<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ed Thompson in the news</title>
	<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/05/05/ed-thompson-in-the-news/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 01:03:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Starchild</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/05/05/ed-thompson-in-the-news/#comment-597640</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 10:07:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/05/05/ed-thompson-in-the-news/#comment-597640</guid>
					<description>It's too bad that Boortz getting injured was the cause of this change. But I'm glad that I'll now have a reason to attend the banquet. Ed Thompson rocks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>It&#8217;s too bad that Boortz getting injured was the cause of this change. But I&#8217;m glad that I&#8217;ll now have a reason to attend the banquet. Ed Thompson rocks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: infojunkie</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/05/05/ed-thompson-in-the-news/#comment-594923</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 16:32:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/05/05/ed-thompson-in-the-news/#comment-594923</guid>
					<description>Quite an improvement in the speaker lineup. Cool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Quite an improvement in the speaker lineup. Cool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: disinter</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/05/05/ed-thompson-in-the-news/#comment-593461</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 20:54:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/05/05/ed-thompson-in-the-news/#comment-593461</guid>
					<description>No Bortz?  Gee darn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>No Bortz?  Gee darn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Galileo</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/05/05/ed-thompson-in-the-news/#comment-593371</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 19:46:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/05/05/ed-thompson-in-the-news/#comment-593371</guid>
					<description>FYI

This article appeared in the Sunday Wisconsin State Journal on the editorial page.  The article was written by the editor of the editorial page.

The writer first attended a Libertarian party meeting back in 1998 when he was a writer, and gained a postive impression of the LP.

This shows how good work can pay off years down the road.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><span class="caps">FYI</span></p>
	<p>This article appeared in the Sunday Wisconsin State Journal on the editorial page.  The article was written by the editor of the editorial page.</p>
	<p>The writer first attended a Libertarian party meeting back in 1998 when he was a writer, and gained a postive impression of the LP.</p>
	<p>This shows how good work can pay off years down the road.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Committee for Clarity</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/05/05/ed-thompson-in-the-news/#comment-593362</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 19:39:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/05/05/ed-thompson-in-the-news/#comment-593362</guid>
					<description>to be very clear

ED rocks!  Go mayor ED!

the committee
...he's a real manly man....use to box too. maybe he'd be the ED...tough guy for a tough job...makes sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>to be very clear</p>
	<p>ED rocks!  Go mayor ED!</p>
	<p>the committee<br />
...he&#8217;s a real manly man&#8230;.use to box too. maybe he&#8217;d be the ED&#8230;tough guy for a tough job&#8230;makes sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Galileo</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/05/05/ed-thompson-in-the-news/#comment-593360</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 19:38:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/05/05/ed-thompson-in-the-news/#comment-593360</guid>
					<description>Ed Thompson &amp;#62; Ted Thompson &amp;#62; Fred Thompson</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Ed Thompson > Ted Thompson > Fred Thompson</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Committee for Clarity</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/05/05/ed-thompson-in-the-news/#comment-593358</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 19:37:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/05/05/ed-thompson-in-the-news/#comment-593358</guid>
					<description>to be clear

Susan the committee is not pleased you stepped into clarify the confusion.  This old girl is our territory and we speak from the Nolan. However, we know the Nolan loves your cat woman suit but doesn't like you sharing it with Knapp.  We will forgive your transgressions for now.

THE committee for clarity. 
...Susan is getting her back up a little bit...that time of the month I guess...no she's past that stuff...I mean above oh well forget it... I'm dead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>to be clear</p>
	<p>Susan the committee is not pleased you stepped into clarify the confusion.  This old girl is our territory and we speak from the Nolan. However, we know the Nolan loves your cat woman suit but doesn&#8217;t like you sharing it with Knapp.  We will forgive your transgressions for now.</p>
	<p><span class="caps">THE</span> committee for clarity.<br />
...Susan is getting her back up a little bit&#8230;that time of the month I guess&#8230;no she&#8217;s past that stuff&#8230;I mean above oh well forget it&#8230; I&#8217;m dead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Allen Hacker</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/05/05/ed-thompson-in-the-news/#comment-593292</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 18:37:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/05/05/ed-thompson-in-the-news/#comment-593292</guid>
					<description>Oh, nooo...!

Be careful Susan, someone will flame you for copping a &quot;girls are superior&quot; attitude.

Of course, I personally would never do that.

-0-</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Oh, nooo&#8230;!</p>
	<p>Be careful Susan, someone will flame you for copping a &#8220;girls are superior&#8221; attitude.</p>
	<p>Of course, I personally would never do that.</p>
	<p><del>0</del></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Susan Hogarth</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/05/05/ed-thompson-in-the-news/#comment-593270</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 18:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/05/05/ed-thompson-in-the-news/#comment-593270</guid>
					<description>Trent,

What a comedy of errors! let's see if I can sort this out:

The Convention-page writer misspelled 'surgery'. Gordon put 'sergery' in quotes to make a bit of a joke of it. Lieberman seems to have thought that Gordon was disputing that it was *really* surgery keeping Boortz away. Root-not-so-radical called Gordon an 'arrogant prick' (which is pretty over-the-top, IMO) because while making what might be construed as a spelling flame, he made a spelling error - a common and embarrassing tendency among speeling-flamers (though I consider Gordon's' flame' more of a 'match' because it was really only a gentle ribbing). Gordon repaired the typos, *both* his and the convention-page writer's, just to stop the senseless quacking. Lot of good *that* did! ;-) Trent took offense because RNSR called Gordon an 'arrogant prick' for a mis-spelling, but really RNSR was using the term because Gordon had the effrontery to mock someone else's mis-speeling even when he (Godon) was a mispeeler.

