Comments on: Ron Paul vs. the Nevada Political Machine http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/04/28/ron-paul-vs-the-nevada-political-machine/ Fri, 16 May 2008 19:43:28 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1.3 by: Cody Quirk http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/04/28/ron-paul-vs-the-nevada-political-machine/#comment-585747 Wed, 30 Apr 2008 02:32:25 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/04/28/ron-paul-vs-the-nevada-political-machine/#comment-585747 And its the actions of the GOP Establishment in Nevada that continues to empower the IAP. And its the actions of the GOP Establishment in Nevada that continues to empower the IAP.

]]> by: Cody Quirk http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/04/28/ron-paul-vs-the-nevada-political-machine/#comment-585745 Wed, 30 Apr 2008 02:30:29 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/04/28/ron-paul-vs-the-nevada-political-machine/#comment-585745 Bob Beers never spoke at the 2006 IAP convention! Bob Beers never spoke at the 2006 IAP convention!

]]> by: Libertarian Joseph http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/04/28/ron-paul-vs-the-nevada-political-machine/#comment-585023 Tue, 29 Apr 2008 18:12:43 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/04/28/ron-paul-vs-the-nevada-political-machine/#comment-585023 Catholic Trotskyist, what is with you and Barack Obama? Just supporting him because he's black? That would be the mantra of most of his supporters. the three camps of Obama: racists socialists and, stupid people Catholic Trotskyist,

what is with you and Barack Obama? Just supporting him because he’s black? That would be the mantra of most of his supporters.

the three camps of Obama:

racists

socialists

and, stupid people

]]> by: Nexus http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/04/28/ron-paul-vs-the-nevada-political-machine/#comment-584590 Tue, 29 Apr 2008 10:34:03 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/04/28/ron-paul-vs-the-nevada-political-machine/#comment-584590 "Her written statement said the convention would reconvene with the same delegates, making it impossible for McCain to recruit more support in the interim." That's a lie. They will change the rules and exclude Paul supporters. Mark my words. “Her written statement said the convention would reconvene with the same delegates, making it impossible for McCain to recruit more support in the interim.”

That’s a lie. They will change the rules and exclude Paul supporters. Mark my words.

]]> by: Gene Berkman http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/04/28/ron-paul-vs-the-nevada-political-machine/#comment-584158 Tue, 29 Apr 2008 00:50:56 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/04/28/ron-paul-vs-the-nevada-political-machine/#comment-584158 Excuse me, both references to the Nevada IAP convention should say "2006 convention of the Independent American Party" - clearly not the 1986 convention. Excuse me, both references to the Nevada IAP convention should say “2006 convention of the Independent American Party” – clearly not the 1986 convention.

]]> by: Gene Berkman http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/04/28/ron-paul-vs-the-nevada-political-machine/#comment-584153 Tue, 29 Apr 2008 00:47:35 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/04/28/ron-paul-vs-the-nevada-political-machine/#comment-584153 Ron Paul does have third party connections in Nevada. Congressman Paul was a featured speaker at the 1986 state convention of the Independent American Party of Nevada. Also speaking at the 2006 IAP convention was St. Sen. Bob Beers, who was chair of the Nevada GOP convention that just took place, or just broke up. Ron Paul does have third party connections in Nevada. Congressman Paul was a featured speaker at the 1986 state convention of the Independent American Party of Nevada.

Also speaking at the 2006 IAP convention was St. Sen. Bob Beers, who was chair of the Nevada GOP convention that just took place, or just broke up.

]]> by: Catholic Trotskyist http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/04/28/ron-paul-vs-the-nevada-political-machine/#comment-584131 Tue, 29 Apr 2008 00:27:03 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/04/28/ron-paul-vs-the-nevada-political-machine/#comment-584131 Congratulations to the Nevada Ron Paul campaign. This is causing confusion in the Republican Party and thus helping the Obama Revolution. Hopefully, if Hillary wins the Dem nomination the Libertarians will reject whoevr they nominated and allow a Paul/Obama or Obama/Paul ticket to run. Or the libertarians could nominate Paul/Gravel at their own convention. Please pray for the pope and please pray for Barack Obama. Congratulations to the Nevada Ron Paul campaign. This is causing confusion in the Republican Party and thus helping the Obama Revolution. Hopefully, if Hillary wins the Dem nomination the Libertarians will reject whoevr they nominated and allow a Paul/Obama or Obama/Paul ticket to run. Or the libertarians could nominate Paul/Gravel at their own convention.

