<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ed Thompson for President?   Maybe&#8230;</title>
	<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/07/31/ed-thompson-for-president-maybe/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 00:40:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Christopher Jagge</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/07/31/ed-thompson-for-president-maybe/#comment-255818</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 10:21:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/07/31/ed-thompson-for-president-maybe/#comment-255818</guid>
					<description>Run Ed!  Run!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Run Ed!  Run!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Michael</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/07/31/ed-thompson-for-president-maybe/#comment-255506</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 23:30:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/07/31/ed-thompson-for-president-maybe/#comment-255506</guid>
					<description>A New York Times poll saying that President Bush is a liar is like Monica Lewinsky saying Mary Poppins is a tramp.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>A New York Times poll saying that President Bush is a liar is like Monica Lewinsky saying Mary Poppins is a tramp.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Libertarian Rolf Lindgren</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/07/31/ed-thompson-for-president-maybe/#comment-255338</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 17:51:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/07/31/ed-thompson-for-president-maybe/#comment-255338</guid>
					<description>9/11 POLLING DATA
 
POLL # 1
 
October 2006 New York Times/CBS Poll
 
Bush Administration regarding 9/11 is…
 
Telling the truth
16%
 
Hiding something
53%
 
Mostly lying
28%
 
Not sure
3%
 
http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/index.cfm/fuseaction/viewItem/itemID/13469
 
POLL # 2
 
May 2006 Zogby Poll
 
Question # 1
 
US government and 9/11 Commission are NOT covering up &amp;#62;&amp;#62; 48%

US government and 9/11 Commission are covering up &amp;#62;&amp;#62; 42%

Not sure &amp;#62;&amp;#62; 10%
 
Question # 2
 
I am not aware of World Trade Center Building 7’s collapse &amp;#62;&amp;#62; 43%

I am aware of it and think the Commission should have investigated it &amp;#62;&amp;#62; 38%

I am aware of it and think the Commission was right to investigate just the Twin Towers’ collapse &amp;#62;&amp;#62; 14%

Neither/Not sure &amp;#62;&amp;#62; 5%
 
More Questions
 
http://www.zogby.com/features/features.dbm?ID=231
 
POLL # 3
 
July 2006 Scripts-Howard Poll
 
Thirty-six percent of respondents overall said it is &quot;very likely&quot; or &quot;somewhat likely&quot; that federal officials either participated in the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon or took no action to stop them &quot;because they wanted the United States to go to war in the Middle East.&quot;
 
http://www.scrippsnews.com/911poll?from=0&amp;#38;comments_per_page=1
 
Public Benefits of Government Conspiracy Theories
By Rolf Lindgren
http://wisopinion.com/index.iml?mdl=article.mdl&amp;#38;article=4695</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>9/11 <span class="caps">POLLING DATA</span></p>
	<p>POLL # 1</p>
	<p>October 2006 New York Times/CBS Poll</p>
	<p>Bush Administration regarding 9/11 is&#8230;</p>
	<p>Telling the truth<br />
16%</p>
	<p>Hiding something<br />
53%</p>
	<p>Mostly lying<br />
28%</p>
	<p>Not sure<br />
3%</p>
	<p><a href='http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/index.cfm/fuseaction/viewItem/itemID/13469' rel='nofollow'>http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/index.cfm/fuseaction/viewItem/itemID/13469</a></p>
	<p><span class="caps">POLL </span># 2</p>
	<p>May 2006 Zogby Poll</p>
	<p>Question # 1</p>
	<p>US government and 9/11 Commission are <span class="caps">NOT</span> covering up >> 48%</p>
	<p>US government and 9/11 Commission are covering up >> 42%</p>
	<p>Not sure >> 10%</p>
	<p>Question # 2</p>
	<p>I am not aware of World Trade Center Building 7&#8217;s collapse >> 43%</p>
	<p>I am aware of it and think the Commission should have investigated it >> 38%</p>
	<p>I am aware of it and think the Commission was right to investigate just the Twin Towers&#8217; collapse >> 14%</p>
	<p>Neither/Not sure >> 5%</p>
	<p>More Questions</p>
	<p><a href='http://www.zogby.com/features/features.dbm?ID=231' rel='nofollow'>http://www.zogby.com/features/features.dbm?ID=231</a></p>
	<p><span class="caps">POLL </span># 3</p>
	<p>July 2006 Scripts-Howard Poll</p>
	<p>Thirty-six percent of respondents overall said it is &#8220;very likely&#8221; or &#8220;somewhat likely&#8221; that federal officials either participated in the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon or took no action to stop them &#8220;because they wanted the United States to go to war in the Middle East.&#8221;</p>
	<p><a href='http://www.scrippsnews.com/911poll?from=0&#038;comments_per_page=1' rel='nofollow'>http://www.scrippsnews.com/911poll?from=0&#038;comments_per_page=1</a></p>
	<p>Public Benefits of Government Conspiracy Theories<br />
By Rolf Lindgren<br />
<a href='http://wisopinion.com/index.iml?mdl=article.mdl&#038;article=4695' rel='nofollow'>http://wisopinion.com/index.iml?mdl=article.mdl&#038;article=4695</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: disinter</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/07/31/ed-thompson-for-president-maybe/#comment-255254</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 15:40:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/07/31/ed-thompson-for-president-maybe/#comment-255254</guid>
					<description>That Dumbdero is a shill is a given.  The question is, is he a shill for Faux News, the Repug party or Guiliani?

