<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chuck Baldwin&#8217;s acceptance speech</title>
	<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/04/27/chuck-baldwins-acceptance-speech/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 03:35:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Zeleni</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/04/27/chuck-baldwins-acceptance-speech/#comment-586517</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 14:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/04/27/chuck-baldwins-acceptance-speech/#comment-586517</guid>
					<description>Cody,

I never called anyone a &quot;fucking idiot&quot; - that was swift kick.  I'm absolutely not a support of Al Gore, and agree that he's a hypocrite.  He was Vice President for 8 years and did next to nothing to combat global warming.  The needs of the people are tied to the needs of the animal and the environment.  If the effects of climate change destroy coastal communities, significantly decrease our crop output, and various other negative impacts, then our human liberties will be a lot more restricted then having to drive a hybrid instead of a Hummer.

I'm pretty sure climatologists haven't done much to promote Euthanasia or say that homosexuality is inherit at birth.  Other scientific communities have proven that homosexuals do have a genetic disposition towards homosexuality.  Do you have facts that prove otherwise?  Do you support the horrendous re-education camps?

Baldwin can support drilling in ANWR, but to claim there's more oil in Alaska than in Saudi Arabia is just incredibly false.  You should tell him to stop saying that if he doesn't want to embarrass himself.  Saudi oil reserves are over 250 billion barrels. while US Geological Survey estimates less than 8 billion barrels in ANWR.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Cody,</p>
	<p>I never called anyone a &#8220;fucking idiot&#8221; &#8211; that was swift kick.  I&#8217;m absolutely not a support of Al Gore, and agree that he&#8217;s a hypocrite.  He was Vice President for 8 years and did next to nothing to combat global warming.  The needs of the people are tied to the needs of the animal and the environment.  If the effects of climate change destroy coastal communities, significantly decrease our crop output, and various other negative impacts, then our human liberties will be a lot more restricted then having to drive a hybrid instead of a Hummer.</p>
	<p>I&#8217;m pretty sure climatologists haven&#8217;t done much to promote Euthanasia or say that homosexuality is inherit at birth.  Other scientific communities have proven that homosexuals do have a genetic disposition towards homosexuality.  Do you have facts that prove otherwise?  Do you support the horrendous re-education camps?</p>
	<p>Baldwin can support drilling in <span class="caps">ANWR</span>, but to claim there&#8217;s more oil in Alaska than in Saudi Arabia is just incredibly false.  You should tell him to stop saying that if he doesn&#8217;t want to embarrass himself.  Saudi oil reserves are over 250 billion barrels. while <span class="caps">US </span>Geological Survey estimates less than 8 billion barrels in <span class="caps">ANWR</span>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Cody Quirk</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/04/27/chuck-baldwins-acceptance-speech/#comment-585907</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 04:55:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/04/27/chuck-baldwins-acceptance-speech/#comment-585907</guid>
					<description>if you think that the “tree huggers” are keeping us from drilling for oil, you are a bigger fucking idiot than keyes.

= I'm sorry, I meant that both the treehuggers and the corporations that are secretly working together are keeping us from drilling oil!

Efficient vehicles, mass transit, and conservation can do a lot more to reduce our reliance on foreign oil than Alaskan oil, which is a drop in the bucket.

= Alternative energies AND drilling for oil on our land can reduce our alliance on foreign oil. Until a alternate energy is delevoped enough to completely replace oil as a source or energy and transportation, then stick with oil... American oil.

 Tar sands and oil shale are very costly and require immense amounts of energy to obtain. Stop dreaming about them.

= When a alternative energy develops that can instantly statisfy 300 million plus American people and our economy, then we can talk.

I’m more interested in protection of the environment. I’m encouraging reduction in our consumption of fossil fuels which are doing significant damage to our environment.

= Too bad people like Al Gore still drive around in SUV's and Hummers.

How about not having the ability to chop down hundreds of trees that are dead from Beetle infestation and are nothing but tinderboxes for a potential fire? Southern California got a taste of that consequence back in 2003 and last year. How about not being able to build a new hospital because of some stupid bug that's &quot;endanged&quot; on a spot of land?

Calling people fascists, commies, and morons just shows your limited ability to actually form a comprehensive argument.

= And calling people 'fucking idiots' is better?

Hypocrite!

My “nutjob ideas” come from the scientific communities.

