Comments on: Mr. Underwood Goes to Googleland: Ralph Nader visit featured on YouTube

by: Sylvia Valls

Fri, 23 May 2008 02:33:50 +0000

In effect, Nader is the only candidate I know who says it like it is… (I don´t know either Gonzalez nor Cynthia, but if she is a black woman she is probably in touch with reality, at least…). He is the brightest of the bunch that I do know, and the most honest and legitimate candidate for the highest office ever… Re the internet: many of us feel that it removes us from our REAL surrounding even more intensely and absorbingly than regular tv, that it is a big waste of time much of the time, and worse, that we can barely do without it as things presently stand. How to turn it into a less enslaving force of “liberation” is an important matter to look at. Only Nader is bound to open up that discussion, if the forces that be allow him to, which they will not. I’m appalled that he is so totally misread.

by: joe

Mon, 19 May 2008 01:35:30 +0000

jeremy, i just watched the video..he never said that. It had nothing to do with talking about the internet or technology. The interview has to do with some tough questions that the puppet candidates never get and never answer.

As many would do you made an assumption based on the corporate propoganda you see on tv, without watching him speak. Nader speaks to the things that the people want…living wage, more restraints on criminal banks, better environmental conditions, etc. And unlike many in washington he actually has done many things by starting so many non profits. So next time you are on the plane and the person next to you isnt smoking be happy that nader did the work that the vast majority of politicians are too selfish to do. Do your research…all you have to do is click on play for starters.

by: Amos

Fri, 16 May 2008 02:33:26 +0000

The guy’s still awsome!
He’s pushing important issues that should be a part of the national debate

by: Ross

Thu, 15 May 2008 22:16:22 +0000

I think he did that in 2004, didn’t he? Let’s see if he does that once there’s a Dem nominee.

by: Scott

Thu, 15 May 2008 22:13:38 +0000

I found it disappointing that Nader would or could not name the specific policy terms that, if adopted by the Dems, would cause him to leave the race.

by: Ross

Thu, 15 May 2008 19:17:35 +0000

I still think McKinney’s slogan should be something like: “Want a woman? Want a black? No need to compromise!”

by: Jurgen Vsych

Thu, 15 May 2008 15:23:36 +0000

If you want Google to have Ralph Nader (and other third party candidates) on the debates, you need to write to them, or call Google Inc. 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway Mountain View, CA 94043 Phone: +1 650-253-0000

Jurgen Vsych
Author “What Was Ralph Nader Thinking?”

by: Sivarticus

Wed, 14 May 2008 23:46:11 +0000

Ha ha ha, oh wow. This all but assures that the ‘net user vote will continue to lay firmly in the arms of Ron Paul, Obama, and maybe Barr. It’s almost hard to believe Nader ever had “rockstar” status among young people in and trendy libs in 2000.

It’s also a sign that the non-Democratic Party left forces are going to be virtually sunk after this year. The Greens and Nader who dominated the last couple election cycles for third party news are going nowhere fast but down. McKinney will end up embarrassing the GP and not bringing a thing to the table with Obama as the Dem, while Nader will just keep…well, keep being Nader…

by: Catholic Trotskyist

Wed, 14 May 2008 23:31:28 +0000

And God said, “CURSED BE THE FASCIST/STALINIST CRIMINAL RALPH NADER, AND GLORY UNTO THE NEW BORN KING, THE HOLY REVOLUTIONARY GENERAL BARACK H. OBAMA.

by: Ross

Wed, 14 May 2008 23:01:07 +0000

Gravel’s buddy?

by: Jerry Baner

Wed, 14 May 2008 18:32:29 +0000

Yet another reason to avoid voting for Nader.

Seriously, who goes to google and starts out by saying “the internet sucks.”

Maybe Gravel’s buddy Ted Stevens, but it doesn’t work for RN.