<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In Da Newz in Alabama</title>
	<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/01/11/in-da-news-in-alabama/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 23:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: paulie</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/01/11/in-da-news-in-alabama/#comment-429870</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 20:58:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/01/11/in-da-news-in-alabama/#comment-429870</guid>
					<description>It's entirely too late for anyone to listen to me, but they should have focused a lot more on Michigan. 

Huge state, open primary, Democrats won't let their delegates vote. 

Massive potential for a crossover vote on peace, drug peace and related issues from Democrats and independents. 

It would (have) be(en) a huge momentum boost going into MLK day money bomb, SC, and Super Tuesday. 

So, what am I missing? Seems like a glaring lack of strategic thinking from here. Of course, there could be factors I don't know about here. If anyone knows what they are, please let me know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>It&#8217;s entirely too late for anyone to listen to me, but they should have focused a lot more on Michigan.</p>
	<p>Huge state, open primary, Democrats won&#8217;t let their delegates vote.</p>
	<p>Massive potential for a crossover vote on peace, drug peace and related issues from Democrats and independents.</p>
	<p>It would (have) be(en) a huge momentum boost going into <span class="caps">MLK</span> day money bomb, SC, and Super Tuesday.</p>
	<p>So, what am I missing? Seems like a glaring lack of strategic thinking from here. Of course, there could be factors I don&#8217;t know about here. If anyone knows what they are, please let me know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: paulie</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/01/11/in-da-news-in-alabama/#comment-429867</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 20:52:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/01/11/in-da-news-in-alabama/#comment-429867</guid>
					<description>I'd rather see a slogan like &quot;the borders ARE stupid,&quot; although we won't see it coming from Ron Paul.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I&#8217;d rather see a slogan like &#8220;the borders <span class="caps">ARE</span> stupid,&#8221; although we won&#8217;t see it coming from Ron Paul.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Derek</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/01/11/in-da-news-in-alabama/#comment-429824</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 19:43:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/01/11/in-da-news-in-alabama/#comment-429824</guid>
					<description>Maybe Paul's slogan should be &quot;It's the borders, stupid!&quot;. I'm glad to see him focusing on Alabama and seriously think he can win Alabama. He could do OK in Michigan to get a delegate or 2 and he shouldn't forget SC because with the system there, if he concentrates on a CD or 2, he can win delegates even if he doesn't win the state.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Maybe Paul&#8217;s slogan should be &#8220;It&#8217;s the borders, stupid!&#8221;. I&#8217;m glad to see him focusing on Alabama and seriously think he can win Alabama. He could do OK in Michigan to get a delegate or 2 and he shouldn&#8217;t forget SC because with the system there, if he concentrates on a CD or 2, he can win delegates even if he doesn&#8217;t win the state.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Tom the Trotskyist</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/01/11/in-da-news-in-alabama/#comment-429032</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 23:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/01/11/in-da-news-in-alabama/#comment-429032</guid>
					<description>Brad, I am glad you agree that Huckabee is a socialist. Indeed, Huckabee is part of the Grand Masonic Committee to destroy the constitution and bring the socialist revolution with Barack Obama, Dennis Kucinich and Cynthia McKinney as the ruling triumverate. Sometime in February or March I will be organizing a flag-burning/constitution-burning party, so stay alert.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Brad, I am glad you agree that Huckabee is a socialist. Indeed, Huckabee is part of the Grand Masonic Committee to destroy the constitution and bring the socialist revolution with Barack Obama, Dennis Kucinich and Cynthia McKinney as the ruling triumverate. Sometime in February or March I will be organizing a flag-burning/constitution-burning party, so stay alert.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ferenc</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/01/11/in-da-news-in-alabama/#comment-428995</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 22:28:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/01/11/in-da-news-in-alabama/#comment-428995</guid>
					<description>People-People
I also vote for him no matter what. But,in the last 3 or 4 decades allways the biger lier was a winer. We have 30% stupid who vote Dem. We also have about 25% stupid who vote Rep. no matter what. Hillary or Mc.Cain?
I don't see to much different. Only Mr. Dr. Ron Paul who have a positive message.
                       God Bless</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>People-People<br />
I also vote for him no matter what. But,in the last 3 or 4 decades allways the biger lier was a winer. We have 30% stupid who vote Dem. We also have about 25% stupid who vote Rep. no matter what. Hillary or Mc.Cain?<br />
I don&#8217;t see to much different. Only Mr. Dr. Ron Paul who have a positive message.</p>
	<p>                       God Bless
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Gene Trosper</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/01/11/in-da-news-in-alabama/#comment-428831</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 19:03:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/01/11/in-da-news-in-alabama/#comment-428831</guid>
					<description>Sayeth Brad:
&quot;I vote for virtue; I vote for Ron Paul.&quot;

