free blowjob pictures

No it’s not. Ron Paul supports federal funding for heterosexual adoptions—he’s perfectly willing to demand that gay people fund straight adoptions but not get access to the same pool of money for themselves.

The anti-gay fig leaf of “I oppose government involvement always” only works when one is consistently opposed to government involvement. When Ron Paul ensures growing government involvement in marriage and adoption—while creating and supporting blockades for gay people (and only gay people) in that process, he’s being anti-gay.

For instance, Ron Paul claims that his opposition to gay marriage grows out of a “view that government shouldn’t be in the marriage business to begin with.” If that’s true, how come he and his wife Carol have a marriage license, and participate in government marriage programs? It’s simple. Ron Paul is using “get government out of marriage” as a rhetorical fig leaf. He supports government marriage for himself and others—but not for gay people.

Ron Paul went on the floor of Congress in 2003 to introduce a bill that would have required the overturning of the Lawrence vs. Texas Supreme Court ruling. That ruling is the one that threw out sodomy laws. An angry Dr. Paul condemned the Supreme Court for interfering in “states’ rights” and praised sodomy laws as “the State of Texas’s right to regulate moral issues like sex.” You can find the whole speech on Lew Rockwell’s web site. Yet more anti-gay rhetoric from this faux “libertarian.”

Others have touched on his protectionist and anti-immigrant agendas, so I won’t go into detail on that, but Ron Paul’s backers need to wake up and smell the coffee on gay issues. If you want to support a homophobic bigot, then support a homophobic bigot. But please don’t keep insisting he’s not a homophobic bigot.

Andy = Batshit crazy.

http://www.infowars.com/articles/immigration/us_army_pushes_amnesty_to_recruit_illegals.htm

June 18th, 2007 at 2:40 am
Oh, and when have I ever denied that La Raza is a racist organization? Clearly A LOT more racist than Ron Paul. Clearly just as racist as the Minute Men (if not more). So what’s the point?”

What’s the point? The La Raza/MECHA La Reconquista/Aztlan crowd are NOT peaceful people. Remember, the old question on the Advocates for Self Government Quiz was about PEACEFUL people crossing borders. It did NOT say a damn thing about non-peaceful people crossing borders.

La Raza and MECHA as well as the entire La Reconquista/Aztlan movement has been funded by globalist organizations like the Rockefeller Foundation and the Ford Foundation. This is all a part of the Council On Foreign Relations/Bilderberg Group plan to destroy what’s left of the Constitutional Republic known as the united States of America and merge us into the North American Union. This is the equivalent to bringing in a foreign army, like allowing the Trojan Horse to enter Troy.

Second, I don’t support a “heavily graduated” income tax. I support a tax on income as the least detrimental way to collect the necessary funds to begin scaling back government. Do you disagree that we need to run surpluses in order to scale back the government without completely and totally crashing the economy (defaulting on our debt)? If so, then you too should be for an income tax because it is the only tax with the potential to generate sufficient revenue that we can actually RAISE more money by cutting. You are smart enough to know that the FraudTax is an economic train wreck, right? So that leaves us with income tax, single tax (impractical and destabilizing to switch), or exceedingly high tarries. Which is best? Which will produce surpluses at even lower rates?

Come back to reality before answering the question.

Adam Smith and John Stuart Mill also supported taxpayer-funded education… As did Milton Friedman. All communists? Friedman also supported central banking (though not the Fed per se—and I can’t blame him since the Fed DID NOT WORK when he developed his opinions) and income tax (though not a graduated one). Was he “as much of a communist” as me?

I called you a Marxist because you were in a class war tizzy. Just like Ron Paul. Just like Pat Buchanan (care to explain where they differ?), etc.

http://www.anu.edu.au/polsci/marx/classics/manifesto.html

Here’s an exert that you will find if you scroll down through the Manifesto.

“These measures will, of course, be different in different countries.

Nevertheless, in most advanced countries, the following will be pretty generally applicable.

1. Abolition of property in land and application of all rents of land to public purposes.

2. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.

3. Abolition of all rights of inheritance.

4. Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels.

5. Centralization of credit in the banks of the state, by means of a national bank with state capital and an exclusive monopoly.

6. Centralization of the means of communication and transport in the hands of the state.

7. Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the state; the bringing into cultivation of waste lands, and the improvement of the soil generally in accordance with a common plan.

8. Equal obligation of all to work. Establishment of industrial armies, especially for agriculture.

9. Combination of agriculture with manufacturing industries; gradual abolition of all the distinction between town and country by a more equable distribution of the populace over the country.

10. Free education for all children in public schools. Abolition of children’s factory labor in its present form. Combination of education with industrial production, etc.”

A central bank like the Federal Reserve System is the 5th Plank in the Communist Manifesto! The income tax is the 2nd Plank. Tax payer funded education is the 10th Plank. These are all things that Globalist_Elite of which Globalist_Elite says he favors!

Now I will say that he wants to “reform” the income tax which I suppose is probably better than nothing. He also said that he supports Charter Schools but Charter Schools still operate with government money (ie-tax revenue) and whenever you involve government there are always strings attached.

It seems that GE still has not given up a lot of his leftist ideas.

June 17th, 2007 at 10:43 pm
Andy the Marxist.”

LOL! It was the big bankers that funded communism. The big bankers are behind the Marxist.

Read a history of the agrarian movement and you can see how inflation is good for poor people. Inflation is bad for bankers. It is bad for people who make loans! It is bad for people who have assets. It is good for people in debt or without assets. Simple economics. Dude, take a class.

It shouldn’t be suprising that diverse groups of people support Ron Paul, because Ron Paul is in favor of everyone leaving everyone else alone.

“Ron Paul claims to view people as individuals, but he holds on to a racist immigration policy—informed not by his distaste for the welfare state, but by his distaste for ‘alien’ culture (HE SAYS SO!) and he surrounds himself with obvious racists; tolerating their tribal collectivism and pride.”

If you want to talk about tribal collectivism and pride look no further than the LA RAZA/MECHA La Reconquista/Aztlan crowd. They are VERY racist and have in fact openly called for taking over a large chunk of this country and driving out all of the non-hispanics. Their motto is, “For the race, everything. For those outside the race, nothing.”

Then you’ve got the NERVE to trash talk Ron Paul. GET YOUR HEAD OUT OF YOUR ASS YOU NAIVE CHICKEN-LIVERED FOOL!!