http://disinter.wordpress.com/2007/07/17/where-rudy-mcromneys-money-goes/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>That Dumbdero is a shill is a given.  The question is, is he a shill for Faux News, the Repug party or Guiliani?</p>
	<p><a href='http://disinter.wordpress.com/2007/07/17/where-rudy-mcromneys-money-goes/' rel='nofollow'>http://disinter.wordpress.com/2007/07/17/where-rudy-mcromneys-money-goes/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Eric Dondero</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/07/31/ed-thompson-for-president-maybe/#comment-255202</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 14:41:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/07/31/ed-thompson-for-president-maybe/#comment-255202</guid>
					<description>Yeah, Drew Carey has been in the news, but the even bigger story is that Alexis Glick, an avowed libertarian, has been appointed by Neal Cavuro, Fox News Sr. VP, to head up the new Fox Business Network.  

The Leftist press are already attacking her as an &quot;extremist libertarian&quot; for some recent remarks she made in favor of abolishing Social Security.  

And, oh, did I mention she's an outright Babe?  (see the photo of her at www.mainstreamlibertarian.com)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Yeah, Drew Carey has been in the news, but the even bigger story is that Alexis Glick, an avowed libertarian, has been appointed by Neal Cavuro, Fox News Sr. VP, to head up the new Fox Business Network.</p>
	<p>The Leftist press are already attacking her as an &#8220;extremist libertarian&#8221; for some recent remarks she made in favor of abolishing Social Security.</p>
	<p>And, oh, did I mention she&#8217;s an outright Babe?  (see the photo of her at <a href='http://www.mainstreamlibertarian.com' rel='nofollow'>www.mainstreamlibertarian.com</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Tom Gellhaus</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/07/31/ed-thompson-for-president-maybe/#comment-255034</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 12:01:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/07/31/ed-thompson-for-president-maybe/#comment-255034</guid>
					<description>I hope Ed decides to run. He sounds like a candidate I could support without qualms, unlike Wayne Root.

I also hope the LP does NOT change their bylaws to allow Paul to run on their line. I don't think he would refuse, but he IS also running for Congress again.
The LP should, imho, not count on Paul but instead focus on Kubby, Phillies, Thompson (if he does run) and the other candidates.

By the way, not to threadjack, but Drew Carey has been in the news lately - is the LP trying any outreach to him? He might be one of those celebrities worth getting more involved - or possibly could endorse a candidate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I hope Ed decides to run. He sounds like a candidate I could support without qualms, unlike Wayne Root.</p>
	<p>I also hope the LP does <span class="caps">NOT</span> change their bylaws to allow Paul to run on their line. I don&#8217;t think he would refuse, but he IS also running for Congress again.<br />
The LP should, imho, not count on Paul but instead focus on Kubby, Phillies, Thompson (if he does run) and the other candidates.</p>
	<p>By the way, not to threadjack, but Drew Carey has been in the news lately &#8211; is the LP trying any outreach to him? He might be one of those celebrities worth getting more involved &#8211; or possibly could endorse a candidate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: disinter</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/07/31/ed-thompson-for-president-maybe/#comment-254694</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 04:48:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/07/31/ed-thompson-for-president-maybe/#comment-254694</guid>
					<description>I'll vote for him if Ron Paul doesn't get the Repug nomination.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I&#8217;ll vote for him if Ron Paul doesn&#8217;t get the Repug nomination.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Trent Hill</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/07/31/ed-thompson-for-president-maybe/#comment-254657</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 04:12:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/07/31/ed-thompson-for-president-maybe/#comment-254657</guid>
					<description>Joey,

Dont call Milnes a joke. Your &quot;journalism&quot; reflects the same definition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Joey,</p>
	<p>Dont call Milnes a joke. Your &#8220;journalism&#8221; reflects the same definition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Andy</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/07/31/ed-thompson-for-president-maybe/#comment-254608</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 03:04:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/07/31/ed-thompson-for-president-maybe/#comment-254608</guid>
					<description>&quot;Tom Bryant Says: 

July 31st, 2007 at 3:18 pm 
Well, assuming that the 9/11 Troofers lied about Ed Thompson being one of them (fair assumption given their past behavior), I think that the LP finally has a candidate worthy of support.&quot;

