<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: W. Virginia Libertarian Party on ‘life support’</title>
	<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/06/18/west-virginia-libertarian-party-on-%e2%80%98life-support%e2%80%99/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 00:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Matt D. Harris</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/06/18/west-virginia-libertarian-party-on-%e2%80%98life-support%e2%80%99/#comment-273387</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 20:24:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/06/18/west-virginia-libertarian-party-on-%e2%80%98life-support%e2%80%99/#comment-273387</guid>
					<description>Sean, it's unfortunate that you feel that way.  It's fortunate, however, that you're wrong.  The LPWV is currently going through a thorough restructuring, and things are looking bright.  Right now we're focusing on getting the basics settled, and hope to mount a very strong showing with a high quality gubernatorial candidate in 2012.  Between now and then, we're going to focus on member recruiting, getting some folks into some local offices where possible or at least launching professional campaigns, and legislative initiatives that will help get our name out there into the public eye.  We're here to stay, this time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Sean, it&#8217;s unfortunate that you feel that way.  It&#8217;s fortunate, however, that you&#8217;re wrong.  The <span class="caps">LPWV</span> is currently going through a thorough restructuring, and things are looking bright.  Right now we&#8217;re focusing on getting the basics settled, and hope to mount a very strong showing with a high quality gubernatorial candidate in 2012.  Between now and then, we&#8217;re going to focus on member recruiting, getting some folks into some local offices where possible or at least launching professional campaigns, and legislative initiatives that will help get our name out there into the public eye.  We&#8217;re here to stay, this time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Sean Scallon</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/06/18/west-virginia-libertarian-party-on-%e2%80%98life-support%e2%80%99/#comment-214688</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 15:32:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/06/18/west-virginia-libertarian-party-on-%e2%80%98life-support%e2%80%99/#comment-214688</guid>
					<description>A state so heavily dependent on government is not going to be on the LP is going to thrive in</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>A state so heavily dependent on government is not going to be on the LP is going to thrive in</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Bill Wood</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/06/18/west-virginia-libertarian-party-on-%e2%80%98life-support%e2%80%99/#comment-214476</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 10:19:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/06/18/west-virginia-libertarian-party-on-%e2%80%98life-support%e2%80%99/#comment-214476</guid>
					<description>Wishing you all the best in rebuilding the Libertarian Party in West Virginia.

Bill</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Wishing you all the best in rebuilding the Libertarian Party in West Virginia.</p>
	<p>Bill</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Paul Wayne Snyder, PhD</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/06/18/west-virginia-libertarian-party-on-%e2%80%98life-support%e2%80%99/#comment-213871</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 21:44:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/06/18/west-virginia-libertarian-party-on-%e2%80%98life-support%e2%80%99/#comment-213871</guid>
					<description>Incert &quot;CALIFRONIA&quot;  and /or &quot;PEACE AND FREEDOM&quot; or &quot;REFORM PARTY&quot; ! 

Reflecting on the Patrick and Bay Buchanan 'debackle' of Long Beach 2000, &quot;John Blair, of the John Blair Committee of the John Blair Party&quot; and theiving skank &quot;Valley Sharp Geyser&quot; are leading the off the ballot [so called] reform movement into Maggie Thatcher's 'Dust Bin of History'!

Citizens For A Better Veterans Home predicts that Blare will get a fraction of the registrations that Unity08 will accumulate in the [once] Goldern State!

And if West Virginia is so restrictive, then why is the verdant MOUNTAIN PARTY doing so well?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Incert &#8220;CALIFRONIA&#8221;  and /or &#8220;PEACE <span class="caps">AND FREEDOM</span>&#8221; or &#8220;REFORM <span class="caps">PARTY</span>&#8221; !</p>
	<p>Reflecting on the Patrick and Bay Buchanan &#8216;debackle&#8217; of Long Beach 2000, &#8220;John Blair, of the John Blair Committee of the John Blair Party&#8221; and theiving skank &#8220;Valley Sharp Geyser&#8221; are leading the off the ballot [so called] reform movement into Maggie Thatcher&#8217;s &#8216;Dust Bin of History&#8217;!</p>
	<p>Citizens For A Better Veterans Home predicts that Blare will get a fraction of the registrations that Unity08 will accumulate in the [once] Goldern State!</p>
	<p>And if West Virginia is so restrictive, then why is the verdant <span class="caps">MOUNTAIN PARTY</span> doing so well?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Richard Winger</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/06/18/west-virginia-libertarian-party-on-%e2%80%98life-support%e2%80%99/#comment-213410</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 12:15:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/06/18/west-virginia-libertarian-party-on-%e2%80%98life-support%e2%80%99/#comment-213410</guid>
					<description>The article is somewhat misleading.  The West Virginia Libertarian Party did get Michael Badnarik on the ballot in 2004.  And Richard Kerr should have told the reporter that West Virginia is tied for 2nd most restrictive state in the nation for presidential ballot access (only Oklahoma is worse, and North Carolina and Wyoming are tied for 2nd place).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>The article is somewhat misleading.  The West Virginia Libertarian Party did get Michael Badnarik on the ballot in 2004.  And Richard Kerr should have told the reporter that West Virginia is tied for 2nd most restrictive state in the nation for presidential ballot access (only Oklahoma is worse, and North Carolina and Wyoming are tied for 2nd place).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