My goodness, I've never seen so many misunderstandings about such a  simple thing! If I didn't know better, I'd think you all were willfully misunderstanding one another.

Oh, right. Back to poo-flinging, boys. Don't let me get in the way!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Trent,</p>
	<p>What a comedy of errors! let&#8217;s see if I can sort this out:</p>
	<p>The Convention-page writer misspelled &#8216;surgery&#8217;. Gordon put &#8216;sergery&#8217; in quotes to make a bit of a joke of it. Lieberman seems to have thought that Gordon was disputing that it was <strong>really</strong> surgery keeping Boortz away. Root-not-so-radical called Gordon an &#8216;arrogant prick&#8217; (which is pretty over-the-top, <span class="caps">IMO</span>) because while making what might be construed as a spelling flame, he made a spelling error &#8211; a common and embarrassing tendency among speeling-flamers (though I consider Gordon&#8217;s&#8217; flame&#8217; more of a &#8216;match&#8217; because it was really only a gentle ribbing). Gordon repaired the typos, <strong>both</strong> his and the convention-page writer&#8217;s, just to stop the senseless quacking. Lot of good <strong>that</strong> did! <img src='http://thirdpartywatch.com/wp-images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />  Trent took offense because <span class="caps">RNSR</span> called Gordon an &#8216;arrogant prick&#8217; for a mis-spelling, but really <span class="caps">RNSR</span> was using the term because Gordon had the effrontery to mock someone else&#8217;s mis-speeling even when he (Godon) was a mispeeler.</p>
	<p>My goodness, I&#8217;ve never seen so many misunderstandings about such a  simple thing! If I didn&#8217;t know better, I&#8217;d think you all were willfully misunderstanding one another.</p>
	<p>Oh, right. Back to poo-flinging, boys. Don&#8217;t let me get in the way!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Trent Hill</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/05/05/ed-thompson-in-the-news/#comment-593146</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 17:04:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/05/05/ed-thompson-in-the-news/#comment-593146</guid>
					<description>He's an arrogant prick cuz he spelled it wrong?

Jesus, you guys dont hold back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>He&#8217;s an arrogant prick cuz he spelled it wrong?</p>
	<p>Jesus, you guys dont hold back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Stephen Gordon</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/05/05/ed-thompson-in-the-news/#comment-593025</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 15:42:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/05/05/ed-thompson-in-the-news/#comment-593025</guid>
					<description>All typos repaired.

Regards,

AP</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>All typos repaired.</p>
	<p>Regards,</p>
	<p>AP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: A Root Not So Radical</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/05/05/ed-thompson-in-the-news/#comment-593015</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 15:37:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/05/05/ed-thompson-in-the-news/#comment-593015</guid>
					<description>And Stephen Gordon misspelled &quot;Thompson&quot; in the last paragraph of his article ... arrogant prick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>And Stephen Gordon misspelled &#8220;Thompson&#8221; in the last paragraph of his article &#8230; arrogant prick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: G.E.</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/05/05/ed-thompson-in-the-news/#comment-592965</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 15:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/05/05/ed-thompson-in-the-news/#comment-592965</guid>
					<description>Lieberman - I think the &quot;sergery&quot; in quotes is in regard to the fact that the word is misspelled at the DenverLPCon site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Lieberman &#8211; I think the &#8220;sergery&#8221; in quotes is in regard to the fact that the word is misspelled at the DenverLPCon site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: G.E.</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/05/05/ed-thompson-in-the-news/#comment-592964</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 15:04:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/05/05/ed-thompson-in-the-news/#comment-592964</guid>
					<description>Hopefully, Boortz's &quot;sergery&quot; is a lobotomy, or, we can hope, an appointment with the recently freed Dr. Kervorkian.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Hopefully, Boortz&#8217;s &#8220;sergery&#8221; is a lobotomy, or, we can hope, an appointment with the recently freed Dr. Kervorkian.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Scott Lieberman</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/05/05/ed-thompson-in-the-news/#comment-592948</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 14:46:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/05/05/ed-thompson-in-the-news/#comment-592948</guid>
					<description>Neal Boortz had a knee replacement about 4 days ago.  Therefore, it is not surprising that he will not be attending the Libertarian Party National Convention just three weeks post-op.

In other words - this was a medical decision, not a political decision.

For proof, you can see the intra-operative picture of Neal's knee at...

http://boortz.com/more/gallery1/neals_knee_inside.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Neal Boortz had a knee replacement about 4 days ago.  Therefore, it is not surprising that he will not be attending the Libertarian Party National Convention just three weeks post-op.</p>
	<p>In other words &#8211; this was a medical decision, not a political decision.</p>
	<p>For proof, you can see the intra-operative picture of Neal&#8217;s knee at&#8230;</p>
	<p><a href='http://boortz.com/more/gallery1/neals_knee_inside.html' rel='nofollow'>http://boortz.com/more/gallery1/neals_knee_inside.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
