<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Smith, &#8220;uncommitted&#8221; carry LP primaries</title>
	<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/02/06/smith-uncommitted-carry-lp-primaries/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 21:17:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Joseph Marzullo</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/02/06/smith-uncommitted-carry-lp-primaries/#comment-514442</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 18:45:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/02/06/smith-uncommitted-carry-lp-primaries/#comment-514442</guid>
					<description>Too bad I'm too young to run for POTUS, I would pwn each and every candidate. lol. The LP has been going in the wrong direction! ah well

Wayne Allyn Root:

*supports the continuation of presence in Iraq (with deadlines) I would prefer to just leave, but I understand where he's going with this. Just up and leaving puts him on the fringe with conservative mainstream.

*he actually supports the FLAT TAX. Not the Fair Tax. But he said he would support the FT if it means we'll be getting rid of the Federal Income Tax.

*he is a good communicator, but he comes off as uhhh I don't know. He's a good orator, but he just makes me feel uncomfortable. And I don't like him advocating a wall on the border. Securing the border is one thing, building a WALL is another.

*He's GREAT on the War on Drug. Wants to end it!

I would probably give him my vote, is voting for New Jersey already done? I just voted for Ron Paul. Root might have some bad positions on some issues, but I think he brings more to the table than the other candidates. He IS mainstream. Well, somewhat.

George Phillies

*bad orator

*annoying

*dorky

Sorry, I would only vote for you if you were the last man standing.

*Christine Smith

Don't know much about you. You seem too... mediocre. The LP needs to nominate a guy like Root, he has the best chance of getting media exposure and he has been out raising everyone so far.

*Steve Kubby

I'd say you're my second choice. How'd you pull off getting on South Park? :) That was very cool. You seem like a good second choice, but I feel like I need to compromise, so that's why I would vote for Wayne Root. He might suck on a few issues, but at least he's not in the fringe.

The rest are out of it...

thank you</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Too bad I&#8217;m too young to run for <span class="caps">POTUS</span>, I would pwn each and every candidate. lol. The LP has been going in the wrong direction! ah well</p>
	<p>Wayne Allyn Root:</p>
	<p>*supports the continuation of presence in Iraq (with deadlines) I would prefer to just leave, but I understand where he&#8217;s going with this. Just up and leaving puts him on the fringe with conservative mainstream.</p>
	<p>*he actually supports the <span class="caps">FLAT TAX</span>. Not the Fair Tax. But he said he would support the FT if it means we&#8217;ll be getting rid of the Federal Income Tax.</p>
	<p>*he is a good communicator, but he comes off as uhhh I don&#8217;t know. He&#8217;s a good orator, but he just makes me feel uncomfortable. And I don&#8217;t like him advocating a wall on the border. Securing the border is one thing, building a <span class="caps">WALL</span> is another.</p>
	<p>*He&#8217;s <span class="caps">GREAT</span> on the War on Drug. Wants to end it!</p>
	<p>I would probably give him my vote, is voting for New Jersey already done? I just voted for Ron Paul. Root might have some bad positions on some issues, but I think he brings more to the table than the other candidates. He IS mainstream. Well, somewhat.</p>
	<p>George Phillies</p>
	<p>*bad orator</p>
	<p>*annoying</p>
	<p>*dorky</p>
	<p>Sorry, I would only vote for you if you were the last man standing.</p>
	<p>*Christine Smith</p>
	<p>Don&#8217;t know much about you. You seem too&#8230; mediocre. The LP needs to nominate a guy like Root, he has the best chance of getting media exposure and he has been out raising everyone so far.</p>
	<p>*Steve Kubby</p>
	<p>I&#8217;d say you&#8217;re my second choice. How&#8217;d you pull off getting on South Park? <img src='http://thirdpartywatch.com/wp-images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  That was very cool. You seem like a good second choice, but I feel like I need to compromise, so that&#8217;s why I would vote for Wayne Root. He might suck on a few issues, but at least he&#8217;s not in the fringe.</p>
	<p>The rest are out of it&#8230;</p>
	<p>thank you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Thomas L. Knapp</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/02/06/smith-uncommitted-carry-lp-primaries/#comment-484126</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 20:51:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/02/06/smith-uncommitted-carry-lp-primaries/#comment-484126</guid>
					<description>Steven,

