<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: W.A.R. on WABC</title>
	<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/05/07/war-on-wabc/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 00:58:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: seahousetom</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/05/07/war-on-wabc/#comment-716730</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 11:50:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/05/07/war-on-wabc/#comment-716730</guid>
					<description>head university go german keyboard jhon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>head university go german keyboard jhon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Gordon is a Dick</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/05/07/war-on-wabc/#comment-598741</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 01:09:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/05/07/war-on-wabc/#comment-598741</guid>
					<description>Root on the radio. Sure this dumb fuck talked about kid fucking stupid pervert.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Root on the radio. Sure this dumb fuck talked about kid fucking stupid pervert.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Peter Orvetti</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/05/07/war-on-wabc/#comment-598017</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 15:18:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/05/07/war-on-wabc/#comment-598017</guid>
					<description>Root could use the &quot;SOB&quot; line if either of his parents had been bureaucrats, too.  Or beach volleyball players.  Or banana growers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Root could use the &#8220;SOB&#8221; line if either of his parents had been bureaucrats, too.  Or beach volleyball players.  Or banana growers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Nexus</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/05/07/war-on-wabc/#comment-597884</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 13:57:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/05/07/war-on-wabc/#comment-597884</guid>
					<description>The whole SOB line is starting to wear thin....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>The whole <span class="caps">SOB</span> line is starting to wear thin&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Stefan</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/05/07/war-on-wabc/#comment-597072</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 02:42:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/05/07/war-on-wabc/#comment-597072</guid>
					<description>Wow, so now all the Arab countries are actually enemies of the US, Root. Wonderful way to achieve diplomacy and  breaking out of political isolationism...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Wow, so now all the Arab countries are actually enemies of the US, Root. Wonderful way to achieve diplomacy and  breaking out of political isolationism&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Stefan</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/05/07/war-on-wabc/#comment-597061</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 02:33:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/05/07/war-on-wabc/#comment-597061</guid>
					<description>Hey Root, you want to cut spending, but you also critisize Paul for being &quot;weak on war on terror&quot;. Newsflash: The amount of spending for military adventures and nation building in Iraq is a MAJOR cost. Paul is sitting on the banking and finance committee and knows much better about economic theory and practise than you.
SO, I am afraid you are WRONG on this and your arrogant &quot;I will roll over all of you&quot; attitude (aka Elliot Spitzer) will cost you the LP nomination at the end, of which you are so sure about. 

Also: when Barr spoke for an hour in the NY, it was not to promote his own candicacy, but to promote the LP as a whole, thus he got 0 min actually and you 15.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Hey Root, you want to cut spending, but you also critisize Paul for being &#8220;weak on war on terror&#8221;. Newsflash: The amount of spending for military adventures and nation building in Iraq is a <span class="caps">MAJOR</span> cost. Paul is sitting on the banking and finance committee and knows much better about economic theory and practise than you.<br />
SO, I am afraid you are <span class="caps">WRONG</span> on this and your arrogant &#8220;I will roll over all of you&#8221; attitude (aka Elliot Spitzer) will cost you the LP nomination at the end, of which you are so sure about.</p>
	<p>Also: when Barr spoke for an hour in the NY, it was not to promote his own candicacy, but to promote the LP as a whole, thus he got 0 min actually and you 15.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Michael Seebeck</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/05/07/war-on-wabc/#comment-597030</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 02:08:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/05/07/war-on-wabc/#comment-597030</guid>
					<description>Funny...

KOA AM 850 in Denver hits 38 states and Canada and Mexico.  I can even get them on my AM dial here in Los Angeles.
KFI AM 640 in Los Angeles gets the most listeners in America in any given day per the Arbitron ratings.

WABC? Third or fourth string, behind those and a few of Chicago stations (WGN AM 720 and WMAQ AM 670, and probably even WLS AM 890 and WBBM AM 780)...

