“Don’t insult the loons! AK is in it for his cash and the fact he has nothing else to do.”

Yep, you certainly hold the moral high ground. . . .

Do you want to have the CP grow and become something it has never been before? Or not? ‘Cause it’s nothing now except in the exaggerated imagining of some of its members.

Practically speaking, you don’t have anyone else except some local yokels willing to run for president on the CP line. Every political figure of any credibility isn’t interested, save only for Keyes

You are being fed a lot of misinformation regarding Dr. Keyes, and dare I say, many of you need to re-read the preamble of the CP. Also take a look at the beginning sentence of your mission statement. . . .”The mission of the Constitution Party is to secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity through the election, at all levels of government, of Constitution Party candidates who will uphold the principles of the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution of the United States.” There’s not a candidate running that has done and is doing it better than Dr. Keyes.

Another in your party, i.e., the CP, has said this. . . .”If the Constitution Party rejects Alan Keyes, it basically rejects what he stands for and declines its best opportunity to make an impact for Biblical, foundational, Declaration of Independence and constitutional principles in this presidential election that lacks a credible conservative nominee; perhaps then the party should change its name and its mission statement.” I concur.

I would invite you to go to his website (www.alankeyes.com), listen to some of his speeches, read his platform, and writings, and see if it doesn’t line up with what the Constitution Party stands for.

Thanks for listening.

I could say some of you haven’t been real nice either, but I’m not that way, and I’d like to see us come together to field a good candidate for the upcoming election. There’s far too much at stake for this country for some of you to be so anti anything. Trent Hill asked “who else”, and I have as yet to hear an answer. All I hear is I wouldn’t consider Alan Keyes, and if he joins or gets the nod, I’m leaving.

http://www.alankeyes.com/discuss/showthread.php?t=788&page=6

QUOTING FROM THEIR SITE:
“In that respect, they’re useful idiots for spreading the word about Alan. All we need to do then is add our comment to direct people to Alan’s website.”

I’d support a ticket of Keyes and Moore in any combination you’d like. Both men have what it takes to turn this country from the way it’s headed.

Some of you really need to loosen up, clear the cobwebs out of those little used minds, and work at fielding a viable candidate, whether it’s Alan Keyes or someone else.