Go to my blog, www.garybaumgarten.com to click on the link to join in the conversation to listen or talk to Gravel.

http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/05/15/phillies-salutes-advance-of-liberty-in-california/#comment-607793

http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/05/15/phillies-salutes-advance-of-liberty-in-california/#comment-607826

That’s pretty obvious to everyone here except you and HugeAss, since you and him are the only ones complaining

Ever learn to read?

http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/05/16/gravel-statement-on-california-supreme-court-ruling/#comment-608801

http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/05/16/gravel-statement-on-california-supreme-court-ruling/#comment-608770

This is how a direct democracy could work instead of turning into mob rule.

No, that is how a Republic would work. If we still had one.

Your really should go back to the the Republicrats where you belong – and take the Outright Liber-Nazis with you.

The only stupid one here is you. You don’t seem to grasp that common-law marriage was also just opened up for same-sex couples as well. No license needed. You got so obsessed with marriage licenses you forgot the alternative got expanded as well.

And you call me stupid? Make fun, buddy.

No, dysentery, I am not.

Let me try to help your feeble attempt to understand:

Huge Ass and I explain to you that this expansion of state power you so eagerly label a victory is, in fact, unconstitutional and unlibertarian. You then cry that we haven’t read the ruling. I then ask you if you are saying the ruling doesn’t require gay couples to get permission from the govt to get married, if it is constitutional and if it is libertarian. You then cry that more government is necessary to get less government.

Are you really too stupid to realize the flaw in your thinking?

It has a lot to do with why you were removed from OL.

Seedick, how could someone be removed from something they didn’t try, or have any interest to, stay in.

Your red herring doesn’t even make sense.

What I am saying is that removing the prohibition on the licensing is a necessary step in removing the licensing. Removing the prohibition levels the playing field and make sit that much easier to argue for removing the licensing altogether with the claim that since everybody does it, it’s not needed. When some can’t get it, as before, then that argument doesn’t work since the statist quo antes claim that it is needed to keep what they consider to be “undesirables” out of their little club. You open up the membership in teh club to all in order to remove the membership requirement altogether.

Too bad you don;t seem to understand political tactics. It has a lot to do with why you were removed from OL.

“This doesn’t move us closer to liberty, because it simply mandates that all gay couples register with the state government, and that unelected judges maintain the power to overrule the wills of the people. Libertarians should be working to abolish unconstitutional marriage licensing, and allow all couples to freely marry.”

http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/05/15/phillies-salutes-advance-of-liberty-in-california/#comment-608831

http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/05/16/california-libertarians-say-todays-supreme-court-decision-on-same-sex-marriage-is-a-step-in-the-right-direction/#comment-608851