To be honest—Keyes doesnt have a shot. I’v spoken with MANY National Convention goers about him, Smith, and Moore—and none of them like him over Smith, Moore, or Baldwin. Some of them downright dislike him. (me included).

I suspect the CP is advertising that Keyes may seek the nomination for practical purposes. And I applaud them for it. Keyes has a constituency which will expand the base of the CP (albeit, not by much) when/if he joins our party or runs for President. He also has some name recogniton and brings that along with him also.

February 14th, 2008 at 1:09 am
Stephen,

I agree with the general tone of the article. Im hoping that after NOT being nominated for the Presidential contests, the other candidates for the CP will stick around and either run for office or expand name recognition via their activism. Think of what Alan Keyes, Roy Moore, Sen. Bob Smith, and Jerome Corsi could do to expand the party in tandem with the efforts of Mary Starrett, Chuck Baldwin, and Jim Clymer…”

Why would the Constitution Party want to be associated with a warmonger like Alan Keyes?

I agree with the general tone of the article. Im hoping that after NOT being nominated for the Presidential contests, the other candidates for the CP will stick around and either run for office or expand name recognition via their activism. Think of what Alan Keyes, Roy Moore, Sen. Bob Smith, and Jerome Corsi could do to expand the party in tandem with the efforts of Mary Starrett, Chuck Baldwin, and Jim Clymer…