Ed Thompson appeared on a 9/11 Truth radio show on the GCN radio network and said that there should be a real investigation into 9/11.  I haven't listened to the show,  but here's a link about it.  


http://64.233.169.104/search?q=cache:hz3syXXRE1UJ:911blogger.com/node/10300+ed+thompson+911+truth&amp;#38;hl=en&amp;#38;ct=clnk&amp;#38;cd=7&amp;#38;gl=us</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>&#8220;Tom Bryant Says:</p>
	<p>July 31st, 2007 at 3:18 pm<br />
Well, assuming that the 9/11 Troofers lied about Ed Thompson being one of them (fair assumption given their past behavior), I think that the LP finally has a candidate worthy of support.&#8221;</p>
	<p>Ed Thompson appeared on a 9/11 Truth radio show on the <span class="caps">GCN</span> radio network and said that there should be a real investigation into 9/11.  I haven&#8217;t listened to the show,  but here&#8217;s a link about it.</p>
	<p><a href='http://64.233.169.104/search?q=cache:hz3syXXRE1UJ:911blogger.com/node/10300+ed+thompson+911+truth&#038;hl=en&#038;ct=clnk&#038;cd=7&#038;gl=us' rel='nofollow'>http://64.233.169.104/search?q=cache:hz3syXXRE1UJ:911blogger.com/node/10300+ed+thompson+911+truth&#038;hl=en&#038;ct=clnk&#038;cd=7&#038;gl=us</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Robert Milnes</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/07/31/ed-thompson-for-president-maybe/#comment-254499</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 00:44:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/07/31/ed-thompson-for-president-maybe/#comment-254499</guid>
					<description>Joey, Hmmm(me trying to make sense of what you wrote). Paraphrasing: despite your support (which is formidible), Ron Paul will not capture the gop nomination, but will decisively bump(sorry, I just wanted to use that word!)Ed Thompson &amp;#38; get the LP nomination. Then lead the Ron Paul devolution! Did I get that right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Joey, Hmmm(me trying to make sense of what you wrote). Paraphrasing: despite your support (which is formidible), Ron Paul will not capture the gop nomination, but will decisively bump(sorry, I just wanted to use that word!)Ed Thompson &#038; get the LP nomination. Then lead the Ron Paul devolution! Did I get that right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Joey Dauben</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/07/31/ed-thompson-for-president-maybe/#comment-254468</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 00:14:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/07/31/ed-thompson-for-president-maybe/#comment-254468</guid>
					<description>Milnes, you're a joke and so is your website. Please. Give me and everyone else a break. 


Thompson's LP campaign will be short-lived, however, if the LP bylaws are changed to nominate Ron Paul, who, despite me supporting, will surely not capture the nomination.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Milnes, you&#8217;re a joke and so is your website. Please. Give me and everyone else a break.</p>
	<p>Thompson&#8217;s LP campaign will be short-lived, however, if the LP bylaws are changed to nominate Ron Paul, who, despite me supporting, will surely not capture the nomination.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Robert Milnes</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/07/31/ed-thompson-for-president-maybe/#comment-254456</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 00:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/07/31/ed-thompson-for-president-maybe/#comment-254456</guid>
					<description>Michael, a Progressive Alliance ticket could break the 40 million barrier.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Michael, a Progressive Alliance ticket could break the 40 million barrier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Michael</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/07/31/ed-thompson-for-president-maybe/#comment-254424</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 23:27:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/07/31/ed-thompson-for-president-maybe/#comment-254424</guid>
					<description>Maybe with Ed Thompson as the presidential nominee the LP will finally be able to break the One Million Vote barrier.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Maybe with Ed Thompson as the presidential nominee the LP will finally be able to break the One Million Vote barrier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Eric Dondero</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/07/31/ed-thompson-for-president-maybe/#comment-254416</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 23:22:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/07/31/ed-thompson-for-president-maybe/#comment-254416</guid>
					<description>You know what else this indicates?  His brother's campaign for President is nearing the end.  

I'm sure Ed wouldn't have even hinted as such, if his brother wasn't planning on dropping out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>You know what else this indicates?  His brother&#8217;s campaign for President is nearing the end.</p>
	<p>I&#8217;m sure Ed wouldn&#8217;t have even hinted as such, if his brother wasn&#8217;t planning on dropping out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jay Matthews</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/07/31/ed-thompson-for-president-maybe/#comment-254405</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 23:06:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2007/07/31/ed-thompson-for-president-maybe/#comment-254405</guid>
					<description>I've mentioned Ed Thompson on more than one occassion here for the nomination,............... definitely a good choice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I&#8217;ve mentioned Ed Thompson on more than one occassion here for the nomination,............... definitely a good choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
