<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LP 2008: Learning from 2004</title>
	<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/06/29/lp-2008-learning-from-2004/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 01:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: watertrustye</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/06/29/lp-2008-learning-from-2004/#comment-716516</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 10:51:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/06/29/lp-2008-learning-from-2004/#comment-716516</guid>
					<description>canada girl ocean woman stone university see house</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>canada girl ocean woman stone university see house</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Kris Overstreet</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/06/29/lp-2008-learning-from-2004/#comment-229666</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2007 05:18:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/06/29/lp-2008-learning-from-2004/#comment-229666</guid>
					<description>Carol Moore is well known for two things: first, for pushing and pushing hard for a right-to-secession plank in the LP platform; second, for attacking virtually everyone who disagrees with her or who deviates from her beliefs in the slightest as a corrupt socialist mole. She makes me look friendly and pleasant by comparison... but then you read the article, so you figured that out by now.

Anyway, it's probably best to avoid citing anything she mentions as fact unless there's a second, independent source... and to avoid following her conclusions  without serious prior consideration.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Carol Moore is well known for two things: first, for pushing and pushing hard for a right-to-secession plank in the LP platform; second, for attacking virtually everyone who disagrees with her or who deviates from her beliefs in the slightest as a corrupt socialist mole. She makes me look friendly and pleasant by comparison&#8230; but then you read the article, so you figured that out by now.</p>
	<p>Anyway, it&#8217;s probably best to avoid citing anything she mentions as fact unless there&#8217;s a second, independent source&#8230; and to avoid following her conclusions  without serious prior consideration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: G.E. Smith the Capitalist Dove</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/06/29/lp-2008-learning-from-2004/#comment-229287</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 22:26:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/06/29/lp-2008-learning-from-2004/#comment-229287</guid>
					<description>Don't project your abusive misogyny on me, Tom. I didn't call anyone any name.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Don&#8217;t project your abusive misogyny on me, Tom. I didn&#8217;t call anyone any name.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Kn@ppster</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/06/29/lp-2008-learning-from-2004/#comment-228853</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 14:52:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/06/29/lp-2008-learning-from-2004/#comment-228853</guid>
					<description>Ah, I miss the old attack dog days ...

... but please don't be calling Carol names like that, GE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Ah, I miss the old attack dog days &#8230;</p>
	<p>... but please don&#8217;t be calling Carol names like that, GE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Andy</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/06/29/lp-2008-learning-from-2004/#comment-228379</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 07:05:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/06/29/lp-2008-learning-from-2004/#comment-228379</guid>
					<description>I've read this before.  I don't agree with her assessment of Aaron Russo.  The comments that she critisized Russo for I interpeted as being funny.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I&#8217;ve read this before.  I don&#8217;t agree with her assessment of Aaron Russo.  The comments that she critisized Russo for I interpeted as being funny.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: G.E. Smith the Capitalist Dove</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/06/29/lp-2008-learning-from-2004/#comment-228330</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 06:23:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/06/29/lp-2008-learning-from-2004/#comment-228330</guid>
					<description>T-nap puttin' hoez n czech!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>T-nap puttin&#8217; hoez n czech!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: gao xia en</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/06/29/lp-2008-learning-from-2004/#comment-228293</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 05:36:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/06/29/lp-2008-learning-from-2004/#comment-228293</guid>
					<description>Send an e-mail to Playboy online's feedback and request a Ron Paul Interview.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Send an e-mail to Playboy online&#8217;s feedback and request a Ron Paul Interview.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
