<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vice-presidential candidate Darrel Castle</title>
	<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/04/27/vice-presidential-candidate-darrel-castle/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 02:33:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: kalipay</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/04/27/vice-presidential-candidate-darrel-castle/#comment-587613</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 03:48:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/04/27/vice-presidential-candidate-darrel-castle/#comment-587613</guid>
					<description>His name is correctly spelled Darrell Castle.

Mary Starrett refused to accept the nomination, desiring to remain in her current position as &quot;press person&quot; for the national party.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>His name is correctly spelled Darrell Castle.</p>
	<p>Mary Starrett refused to accept the nomination, desiring to remain in her current position as &#8220;press person&#8221; for the national party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Cody Quirk</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/04/27/vice-presidential-candidate-darrel-castle/#comment-584334</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 04:54:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/04/27/vice-presidential-candidate-darrel-castle/#comment-584334</guid>
					<description>So what do the ex CP nutjobs think about Baldwin now, hmmmmm?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>So what do the ex CP nutjobs think about Baldwin now, hmmmmm?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Hayhurst for America</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/04/27/vice-presidential-candidate-darrel-castle/#comment-583729</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 17:43:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/04/27/vice-presidential-candidate-darrel-castle/#comment-583729</guid>
					<description>&quot;Baldwin is a strong choice because of his obvious connection to the Paul-movement,&quot;

I agree that Chuck Baldwin is a strong choice and my introduction to Mr. Baldwin was through Ron Paul. I think that a lot of &quot;Ron Paul Republicans&quot; will be interested in Mr. Baldwin, but that the more Libertarian Ron Paul supporters may lean to Barr. The goal now is to get the message of the CP and Baldwin out to the masses.

I'm a GOP member that is so feed up with the last twenty years of my party. Their are a few Americans in the bunch, but most are career politicians caring even less about you or I and transforming our once conservative party into a mockery.

I have thought long and hard and a move to the CP may be the answer. So from an outsider of the CP, (not for long if I listen to my heart), Baldwin is the only candidate that true Americans have and we have to do all we can to get him in the public eye.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>&#8220;Baldwin is a strong choice because of his obvious connection to the Paul-movement,&#8221;</p>
	<p>I agree that Chuck Baldwin is a strong choice and my introduction to Mr. Baldwin was through Ron Paul. I think that a lot of &#8220;Ron Paul Republicans&#8221; will be interested in Mr. Baldwin, but that the more Libertarian Ron Paul supporters may lean to Barr. The goal now is to get the message of the CP and Baldwin out to the masses.</p>
	<p>I&#8217;m a <span class="caps">GOP</span> member that is so feed up with the last twenty years of my party. Their are a few Americans in the bunch, but most are career politicians caring even less about you or I and transforming our once conservative party into a mockery.</p>
	<p>I have thought long and hard and a move to the CP may be the answer. So from an outsider of the CP, (not for long if I listen to my heart), Baldwin is the only candidate that true Americans have and we have to do all we can to get him in the public eye.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Trent Hill</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/04/27/vice-presidential-candidate-darrel-castle/#comment-583209</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 05:24:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/04/27/vice-presidential-candidate-darrel-castle/#comment-583209</guid>
					<description>Chris,

REALLY? KEYES!?
......wow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Chris,</p>
	<p><span class="caps">REALLY</span>? KEYES!?<br />
......wow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Christopher Hansen</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/04/27/vice-presidential-candidate-darrel-castle/#comment-583195</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 05:04:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/04/27/vice-presidential-candidate-darrel-castle/#comment-583195</guid>
					<description>I regularly post Chuck's blogs on the IAP blog.