= The same communities that promote Euthanasia and say homosexuality is a actual physical condition at birth?

The needs of the people outweigh the needs of a animal that will not go extinct over drilling on a barren cold land as a alternative to getting oil from Theocratic dictatorships that treat their women like slaves and punish religious minorities.

Joseph has a good point, when in the name of enviormentalism do we do away with human liberties?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>if you think that the &#8220;tree huggers&#8221; are keeping us from drilling for oil, you are a bigger fucking idiot than keyes.</p>
	<p>= I&#8217;m sorry, I meant that both the treehuggers and the corporations that are secretly working together are keeping us from drilling oil!</p>
	<p>Efficient vehicles, mass transit, and conservation can do a lot more to reduce our reliance on foreign oil than Alaskan oil, which is a drop in the bucket.</p>
	<p>= Alternative energies <span class="caps">AND</span> drilling for oil on our land can reduce our alliance on foreign oil. Until a alternate energy is delevoped enough to completely replace oil as a source or energy and transportation, then stick with oil&#8230; American oil.</p>
	<p> Tar sands and oil shale are very costly and require immense amounts of energy to obtain. Stop dreaming about them.</p>
	<p>= When a alternative energy develops that can instantly statisfy 300 million plus American people and our economy, then we can talk.</p>
	<p>I&#8217;m more interested in protection of the environment. I&#8217;m encouraging reduction in our consumption of fossil fuels which are doing significant damage to our environment.</p>
	<p>= Too bad people like Al Gore still drive around in <span class="caps">SUV</span>&#8217;s and Hummers.</p>
	<p>How about not having the ability to chop down hundreds of trees that are dead from Beetle infestation and are nothing but tinderboxes for a potential fire? Southern California got a taste of that consequence back in 2003 and last year. How about not being able to build a new hospital because of some stupid bug that&#8217;s &#8220;endanged&#8221; on a spot of land?</p>
	<p>Calling people fascists, commies, and morons just shows your limited ability to actually form a comprehensive argument.</p>
	<p>= And calling people &#8216;fucking idiots&#8217; is better?</p>
	<p>Hypocrite!</p>
	<p>My &#8220;nutjob ideas&#8221; come from the scientific communities.</p>
	<p>= The same communities that promote Euthanasia and say homosexuality is a actual physical condition at birth?</p>
	<p>The needs of the people outweigh the needs of a animal that will not go extinct over drilling on a barren cold land as a alternative to getting oil from Theocratic dictatorships that treat their women like slaves and punish religious minorities.</p>
	<p>Joseph has a good point, when in the name of enviormentalism do we do away with human liberties?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Douglas</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/04/27/chuck-baldwins-acceptance-speech/#comment-585815</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 03:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/04/27/chuck-baldwins-acceptance-speech/#comment-585815</guid>
					<description>Chuck Baldwin's essays and sermons can be found on his site, Chuck Baldwin Live http://www.chuckbaldwinlive.com/ , where you can learn more about his political philosophy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Chuck Baldwin&#8217;s essays and sermons can be found on his site, Chuck Baldwin Live <a href='http://www.chuckbaldwinlive.com/' rel='nofollow'>http://www.chuckbaldwinlive.com/</a> , where you can learn more about his political philosophy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Zeleni</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/04/27/chuck-baldwins-acceptance-speech/#comment-585263</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 20:43:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/04/27/chuck-baldwins-acceptance-speech/#comment-585263</guid>
					<description>Wow.  My job is to try and cut down how much government pollutes by reducing their energy consumption, but thanks for your concern.  Privatizing governmental institutions wouldn't actually reduce their pollution - it would just shift it from the public to the private sector.  The major exception is war, which is definitely a source of pollution and vast energy consumption, and which I denounce.

My &quot;nutjob ideas&quot; come from the scientific communities.  I'm not disparaging free market solutions and competition in the renewable energy industry.  However, there are externalities which are not taken into account in our markets, making it inadequate to completely meet our environmental needs.