I vote for Ron Paul as well, but it's not because of virtue. I know of NO ONE virtuous. I think virtue is a romantic notion. We're humans. We're imperfect and make mistakes.

Like Ron Paul himself has stated: the campaign is not about him, it's about the message.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Sayeth Brad:<br />
&#8220;I vote for virtue; I vote for Ron Paul.&#8221;</p>
	<p>I vote for Ron Paul as well, but it&#8217;s not because of virtue. I know of <span class="caps">NO ONE</span> virtuous. I think virtue is a romantic notion. We&#8217;re humans. We&#8217;re imperfect and make mistakes.</p>
	<p>Like Ron Paul himself has stated: the campaign is not about him, it&#8217;s about the message.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Brad</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/01/11/in-da-news-in-alabama/#comment-428793</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 18:41:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/01/11/in-da-news-in-alabama/#comment-428793</guid>
					<description>Ron Paul is the only candidate that displayed substance and thought process in his answers.  The man basses his decision on logic and reason, not emotion.  He recognizes that emotion is for guidance not decision making. He is a man of great character and those who question it have obviously not been exposed to the vast amount of essays and speeches this man has given over the years.  Circumstantial evidence if repeated enough will bend the weak minded to inaccurate conclusion.  Think for yourself; Do not be easily led by the bridle of emotion.

McCain is a fool if he thinks we are not going into a recession.  Bad Economic Records are being set at an unprecedented rate.  Things are crashing on a massive scale never seen before. The Idea that McCain 

Romney has the economic savvy and more than likely would be a good president. He is more of a compromiser than I would prefer.

Huckabee is a slick talking socialist in my opinion.  He has great command of the language but is strategically telling people what he thinks they want to hear.  He has steadily adopted closer positions to Ron Paul since the first debate.

Giuliani is just as corrupt as Hillary.

Thompson is just pretending.  No real substance to his positions or character.  More of the same.

Ron Paul is the only candidate that does not blow in the wind and has the wisdom to ask the right questions to allow logical conclusion.

I vote for virtue; I vote for Ron Paul.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Ron Paul is the only candidate that displayed substance and thought process in his answers.  The man basses his decision on logic and reason, not emotion.  He recognizes that emotion is for guidance not decision making. He is a man of great character and those who question it have obviously not been exposed to the vast amount of essays and speeches this man has given over the years.  Circumstantial evidence if repeated enough will bend the weak minded to inaccurate conclusion.  Think for yourself; Do not be easily led by the bridle of emotion.</p>
	<p>McCain is a fool if he thinks we are not going into a recession.  Bad Economic Records are being set at an unprecedented rate.  Things are crashing on a massive scale never seen before. The Idea that McCain</p>
	<p>Romney has the economic savvy and more than likely would be a good president. He is more of a compromiser than I would prefer.</p>
	<p>Huckabee is a slick talking socialist in my opinion.  He has great command of the language but is strategically telling people what he thinks they want to hear.  He has steadily adopted closer positions to Ron Paul since the first debate.</p>
	<p>Giuliani is just as corrupt as Hillary.</p>
	<p>Thompson is just pretending.  No real substance to his positions or character.  More of the same.</p>
	<p>Ron Paul is the only candidate that does not blow in the wind and has the wisdom to ask the right questions to allow logical conclusion.</p>
	<p>I vote for virtue; I vote for Ron Paul.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Fred C.</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/01/11/in-da-news-in-alabama/#comment-428792</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 18:41:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/01/11/in-da-news-in-alabama/#comment-428792</guid>
					<description>Jason: I've been trying to put together something like that for a little, but I could never get the analogies to work right (I was trying to use a parent with kids). Can I get permission to repost this on some RP groups? With credit, of course.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Jason: I&#8217;ve been trying to put together something like that for a little, but I could never get the analogies to work right (I was trying to use a parent with kids). Can I get permission to repost this on some RP groups? With credit, of course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jason Robinson</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/01/11/in-da-news-in-alabama/#comment-428784</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 18:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/01/11/in-da-news-in-alabama/#comment-428784</guid>
					<description>As the DNC said in ‘96 ‘It is the economy stupid’.

