<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kevin Thompson&#8217;s criticism of Tom Brady&#8217;s fornication featured on WHDH-TV</title>
	<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/05/31/kevin-thompsons-criticism-of-tom-bradys-fornication-featured-on-whdh-tv/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 03:21:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Nike SB</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/05/31/kevin-thompsons-criticism-of-tom-bradys-fornication-featured-on-whdh-tv/#comment-383629</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 07:13:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/05/31/kevin-thompsons-criticism-of-tom-bradys-fornication-featured-on-whdh-tv/#comment-383629</guid>
					<description>Tom Brady is not a man... he is a machine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Tom Brady is not a man&#8230; he is a machine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Marysgold</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/05/31/kevin-thompsons-criticism-of-tom-bradys-fornication-featured-on-whdh-tv/#comment-290822</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 17:53:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/05/31/kevin-thompsons-criticism-of-tom-bradys-fornication-featured-on-whdh-tv/#comment-290822</guid>
					<description>I am a Pats fan &amp;#38; VERY disappointed by Tom Brady, the guy has no respect for women, family values, or the Catholic Faith....
 Is his family an example of Catholic education in California???
Every time I see a youngster with his jersey on I say to myself &quot; I hope you have loving parents that are together in your home because Tom Brady dosen t appear to want to provide THAT for his own son&quot;
 Very sad..... that being said I still love the team.... GO Pats !!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I am a Pats fan &#038; <span class="caps">VERY</span> disappointed by Tom Brady, the guy has no respect for women, family values, or the Catholic Faith&#8230;.</p>
	<p> Is his family an example of Catholic education in California???<br />
Every time I see a youngster with his jersey on I say to myself &#8221; I hope you have loving parents that are together in your home because Tom Brady dosen t appear to want to provide <span class="caps">THAT</span> for his own son&#8221;<br />
 Very sad&#8230;.. that being said I still love the team&#8230;. <span class="caps">GO </span>Pats <img src="!" alt="" border="0" />!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Cody Quirk</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/05/31/kevin-thompsons-criticism-of-tom-bradys-fornication-featured-on-whdh-tv/#comment-201345</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 04:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/05/31/kevin-thompsons-criticism-of-tom-bradys-fornication-featured-on-whdh-tv/#comment-201345</guid>
					<description>I don’t think the Puritans perfectly applied biblical principles of civil government, but I do believe they came much closer than America does today.

=You're right! The disregard of human life during the Salem witchcraft trials wasn't Biblical at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I don&#8217;t think the Puritans perfectly applied biblical principles of civil government, but I do believe they came much closer than America does today.</p>
	<p>=You&#8217;re right! The disregard of human life during the Salem witchcraft trials wasn&#8217;t Biblical at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: shirley58</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/05/31/kevin-thompsons-criticism-of-tom-bradys-fornication-featured-on-whdh-tv/#comment-201183</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 00:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/05/31/kevin-thompsons-criticism-of-tom-bradys-fornication-featured-on-whdh-tv/#comment-201183</guid>
					<description>I was'nt aware that Tom Brady was a state hero just because he won 3 superbowls.  Big deal.  Whats he a hero for?  HUH?  He should be called out  because hes a role model for our kids, or so called role model, gag!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I was&#8217;nt aware that Tom Brady was a state hero just because he won 3 superbowls.  Big deal.  Whats he a hero for?  <span class="caps">HUH</span>?  He should be called out  because hes a role model for our kids, or so called role model, gag<img src="!" alt="" border="0" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Chris Fluharty</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/05/31/kevin-thompsons-criticism-of-tom-bradys-fornication-featured-on-whdh-tv/#comment-200594</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 05:01:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/05/31/kevin-thompsons-criticism-of-tom-bradys-fornication-featured-on-whdh-tv/#comment-200594</guid>
					<description>Trent &amp;#38; Cody,

