<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Phillies on immigration policy</title>
	<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/03/27/phillies-on-immigration-policy/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 23:33:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: paulie</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/03/27/phillies-on-immigration-policy/#comment-550222</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 23:52:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/03/27/phillies-on-immigration-policy/#comment-550222</guid>
					<description>I applaud George Phillies for issuing this statement. 

I'm not so sure it represents a change in his views, though. 

Is Dr. Phillies in favor of maintaining a quota on the &lt;i&gt;total&lt;/i&gt; number of immigrants? How about employer sanctions? Both stances are still contrary to the current (post-2006) LP Platform. 

I would love a yes or no answer to these two questions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I applaud George Phillies for issuing this statement.</p>
	<p>I&#8217;m not so sure it represents a change in his views, though.</p>
	<p>Is Dr. Phillies in favor of maintaining a quota on the <i>total</i> number of immigrants? How about employer sanctions? Both stances are still contrary to the current (post-2006) <span class="caps">LP </span>Platform.</p>
	<p>I would love a yes or no answer to these two questions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: silver Republican</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/03/27/phillies-on-immigration-policy/#comment-549936</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 16:20:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/03/27/phillies-on-immigration-policy/#comment-549936</guid>
					<description>I fail to see the appeal Phillies has compared to the other left libertarians.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I fail to see the appeal Phillies has compared to the other left libertarians.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: G.E.</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/03/27/phillies-on-immigration-policy/#comment-549913</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 15:31:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/03/27/phillies-on-immigration-policy/#comment-549913</guid>
					<description>I've definitely flip flopped on a lot of issues as I've grown and developed a better understanding of libertarian philosophy... But I didn't do it while running for the LP's presidential nomination.

Phillies's original immigration stance was pure Know-Nothingism. Now he's taking a libertarian, pro-capitalist, pro-freedom stance? I guess he realized he couldn't unite the anti-capitalist, pro-xenophobia CP types with the rabidly pro-special-rights for gays, pro-abortion libertine cosmotarians. Attempting to do so was more futile than Milnes's &quot;progressive alliance.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I&#8217;ve definitely flip flopped on a lot of issues as I&#8217;ve grown and developed a better understanding of libertarian philosophy&#8230; But I didn&#8217;t do it while running for the LP&#8217;s presidential nomination.</p>
	<p>Phillies&#8217;s original immigration stance was pure Know-Nothingism. Now he&#8217;s taking a libertarian, pro-capitalist, pro-freedom stance? I guess he realized he couldn&#8217;t unite the anti-capitalist, pro-xenophobia CP types with the rabidly pro-special-rights for gays, pro-abortion libertine cosmotarians. Attempting to do so was more futile than Milnes&#8217;s &#8220;progressive alliance.&#8221; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