Yes, the endorsement had an effect. The Rolla Daily News is published in Phelps County, Missouri, and in that county Phillies tied with Root for second place (out of twenty votes cast in Phelps County's LP primary, Root and Phillies each received three -- &quot;uncommitted&quot; won the county with, if I remember correctly, 7 votes). Phillies polled 4th place statewide.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Steven,</p>
	<p>Yes, the endorsement had an effect. The Rolla Daily News is published in Phelps County, Missouri, and in that county Phillies tied with Root for second place (out of twenty votes cast in Phelps County&#8217;s LP primary, Root and Phillies each received three&#8212;&#8220;uncommitted&#8221; won the county with, if I remember correctly, 7 votes). Phillies polled 4th place statewide.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Steven R Linnabary</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/02/06/smith-uncommitted-carry-lp-primaries/#comment-484098</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 20:28:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/02/06/smith-uncommitted-carry-lp-primaries/#comment-484098</guid>
					<description>Out of mere curiousity, does anybody know if the Phillies endorsement by the Rolla newspaper have any effect (either for the LP in general, or for Phillies in general) on voting patterns in that county in Missouri?

PEACE
Steve</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Out of mere curiousity, does anybody know if the Phillies endorsement by the Rolla newspaper have any effect (either for the LP in general, or for Phillies in general) on voting patterns in that county in Missouri?</p>
	<p><span class="caps">PEACE</span><br />
Steve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jake Roberts</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/02/06/smith-uncommitted-carry-lp-primaries/#comment-483710</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 14:23:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/02/06/smith-uncommitted-carry-lp-primaries/#comment-483710</guid>
					<description>Imperato should quit now, it is established that he is a loser and a fringe candidate who does not have Libertarian ideas for America.  He prefers big government to pay for all of his social programs and really would prefer to run a dictatorship where everyone believes everything he says.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Imperato should quit now, it is established that he is a loser and a fringe candidate who does not have Libertarian ideas for America.  He prefers big government to pay for all of his social programs and really would prefer to run a dictatorship where everyone believes everything he says.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Thomas M. Sipos</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/02/06/smith-uncommitted-carry-lp-primaries/#comment-483112</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 06:59:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/02/06/smith-uncommitted-carry-lp-primaries/#comment-483112</guid>
					<description>The mostly irrelevant results for Super Tuesday's Libertarian Party presidential &quot;primary election&quot; in California indicate little, apart from Root's lack of appeal.

The &quot;primary voters&quot; came from the 83-86,000 (last I heard) &lt;b&gt;registered&lt;/b&gt; Libertarians in California. Unlike the 1,200+ &lt;b&gt;dues-paying CLP members&lt;/b&gt; (from which the likely 50 or so CLP &lt;b&gt;delegates&lt;/b&gt; to the LP national convention will be chosen), primary voters don't follow internal LP politics, so they're unfamiliar with the candidates.

It's thus not surprising that the only female name, Christine Smith, won. Sorry, but Smith won due to voter ignorance, and because of her sex. (And before anyone calls me a &quot;sexist,&quot; remember, I'm the one who's been promoting &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.libertarianpeacenik.com/articles/karen1.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Karen Kwiatkowski&lt;/a&gt; for president these last several years.)

Smith's victory does not reflect her actual support among the eventual California delegation. It doesn't even reflect her support among primary voters, since they voted for her out of ignorance.

However, the real loser was Wayne Allyn Root. Root is the only LP candidate who is known to primary voters. Root's the only one who's appeared on Major Media for months now, doing talk radio and cable TV shows throughout Southern California.

And still, with all that Major Media attention, Root came in third.

Smith won due to &lt;b&gt;voter ignorance&lt;/b&gt;. Root lost due to &lt;b&gt;voter awareness&lt;/b&gt;.

I predict that neither candidate will be the favorite of the CLP (or national) delegation at the national convention.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>The mostly irrelevant results for Super Tuesday&#8217;s Libertarian Party presidential &#8220;primary election&#8221; in California indicate little, apart from Root&#8217;s lack of appeal.</p>
	<p>The &#8220;primary voters&#8221; came from the 83-86,000 (last I heard) <b>registered</b> Libertarians in California. Unlike the 1,200+ <b>dues-paying <span class="caps">CLP</span> members</b> (from which the likely 50 or so <span class="caps">CLP </span><b>delegates</b> to the LP national convention will be chosen), primary voters don&#8217;t follow internal LP politics, so they&#8217;re unfamiliar with the candidates.</p>
	<p>It&#8217;s thus not surprising that the only female name, Christine Smith, won. Sorry, but Smith won due to voter ignorance, and because of her sex. (And before anyone calls me a &#8220;sexist,&#8221; remember, I&#8217;m the one who&#8217;s been promoting <a HREF="http://www.libertarianpeacenik.com/articles/karen1.htm" rel="nofollow">Karen Kwiatkowski</a> for president these last several years.)</p>
	<p>Smith&#8217;s victory does not reflect her actual support among the eventual California delegation. It doesn&#8217;t even reflect her support among primary voters, since they voted for her out of ignorance.</p>
	<p>However, the real loser was Wayne Allyn Root. Root is the only LP candidate who is known to primary voters. Root&#8217;s the only one who&#8217;s appeared on Major Media for months now, doing talk radio and cable TV shows throughout Southern California.</p>
	<p>And still, with all that Major Media attention, Root came in third.</p>
	<p>Smith won due to <b>voter ignorance</b>. Root lost due to <b>voter awareness</b>.</p>
	<p>I predict that neither candidate will be the favorite of the <span class="caps">CLP </span>(or national) delegation at the national convention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Nigel Watt</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/02/06/smith-uncommitted-carry-lp-primaries/#comment-483090</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 06:18:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/02/06/smith-uncommitted-carry-lp-primaries/#comment-483090</guid>
					<description>I'm planning on voting in the Republican primary (for Paul, obviously - couldn't be in my county for the LP conventions anyways), so I can't impact the vote here, but at this point I'd be fine with either Kubby or Smith.

