Comments on: Bloomberg Not Squeaky Clean http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/07/30/bloomberg-not-squeaky-clean/ Thu, 04 Dec 2008 05:34:13 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1.3 by: G.E. Smith the Capitalist Dove http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/07/30/bloomberg-not-squeaky-clean/#comment-254223 Tue, 31 Jul 2007 19:24:26 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/07/30/bloomberg-not-squeaky-clean/#comment-254223 You're wrong, matt. Poll after poll shows that Americans want a viable third choice. They don't want it from the fringes. They want it from the center. And although Bloomberg has a lot of very bad ideas, he is still going to be better than the two major party nominees. In fact, I would rate him a distant #3 behind Ron Paul and Bill Richardson even if he weren't an independent. You’re wrong, matt. Poll after poll shows that Americans want a viable third choice. They don’t want it from the fringes. They want it from the center. And although Bloomberg has a lot of very bad ideas, he is still going to be better than the two major party nominees. In fact, I would rate him a distant #3 behind Ron Paul and Bill Richardson even if he weren’t an independent.

]]> by: matt http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/07/30/bloomberg-not-squeaky-clean/#comment-254146 Tue, 31 Jul 2007 18:23:19 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/07/30/bloomberg-not-squeaky-clean/#comment-254146 The center is clogged, and unless he spends part of his billions bribing the present centrist frontrunners to drop out of the race, his ideas will get precious little traction. The center is clogged, and unless he spends part of his billions bribing the present centrist frontrunners to drop out of the race, his ideas will get precious little traction.

]]> by: Brian http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/07/30/bloomberg-not-squeaky-clean/#comment-253919 Tue, 31 Jul 2007 13:16:37 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/07/30/bloomberg-not-squeaky-clean/#comment-253919 Anyone who has a billion dollars to spend on an election bid is relevant. Anyone who has a billion dollars to spend on an election bid is relevant.

]]> by: Austin Cassidy http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/07/30/bloomberg-not-squeaky-clean/#comment-253832 Tue, 31 Jul 2007 11:08:52 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/07/30/bloomberg-not-squeaky-clean/#comment-253832 I'm not sure how irrelevant he's going to be once he announces his campaign. He may wind up being the most relevant of any independent candidate in any of our lifetime's. I’m not sure how irrelevant he’s going to be once he announces his campaign. He may wind up being the most relevant of any independent candidate in any of our lifetime’s.

]]> by: Jay Matthews http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/07/30/bloomberg-not-squeaky-clean/#comment-253820 Tue, 31 Jul 2007 10:53:00 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/07/30/bloomberg-not-squeaky-clean/#comment-253820 Or as it would appear in the NY Post: "Bloomie Gets Naughty" Or as it would appear in the NY Post:

“Bloomie Gets Naughty”

]]> by: matt http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/07/30/bloomberg-not-squeaky-clean/#comment-253596 Tue, 31 Jul 2007 05:52:48 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/07/30/bloomberg-not-squeaky-clean/#comment-253596 I'll rewrite the headline for free: Bloomberg talked dirty to employees, is still irrelevant. I’ll rewrite the headline for free:

Bloomberg talked dirty to employees, is still irrelevant.

]]>