The key to my win in Portland was staying out of the sun all summer and getting up an hour and half early to straighten my hair. I also grabbed a lot of Reform ass to employ a Yankism. Until Rick McGinnis told me not to feel up the delegates so much…something about a NAP whatever that is.

People are so uptight.

The Keaton

...one favor from you denverites…will someone please, at least, LOUDLY boo bobo barf, wayne rot, etcetercrats for me?...i’ll be booing them in my den…(hopefully sipping a cool IPA beer and stuffing my nacho-chip chute with home-made salsa…the best on the planet, btw!)..

...btw, ?i hear justin raimondo is on live public radio today at noon-ish..good writer, but, it seems, a weird shill for the likes of republican dissembler and sphincter-hole pat buchanan..and others..

And this is the new way to attract voters and enact real change too, I suppose? (END)

...brian, this could be pent-up rage at me for having exposed him as a monetary dildon/republicrat over at ?’the official site of the LNC’..

...he appears a little ‘we$t around the ears’..hopefully, he doesn’t besmirch ‘libertarianism’ any more! (i sense he’s one of those kneel boor ‘libertarians’..i.e. a stooooooooooopid republican with a tax gripe!) ;o)

...and i love being called a ‘radical’ by goddamned fool republicrat leaf-flailers…’rad’ish, root, fundamental..sound!..

Wow, I was reading backwards and though Keaton was joking. Seriously? How cool!

Could you also do one that says ‘Ban Radicals’? ‘Cause our propaganda budget is pretty marginal.

You will not make your election to the LNC.

Not your choice or mine, bub. That’s up to the delegates.

Angela says:

There will be radicals on the LNC regardless of your efforts. You have a choice however. You can sensibly choose Miss Hogarth, a married white (probably WASP) non drug using heterosexual or you will forever be blessed with my butch bisexual half Jewish mix raced rump.

Take your pick.

(1) Of course there will be radicals on the LNC. (LNC = Libertarians Not Conservatives)

(2) Choice: to quote my husband: Not one or the other, but both!

(3) married, check; white, check; WASP, by birth but actually WASA; non-drug-using, check (excluding caffeine, natch); heteo, check (for now).

Flattery will get you … everywhere.

Please, you’d end up with a stomach pump if you tried to keep up with me.

rather than Phillies, who simply champions letting gays have a share at the federal trough with hate crime laws, discrimination laws, federal interference in adoption and marriage, etc.

This would be the “equality” the Outright Liber-Nazis cry about all the time…

If you truly champion the rights of gay people, then you would be fighting to keep the government out of the workplace, marriage, and adoption, rather than expanding it to create thought crimes.

That is just it. The Outright Liber-Nazis don’t actually champion the rights of gay people.

Steve Newton explained rather well why this is nonsense.

I’d only add that the declaration that “gay rights is a collectivist concept” is as absurd as arguing that “gun owner rights is a collectivist concept” or “taxpayer rights is a collectivist concept” or “free speech rights are a collectivist concept.”

All those concepts apply to a group of people, but it doesn’t make them “collective”—it simply means that a significant group of people have individual rights that are often denied to them by dint of being a member of that group.

It’s government that classifies them into the group and then denies them their individual rights as a result of them being in that group. Repudiating that attack by government is the ultimate defense of individual rights.”

There are several flaws in this:
1. As you gays point out so often, homsexuality isn’t a choice. Owning a gun is.
2. If you are truly defending the rights of gay people, rather than collectivist ‘gay rights’, then you have endorsed Kubby, who actually worked for the rights of both gays and straights to smoke medicinal marijuana, rather than Phillies, who simply champions letting gays have a share at the federal trough with hate crime laws, discrimination laws, federal interference in adoption and marriage, etc.
3. If you truly champion the rights of gay people, then you would be fighting to keep the government out of the workplace, marriage, and adoption, rather than expanding it to create thought crimes.

Besides, if I see a “Ban” anybody T-shirt at the convention, I’ll use it to check the oil and other fluids on my rental car, then toss it out. The only exception is a Ban Dondero shirt, and that I might turn into a flag.

And if you feel the urge to catfight it out, make it a fundraiser!

Team Seebeck, Male 2/5

Then why can’t he give a straight answer to a question?

I’m jealous. I’m going to get Aaron Starr to pay for 300 Ban Keaton shirts. You will not take my crown as Anarchist Bitch.

The Keaton

There will be radicals on the LNC regardless of your efforts. You have a choice however. You can sensibly choose Miss Hogarth, a married white (probably WASP) non drug using heterosexual or you will forever be blessed with my butch bisexual half Jewish mix raced rump.

Take your pick.

Angela Keaton Doherty, Anarcho-capitalist, paleo-cunt

And this is the new way to attract voters and enact real change too, I suppose?