I'm not sure you all got my point but that is ok.  You are free to your own beliefs even among family.  I lived in the West Coast for 20 years and know how you all think so I will leave it at that.  But it was a move every CPer should do running on the platform he claims to be running on.  It would have been dumb in California by one of you all because you all are more classic liberals (small non-intrusive government).  Whereas Kevin is more socially driven conservative.  @ entirely different platforms that the CP has.  I would agree it was dumb if he were running on a classic liberal platform.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Trent &#038; Cody,</p>
	<p>I&#8217;m not sure you all got my point but that is ok.  You are free to your own beliefs even among family.  I lived in the West Coast for 20 years and know how you all think so I will leave it at that.  But it was a move every CPer should do running on the platform he claims to be running on.  It would have been dumb in California by one of you all because you all are more classic liberals (small non-intrusive government).  Whereas Kevin is more socially driven conservative.  @ entirely different platforms that the CP has.  I would agree it was dumb if he were running on a classic liberal platform.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Trent Hill</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/05/31/kevin-thompsons-criticism-of-tom-bradys-fornication-featured-on-whdh-tv/#comment-200108</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 04:50:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/05/31/kevin-thompsons-criticism-of-tom-bradys-fornication-featured-on-whdh-tv/#comment-200108</guid>
					<description>Distler,

The guy is running for U.S. Congress in Massachusetts and has attacked a state hero. No need to wait until election day, he has already been crushed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Distler,</p>
	<p>The guy is running for U.S. Congress in Massachusetts and has attacked a state hero. No need to wait until election day, he has already been crushed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Marc</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/05/31/kevin-thompsons-criticism-of-tom-bradys-fornication-featured-on-whdh-tv/#comment-199802</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2007 16:35:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/05/31/kevin-thompsons-criticism-of-tom-bradys-fornication-featured-on-whdh-tv/#comment-199802</guid>
					<description>I beg to differ Mr. Thompson,

a blog should also allow different opinion, if it claims any credibility. I have no problem with any moral standards but I come to ask myself if there are not many more pressing needs for the US to consider than the private (as in none of our business) life of a popular sports figure. And that is what Brady really is, popular and not a role model of any kind. That should be we, the parents, not the sport or pop star.

And regarding Joe: pleas wake up man! The Congress has nothing to do to you with world problems? Then we should shut it down. As long as Mr Thompson is not running for Mayor of a small town in Mass. he should concern himself with these things. Because he will not be able to do too much about Tom Bradys lifestyle as a member of Congress but he would have voting power on bills that condern financial aid to the poorest countries around the world. But as long as we, the people of the US, are negligent to the fact that our economy polutes the world more than any other countries we may lose any respect that outside world has for us. But I am pretty sure you will shrug it off and say: what the ****, right? As for the fact that we are destroying the very planet our children and their children will be raised on (with or without a loving father, Mr. Thompson), taht doesn't concern you as well, I suppose.

So find something meaningful to talk about. Or shut up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I beg to differ Mr. Thompson,</p>
	<p>a blog should also allow different opinion, if it claims any credibility. I have no problem with any moral standards but I come to ask myself if there are not many more pressing needs for the US to consider than the private (as in none of our business) life of a popular sports figure. And that is what Brady really is, popular and not a role model of any kind. That should be we, the parents, not the sport or pop star.</p>
	<p>And regarding Joe: pleas wake up man! The Congress has nothing to do to you with world problems? Then we should shut it down. As long as Mr Thompson is not running for Mayor of a small town in Mass. he should concern himself with these things. Because he will not be able to do too much about Tom Bradys lifestyle as a member of Congress but he would have voting power on bills that condern financial aid to the poorest countries around the world. But as long as we, the people of the US, are negligent to the fact that our economy polutes the world more than any other countries we may lose any respect that outside world has for us. But I am pretty sure you will shrug it off and say: what the ****, right? As for the fact that we are destroying the very planet our children and their children will be raised on (with or without a loving father, Mr. Thompson), taht doesn&#8217;t concern you as well, I suppose.</p>
	<p>So find something meaningful to talk about. Or shut up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Anthony Distler</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/05/31/kevin-thompsons-criticism-of-tom-bradys-fornication-featured-on-whdh-tv/#comment-199760</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2007 14:28:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/05/31/kevin-thompsons-criticism-of-tom-bradys-fornication-featured-on-whdh-tv/#comment-199760</guid>
					<description>The only thing great about this story is looking foward to seeing Kevin Thompson getting completely destroyed in the election. I'm looking foward to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>The only thing great about this story is looking foward to seeing Kevin Thompson getting completely destroyed in the election. I&#8217;m looking foward to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Trent Hill</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/05/31/kevin-thompsons-criticism-of-tom-bradys-fornication-featured-on-whdh-tv/#comment-199528</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2007 05:04:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/05/31/kevin-thompsons-criticism-of-tom-bradys-fornication-featured-on-whdh-tv/#comment-199528</guid>
					<description>Puritans? Wow. I dont even NEED to reply.

You hold Puritans in high regard? I need not,but I will.