Please pray for the pope and please pray for Barack Obama.

]]> by: disinter http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/04/28/ron-paul-vs-the-nevada-political-machine/#comment-584039 Mon, 28 Apr 2008 23:12:46 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/04/28/ron-paul-vs-the-nevada-political-machine/#comment-584039 Ron Paul tells CNN’s John Roberts he is still in the race and gaining support from delegates every day: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NWMDF92ZE7c Ron Paul tells CNN’s John Roberts he is still in the race and gaining support from delegates every day:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NWMDF92ZE7c

]]> by: Sivarticus http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/04/28/ron-paul-vs-the-nevada-political-machine/#comment-584000 Mon, 28 Apr 2008 22:44:44 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/04/28/ron-paul-vs-the-nevada-political-machine/#comment-584000 Who's to say Ron Paul won't get angry and end up in some sort of independent or third party run? I admit, it's highly unlikely, but he never has out and out said no (except in that crap e-mail after Super Tuesday that wasn't written by him). From what I hear in recent interviews, it's still "no intentions" or "no plans," the same wiggly line he's always given on the third party question. I do know one thing: Ron Paul's chances of at least endorsing a third party candidate from the LP or CP will rise dramatically if they deny him a speaking spot at the National Convention. Who’s to say Ron Paul won’t get angry and end up in some sort of independent or third party run? I admit, it’s highly unlikely, but he never has out and out said no (except in that crap e-mail after Super Tuesday that wasn’t written by him). From what I hear in recent interviews, it’s still “no intentions” or “no plans,” the same wiggly line he’s always given on the third party question.

I do know one thing: Ron Paul’s chances of at least endorsing a third party candidate from the LP or CP will rise dramatically if they deny him a speaking spot at the National Convention.

]]> by: Richie http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/04/28/ron-paul-vs-the-nevada-political-machine/#comment-583971 Mon, 28 Apr 2008 22:13:04 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/04/28/ron-paul-vs-the-nevada-political-machine/#comment-583971 Medved is a liar. Baldwin is not a truther. Not that there's anything wrong with that. Medved is a liar. Baldwin is not a truther. Not that there’s anything wrong with that.

]]> by: Joseph Marzullo http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/04/28/ron-paul-vs-the-nevada-political-machine/#comment-583932 Mon, 28 Apr 2008 21:34:58 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/04/28/ron-paul-vs-the-nevada-political-machine/#comment-583932 Deran, inept staff not a great speaker that's what hurt the campaign. Deran,

inept staff

not a great speaker

that’s what hurt the campaign.

]]> by: Dan http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/04/28/ron-paul-vs-the-nevada-political-machine/#comment-583909 Mon, 28 Apr 2008 21:10:17 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/04/28/ron-paul-vs-the-nevada-political-machine/#comment-583909 sorry for the off topic comment: Did anyone hear the Michael Medved show today? He was slamming Alan Keyes, calling him a nut case. He said that he was so pathetic that he couldn't win the nomination of the constipation party. After slamming keyes, he said that keyes lost to someone even more bizzare than keyes - chuck baldwin. He said that he was a 9/11 truther nutcase. It was brutal. sorry for the off topic comment:

Did anyone hear the Michael Medved show today?

He was slamming Alan Keyes, calling him a nut case. He said that he was so pathetic that he couldn’t win the nomination of the constipation party. After slamming keyes, he said that keyes lost to someone even more bizzare than keyes – chuck baldwin. He said that he was a 9/11 truther nutcase.

It was brutal.

]]> by: Deran http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/04/28/ron-paul-vs-the-nevada-political-machine/#comment-583876 Mon, 28 Apr 2008 20:35:58 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/04/28/ron-paul-vs-the-nevada-political-machine/#comment-583876 I'm still very interested to learn what the GOP did, threatened or offered to keep Dr. Paul from really taking his presidential campaign as seriously as his many supporters did? As in; I am sure his people would have worked for him all the way to Nov, as a Lib or indie. I realize the GOP would probably take away his seniority in the House, but how many more session does he want to stay in the House? I’m still very interested to learn what the GOP did, threatened or offered to keep Dr. Paul from really taking his presidential campaign as seriously as his many supporters did? As in; I am sure his people would have worked for him all the way to Nov, as a Lib or indie. I realize the GOP would probably take away his seniority in the House, but how many more session does he want to stay in the House?

]]>