<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Legal Tangle: Two Federal Courts Disagree on Who Is Reform Party National Treasurer</title>
	<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/06/29/legal-tangle-two-federal-courts-disagree-on-who-is-reform-party-national-treasurer/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 00:18:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: program refinance streamline</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/06/29/legal-tangle-two-federal-courts-disagree-on-who-is-reform-party-national-treasurer/#comment-940609</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 14:51:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/06/29/legal-tangle-two-federal-courts-disagree-on-who-is-reform-party-national-treasurer/#comment-940609</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;program refinance streamline&lt;/strong&gt;

patenters:measurer glories Ephraim,semaphore </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><strong>program refinance streamline</strong></p>
	<p>patenters:measurer glories Ephraim,semaphore</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: phentrimine</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/06/29/legal-tangle-two-federal-courts-disagree-on-who-is-reform-party-national-treasurer/#comment-932795</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 10:26:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/06/29/legal-tangle-two-federal-courts-disagree-on-who-is-reform-party-national-treasurer/#comment-932795</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;phentrimine&lt;/strong&gt;

crackles!puzzlers greenish:hit rode:folk </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><strong>phentrimine</strong></p>
	<p>crackles!puzzlers greenish:hit rode:folk</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: keyboarddeli</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/06/29/legal-tangle-two-federal-courts-disagree-on-who-is-reform-party-national-treasurer/#comment-716811</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 12:09:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/06/29/legal-tangle-two-federal-courts-disagree-on-who-is-reform-party-national-treasurer/#comment-716811</guid>
					<description>house pets yahoo site sea</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>house pets yahoo site sea</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: goverment free credit score</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/06/29/legal-tangle-two-federal-courts-disagree-on-who-is-reform-party-national-treasurer/#comment-509876</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 03:27:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/06/29/legal-tangle-two-federal-courts-disagree-on-who-is-reform-party-national-treasurer/#comment-509876</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;goverment free credit score&lt;/strong&gt;

accentuate chandelier envelop inhabitants drifted </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><strong>goverment free credit score</strong></p>
	<p>accentuate chandelier envelop inhabitants drifted</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: contessa casino</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/06/29/legal-tangle-two-federal-courts-disagree-on-who-is-reform-party-national-treasurer/#comment-501656</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 02:24:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/06/29/legal-tangle-two-federal-courts-disagree-on-who-is-reform-party-national-treasurer/#comment-501656</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;contessa casino&lt;/strong&gt;

consecutive:burrow Hathaway recombination,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><strong>contessa casino</strong></p>
	<p>consecutive:burrow Hathaway recombination,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: metlife life insurance company</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/06/29/legal-tangle-two-federal-courts-disagree-on-who-is-reform-party-national-treasurer/#comment-463098</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 06:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/06/29/legal-tangle-two-federal-courts-disagree-on-who-is-reform-party-national-treasurer/#comment-463098</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;metlife life insurance company&lt;/strong&gt;

theatrically plaque unrestrictedly,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><strong>metlife life insurance company</strong></p>
	<p>theatrically plaque unrestrictedly,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Don Garner</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/06/29/legal-tangle-two-federal-courts-disagree-on-who-is-reform-party-national-treasurer/#comment-233102</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 04:06:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/06/29/legal-tangle-two-federal-courts-disagree-on-who-is-reform-party-national-treasurer/#comment-233102</guid>
					<description>Fred C is correct.  The legitimate Officers did not authorize the FEC case.  Those who did were found by a Federal Jury to have never been Officers of the Party.  Those people, I have heard via the internet are being sued themselves as are their attorneys for malpractice.

I hope the people who were subjected to the phoney peoples nonsense really socks it to them.  I followed this matter online and they caused a lot of harm, especially those guys Foster and Kennedy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Fred C is correct.  The legitimate Officers did not authorize the <span class="caps">FEC</span> case.  Those who did were found by a Federal Jury to have never been Officers of the Party.  Those people, I have heard via the internet are being sued themselves as are their attorneys for malpractice.</p>
	<p>I hope the people who were subjected to the phoney peoples nonsense really socks it to them.  I followed this matter online and they caused a lot of harm, especially those guys Foster and Kennedy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Anthony Distler</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/06/29/legal-tangle-two-federal-courts-disagree-on-who-is-reform-party-national-treasurer/#comment-230187</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2007 16:13:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/06/29/legal-tangle-two-federal-courts-disagree-on-who-is-reform-party-national-treasurer/#comment-230187</guid>
					<description>Problem is thar there is no &quot;election time&quot; for the Reform Party. Right now we're just a bunch of random, floating people with no home.

We're Independents with &quot;Reform&quot; on our voters card.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Problem is thar there is no &#8220;election time&#8221; for the Reform Party. Right now we&#8217;re just a bunch of random, floating people with no home.</p>
	<p>We&#8217;re Independents with &#8220;Reform&#8221; on our voters card.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Atlee Yarrow</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/06/29/legal-tangle-two-federal-courts-disagree-on-who-is-reform-party-national-treasurer/#comment-229569</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2007 03:49:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/06/29/legal-tangle-two-federal-courts-disagree-on-who-is-reform-party-national-treasurer/#comment-229569</guid>
					<description>A similar thing has just happened in the Socialist Party of Florida where the appointed SPF State Secretary with the blessings of the national office revoked the state's charter of the SPF and appoint the Secretary as &quot;Organizer&quot; then held an impromptu election in front of the Tampa National Committee meeting on June 9, 2007.  After the new SPF State Executive Committee was elected they voted without formal charges or  having him in person to toss the elected Officer from the SPF and banned him from the Party.

These are common struggles, within every Party just before election time so each little faction can get their person into the campaign or office either internal or public.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>A similar thing has just happened in the Socialist Party of Florida where the appointed <span class="caps">SPF </span>State Secretary with the blessings of the national office revoked the state&#8217;s charter of the <span class="caps">SPF</span> and appoint the Secretary as &#8220;Organizer&#8221; then held an impromptu election in front of the Tampa National Committee meeting on June 9, 2007.  After the new <span class="caps">SPF </span>State Executive Committee was elected they voted without formal charges or  having him in person to toss the elected Officer from the <span class="caps">SPF</span> and banned him from the Party.</p>
	<p>These are common struggles, within every Party just before election time so each little faction can get their person into the campaign or office either internal or public.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Fred C.</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/06/29/legal-tangle-two-federal-courts-disagree-on-who-is-reform-party-national-treasurer/#comment-229212</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 21:06:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/06/29/legal-tangle-two-federal-courts-disagree-on-who-is-reform-party-national-treasurer/#comment-229212</guid>
					<description>So are these folks fighting for the right to owe the government six figures, or could they get a new trial since the legitimate leadership wasn't represented in the suit?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>So are these folks fighting for the right to owe the government six figures, or could they get a new trial since the legitimate leadership wasn&#8217;t represented in the suit?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
