/27/american-pro-life-parties-alliance/#comment-173368 Shotdown1027@yahoo.com Shotdown1027@yahoo.com

]]>