Calling people fascists, commies, and morons just shows your limited ability to actually form a comprehensive argument.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Wow.  My job is to try and cut down how much government pollutes by reducing their energy consumption, but thanks for your concern.  Privatizing governmental institutions wouldn&#8217;t actually reduce their pollution &#8211; it would just shift it from the public to the private sector.  The major exception is war, which is definitely a source of pollution and vast energy consumption, and which I denounce.</p>
	<p>My &#8220;nutjob ideas&#8221; come from the scientific communities.  I&#8217;m not disparaging free market solutions and competition in the renewable energy industry.  However, there are externalities which are not taken into account in our markets, making it inadequate to completely meet our environmental needs.</p>
	<p>Calling people fascists, commies, and morons just shows your limited ability to actually form a comprehensive argument.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Libertarian Joseph</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/04/27/chuck-baldwins-acceptance-speech/#comment-585204</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 20:20:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/04/27/chuck-baldwins-acceptance-speech/#comment-585204</guid>
					<description>No solution? There are solutions, free market solutions. Create a viable alternative source of energy that is both cleaner and cheaper than fossil fuel, then you get people to switch. Start an organization that encourages people to change their source of fuel. Why try to impose your will on everyone via government? That's what fascists do, are you a fascist? or a commie? Yeah, same difference, right?

Why don't you try to cut down how much government pollutes? You can't make people adopt your nutjob ideas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>No solution? There are solutions, free market solutions. Create a viable alternative source of energy that is both cleaner and cheaper than fossil fuel, then you get people to switch. Start an organization that encourages people to change their source of fuel. Why try to impose your will on everyone via government? That&#8217;s what fascists do, are you a fascist? or a commie? Yeah, same difference, right?</p>
	<p>Why don&#8217;t you try to cut down how much government pollutes? You can&#8217;t make people adopt your nutjob ideas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Zeleni</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/04/27/chuck-baldwins-acceptance-speech/#comment-585099</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 19:07:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/04/27/chuck-baldwins-acceptance-speech/#comment-585099</guid>
					<description>I'm more interested in protection of the environment.  I'm encouraging reduction in our consumption of fossil fuels which are doing significant damage to our environment.  These solutions can do a lot to stimulate the economy and provide good paying American jobs while reducing our damage to the environment.  Fossil fuels are a non-renewable dead end.  It's not like I have a What Would Hamilton Do? poster hanging above me, although that sounds cute.  Libertarians and Constitutionalists have no solutions for our environmental problems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I&#8217;m more interested in protection of the environment.  I&#8217;m encouraging reduction in our consumption of fossil fuels which are doing significant damage to our environment.  These solutions can do a lot to stimulate the economy and provide good paying American jobs while reducing our damage to the environment.  Fossil fuels are a non-renewable dead end.  It&#8217;s not like I have a What Would Hamilton Do? poster hanging above me, although that sounds cute.  Libertarians and Constitutionalists have no solutions for our environmental problems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Libertarian Joseph</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/04/27/chuck-baldwins-acceptance-speech/#comment-585001</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 18:01:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/04/27/chuck-baldwins-acceptance-speech/#comment-585001</guid>
					<description>Zeleni,

what you speak of is protectionism. It's nothing but an anti-American Hamiltonian policy that does nothing but hurt us.

Free trade!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Zeleni,</p>
	<p>what you speak of is protectionism. It&#8217;s nothing but an anti-American Hamiltonian policy that does nothing but hurt us.</p>
	<p>Free trade!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Zeleni</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/04/27/chuck-baldwins-acceptance-speech/#comment-584993</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 17:58:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/04/27/chuck-baldwins-acceptance-speech/#comment-584993</guid>
					<description>Efficient vehicles, mass transit, and conservation can do a lot more to reduce our reliance on foreign oil than Alaskan oil, which is a drop in the bucket.  Tar sands and oil shale are very costly and require immense amounts of energy to obtain.  Stop dreaming about them.

Way to think inside the box.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Efficient vehicles, mass transit, and conservation can do a lot more to reduce our reliance on foreign oil than Alaskan oil, which is a drop in the bucket.  Tar sands and oil shale are very costly and require immense amounts of energy to obtain.  Stop dreaming about them.</p>
	<p>Way to think inside the box.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Libertarian Joseph</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/04/27/chuck-baldwins-acceptance-speech/#comment-584960</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 17:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/04/27/chuck-baldwins-acceptance-speech/#comment-584960</guid>
					<description>I'm glad he campaigned for Ron Paul. He's a good nominee.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I&#8217;m glad he campaigned for Ron Paul. He&#8217;s a good nominee.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: swift kick into codys nuts</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/04/27/chuck-baldwins-acceptance-speech/#comment-584492</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 07:54:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/04/27/chuck-baldwins-acceptance-speech/#comment-584492</guid>
					<description>Nice logic moron. BTW, there’s PLENTY of oil in North America, its just that the tree-huggers don’t want us to drill for it.