Phillies is too off-message and un-charismatic to help the LP at all.

(Disclaimer: I was the electronic outreach coordinator for Phillies at one point and left of my own accord.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I&#8217;m planning on voting in the Republican primary (for Paul, obviously &#8211; couldn&#8217;t be in my county for the LP conventions anyways), so I can&#8217;t impact the vote here, but at this point I&#8217;d be fine with either Kubby or Smith.</p>
	<p>Phillies is too off-message and un-charismatic to help the LP at all.</p>
	<p>(Disclaimer: I was the electronic outreach coordinator for Phillies at one point and left of my own accord.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: David F. Nolan</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/02/06/smith-uncommitted-carry-lp-primaries/#comment-482955</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 03:08:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/02/06/smith-uncommitted-carry-lp-primaries/#comment-482955</guid>
					<description>I think Tom Knapp's analysis is pretty much spot-on.  As I've written elsewhere, the contest for the LP nomination is far from over -- indeed, it has barely begun -- but as of today, it appears that Root and Kubby are the candidates to bet on, with Christine Smith a strong contender if she gets back into the race in a serious way. Phillis has stumbled badly, and the rest of the wanna-bes aren't even on the radar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I think Tom Knapp&#8217;s analysis is pretty much spot-on.  As I&#8217;ve written elsewhere, the contest for the LP nomination is far from over&#8212;indeed, it has barely begun&#8212;but as of today, it appears that Root and Kubby are the candidates to bet on, with Christine Smith a strong contender if she gets back into the race in a serious way. Phillis has stumbled badly, and the rest of the wanna-bes aren&#8217;t even on the radar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Joseph Knight</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/02/06/smith-uncommitted-carry-lp-primaries/#comment-482910</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 01:52:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/02/06/smith-uncommitted-carry-lp-primaries/#comment-482910</guid>
					<description>GO CHRISTINE! You make me proud.

As for Root, I just don't think convention-going big-Ls would nominate the man if he was the only one running. Sigh, but then again I didn't think any libertarian would ever run on a fair-tax platform.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><span class="caps">GO CHRISTINE</span>! You make me proud.</p>
	<p>As for Root, I just don&#8217;t think convention-going big-Ls would nominate the man if he was the only one running. Sigh, but then again I didn&#8217;t think any libertarian would ever run on a fair-tax platform.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Lex</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/02/06/smith-uncommitted-carry-lp-primaries/#comment-482705</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 21:44:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/02/06/smith-uncommitted-carry-lp-primaries/#comment-482705</guid>
					<description>I'm surprised that George Phillies didn't receive more votes yesterday, but he may have been the &quot;big winner&quot; after all -- Ron Paul's disappointing vote totals could discourage Paul from a third party run, and Phillies might be the main beneficiary, given his call to enforce the immigration laws and his advertising on pro-Paul websites.

Good job by Third Party Watch regular Robert Milnes as well, beating multi-millionaire candidate Daniel Imperato in California.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I&#8217;m surprised that George Phillies didn&#8217;t receive more votes yesterday, but he may have been the &#8220;big winner&#8221; after all&#8212;Ron Paul&#8217;s disappointing vote totals could discourage Paul from a third party run, and Phillies might be the main beneficiary, given his call to enforce the immigration laws and his advertising on pro-Paul websites.</p>
	<p>Good job by Third Party Watch regular Robert Milnes as well, beating multi-millionaire candidate Daniel Imperato in California.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Thomas L. Knapp</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/02/06/smith-uncommitted-carry-lp-primaries/#comment-482638</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 20:49:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/02/06/smith-uncommitted-carry-lp-primaries/#comment-482638</guid>
					<description>George,

