<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Constitution Party candidate running for Congress in Concord</title>
	<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/05/05/constitution-party-candidate-running-for-congress-in-concord/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 20:04:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Paul</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/05/05/constitution-party-candidate-running-for-congress-in-concord/#comment-183470</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 17:53:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/05/05/constitution-party-candidate-running-for-congress-in-concord/#comment-183470</guid>
					<description>This representative of the Constitution Party of Massachusetts is lying! He says that our Founding Fathers were christian and our constitution was founded on the bible. Nothing could be farther from the truth!
The founding fathers were by and large Deists, not christians. In addition, after seven and a half months of strenuous debate on the subject of religious language in the constitution, they decided that a completely secular document would be the best way to ensure liberty for all. Men such as James Madison, Thomas Jefferson and Benjamin Franklin, amongst others, rarely had anything good to say about christianity, or organized religion of any sort, and quite to the contrary are on record critizing those forces most strongly.
If you don't believe me, then google it for yourself!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>This representative of the Constitution Party of Massachusetts is lying! He says that our Founding Fathers were christian and our constitution was founded on the bible. Nothing could be farther from the truth!<br />
The founding fathers were by and large Deists, not christians. In addition, after seven and a half months of strenuous debate on the subject of religious language in the constitution, they decided that a completely secular document would be the best way to ensure liberty for all. Men such as James Madison, Thomas Jefferson and Benjamin Franklin, amongst others, rarely had anything good to say about christianity, or organized religion of any sort, and quite to the contrary are on record critizing those forces most strongly.<br />
If you don&#8217;t believe me, then google it for yourself!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Kevin Thompson</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/05/05/constitution-party-candidate-running-for-congress-in-concord/#comment-177710</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 20:59:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/05/05/constitution-party-candidate-running-for-congress-in-concord/#comment-177710</guid>
					<description>I am officially announcing my candidacy on May 12 at 5:00pm over at the Old North Bridge in Concord, MA.  In the article referenced above, there is one error.  I am the principal of the South Shore Christian School in Brockton, MA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I am officially announcing my candidacy on May 12 at 5:00pm over at the Old North Bridge in Concord, MA.  In the article referenced above, there is one error.  I am the principal of the South Shore Christian School in Brockton, MA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Citizens For A Better Veterans Home[s]</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/05/05/constitution-party-candidate-running-for-congress-in-concord/#comment-176791</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 18:29:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/05/05/constitution-party-candidate-running-for-congress-in-concord/#comment-176791</guid>
					<description>Good solid objective journalism, just include the state on the head line[s]!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Good solid objective journalism, just include the state on the head line[s]!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Gary Odom</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/05/05/constitution-party-candidate-running-for-congress-in-concord/#comment-176305</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2007 21:28:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/05/05/constitution-party-candidate-running-for-congress-in-concord/#comment-176305</guid>
					<description>He'll get on the ballot.  He has one of the premier petitioners in the country involved in the Massachusetts Constitution party who is supporting him and I am quite sure he will make sure that Kevin gets the signatures he needs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>He&#8217;ll get on the ballot.  He has one of the premier petitioners in the country involved in the Massachusetts Constitution party who is supporting him and I am quite sure he will make sure that Kevin gets the signatures he needs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ted</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/05/05/constitution-party-candidate-running-for-congress-in-concord/#comment-176206</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2007 16:36:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/05/05/constitution-party-candidate-running-for-congress-in-concord/#comment-176206</guid>
					<description>It sounds like he can't start working on his petitions until Meehan officially announces he is resigning (which is expected to be on 9 May).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>It sounds like he can&#8217;t start working on his petitions until Meehan officially announces he is resigning (which is expected to be on 9 May).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: matt</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/05/05/constitution-party-candidate-running-for-congress-in-concord/#comment-176053</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2007 06:58:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/05/05/constitution-party-candidate-running-for-congress-in-concord/#comment-176053</guid>
					<description>Hey! That's my line. 

But I sure won't use it here. This is a fine piece of journalism, IMHO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Hey! That&#8217;s my line.</p>
	<p>But I sure won&#8217;t use it here. This is a fine piece of journalism, <span class="caps">IMHO</span>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Cody Quirk</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/05/05/constitution-party-candidate-running-for-congress-in-concord/#comment-176052</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2007 06:57:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/05/05/constitution-party-candidate-running-for-congress-in-concord/#comment-176052</guid>
					<description>Is he ballot-qualified, or on the verge of getting on the ballot?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Is he ballot-qualified, or on the verge of getting on the ballot?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: globalist_elitist</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/05/05/constitution-party-candidate-running-for-congress-in-concord/#comment-175914</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2007 01:12:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/05/05/constitution-party-candidate-running-for-congress-in-concord/#comment-175914</guid>
					<description>&quot;Enough of the editorializing. I demand fair and balanced coverage.&quot;

Just kidding. Solid reporting, Brad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>&#8220;Enough of the editorializing. I demand fair and balanced coverage.&#8221;</p>
	<p>Just kidding. Solid reporting, Brad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