Seems to me once again, Root has no idea what he is talking about...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Funny&#8230;</p>
	<p><span class="caps">KOA AM 850</span> in Denver hits 38 states and Canada and Mexico.  I can even get them on my AM dial here in Los Angeles.<br />
<span class="caps">KFI AM 640</span> in Los Angeles gets the most listeners in America in any given day per the Arbitron ratings.</p>
	<p><span class="caps">WABC</span>? Third or fourth string, behind those and a few of Chicago stations (WGN <span class="caps">AM 720</span> and <span class="caps">WMAQ AM 670</span>, and probably even <span class="caps">WLS AM 890</span> and <span class="caps">WBBM AM 780</span>)...</p>
	<p>Seems to me once again, Root has no idea what he is talking about&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Andy</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/05/07/war-on-wabc/#comment-596522</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 20:08:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/05/07/war-on-wabc/#comment-596522</guid>
					<description>Wayne Root said that he opposes late term &amp;#38; partial birth abortion (unless a mothers life is in danger) and he supports parental notification of abortion for underage girls.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Wayne Root said that he opposes late term &#038; partial birth abortion (unless a mothers life is in danger) and he supports parental notification of abortion for underage girls.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Brian Holtz's Liver</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/05/07/war-on-wabc/#comment-596250</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 16:56:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/05/07/war-on-wabc/#comment-596250</guid>
					<description>drinkingatyahooyahooyahooooimdrunk</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>drinkingatyahooyahooyahooooimdrunk</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: silver Republican</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/05/07/war-on-wabc/#comment-596136</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 15:58:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/05/07/war-on-wabc/#comment-596136</guid>
					<description>How on Earth can a serious argument be made that CNN and MSNBC are pro war? I agree that all of the channels are biased, but not in the same way! A mistake that third party folks make is their attempt to try to group the major parties toghether.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>How on Earth can a serious argument be made that <span class="caps">CNN</span> and <span class="caps">MSNBC</span> are pro war? I agree that all of the channels are biased, but not in the same way! A mistake that third party folks make is their attempt to try to group the major parties toghether.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Thomas M. Sipos</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/05/07/war-on-wabc/#comment-596058</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 15:08:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/05/07/war-on-wabc/#comment-596058</guid>
					<description>Oh wait, that's another book on neocon thinking.  Here's Kristol's &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0465068731/communistvampire&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;book&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Oh wait, that&#8217;s another book on neocon thinking.  Here&#8217;s Kristol&#8217;s <a HREF="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0465068731/communistvampire" rel="nofollow">book</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Thomas M. Sipos</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/05/07/war-on-wabc/#comment-596050</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 15:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/05/07/war-on-wabc/#comment-596050</guid>
					<description>Dondero, I've answered some of these points before.  But why bother?  You never listen, hence, you keep raising the same objections.

Neocons are NOT anti-choice on abortion.  They're mostly pro-choice.

The term &quot;neoconservative&quot; was coined by Irving Kristol in his 1986 book, &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1425902340/communistvampire&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Reflections of a Neoconservative&lt;/a&gt;, to refer to that branch of conservatism which was primarily concerned about foreign policy (as opposed to economic conservatives, and social conservatives).

It is the religious &quot;social conservatives&quot; who are anti-choice.  NOT neoconservatives.

I don't know whether you're shamelessly lying, or just astonishingly stupid (it's not ignorance, since you were told this by me before).

And CNN is pro-war, as is much of the &quot;liberal mainstream media.&quot;  They may be anti-Bush, but they're hardly challenging the notion of American Empire.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Dondero, I&#8217;ve answered some of these points before.  But why bother?  You never listen, hence, you keep raising the same objections.</p>
	<p>Neocons are <span class="caps">NOT</span> anti-choice on abortion.  They&#8217;re mostly pro-choice.</p>
	<p>The term &#8220;neoconservative&#8221; was coined by Irving Kristol in his 1986 book, <a HREF="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1425902340/communistvampire" rel="nofollow">Reflections of a Neoconservative</a>, to refer to that branch of conservatism which was primarily concerned about foreign policy (as opposed to economic conservatives, and social conservatives).</p>
	<p>It is the religious &#8220;social conservatives&#8221; who are anti-choice.  <span class="caps">NOT</span> neoconservatives.</p>
	<p>I don&#8217;t know whether you&#8217;re shamelessly lying, or just astonishingly stupid (it&#8217;s not ignorance, since you were told this by me before).</p>
	<p>And <span class="caps">CNN</span> is pro-war, as is much of the &#8220;liberal mainstream media.&#8221;  They may be anti-Bush, but they&#8217;re hardly challenging the notion of American Empire.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Eric Dondero</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/05/07/war-on-wabc/#comment-596031</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 14:52:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/05/07/war-on-wabc/#comment-596031</guid>
					<description>And incidentally, I seem to remember Root appearing on CNN a time or two.  They're the most anti-War/Bush bashing network on cable.  

Kind of blows your theory out of the water.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>And incidentally, I seem to remember Root appearing on <span class="caps">CNN</span> a time or two.  They&#8217;re the most anti-War/Bush bashing network on cable.</p>
	<p>Kind of blows your theory out of the water.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Eric Dondero</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/05/07/war-on-wabc/#comment-596030</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 14:51:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/05/07/war-on-wabc/#comment-596030</guid>
					<description>Sipos, why would the NeoCon media be excited about Root.  In case you're not aware, Root is hardcore Pro-Choice on abortion.  

He's also Pro-Gambling.  

NeoCons are unanimously Pro-Life/Religious Right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Sipos, why would the NeoCon media be excited about Root.  In case you&#8217;re not aware, Root is hardcore Pro-Choice on abortion.</p>
	<p>He&#8217;s also Pro-Gambling.</p>
	<p>NeoCons are unanimously Pro-Life/Religious Right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Thomas M. Sipos</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/05/07/war-on-wabc/#comment-596016</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 14:45:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/05/07/war-on-wabc/#comment-596016</guid>
					<description>No surprise.  Pro-war, neocon media has long been promoting Root.  

The question is, will the LP delegates allow the pro-war media to pick our candidate -- or will we choose our own?

Gravel, Ruwart, Kubby, and Phillies aren't being promoted by the pro-war media.  Which I find telling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>No surprise.  Pro-war, neocon media has long been promoting Root.</p>
	<p>The question is, will the LP delegates allow the pro-war media to pick our candidate&#8212;or will we choose our own?</p>
	<p>Gravel, Ruwart, Kubby, and Phillies aren&#8217;t being promoted by the pro-war media.  Which I find telling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