You write:

&quot;The Phillies 2008 Primary Direct Mail campaign exists primarily in Mr. Knapp’s imagination.&quot;

Thanks for cluing me in to the fact that I'm just imagining the  pieces of Phillies 2008 direct mail received at my house, some addressed to me and some addressed to my significant other. My recollection is that we have each received four pieces of said mail, in our imaginations. The &quot;Phillies Buck&quot; should have clued me in to the fact that I was just having a bizarre cartoon dream.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>George,</p>
	<p>You write:</p>
	<p>&#8220;The Phillies 2008 Primary Direct Mail campaign exists primarily in Mr. Knapp&#8217;s imagination.&#8221;</p>
	<p>Thanks for cluing me in to the fact that I&#8217;m just imagining the  pieces of Phillies 2008 direct mail received at my house, some addressed to me and some addressed to my significant other. My recollection is that we have each received four pieces of said mail, in our imaginations. The &#8220;Phillies Buck&#8221; should have clued me in to the fact that I was just having a bizarre cartoon dream.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: George Phillies</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/02/06/smith-uncommitted-carry-lp-primaries/#comment-482629</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 20:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/02/06/smith-uncommitted-carry-lp-primaries/#comment-482629</guid>
					<description>The Phillies 2008 California phone campaign got started far too late, because I made the mistake of assuming that the LNC would be able to get their BallotBase program up and running in time.  I also hoped that since they had sent out an email for a republican they would send out matching emails for their own party's candidates.   Wrong, twice.

On the bright side, when it became clear that the LNC had thrown away $200,000 on ballotbase, a program that does not work, including paying huge amounts of money for data that is now rotting in a database someplace, my campaign did get GeorgeBase up and running in a few days, at 0.1% of their cost, with well above 60,000 names of L supporters with phone numbers.

Almost everyone in California who was reached *had already voted by mail*, which you can easily do in California, at least in the two counties where we concentrated our efforts.  Needless to say, they could not change their votes, so the campaign was not directly going to do much.  

The Phillies 2008 Primary Direct Mail campaign exists primarily in Mr. Knapp's imagination.  I am doing contacting of state party leaders, systematically around the country, by phone email and real mail, meaning I did reach a few dozen people in MO, and once you have the answering machine on the phone the 'please vote for me' was a few extra words.  However, MO was an open primary, and effective L targeted schemes are challenging.  Nonetheless, for MO, my congratulations to 'uncommitted' and Wayne for finishing first and second.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>The Phillies 2008 California phone campaign got started far too late, because I made the mistake of assuming that the <span class="caps">LNC</span> would be able to get their BallotBase program up and running in time.  I also hoped that since they had sent out an email for a republican they would send out matching emails for their own party&#8217;s candidates.   Wrong, twice.</p>
	<p>On the bright side, when it became clear that the <span class="caps">LNC</span> had thrown away $200,000 on ballotbase, a program that does not work, including paying huge amounts of money for data that is now rotting in a database someplace, my campaign did get GeorgeBase up and running in a few days, at 0.1% of their cost, with well above 60,000 names of L supporters with phone numbers.</p>
	<p>Almost everyone in California who was reached <strong>had already voted by mail</strong>, which you can easily do in California, at least in the two counties where we concentrated our efforts.  Needless to say, they could not change their votes, so the campaign was not directly going to do much.</p>
	<p>The Phillies 2008 Primary Direct Mail campaign exists primarily in Mr. Knapp&#8217;s imagination.  I am doing contacting of state party leaders, systematically around the country, by phone email and real mail, meaning I did reach a few dozen people in MO, and once you have the answering machine on the phone the &#8216;please vote for me&#8217; was a few extra words.  However, MO was an open primary, and effective L targeted schemes are challenging.  Nonetheless, for MO, my congratulations to &#8216;uncommitted&#8217; and Wayne for finishing first and second.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Robert Milnes</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/02/06/smith-uncommitted-carry-lp-primaries/#comment-482613</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 20:37:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/02/06/smith-uncommitted-carry-lp-primaries/#comment-482613</guid>
					<description>Agreed, Smith's victory came from the female vote. Kubby's vote from home court advantage &amp;#38; previous run for gov. That puts WAR as frontrunner &amp;#38; Bob Jackson up &amp;#38; comer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Agreed, Smith&#8217;s victory came from the female vote. Kubby&#8217;s vote from home court advantage &#038; previous run for gov. That puts <span class="caps">WAR</span> as frontrunner &#038; Bob Jackson up &#038; comer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Obama Chris</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/02/06/smith-uncommitted-carry-lp-primaries/#comment-482561</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 20:07:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/02/06/smith-uncommitted-carry-lp-primaries/#comment-482561</guid>
					<description>A Smith/Kubby ticket sounds good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>A Smith/Kubby ticket sounds good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Thomas L. Knapp</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/02/06/smith-uncommitted-carry-lp-primaries/#comment-482414</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 19:03:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/02/06/smith-uncommitted-carry-lp-primaries/#comment-482414</guid>
					<description>Seth,