He appears to be a very good man. I can easily vote for him but prefer Keyes for many reasons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I regularly post Chuck&#8217;s blogs on the <span class="caps">IAP</span> blog.</p>
	<p>He appears to be a very good man. I can easily vote for him but prefer Keyes for many reasons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Stefan</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/04/27/vice-presidential-candidate-darrel-castle/#comment-583154</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 03:56:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/04/27/vice-presidential-candidate-darrel-castle/#comment-583154</guid>
					<description>Trent: why did they not nominate Mary Starrett, who was also one of the three. She asked the questions to the candidates right? I mean she is not only very strong pro-life, but has media-experience and qualifications (which the CP need) and with her being an attractive genuine middle-aged woman who ran for senate in Oregon two years ago, would she not have been the ideal vice-presidential candidate and would have attracted a lot of female interest and support? Baldwin is a very good choice indeed, good age, intelligent with some media following and will be able to get a lot of evangelical support, and also from Catholics, who are both pro-life and anti-war. The CP also has potential to go make inroads into the Huckabee supporters, for one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Trent: why did they not nominate Mary Starrett, who was also one of the three. She asked the questions to the candidates right? I mean she is not only very strong pro-life, but has media-experience and qualifications (which the CP need) and with her being an attractive genuine middle-aged woman who ran for senate in Oregon two years ago, would she not have been the ideal vice-presidential candidate and would have attracted a lot of female interest and support? Baldwin is a very good choice indeed, good age, intelligent with some media following and will be able to get a lot of evangelical support, and also from Catholics, who are both pro-life and anti-war. The CP also has potential to go make inroads into the Huckabee supporters, for one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Sean</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/04/27/vice-presidential-candidate-darrel-castle/#comment-583148</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 03:47:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/04/27/vice-presidential-candidate-darrel-castle/#comment-583148</guid>
					<description>Castle did a great job chairing the Platform committee (I watched as an observer).  He has a dry humor, and it took a very long time for me to find an instance of him smiling.  My choice was Bradley (although I abstained from voting because of a weird request by Baldwin that I felt made voting meaningless).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Castle did a great job chairing the Platform committee (I watched as an observer).  He has a dry humor, and it took a very long time for me to find an instance of him smiling.  My choice was Bradley (although I abstained from voting because of a weird request by Baldwin that I felt made voting meaningless).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Trent Hill</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/04/27/vice-presidential-candidate-darrel-castle/#comment-583139</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 03:26:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/04/27/vice-presidential-candidate-darrel-castle/#comment-583139</guid>
					<description>Baldwin is a strong choice because of his obvious connection to the Paul-movement, although i'm not convinced we'll make good on that.

Castle, however, was a very poor choice. He's simply a lawyer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Baldwin is a strong choice because of his obvious connection to the Paul-movement, although i&#8217;m not convinced we&#8217;ll make good on that.</p>
	<p>Castle, however, was a very poor choice. He&#8217;s simply a lawyer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: silver Republican</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/04/27/vice-presidential-candidate-darrel-castle/#comment-582918</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 23:26:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/04/27/vice-presidential-candidate-darrel-castle/#comment-582918</guid>
					<description>I'm no Keyes groupie, but this does seem to be the weakest CP tiket in a while a year where the libs will have a stronger then normall tiket.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I&#8217;m no Keyes groupie, but this does seem to be the weakest CP tiket in a while a year where the libs will have a stronger then normall tiket.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Joseph Marzullo</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/04/27/vice-presidential-candidate-darrel-castle/#comment-582902</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 22:55:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/04/27/vice-presidential-candidate-darrel-castle/#comment-582902</guid>
					<description>Another bum, eh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Another bum, eh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: NewFederalist</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/04/27/vice-presidential-candidate-darrel-castle/#comment-582884</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 22:38:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/04/27/vice-presidential-candidate-darrel-castle/#comment-582884</guid>
					<description>Apparently not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Apparently not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: silver Republican</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/04/27/vice-presidential-candidate-darrel-castle/#comment-582857</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 22:10:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/04/27/vice-presidential-candidate-darrel-castle/#comment-582857</guid>
					<description>Does anyone know anything about this guy?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Does anyone know anything about this guy?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