if you think that the &quot;tree huggers&quot; are keeping us from drilling for oil, you are a bigger fucking idiot than keyes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Nice logic moron. <span class="caps">BTW</span>, there&#8217;s <span class="caps">PLENTY</span> of oil in North America, its just that the tree-huggers don&#8217;t want us to drill for it.</p>
	<p>if you think that the &#8220;tree huggers&#8221; are keeping us from drilling for oil, you are a bigger fucking idiot than keyes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Cody Quirk</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/04/27/chuck-baldwins-acceptance-speech/#comment-584341</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 05:08:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/04/27/chuck-baldwins-acceptance-speech/#comment-584341</guid>
					<description>Salivating at the idea of destroying our environment to drill for oil in Alaska (which doesn’t have nearly as much oil as Saudi Arabia, but nice try) and other natural areas doesn’t seem like being good stewards of the land.

= Oh, so we should keep funding those governments that kill Christians and treat their women like animals, and even fund the terrorists that get secret support from them.

Nice logic moron. BTW, there's PLENTY of oil in North America, its just that the tree-huggers don't want us to drill for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Salivating at the idea of destroying our environment to drill for oil in Alaska (which doesn&#8217;t have nearly as much oil as Saudi Arabia, but nice try) and other natural areas doesn&#8217;t seem like being good stewards of the land.</p>
	<p>= Oh, so we should keep funding those governments that kill Christians and treat their women like animals, and even fund the terrorists that get secret support from them.</p>
	<p>Nice logic moron. <span class="caps">BTW</span>, there&#8217;s <span class="caps">PLENTY</span> of oil in North America, its just that the tree-huggers don&#8217;t want us to drill for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Zeleni</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/04/27/chuck-baldwins-acceptance-speech/#comment-584274</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 03:24:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/04/27/chuck-baldwins-acceptance-speech/#comment-584274</guid>
					<description>Salivating at the idea of destroying our environment to drill for oil in Alaska (which doesn't have nearly as much oil as Saudi Arabia, but nice try) and other natural areas doesn't seem like being good stewards of the land.

Also, the Constitution Party isn't the only national party that's serious about ending the War in Iraq.  Ever hear of the Green Party or the Libertarians?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Salivating at the idea of destroying our environment to drill for oil in Alaska (which doesn&#8217;t have nearly as much oil as Saudi Arabia, but nice try) and other natural areas doesn&#8217;t seem like being good stewards of the land.</p>
	<p>Also, the Constitution Party isn&#8217;t the only national party that&#8217;s serious about ending the War in Iraq.  Ever hear of the Green Party or the Libertarians?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Laura</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/04/27/chuck-baldwins-acceptance-speech/#comment-583923</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 21:25:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/04/27/chuck-baldwins-acceptance-speech/#comment-583923</guid>
					<description>We want to see debates between the CP nominees and the LP nominees!