George Phillies campaign in Missouri using direct mail. He campaigned in Missouri using email. He campaigned in Missouri by phone. His campaign blasted about a press release about the newspaper endorsement that you now call a &quot;null factor.&quot;

In California, he ran a GOTV calling operation -- I'm aware of one registered Libertarian household which received two calls, one each for the two registered Libertarian voters in the household.

If you don't think that 4th place, sub-10% polling in those two states is a &quot;loss&quot; after those self-advertised efforts, you're high.

I have so far not commented on the Arizona web election because I have no details on it. I don't know if any of the campaigns had advance knowledge of it (to the best of my knowledge, the AZLP did not contact the Kubby campaign about it). I don't know if 10 people, 100 people or 1000 people voted in it. I don't know which candidates were listed on the electronic ballot. I don't know how secure the process was. When I know more, I'll say more. Until I know more, I won't.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Seth,</p>
	<p>George Phillies campaign in Missouri using direct mail. He campaigned in Missouri using email. He campaigned in Missouri by phone. His campaign blasted about a press release about the newspaper endorsement that you now call a &#8220;null factor.&#8221;</p>
	<p>In California, he ran a <span class="caps">GOTV</span> calling operation&#8212;I&#8217;m aware of one registered Libertarian household which received two calls, one each for the two registered Libertarian voters in the household.</p>
	<p>If you don&#8217;t think that 4th place, sub-10% polling in those two states is a &#8220;loss&#8221; after those self-advertised efforts, you&#8217;re high.</p>
	<p>I have so far not commented on the Arizona web election because I have no details on it. I don&#8217;t know if any of the campaigns had advance knowledge of it (to the best of my knowledge, the <span class="caps">AZLP</span> did not contact the Kubby campaign about it). I don&#8217;t know if 10 people, 100 people or 1000 people voted in it. I don&#8217;t know which candidates were listed on the electronic ballot. I don&#8217;t know how secure the process was. When I know more, I&#8217;ll say more. Until I know more, I won&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Seth Cohn</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/02/06/smith-uncommitted-carry-lp-primaries/#comment-482303</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 18:27:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/02/06/smith-uncommitted-carry-lp-primaries/#comment-482303</guid>
					<description>Tom, you insist on spinning this as a Phillies loss.  Far from it.

California voters didn't turn out for much of anyone... Christine Smith wins because of her sex, plain and simple: It's a well known fact that females tend to pull votes BECAUSE they are female.  Kubby's failure to win his home state says far more than any Phillies failure to win a state on the other side of the country that he didn't campaign as heavily in.

Missouri's 'endorsement' was a small paper, so that's a null factor.   It was an open primary, so Root's Republican roots paid off there.

Arizona, where Phillies beat Barry Hess's hometown advantage, and they were using IRV so it wasn't 'one vote takes all' says FAR more about the true nature of the race: Phillies might not everyone's first choice, but he's probably everyone's second choice.

[obdisclaimer: I used to be the Phillies Webmaster, but currently have no staff position with the campaign.]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Tom, you insist on spinning this as a Phillies loss.  Far from it.</p>
	<p>California voters didn&#8217;t turn out for much of anyone&#8230; Christine Smith wins because of her sex, plain and simple: It&#8217;s a well known fact that females tend to pull votes <span class="caps">BECAUSE</span> they are female.  Kubby&#8217;s failure to win his home state says far more than any Phillies failure to win a state on the other side of the country that he didn&#8217;t campaign as heavily in.</p>
	<p>Missouri&#8217;s &#8216;endorsement&#8217; was a small paper, so that&#8217;s a null factor.   It was an open primary, so Root&#8217;s Republican roots paid off there.</p>
	<p>Arizona, where Phillies beat Barry Hess&#8217;s hometown advantage, and they were using <span class="caps">IRV</span> so it wasn&#8217;t &#8216;one vote takes all&#8217; says <span class="caps">FAR</span> more about the true nature of the race: Phillies might not everyone&#8217;s first choice, but he&#8217;s probably everyone&#8217;s second choice.</p>
	<p>[obdisclaimer: I used to be the Phillies Webmaster, but currently have no staff position with the campaign.]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