I didn't say it was a bad thing to WANT to turn the clock back, it is simply unwise to SAY it. Kevin knows what he means, and I know what he means--but the public hears it goes &quot;eek.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Puritans? Wow. I dont even <span class="caps">NEED</span> to reply.</p>
	<p>You hold Puritans in high regard? I need not,but I will.</p>
	<p>I didn&#8217;t say it was a bad thing to <span class="caps">WANT</span> to turn the clock back, it is simply unwise to <span class="caps">SAY</span> it. Kevin knows what he means, and I know what he means&#8212;but the public hears it goes &#8220;eek.&#8221; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Joe</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/05/31/kevin-thompsons-criticism-of-tom-bradys-fornication-featured-on-whdh-tv/#comment-199345</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2007 21:16:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/05/31/kevin-thompsons-criticism-of-tom-bradys-fornication-featured-on-whdh-tv/#comment-199345</guid>
					<description>My confusion was with Trent claiming that it is a bad idea for a candidate to say he wants to turn back the clock, when his own party includes a desire to turn back the clock in their own mission statement.  Butch said he wanted  &quot;turn back the clock so the nation handle business the way it once did,with a strong emphasis on biblical principles.&quot;  I believe you said that sounded okay with you.  That sounds pretty good to me too.  I don't think the Puritans perfectly applied biblical principles of civil government, but I do believe they came much closer than America does today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>My confusion was with Trent claiming that it is a bad idea for a candidate to say he wants to turn back the clock, when his own party includes a desire to turn back the clock in their own mission statement.  Butch said he wanted  &#8220;turn back the clock so the nation handle business the way it once did,with a strong emphasis on biblical principles.&#8221;  I believe you said that sounded okay with you.  That sounds pretty good to me too.  I don&#8217;t think the Puritans perfectly applied biblical principles of civil government, but I do believe they came much closer than America does today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Cody Quirk</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/05/31/kevin-thompsons-criticism-of-tom-bradys-fornication-featured-on-whdh-tv/#comment-199271</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2007 18:22:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/05/31/kevin-thompsons-criticism-of-tom-bradys-fornication-featured-on-whdh-tv/#comment-199271</guid>
					<description>I agree with Pastor Butch Paugh, and apparently Kevin too, in wanting “to turn back the clock so West Virginia and the nation handle business the way it once did, absent the burdensome tax structure but with a strong emphasis on biblical principles.” Do you?

=Depends on when you want to stop the Clock. 
There is such a thing as going too far back. And FYI, the Founding Fathers didn't want a nation to be governed under religious law, but constitutional law- want me to bring in the quotes from them?

=Why are you still quoting the CP platform, I thought you didn't want to have anything to do with the national party? And why don't you quote the part about no religious tests while you're at it. It even seems sacreligious in a way that you hold the CP platform on the same level as scripture.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I agree with Pastor Butch Paugh, and apparently Kevin too, in wanting &#8220;to turn back the clock so West Virginia and the nation handle business the way it once did, absent the burdensome tax structure but with a strong emphasis on biblical principles.&#8221; Do you?</p>
	<p>=Depends on when you want to stop the Clock.<br />
There is such a thing as going too far back. And <span class="caps">FYI</span>, the Founding Fathers didn&#8217;t want a nation to be governed under religious law, but constitutional law- want me to bring in the quotes from them?</p>
	<p>=Why are you still quoting the CP platform, I thought you didn&#8217;t want to have anything to do with the national party? And why don&#8217;t you quote the part about no religious tests while you&#8217;re at it. It even seems sacreligious in a way that you hold the CP platform on the same level as scripture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Joe</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/05/31/kevin-thompsons-criticism-of-tom-bradys-fornication-featured-on-whdh-tv/#comment-199255</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2007 17:20:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/05/31/kevin-thompsons-criticism-of-tom-bradys-fornication-featured-on-whdh-tv/#comment-199255</guid>
					<description>Trent, 

That is what your party's candidates say THEIR goals are.  At least Butch does.  Kevin says  he is running &quot;to bring America back to the principles that our founding fathers used to make this the greatest nation in history.&quot;  The mission statement of the Constitution Party states that your goal is &quot;to restore American jurisprudence to its original Biblical common-law foundations.&quot;  Do you agree?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Trent,</p>
	<p>That is what your party&#8217;s candidates say <span class="caps">THEIR</span> goals are.  At least Butch does.  Kevin says  he is running &#8220;to bring America back to the principles that our founding fathers used to make this the greatest nation in history.&#8221;  The mission statement of the Constitution Party states that your goal is &#8220;to restore American jurisprudence to its original Biblical common-law foundations.&#8221;  Do you agree?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Trent Hill</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/05/31/kevin-thompsons-criticism-of-tom-bradys-fornication-featured-on-whdh-tv/#comment-199236</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2007 16:29:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/05/31/kevin-thompsons-criticism-of-tom-bradys-fornication-featured-on-whdh-tv/#comment-199236</guid>
					<description>&quot;“to turn back the clock so&quot;