Thought Chuck's speech was wonderful.  Chuck, you're a &quot;big name&quot; to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>We want to see debates between the CP nominees and the LP nominees!</p>
	<p>Thought Chuck&#8217;s speech was wonderful.  Chuck, you&#8217;re a &#8220;big name&#8221; to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Larry Breazeale,Msgt.(ret.)USAFR</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/04/27/chuck-baldwins-acceptance-speech/#comment-583725</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 17:37:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/04/27/chuck-baldwins-acceptance-speech/#comment-583725</guid>
					<description>I think Chuck Balwin did a great job, over all. Chuck is a &quot;loyalist&quot; to the cause, the CP and the country. Chuck is quite known and respected in many &quot;RON PAUL&quot; circles. He should get a big chunk of the Ron Paul vote.
The National Veterans Coalition &quot;first pick&quot; was always Dr. Jerome Corsi.
I proudly wore my &quot;JEROME CORSI FOR PRESIDENT 2008&quot; button at the convention, out of respect to Corsi and the NVC's original endorsement of him last year. (maybe 2012 ??) We all know WHY Corsi could not run THIS TIME. A man has to make a living. With Chuck as our nominee, he and Darrell will do good. TOGETHER, they will do good. They are a great team.
All they have to do is get on the Lou Dobbs or Glenn Beck show, and it will be all over for McCain....if not already. The GOP is already dead.
Dr. Jerome Corsi is still a dedicated CP member and we love having him in our ranks. He is doing a great job getting the truth out about the treasonable NAU (North American Union)..with his book, his speaking tours, and his T.V. &amp;#38; radio appearances. The CP platform, is a platform that the average man &amp;#38; woman on the street can identify with. THAT is something ALL the other political parties (major &amp;#38; minor) do not and will not ever understand. We in the CP have the issues that no other candidate of all the other parties want to talk about. We are not going away. The CP is here to stay. I am very proud to be part of it. 
                      Larry Breazeale, Msgt. (ret.) USAF
                      National Veterans Coalition
                      Constitution party</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I think Chuck Balwin did a great job, over all. Chuck is a &#8220;loyalist&#8221; to the cause, the CP and the country. Chuck is quite known and respected in many &#8220;RON <span class="caps">PAUL</span>&#8221; circles. He should get a big chunk of the Ron Paul vote.<br />
The National Veterans Coalition &#8220;first pick&#8221; was always Dr. Jerome Corsi.<br />
I proudly wore my &#8220;JEROME <span class="caps">CORSI FOR PRESIDENT 2008</span>&#8221; button at the convention, out of respect to Corsi and the <span class="caps">NVC</span>&#8217;s original endorsement of him last year. (maybe 2012 ??) We all know <span class="caps">WHY </span>Corsi could not run <span class="caps">THIS TIME</span>. A man has to make a living. With Chuck as our nominee, he and Darrell will do good. <span class="caps">TOGETHER</span>, they will do good. They are a great team.<br />
All they have to do is get on the Lou Dobbs or Glenn Beck show, and it will be all over for McCain&#8230;.if not already. The <span class="caps">GOP</span> is already dead.<br />
Dr. Jerome Corsi is still a dedicated CP member and we love having him in our ranks. He is doing a great job getting the truth out about the treasonable <span class="caps">NAU </span>(North American Union)..with his book, his speaking tours, and his T.V. &#038; radio appearances. The CP platform, is a platform that the average man &#038; woman on the street can identify with. <span class="caps">THAT</span> is something <span class="caps">ALL</span> the other political parties (major &#038; minor) do not and will not ever understand. We in the CP have the issues that no other candidate of all the other parties want to talk about. We are not going away. The CP is here to stay. I am very proud to be part of it.</p>
	<p>                      Larry Breazeale, Msgt. (ret.) <span class="caps">USAF</span><br />
                      National Veterans Coalition<br />
                      Constitution party
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: SOSAFORUS</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/04/27/chuck-baldwins-acceptance-speech/#comment-583671</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 16:09:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/04/27/chuck-baldwins-acceptance-speech/#comment-583671</guid>
					<description>I liked what he had to say on illegal immigration, the borders, the UN, and the one world order(globalization)...We need someone with the back bone to enforce our laws protect our children and family's from the crime that has run rampant in our country. 

The three Senators we have now have been a huge part of our problems, I know how most of them have voted on the Senate floor and I guarentee you it has not been for what is good for America, Americans or our country....They are all willing to put lawbreakers before citizens either for the vote or big business and it has to stop.

We must make a change and it has to be from the politicans who have helped cause the problems....amnesty has been given twice and it has not worked, it is plain insanity to do it again, we must bring back the rule of law, and even though he is a pastor he has the right of what must be done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I liked what he had to say on illegal immigration, the borders, the UN, and the one world order(globalization)...We need someone with the back bone to enforce our laws protect our children and family&#8217;s from the crime that has run rampant in our country.</p>
	<p>The three Senators we have now have been a huge part of our problems, I know how most of them have voted on the Senate floor and I guarentee you it has not been for what is good for America, Americans or our country&#8230;.They are all willing to put lawbreakers before citizens either for the vote or big business and it has to stop.</p>
	<p>We must make a change and it has to be from the politicans who have helped cause the problems&#8230;.amnesty has been given twice and it has not worked, it is plain insanity to do it again, we must bring back the rule of law, and even though he is a pastor he has the right of what must be done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
