Comments on: Constitution Party Chooses Stand-in Ticket

by: rightallcarw

Sat, 26 Jul 2008 05:39:05 +0000

mail apple frog car boat

by: Cody Quirk

Sun, 12 Aug 2007 10:27:32 +0000

The Nevada IAP supports the CP’s Platform.
Therefore it isn’t Pro-Abortion.
In fact what makes it so distasteful in the eyes of the ex-CP bigots in the fact that it has Mormon leaders that have a realistic view of Life that doesn’t mean sacrificing the life of the mother, or allowing a horribly deformed and extremely ill child to live it’s life in pain and misery.

by: Prolifer

Sat, 04 Aug 2007 00:02:06 +0000

Considering the CP presidential candidate dilemma, maybe they could have had some more solidarity and grassroots support, as well as more people who could run if they hadn’t compromised on the life issue and upheld a PRO-ABORTION state affiliate, thereby showing the world that they don’t really care about life, when push comes to shove (or rather when push comes to ballot access).

by: Sean Scallon

Mon, 30 Jul 2007 14:43:04 +0000

The problem with Corsi, Keyes and Gilchrist is that they are all war supporters and for them to win the CP nomination would wreck the party in the long run. the last thing the CP needs after going through a very divisive period is another divisive period, especially with new chapters being organized around the country. Chuck Baldwin will be a safe and steady pick.

Or, what you could do, is get Ron Paul’s permission to have his name put up for nomination to the CP line. He would still run for his Congressional seat in Texas, but at least he would be on the Presidential ballot as a choice for the disgruntled to vote for.

by: matt

Sun, 29 Jul 2007 12:17:40 +0000

The CP needs a better candidate than any of the ones mentioned. Sure we’re all hoping that we’ll have Ron Paul to vote for, but contingency plans are key. The CP is pretty much my emergency fallback plan if Ron Paul doesn’t win the nomination and the LP nominates an idiot. I’d sure hate to have to write somebody in.

by: Trent Hill

Sun, 29 Jul 2007 06:49:55 +0000

Brownback? Seriously?
Tancredo is a war-mongerer.
So is Keyes (having done more research on him…he isnt very good).
Jerome Corsi has authored several books about how Iran is a nuclear armageddon bringer. I don’t trust him that much.

by: Cody Quirk

Sat, 28 Jul 2007 20:26:57 +0000

Uhhmmmm,

by next year, Jerome could change his mind.

by: Anthony Distler

Sat, 28 Jul 2007 15:19:14 +0000

Tom Tancredo has already hinted that he’s using his presidental campaign to spread his immigration message, and only wants to be re-elected to Congress. There is no way Sam Brownback would bolt the GOP to run as a CP member.

Alan Keyes is still considering a White House bid. He may be there afterall.

by: CPer

Sat, 28 Jul 2007 11:51:28 +0000

It is a shame that the CP was unable to pull in any big names for the nomination. I know there is still time but this has me worried about our viability.

This was suppose to be the year that we drew from a list of creditable electable candidates. Rather it would be Gilchrist, Keys, Paul, Brownback, Tancredo or any combination.

This absence of a flag bearer and messenger has me worried and a bit troubled when I look at the realities of using the CP to impacting the political scene.

Since the GOP primary started insanely too early, and most expect 4 or 5 to withdraw by the end of August we might see one of those names on our ballots.

by: NewFederalist

Sat, 28 Jul 2007 01:27:35 +0000

If a “name” candidate does not surface for the CP nomination, I think Chuck Baldwin would make an excellent representative of the party’s viewpoint in the general election.