Our Nation produces 13.1 trillion dollars of wealth each year, and of that the government takes 2.4 trillion dollars and spends 2.6 trillion dollars.  Since the government spends more than it takes, it has developed a debt, which is currently 10 trillion dollars. We have promised to make future expenditures above and beyond what we are currently spending, to an amount of 58 trillion dollars between 2017 and 2040.  This works out to an average of 2.5 trillion dollars a year. In addition to this, 4 trillion dollars of the debt will also need to be paid back without any additional sources of revenue, although existing taxation can be increased.

To put this in perspective, imagine that you work for a company that earns $131,000 of annual revenue, they pay you $23,000 a year, and your budget is $26,000 for the year. At the same time you have $64,000 on the credit cards and $46,000 that you have borrowed from your 401k, and just signed a 30 year mortgage for your parent’s house for $580,000, but the property is condemned.  And this is all okay because you have $6.59 in the bank.  Your parents are going to give you $1,000 a year until 2017, and then they need you to start paying them back.

We have established significant control over air travel, but our boarders are open, illegal immigration is not under control, our ports are not secure, and our visa system has not been updated. If the government thought that terrorism is a serious problem, they haven’t done anything to stop it, yet they have stripped our rights and liberties under the banner of terrorism since October of 2001. Although we haven’t plugged any of the holes in our system, there hasn’t been a terrorist attack on U.S. soil for over 6 years.  The government spending and the economy will destroy this nation in less than 33 years.

I believe that Ron Paul is the only candidate from either the Republican or Democratic parties that will even attempt to fix this.

(Numbers have been obtained from the CIA Fact book.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>As the <span class="caps">DNC</span> said in &#8216;96 &#8216;It is the economy stupid&#8217;.</p>
	<p>Our Nation produces 13.1 trillion dollars of wealth each year, and of that the government takes 2.4 trillion dollars and spends 2.6 trillion dollars.  Since the government spends more than it takes, it has developed a debt, which is currently 10 trillion dollars. We have promised to make future expenditures above and beyond what we are currently spending, to an amount of 58 trillion dollars between 2017 and 2040.  This works out to an average of 2.5 trillion dollars a year. In addition to this, 4 trillion dollars of the debt will also need to be paid back without any additional sources of revenue, although existing taxation can be increased.</p>
	<p>To put this in perspective, imagine that you work for a company that earns $131,000 of annual revenue, they pay you $23,000 a year, and your budget is $26,000 for the year. At the same time you have $64,000 on the credit cards and $46,000 that you have borrowed from your 401k, and just signed a 30 year mortgage for your parent&#8217;s house for $580,000, but the property is condemned.  And this is all okay because you have $6.59 in the bank.  Your parents are going to give you $1,000 a year until 2017, and then they need you to start paying them back.</p>
	<p>We have established significant control over air travel, but our boarders are open, illegal immigration is not under control, our ports are not secure, and our visa system has not been updated. If the government thought that terrorism is a serious problem, they haven&#8217;t done anything to stop it, yet they have stripped our rights and liberties under the banner of terrorism since October of 2001. Although we haven&#8217;t plugged any of the holes in our system, there hasn&#8217;t been a terrorist attack on U.S. soil for over 6 years.  The government spending and the economy will destroy this nation in less than 33 years.</p>
	<p>I believe that Ron Paul is the only candidate from either the Republican or Democratic parties that will even attempt to fix this.</p>
	<p>(Numbers have been obtained from the <span class="caps">CIA </span>Fact book.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