Joe. Whatever your goals are, THIS is not a good way to begin any sentence in politics. People want to go forward, not move backwards to a time of poverty and disparity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>&#8220;&#8220;to turn back the clock so&#8221;</p>
	<p>Joe. Whatever your goals are, <span class="caps">THIS</span> is not a good way to begin any sentence in politics. People want to go forward, not move backwards to a time of poverty and disparity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Kevin Thompson</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/05/31/kevin-thompsons-criticism-of-tom-bradys-fornication-featured-on-whdh-tv/#comment-199180</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2007 13:21:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/05/31/kevin-thompsons-criticism-of-tom-bradys-fornication-featured-on-whdh-tv/#comment-199180</guid>
					<description>I found the response to my blog to be increadible.  Let make a few comments here, and abstain for awhile while I beging writing a follow-up on my blog for next week.

Marc, I have lost high moral ground because I did not allow your comment to be posted on my blog?  I was not aware that was the determining factor for morality.  To harken back to the days of Reagan, &quot;Sir, I paid for this microphone...&quot;  We are talking about MY campaign blog.  My campaign blog centers on my campaign consisting of my views.  Why would you expect me to post differing opinions?  That is what a blog such as this one is for.  Would expect any of the other candidates to post my comments on their websites?  Of course not.  They have their sites to promote their views, and I have mine to promote my views.  I am not in this campiagn to promote or give voice to views I disagree with.  Your voice is heard through forums such as these.  if you really feel strongly about this, start your own blog and shout it from the rooftops.  You have that right.  By the way, if you ever saw the vulgarity in most of the negative responses I recieve, you wouldn't post them either.

I have many other comments to make, but I will make them from my blog probably sometime next week.  But I will say this, for the first time in my memory, in liberal Massachusetts, a popular sports celebrity was called out for his immoral behavior, and I was given a voice, by the &quot;liberal&quot; media, to say just that.  What a victory!  Who would have ever thought...

The more and more negative responses I get only serve to encourage me - my voice is being heard.  People are talking about issues such as morality, virtue and personal responsablility.  That is a victory in and of itself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I found the response to my blog to be increadible.  Let make a few comments here, and abstain for awhile while I beging writing a follow-up on my blog for next week.</p>
	<p>Marc, I have lost high moral ground because I did not allow your comment to be posted on my blog?  I was not aware that was the determining factor for morality.  To harken back to the days of Reagan, &#8220;Sir, I paid for this microphone&#8230;&#8221;  We are talking about MY campaign blog.  My campaign blog centers on my campaign consisting of my views.  Why would you expect me to post differing opinions?  That is what a blog such as this one is for.  Would expect any of the other candidates to post my comments on their websites?  Of course not.  They have their sites to promote their views, and I have mine to promote my views.  I am not in this campiagn to promote or give voice to views I disagree with.  Your voice is heard through forums such as these.  if you really feel strongly about this, start your own blog and shout it from the rooftops.  You have that right.  By the way, if you ever saw the vulgarity in most of the negative responses I recieve, you wouldn&#8217;t post them either.</p>
	<p>I have many other comments to make, but I will make them from my blog probably sometime next week.  But I will say this, for the first time in my memory, in liberal Massachusetts, a popular sports celebrity was called out for his immoral behavior, and I was given a voice, by the &#8220;liberal&#8221; media, to say just that.  What a victory!  Who would have ever thought&#8230;</p>
	<p>The more and more negative responses I get only serve to encourage me &#8211; my voice is being heard.  People are talking about issues such as morality, virtue and personal responsablility.  That is a victory in and of itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Joe</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/05/31/kevin-thompsons-criticism-of-tom-bradys-fornication-featured-on-whdh-tv/#comment-199161</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2007 12:20:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/05/31/kevin-thompsons-criticism-of-tom-bradys-fornication-featured-on-whdh-tv/#comment-199161</guid>
					<description>What does the United States Congress have to do with world poverty and hunger?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>What does the United States Congress have to do with world poverty and hunger?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
